Different Frequency Temporal Interference Stimulation on Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus for Parkinson's Disease

July 19, 2026 updated by: Ke Dong, MD

A Single-Center, Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of Different Frequency Temporal Interference Stimulation Applied to Bilateral Subthalamic Nucleus for Improving Motor and Vocal Functions in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

This clinical trial will evaluate the efficacy of accelerated Temporal Interference Stimulation (TIS) as a therapeutic intervention for individuals diagnosed with Parkinson's disease. Different frequency TIS will be delivered targeting the bilateral subthalamic nuclei of the brain according to the patient's clinical symptoms. Specifically, the basal thalamic nuclei on the side opposite to the side where the patient's symptoms are most severe receive stimulation at 130 Hz, whilst those on the other side receive stimulation at 60 Hz. The primary objective is to assess whether accelerated TIS yields measurable improvements in motor performance and verbal speech function among enrolled subjects. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) will be adopted as an auxiliary imaging modality to objectively characterize underlying cerebral functional alterations induced by accelerated TIS intervention. The core scientific research questions to be addressed in this trial are listed as follows:

Will accelerated TIS administered to the bilateral subthalamic nuclei produce significant improvements in motor function and cognitive function among enrolled subjects with Parkinson-related disorders? What quantitative and qualitative modifications in cerebral functional activity will be detected via fMRI after standardized accelerated TIS intervention administration? Investigators will implement a two-arm parallel controlled comparative design for all enrolled eligible subjects. All confirmed Parkinson's disease patients will undergo standardized random grouping and be allocated into two independent research arms. Subjects in the experimental arm will receive continuous, standardized TIS intervention targeting bilateral subthalamic nuclei. Subjects in the control arm will receive matched sham stimulation intervention. Sham stimulation adopts identical operation procedures, equipment wearing mode and on-site operating environment as formal TIS, with no valid neuromodulation therapeutic effect generated. Rigorous controlled grouping design will ensure objective, verifiable data support for verifying the actual intervention efficacy of different frequency TIS on motor dysfunction and speech impairment in Parkinson-related patients.

All enrolled subjects will complete the following standardized trial procedures in full compliance with the trial protocol:

Receive continuous targeted intervention of either formal TIS or matched sham stimulation on bilateral subthalamic nuclei, with consecutive 5-day fixed-course administration in strict accordance with trial operating specifications.

Complete unified fMRI brain scanning examinations and standardized motor function as well as speech function quantitative evaluation assessments at two fixed time nodes, including the baseline time point before intervention initiation and the follow-up time point after all intervention courses are completed.

