- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07716423
Remote Versus On-Site Robotic Surgery for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Procedures
Safety and Efficacy of Remote Versus On-Site Robotic Surgery in Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Procedures: An International, Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized, Single-Blind, Non-Inferiority Controlled Trial
This study will compare remote robotic surgery with on-site robotic surgery for patients who need surgery for diseases of the liver, bile duct, gallbladder, or pancreas. Remote robotic surgery means that an experienced surgeon controls the robotic surgical system from a different location, while the patient and the operating room team are at the local hospital. On-site robotic surgery means that the surgeon controls the robotic system in the same hospital as the patient.
The main purpose of this study is to find out whether remote robotic surgery is not worse than on-site robotic surgery in terms of surgical success. Surgical success means that the planned robotic operation is completed safely, without unplanned conversion to open surgery or standard laparoscopic surgery, without major unexpected injury, and without serious problems related to the remote robotic system, network, or communication.
Eligible patients will be adults who are scheduled to undergo selected robotic hepatobiliary or pancreatic procedures, including hepatectomy, liver segmentectomy, local liver resection, cholecystectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or distal pancreatectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned to either the remote robotic surgery group or the on-site robotic surgery group. The study is single-blind, which means that participants will not know which group they are assigned to, although the surgical and operating room teams will know because of the nature of the procedure.
The study will evaluate surgical success, operation time, blood loss, conversion to open surgery, complications, recovery after surgery, length of hospital stay, readmission, reoperation or other interventions, death within 30 and 90 days after surgery, and quality of recovery. For patients in the remote robotic surgery group, the study will also record the performance of the remote surgical system, including network delay, system stability, image transmission, system interruption, and the need for local surgical takeover.
A total of 168 patients are planned to be enrolled. Patients will be followed during hospitalization and after surgery to assess safety, recovery, and short-term clinical outcomes. The results of this study may help determine whether remote robotic surgery can be safely and effectively used for hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery, especially in hospitals or regions where access to experienced surgical specialists is limited.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Remote robotic surgery is an emerging surgical approach that combines robotic surgical systems, high-speed network communication, digital medical platforms, and cross-regional surgical collaboration. This approach may allow experienced surgeons to perform or participate in complex operations for patients located in different hospitals, regions, or countries. It has the potential to improve access to high-quality surgical care, especially in areas where experienced hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeons are not readily available.
Hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery is technically demanding because of the complex anatomy of the liver, bile duct, gallbladder, pancreas, major blood vessels, and digestive tract. Procedures such as liver resection, pancreaticoduodenectomy, and distal pancreatectomy require precise dissection, careful bleeding control, safe reconstruction, and close cooperation between the surgeon, local operating room team, anesthesia team, nursing team, and technical support team. For this reason, the safety and effectiveness of remote robotic surgery in this field need to be evaluated in a structured clinical trial.
This is an investigator-initiated, international, multicenter, prospective, randomized, single-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority controlled trial. The study will compare remote robotic surgery with on-site robotic surgery in patients undergoing selected hepatobiliary and pancreatic procedures. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the remote robotic surgery group or the on-site robotic surgery group through a central randomization system. Stratified block randomization will be used to reduce imbalance among study centers and procedure types.
Participants in the remote robotic surgery group will undergo robotic surgery performed by an experienced surgeon using a remote robotic control system. The patient, robotic patient-side cart, local surgical team, anesthesia team, nursing team, and technical support team will remain in the local operating room. A qualified local surgical team will be available to assist the procedure and to take over the operation if needed for patient safety. Participants in the on-site robotic surgery group will undergo standard robotic surgery performed by a qualified local robotic surgeon at the same hospital where the patient is treated. Both groups will follow standardized surgical procedures and perioperative management protocols as much as possible, including preoperative assessment, anesthesia, antibiotic prophylaxis, thrombosis prevention, postoperative pain control, enhanced recovery care, laboratory and imaging follow-up, drainage management, complication management, and discharge criteria.
The study will include adult patients who are scheduled to undergo one of the following robotic hepatobiliary or pancreatic procedures: hemihepatectomy, liver segmentectomy, local liver resection, cholecystectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or distal pancreatectomy. Patients must be considered suitable for robotic surgery after preoperative assessment. Patients who require complex vascular reconstruction, combined major operations, emergency surgery, or who are considered unsuitable for safe robotic surgery will not be enrolled.
The primary endpoint is surgical success. Surgical success is defined as completion of the planned robotic hepatobiliary or pancreatic procedure without unplanned conversion to open surgery or conventional laparoscopic surgery, without major unexpected injury such as major vascular injury, major bile duct injury, unexpected main pancreatic duct injury, or uncontrollable bleeding, and without serious interruption or failure related to the remote robotic system, network, image transmission, communication, or device performance. In the remote robotic surgery group, cases that require unplanned local takeover of the main surgical procedure because of network, system, or device problems will be considered unsuccessful for the primary endpoint. Final endpoint assessment may be based on surgical records, anesthesia records, intraoperative video, remote system logs, local takeover records, adverse event records, and review by an independent endpoint adjudication committee when needed.
