VEXUS and Assessment of Dry Weight of Patients on Hemodialysis

July 18, 2026 updated by: Sara Taha, Alexandria University

Contribution of Lung Ultrasound and VExUS Score in Assessment of Volume Status in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients.

This is a prospective, single-arm study that will be conducted over a period of 24 weeks. The same maintenance HD patients will be followed sequentially in two study phases, with each patient serving as their own control.

The study aims to evaluate the role of POCUS, including LUS and VExUS score, in improving the assessment of volume status and determination of dry weight in patients undergoing maintenance HD.

Phase I (Weeks 1-12): Clinical Assessment Phase During the first 12 weeks, all patients will be managed using standard clinical assessment alone. Determination of dry weight and calculation of target ultrafiltration (UF) will rely primarily on clinical parameters, including physical examination and routine clinical judgment.

Phase II (Weeks 13-24): POCUS-guided assessment period During the second 12 weeks, the same patients will undergo POCUS assessment, including LUS and VExUS Score.

LUS and VExUS examinations will be performed 30 minutes after the scheduled hemodialysis session. All measurements will be conducted during the mid-week dialysis session to reflect the average hydration status of each patient.

At the end of each phase, the results of all patients will be correlated with assessment of dry weight by BIS (Inbody version 720).

Inclusion criteria:

ESRD patients on maintenance HD for more than three months. In the HD unit at Medical Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine. Alexandria University.

Age: 25 -65 years old. The ability to give informed consent.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with previous echocardiographic evidence of right heart dysfunction, tricuspid valve disease, or IVC thrombosis.
  • Patients with liver cirrhosis
  • Lung diseases: interstitial lung diseases, COPD patients.
  • Obese (BMI≥30) Before inclusion in the study, all patients will be required to fill out a written informed consent. Also, approval from the Medical Ethics Committee will be obtained. Maintenance hemodialysis patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

All study participants will undergo a comprehensive array of assessments

Before the midweek session, which will include the following evaluations:

I. Full history taking and clinical assessment A thorough evaluation will include patient age, gender, cause of ESRD, duration of dialysis, and detailed cardiac and pulmonary medical history, including any intradialytic hypotension or hypertension episodes.

At the end of each mid-week session, blood pressure, pulse oximetry measurement, and respiratory symptoms will be assessed in the 2 phases of the study.

II. Laboratory Investigations:

A comprehensive panel of tests will be conducted, including

  • Complete blood count (CBC).
  • Blood urea (Pre and post-dialysis for Kt/V calculation), serum creatinine and serum albumin.

III. Assessment of dialysis adequacy:

By measurement of Kt/V.

IV. Echocardiography Will be done for all patients in the study V. Ultrafiltration Prescription and Volume Assessment Clinical Determination of Target Ultrafiltration During the clinical assessment phase, target UF will be prescribed based on standard clinical parameters. These include interdialytic weight gain, pre- and post-dialysis body weight, blood pressure trends (any intradialytic hypotension or hypertension episodes), presence of peripheral edema, chest auscultation, pulmonary symptoms, and jugular venous pressure in cmH2O where assessable, and intradialytic symptoms such as hypotension or muscle cramps.

Estimated dry weight will be determined clinically, and target UF will be calculated as the difference between pre-dialysis weight and estimated dry weight. The ultrafiltration rate will be recorded in millilitres per minute per kilogram of body weight.

During the POCUS-guided phase:

LUS Eight-zone examination:

  • LUS will be used to assess pulmonary congestion by quantifying B-lines as a marker of extravascular lung water. The presence of multiple B-lines will indicate pulmonary congestion and support adjustment of dry weight and target UF. Conversely, minimal or absent B-lines will suggest euvolemia, prompting avoidance of unnecessary UF escalation to reduce the risk of intradialytic hypotension.
  • In this study, each hemithorax is divided into four areas (two anterior, two lateral). For a scan to be considered abnormal, it must meet the following criteria:

    • multiple artefacts per scan (at least three)
    • positive findings in more than one scan per side
    • positive findings bilaterally.

VExUS Score:

  • Venous congestion will be evaluated using ultrasound and Doppler-based techniques 30 minutes after the HD session during the POCUS-guided phase.
  • The assessment will include:

    1. Measurement of the static diameter of the inferior vena cava (IVC).

      • Normal: IVC less than 20 mm
      • Abnormal: IVC is greater than or equal to 20 mm.
    2. Recording of hepatic venous (HV) flow, classified as follows:

      Normal: Continuous systolic flow greater than diastolic flow Abnormal: Systolic flow less than diastolic flow Severely Abnormal: Systolic flow reversal

    3. Assessment of portal vein (PV) pulsatility using pulsed-wave Doppler. PV patterns include:

      Normal: Continuous flow Abnormal: Pulsatile flow If pulsatile flow is detected, the pulsatility index (PI) will be calculated to assess the severity of the abnormality.

      The PI is determined using the formula: (PVmax -PVmin)/PVmax × 100).

  • Measurements will be categorised based on Doppler findings and used to determine the VExUS score (0-3).

Note: The intrarenal flow profile will be omitted from the VExUS score due to its frequent unreliability and inconsistent detectability in previous studies Involving dialysis patients.

- Higher VExUS grades will indicate significant systemic venous congestion and support modification of dry weight and/or increase in target UF, provided hemodynamic stability is maintained. Lower VExUS grades will indicate minimal venous congestion and guide conservative UF strategies when clinically appropriate.

Bio-impedance spectroscopy:

At the end of each phase, all patients' volume status will be assessed by using a Biospace InBody 720 body composition analyzer to be correlated with the results of each phase.

InIntegrated Volume Assessment and Safety Considerations Target UF prescription during the POCUS-guided phase will be based on an integrated assessment combining clinical evaluation, LUS, and VExUS findings. Adjustments to UF and dry weight will be performed gradually and individualised for each patient, with careful attention to patient tolerance and intradialytic hemodynamic stability. Excessive UF rates and intradialytic complications will be actively avoided.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Alexandria University Hospitals
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ESRD patients on maintenance HD for more than three months.
  • In the HD unit at the Medical Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine. Alexandria University.
  • Age: 25 -65 years old.
  • The ability to give informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with previous echocardiographic evidence of right heart dysfunction, tricuspid valve disease, or IVC thrombosis.
  • Patients with liver cirrhosis
  • Lung diseases: interstitial lung diseases, COPD patients.
  • Obese (BMI≥30)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Patients on maintenance hemodialysis
the same patients will be used as their own control in two phase study where US will be used to determine patients dry weight
usage of US to determine patient dry weight and ultrafiltration volume needed
Other Names:
  • POCUS
  • VEXUS
  • lung US

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of patients dry weight between the two phases of the study
Time Frame: 3 months
Change of patient dry weight (in KG ) measured by bioimpedance device between the two phases of the study
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0109628

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

patients did not consent for sharing their data

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Weight

Clinical Trials on ULTRASOUND for volume assessment

Subscribe