Walking With Overground Robotic Exoskeleton Device to Increase Behavioral Responsiveness in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness (WALK DOC) (WALK DOC)

July 13, 2026 updated by: Chad, Swank, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether walking with an overground robotic exoskeleton (ORE) can improve responsiveness and brain activity in adults with disorders of consciousness (DoC) during inpatient rehabilitation after a severe brain injury. Participants include adults ages 18-70 who are in a coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, or minimally conscious state and are receiving rehabilitation care at Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does using an ORE improve behavioral responsiveness compared with lying down, sitting, or standing?
  • Does using an ORE increase brain activity, and are changes in brain activity related to changes in responsiveness?
  • Is ORE therapy safe, tolerable, and feasible for people with DoC during inpatient rehabilitation?

Researchers will compare participants' responses during sessions involving lying down, sitting, standing, and walking with the robotic exoskeleton to see if the exoskeleton leads to greater improvements in responsiveness and brain activity.

Participants will:

  • Complete an initial screening session to determine whether they can safely use the robotic exoskeleton.
  • Participate in six study sessions over about two weeks during their rehabilitation stay. During these sessions, participants will complete activities that may include lying down, sitting, standing, and walking with a robotic exoskeleton. The order of activities will be assigned at random.
  • Have their level of responsiveness measured before and after each session using a standardized assessment called the Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R).
  • Wear a wireless EEG cap before, during, and after sessions so researchers can measure brain activity.
  • Have their heart rate and safety monitored throughout the study sessions.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

18

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02129
        • Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Chad Swank, PhD
        • Contact:
          • Clinical Research Project Manager
          • Phone Number: 6179526354
          • Email: jzhang71@mgb.org

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will be selected from inpatient rehabilitation patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) receiving medical care and rehabilitation at inpatient rehabilitation units in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) or long-term acute care hospital (LTAC). Patients will be identified from those admitted for inpatient rehabilitation and screened using the eligibility criteria outlined, through the hospital's standard clinical and medical record review processes.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical diagnosis of disorders of consciousness (DoC) confirmed by the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R), including patient classified as Minimally Conscious State (MCS), Unresponsive Wakefulness Syndrome (UWS), or coma.
  • Acute/Subacute phase of recovery
  • Medically stable as deemed by a physician
  • Undergoing medical care and rehabilitation at hospital
  • Both sexes and all races and ethnicities
  • Meet the robotic exoskeleton frame limitations
  • Continence of or a program for bladder and bowel management

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Concurrent spinal cord injury (SCI)
  • Degenerative diagnoses, pre-morbid developmental disability, significant psychological diagnosis such as bipolar disorder and schizophrenia
  • Any contraindication to use the exoskeleton device, including:
  • Contracture in the hip, knee and ankle joints.
  • Uncorrectable Equinovarus foot deformation.
  • Severe muscular spasticity of the lower extremities (Modified Ashworth Scale Grade 3 higher).
  • Fractures or incomplete bone junctions in the spine, pelvis, and/or lower extremities.
  • Osteoporosis or lower bone mineral density -3.5, and history(ies) of osteoporotic fracture(s).
  • Skin disorders including Stage I pressure injuries at the hip, lower limbs, and Exoskeleton contact areas, according to the National and European Pressure Ulcer Classification System (NPUAP-EPUAP).
  • Inability to communicate with an Assistant due to cognitive and language disorders.
  • Severe arthritis, acute arthritis, or synovitis after total or partial lower limb joint replacement.
  • Orthostatic hypotension, essential hypertension, and a condition in which blood pressure is not controlled.
  • Myocardial infarction or angina or ischemic heart disease within the last 6 months.
  • Tachycardia, bradycardia, arrhythmia and other cardiac functions that are not controlled.
  • Uncontrolled autonomic dysreflexia (AD).
  • Uncontrolled diabetes.
  • Infectious diseases or other serious complications.
  • Uncorrectable leg length discrepancy over 2 cm when using additional correction tools.
  • III-IV spine scoliotic deformity.
  • Pregnant women should consult their physician prior to use.
  • Amputations and lower limb prostheses.
  • Morphological characteristics out of the device limitations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with Disorders of Consciousness
Adults with a disorder of consciousness, such as coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, or a minimally conscious state, who are receiving inpatient rehabilitation after a severe brain injury.
Participants will receive overground robotic exoskeleton-assisted standing and walking as part of inpatient rehabilitation. Following a screening session to assess device fit and tolerance, participants complete supervised ORE sessions. The intervention is distinguished by the use of assisted overground walking and upright mobility in individuals with disorders of consciousness and is evaluated in relation to behavioral responsiveness, brain activity, safety, tolerability, and feasibility.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R)
Time Frame: From enrollment to end of study at 2 weeks
The Coma Recovery Scale-Revised (CRS-R) is a 23-item behavioral assessment used to evaluate consciousness in patients with brain injuries. It measures auditory, visual, motor, oromotor, and communication functions. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 23, with higher scores indicating a higher level of neurobehavioral function and conscious awareness. CRS-R scores help characterize a patient's level of consciousness, including coma, vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome, or minimally conscious state.
From enrollment to end of study at 2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disability Rating Scale (DRS)
Time Frame: Discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, an average of 8 weeks
The Disability Rating Scale (DRS) is an 8-item clinical tool used to track a patient's recovery from a moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) from the coma stage through to community living. Scores range from 0 (no disability) to 29 (extreme vegetative state)
Discharge from inpatient rehabilitation, an average of 8 weeks
CARE (Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation)
Time Frame: From inpatient admission through discharge from inpatient stay, assessed at routine intervals.

