AI Prediction of Treatment Response in DME

July 14, 2026 updated by: Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Saad, Benha University

Artificial Intelligence and Imaging Biomarkers for Predicting Treatment Response in Diabetic Macular Edema: A Systematic Review

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a leading cause of vision loss among individuals with diabetes mellitus. Although intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) therapy is the standard treatment for center-involved DME, treatment response varies considerably between patients. Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI), including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), have enabled automated analysis of retinal imaging biomarkers to predict anatomical and functional treatment outcomes. This study aims to systematically evaluate published evidence regarding AI-based prediction models and imaging biomarkers used to predict treatment response in patients with DME. The review will assess the predictive performance of AI models, identify the most important imaging biomarkers, compare different AI approaches and imaging modalities, and summarize methodological strengths, limitations, and research gaps to support future development of precision ophthalmology.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Diabetic macular edema is one of the most common causes of visual impairment in patients with diabetic retinopathy. Despite the widespread use of intravitreal anti-VEGF agents, corticosteroids, laser photocoagulation, and combination therapies, individual responses remain highly variable. Early identification of patients who are likely to respond to specific treatments may improve visual outcomes while reducing unnecessary treatment burden.

Advances in retinal imaging, particularly optical coherence tomography (OCT) and optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), have enabled detailed characterization of retinal structural and vascular biomarkers associated with treatment outcomes. Commonly investigated biomarkers include central retinal thickness, intraretinal cysts, subretinal fluid, hyperreflective retinal foci, disorganization of the retinal inner layers (DRIL), ellipsoid zone integrity, external limiting membrane integrity, choroidal thickness, choroidal vascularity index, retinal fluid volume, vascular density, and foveal avascular zone parameters.

Artificial intelligence techniques, including conventional machine learning and deep learning algorithms, increasingly integrate retinal imaging features with demographic and clinical variables to predict functional and anatomical responses to therapy. Reported prediction models have demonstrated promising diagnostic performance, although considerable variability exists regarding imaging modalities, model architecture, validation strategies, outcome definitions, and reporting standards.

This systematic review will comprehensively evaluate published studies investigating AI-based prediction of treatment response in patients with diabetic macular edema. The review will identify imaging biomarkers contributing to predictive performance, compare machine learning and deep learning approaches, evaluate different retinal imaging modalities, summarize reported model performance metrics including area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score, and assess methodological quality using validated risk-of-bias assessment tools. Where sufficient homogeneous data are available, a random-effects meta-analysis will be conducted to quantitatively synthesize model performance.

The findings are expected to identify robust imaging biomarkers, highlight current limitations of AI prediction models, and provide recommendations for future research and clinical implementation of AI-assisted precision medicine in diabetic macular edema.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1284

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Benha
      • Banhā, Benha, Egypt, 13111
        • Benha University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients diagnosed with diabetic macular edema (DME) who underwent retinal imaging and received treatment with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), intravitreal corticosteroids, laser photocoagulation, or combination therapy. Eligible participants have baseline and follow-up clinical data, including best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT), and/or optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) images suitable for artificial intelligence-based analysis to predict anatomical and functional treatment response.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older.
  • Diagnosis of diabetic macular edema (DME) confirmed by clinical examination and optical coherence tomography (OCT).
  • Treatment with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), intravitreal corticosteroids, focal/grid laser photocoagulation, or combination therapy.
  • Availability of baseline retinal imaging, including OCT, OCT angiography (OCTA), fundus photography, or multimodal imaging suitable for artificial intelligence analysis.
  • Availability of baseline and follow-up best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) measurements.
  • Complete demographic and clinical data required for model development or validation.
  • Minimum follow-up of 3 months after initiation of treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Macular edema due to causes other than diabetes.
  • Previous vitreoretinal surgery in the study eye.
  • Coexisting retinal diseases that may affect visual or anatomical outcomes (e.g., retinal vein occlusion, age-related macular degeneration, uveitis, inherited retinal disorders).
  • Significant media opacity resulting in poor-quality retinal imaging.
  • Incomplete clinical records or missing imaging data.
  • Follow-up duration less than 3 months.
  • Images that fail quality-control criteria for artificial intelligence analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Artificial Intelligence
This review focuses on published studies evaluating artificial intelligence (AI)-based models that use retinal imaging biomarkers to predict treatment response in patients with diabetic macular edema. The review synthesizes evidence on machine learning and deep learning approaches, imaging modalities including optical coherence tomography (OCT), optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and fundus photography, and their reported predictive performance for anatomical and functional treatment outcomes.
Participants undergo retinal imaging analysis using artificial intelligence-based prediction models developed from optical coherence tomography (OCT), optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), fundus photography, and relevant clinical variables. The AI algorithms are used to predict treatment response in diabetic macular edema, including anatomical and functional outcomes following anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), corticosteroid, laser, or combination therapies. The AI analysis does not alter clinical management and is performed for predictive evaluation only.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Predictive Performance of the Artificial Intelligence Model for Treatment Response
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
To evaluate the ability of the artificial intelligence model to predict treatment response in patients with diabetic macular edema using retinal imaging biomarkers. Model performance will be assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, precision, recall, F1-score, and calibration, where applicable.
Baseline to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Central Retinal Thickness
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months
Reduction in central retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography and its relationship with AI prediction results.
Baseline to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 22, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 14, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Retinopathy

Clinical Trials on Artificial Intelligence-Based Imaging Analysis

Subscribe