Secondary endpoints will include intraoperative safety, operative time, robotic console time, anesthesia time, blood loss, transfusion, unplanned conversion, local takeover, system interruption, intensive care unit admission, postoperative recovery, time to ambulation, time to first oral intake, time to first flatus or bowel movement, drainage duration, postoperative length of stay, total hospital stay, hospital costs, readmission, reintervention, reoperation, 30-day mortality, 90-day mortality, and postoperative quality of recovery. Quality of recovery will be assessed using the QoR-15 scale. Physical recovery may also be assessed using functional tests such as the 30-second chair stand test.
Procedure-specific outcomes will also be evaluated. For liver surgery, these may include completion of the planned resection, liver inflow occlusion method and duration, liver transection-related outcomes, R0 resection rate for malignant tumors, bile leakage, post-hepatectomy liver failure, postoperative bleeding, and dynamic changes in liver function tests. For cholecystectomy, outcomes may include achievement of the critical view of safety, gallbladder rupture, bile duct injury, unplanned drainage, unplanned common bile duct exploration, and conversion. For pancreatic surgery, outcomes may include completion of the planned pancreatic resection, reconstruction or pancreatic stump management, postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage, R0 resection rate for malignant tumors, lymph node retrieval, and related postoperative complications.
For the remote robotic surgery group, technical performance of the remote surgical system will be recorded, including network latency, connection stability, image quality, communication quality, packet loss or frame loss, system alarms, device malfunction, interruption time, and any need for local surgical takeover. The workload of the remote surgeon, local surgeon, assistant, scrub nurse, anesthesia team, and technical support team will be assessed using the NASA-TLX scale after surgery.
The planned sample size is 168 participants, with 84 participants in the remote robotic surgery group and 84 participants in the on-site robotic surgery group. The sample size is based on a non-inferiority design using surgical success as the primary endpoint. The expected surgical success rate is 95% in both groups, with a non-inferiority margin of 10%, a one-sided alpha level of 0.025, and 80% statistical power, while allowing for potential dropout, withdrawal, major protocol deviation, preoperative cancellation, or invalid cases.
All participants will be followed during hospitalization and after surgery, with key postoperative assessments planned up to 90 days after the operation. Adverse events and serious adverse events will be recorded and managed according to the study protocol and local clinical practice. The study will be conducted after ethics approval at participating centers, and written informed consent will be obtained before enrollment. The results of this trial are expected to provide clinical evidence on whether remote robotic surgery is a safe, effective, and scalable approach for selected hepatobiliary and pancreatic procedures.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Yunshi Cai
- Phone Number: +86 18323424374
- Email: caiyunshi@scu.edu.cn
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 to 80 years, regardless of sex.
- Scheduled to undergo robot-assisted hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery, limited to hemihepatectomy, liver segmentectomy, local liver resection, cholecystectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy, or distal pancreatectomy.
- Considered to have an indication for surgery and to be suitable for robotic surgery based on preoperative assessment.
- No definite contraindication to robotic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, pneumoperitoneum, or general anesthesia.
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status class I to III.
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score of 0 to 2.
- Expected survival of at least 3 months.
- Adequate major organ function, with laboratory test results within 7 days before enrollment meeting the following criteria: white blood cell count at least 2.5 x 10^9/L, absolute neutrophil count at least 1.5 x 10^9/L, platelet count at least 75 x 10^9/L, hemoglobin at least 90 g/L, international normalized ratio no more than 1.5 x upper limit of normal, and serum creatinine no more than 1.5 x upper limit of normal.
- For patients undergoing liver surgery, Child-Pugh class A liver function or Child-Pugh class B liver function considered tolerable for surgery, with adequate liver reserve and adequate predicted future liver remnant volume.
- For patients undergoing pancreatic surgery, imaging assessment showing resectability by robotic surgery without the need for complex vascular reconstruction.
- Willing and able to complete perioperative observation and postoperative follow-up according to the study protocol.
- Voluntarily agrees to participate in the study and provides written informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Need for combined vascular reconstruction.
- Need for two or more major hepatobiliary or pancreatic procedures at the same time, or need for major resection of other organs.
- Unable to complete full preoperative assessment, randomization, or remote robotic system preparation.
- Considered clearly unsuitable for robotic surgery before the operation.
- Preoperative assessment indicating a high probability of conversion to open surgery, or difficulty safely completing the planned procedure using a robotic platform.