The CARE (Continuity Assessment Record and Evaluation) tool is a standardized CMS assessment used to measure the medical, functional, cognitive, and social needs of Medicare post-acute care patients

The assessment evaluates four major domains:

  • Medical Domain: Monitors changes in severity, active treatments, pain, and pressure ulcers.
  • Functional Domain: Evaluates self-care and mobility prior to and during the illness (e.g., assessing mobility and daily living activities).
  • Cognitive Domain: Assesses functional cognition, cognitive impairments, and factors affecting outcomes.
  • Social/Environmental Factors: Reviews living situations, support systems, and discharge planning needs.
From inpatient admission through discharge from inpatient stay, assessed at routine intervals.
Electroencephalogram (EEG)
Time Frame: Measured throughout 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation.
Cortical activity will be recorded continuously during the study sessions using a 24-channel mobile electroencephalography (EEG) system. Key positional changes will be marked in the EEG recording. EEG spectral power, including power within predefined brain wave frequency bands, will be evaluated before, during, and after positional changes. Changes in these measures will be used to evaluate cortical activity across study conditions. EEG frequency measures will be reported in hertz (Hz).
Measured throughout 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation.
Event-Related Potential (ERP) - N100
Time Frame: Measured throughout 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation.
Event-related potentials (ERP) will be recorded before and immediately after each study session. N100 ERP responses will be assessed, reflecting auditory sensory processing. For each response, the timing of the brain response (peak latency) will be measured. ERP latency measures will be reported in milliseconds (ms).
Measured throughout 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation.
Event-Related Potential (ERP) - P300
Time Frame: Measured throughout 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation.
Event-related potentials (ERP) will be recorded before and immediately after each study session. P300 ERP responses will be assessed, reflecting basic attention processing. For each response, the timing of the brain response (peak latency) will be measured. ERP latency measures will be reported in milliseconds (ms).
Measured throughout 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation.
Event-Related Potential (ERP) - N400
Time Frame: Measured throughout 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation.
Event-related potentials (ERP) will be recorded before and immediately after each study session. N400 ERP responses will be assessed, reflecting cognitive processing. For each response, the timing of the brain response (peak latency) will be measured. ERP latency measures will be reported in milliseconds (ms).
Measured throughout 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks during inpatient rehabilitation.
Rate of Adverse Events (AE)
Time Frame: Measured throughout study participation, including during 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks and at routine intervals as part of standard clinical care during inpatient rehabilitation.
Safety of the study will be measure via Rate of Adverse Events (AE). Reported exoskeleton-emergent AE will include: increase in pain behavior or agitation, disconcerting changes in cardiovascular function (e.g., sudden drop in blood pressure), skin irritation or orthopedic injuries caused by the robotic exoskeleton device, sudden changes in alertness (e.g., somnolence), autonomic storming, and seizure activity.
Measured throughout study participation, including during 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks and at routine intervals as part of standard clinical care during inpatient rehabilitation.
Heart Rate Reserve (HRR)
Time Frame: Measured throughout study participation, including during 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks and at routine intervals as part of standard clinical care during inpatient rehabilitation.
Heart Rate Reserve (HRR) will be recorded as a measure of cardiovascular tolerability during the intervention. A heart rate monitor will be used to record the amount of time spent in each heart rate zone during ORE sessions: very light (<30% HRR), light (30-39%), moderate (40-59%), vigorous (60-89%), and near maximal (>90%).
Measured throughout study participation, including during 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks and at routine intervals as part of standard clinical care during inpatient rehabilitation.
Session completion rate (SCR)
Time Frame: Measured throughout study participation, including during 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks and at routine intervals as part of standard clinical care during inpatient rehabilitation.
Session completion rate (SCR) will be used to assess the feasibility of completing the scheduled overground robotic exoskeleton sessions. Feasibility will be measured by the percentage of scheduled sessions that each participant completes. Based on prior clinical experience delivering exoskeleton sessions to patients with disorders of consciousness, successful session completion will be defined as completing at least 75% of the scheduled overground robotic exoskeleton sessions. For any missed session, the reason for the missed session and whether the session was rescheduled or made up will be documented. The time needed to complete any make-up sessions will also be recorded. These data will help determine whether the intervention schedule is practical and manageable for participants.
Measured throughout study participation, including during 6 study assessment sessions conducted over 2 weeks and at routine intervals as part of standard clinical care during inpatient rehabilitation.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chad Swank, PhD, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Disorders of Consciousness

Clinical Trials on Overground Robotic Exoskeleton (ORE)

3
Subscribe