- Uncorrectable severe coagulation disorder or active bleeding tendency.
- Severe dysfunction of the heart, lung, liver, kidney, brain, or other major organs that makes the patient unable to tolerate general anesthesia, pneumoperitoneum, or the planned surgery.
- For patients undergoing liver surgery, inadequate liver reserve or inadequate predicted future liver remnant volume for safe surgery.
- Uncontrolled severe infection, sepsis, severe malnutrition, or other conditions that significantly increase perioperative risk.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
- Severe psychiatric, cognitive, or communication disorder that prevents cooperation with the study or follow-up.
- Major compliance concerns as judged by the investigator.
- Currently participating in another interventional clinical study that may affect endpoint assessment in this study.
- Any other condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient unsuitable for enrollment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Remote Robotic Surgery Group
Participants in this group will undergo remote robotic hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery.
The surgeon will control the robotic surgical system from a remote location, while the patient, local surgical team, anesthesia team, nursing team, and technical support team remain in the local operating room.
|
Participants in this group will undergo remote robotic hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery.
The surgeon will control the robotic surgical system from a remote location, while the patient, local surgical team, anesthesia team, nursing team, and technical support team remain in the local operating room.
|
|
Active Comparator: On-Site Robotic Surgery Group
Participants in this group will undergo on-site robotic hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery performed by a qualified local robotic surgeon at the same hospital where the patient is treated.
|
Participants in this group will undergo on-site robotic hepatobiliary or pancreatic surgery performed by a qualified local robotic surgeon at the same hospital where the patient is treated.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Surgical Success Rate
Time Frame: From surgery to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.
|
The percentage of participants who achieve surgical success.
Surgical success is defined as completion of the planned robotic hepatobiliary or pancreatic procedure without unplanned conversion to open surgery or conventional laparoscopic surgery, without major unexpected injury such as major vascular injury, major bile duct injury, unexpected main pancreatic duct injury, or uncontrollable bleeding, and without serious interruption or failure related to the remote robotic system, network, image transmission, communication, or device performance.
|
From surgery to hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- TELEHPB-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases
-
Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, IndiaRecruitingBile Duct Diseases | Pancreas Disease | Hepatobiliary DiseaseIndia
-
Zhongnan HospitalRecruitingHepatobiliary DiseasesChina
-
Ruijin HospitalRecruitingHepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Other Gastrointestinal Carcinoma (Non-stomach, Non-esophagi)China
-
Stanford UniversityThe American Association of Physicists in MedicineTerminatedPancreatic Cancer | Lung Cancer | Liver Cancer | Hepatobiliary Cancers | Hepatobiliary Cancers Liver | Lung Cancer Non-Small Cell Cancer (NSCLC) | Lung Cancer Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) | Hepatobiliary Cancers Hepatocellular Carcinoma (Hepatoma) | Hepatobiliary Cancers Gallbladder | Hepatobiliary Cancers...United States
-
GMG Arcdata LLCNational Cancer Institute (NCI); Georgetown UniversityRecruitingPatient Engagement | Pancreas Cancer | Hepatobiliary CancerUnited States
-
SanofiCompletedHepatic and Hepatobiliary DisordersRussian Federation
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Comprehensive Cancer NetworkCompletedGastric Cancer | Pancreatic Cancer | Esophageal Cancer | Rectal Cancer | Colon Cancer | Hepatobiliary CancerUnited States
-
University of NebraskaTerminatedHepatobiliary DiseasesUnited States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisNot yet recruitingPancreatic Cancer | Hepatobiliary CancerFrance
-
Chikara TashiroCompletedInflammatory Bowel Disease | Pancreas Disease | Hepatobiliary DiseaseJapan
Clinical Trials on Remote Robotic Surgery
-
Guangzhou Medical UniversityRecruiting
-
University Hospital, GrenobleCompleted
-
Lahey ClinicCompletedOff-shift Robotic TeleroundingUnited States
-
The Third Xiangya Hospital of Central South UniversityActive, not recruitingGastric Cancer | Rectal Cancer | Appendicitis | Colon Cancer | Cholecystolithiasis | Gastric Bypass | Sleeve Gastrectomy | Gastric Ulcer With Perforation But Without ObstructionChina
-
Ruijin HospitalShandong Provincial Hospital; The First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingRectal Cancer | SurgeryChina
-
Taiyuan LiNot yet recruitingRectal Neoplasms | Robotic Surgery | Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction SurgeryChina
-
Ruijin HospitalShanghai Jiao Tong University School of MedicineRecruitingPancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma | Minimally Invasive SurgeryChina
-
Xu jianminActive, not recruiting
-
Daorong WangCompletedLaparoscopic | Robotic | Anterior Resection for Rectal CancerChina
-
Karolinska InstitutetCompleted