Truthfully record all adverse reactions and abnormal physical discomfort symptoms that occur throughout the whole intervention and follow-up observation cycle in standardized adverse event registration forms.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Idiopathic Parkinson's disease diagnosed by neurologists according to the Movement Disorder Society Clinical Diagnostic Criteria;
  2. Hoehn and Yahr stage 1.5-3.0;
  3. Stable levodopa-based antiparkinsonian medication for at least 4 weeks before enrolment, with no planned medication change during the trial period;
  4. Ability to walk independently;
  5. Ability to understand and follow study instructions and complete the required assessments, with no severe cognitive impairment as screened by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and/or Mini-Mental State Examination according to prespecified thresholds;
  6. Willingness to participate and provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any contraindication to MRI or tTIS, including claustrophobia or ferromagnetic intracranial or subcutaneous implants;
  2. Significant systemic disease that could increase study risk or interfere with trial participation;
  3. Neurological disorders other than Parkinson's disease;
  4. Major psychiatric disorder or severe depression or anxiety;
  5. History of deep brain stimulation surgery;
  6. Inability or unwillingness to complete all interventions and assessments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Stimulation Group
Participants diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in the active stimulation group will receive sequential bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) temporal interference electrical stimulation therapy twice daily, with each session lasting 40 minutes and a rest interval of at least 1 hour between treatments. The stimulation target is the bilateral subthalamic nucleus, with individualized electrode placement and current intensity determined via personalized modeling based on each patient's magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data. For the stimulation protocol, a unified carrier frequency of 2000 Hz is adopted for bilateral STN intervention. Specifically, TI stimulation with an envelope frequency of 130 Hz is delivered to the STN contralateral to the patient's most symptomatic side, while TI stimulation with an envelope frequency of 60 Hz is administered to the STN ipsilateral to the patient's most symptomatic side.
Sequential bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) temporal interference electrical stimulation (sham control), administered twice daily (40 minutes per session, ≥1 hour rest interval between sessions). Stimulation targets are bilateral STN, with individualized electrode placement and current intensity determined via personalized modeling from patient MRI data. Sham stimulation uses two identical high frequencies (2000 Hz and 2000 Hz) to eliminate the therapeutic interference effect, matching all other procedural details to the active stimulation arm.
Other Names:
  • TIS
  • TI
  • tTIS
  • TI Stimulation
  • Transcranial Temporal Interference Electrical Stimulation
Sequential bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) temporal interference electrical stimulation, administered twice daily (40 minutes per session, ≥1 hour rest interval between sessions). Stimulation targets are bilateral STN, with individualized electrode placement and current intensity determined via personalized modeling from patient MRI data. A fixed carrier frequency of 2000 Hz is used for all STN stimulation. Specifically, therapeutic temporal interference stimulation with an envelope frequency of 130 Hz is delivered to the STN contralateral to the patient's most symptomatic side, while stimulation with an envelope frequency of 60 Hz is applied to the STN ipsilateral to the most symptomatic side to produce targeted therapeutic interference fields.
Other Names:
  • TIS
  • TI
  • tTIS
  • TI Stimulation
  • Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation
Sham Comparator: Sham Stimulation Group
Participants diagnosed with Parkinson's disease in the sham stimulation group will follow an identical stimulation protocol to the active stimulation group (twice daily, 40 minutes per session, bilateral STN targeting via personalized MRI modeling), except that two identical high frequencies (2000 Hz and 2000 Hz) are applied to eliminate the therapeutic interference effect, serving as a sham control condition.
Sequential bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) temporal interference electrical stimulation (sham control), administered twice daily (40 minutes per session, ≥1 hour rest interval between sessions). Stimulation targets are bilateral STN, with individualized electrode placement and current intensity determined via personalized modeling from patient MRI data. Sham stimulation uses two identical high frequencies (2000 Hz and 2000 Hz) to eliminate the therapeutic interference effect, matching all other procedural details to the active stimulation arm.
Other Names:
  • TIS
  • TI
  • tTIS
  • TI Stimulation
  • Transcranial Temporal Interference Electrical Stimulation
Sequential bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) temporal interference electrical stimulation, administered twice daily (40 minutes per session, ≥1 hour rest interval between sessions). Stimulation targets are bilateral STN, with individualized electrode placement and current intensity determined via personalized modeling from patient MRI data. A fixed carrier frequency of 2000 Hz is used for all STN stimulation. Specifically, therapeutic temporal interference stimulation with an envelope frequency of 130 Hz is delivered to the STN contralateral to the patient's most symptomatic side, while stimulation with an envelope frequency of 60 Hz is applied to the STN ipsilateral to the most symptomatic side to produce targeted therapeutic interference fields.
Other Names:
  • TIS
  • TI
  • tTIS
  • TI Stimulation
  • Transcranial Temporal Interference Stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The score of the Movement Disorder Society-Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III (MDS-UPDRS-III)
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 month after treatment
The MDS-UPDRS-III is a standardized assessment tool to evaluate motor function symptoms in people with Parkinson's disease.It has a scoring range of 0 to 132 points, with higher scores meaning more severe motor disorders.
From enrollment to 1 month after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The scores of Mini-BESTest
Time Frame: From enrollment to 1 month after treatment
The Mini-BESTest is a clinical assessment tool for evaluating balance function. It assesses the balance control system across multiple domains, with a scoring range of 0 to 28 points; higher scores indicate better balance function.
From enrollment to 1 month after treatment
10-Meter Walk Test
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
The 10-Meter Walk Test assesses gait speed and functional mobility by measuring the time required to walk 10 meters. Increased time reflects slower walking and worse mobility.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
BOLD-fMRI
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Functional MRI is used to acquire BOLD data. BOLD signals reflect regional brain activity and functional connectivity. This measure evaluates brain function and structural connectivity associated with motor and cognitive performance.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Phonation duration
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Phonation duration refers to the continuous time of voluntary phonation. This indicators is used to objectively evaluate the functional status of the subjects' vocal system. Abnormalities in phonation duration may indicate impairments in vocal cord movement, laryngeal muscle control, or related neural regulation, which is of great significance for assessing the severity of vocal function disorders and the effect of intervention.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Diffusion Tensor Imaging(DTI)
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Functional MRI is used to acquire Diffusion Tensor Imaging(DTI) data. DTI characterizes white matter microstructural integrity and fiber tract organization. This measure evaluates brain function and structural connectivity associated with motor and cognitive performance.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Voice intensity
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Voice intensity is measured using Praat software. Voice intensity, expressed in dB SPL, reflects the loudness of the voice. This indicators is used to objectively evaluate the functional status of the subjects' vocal system. Abnormalities in voice intensity may indicate impairments in vocal cord movement, laryngeal muscle control, or related neural regulation, which is of great significance for assessing the severity of vocal function disorders and the effect of intervention.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Velocity of center of pressure (COP) sway
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Center of pressure (COP) sway velocity of subjects on stable and unstable surfaces is measured via a balance board during two standing conditions: single-task quiet standing and dual-task standing. The dual-task standing requires subjects to continuously perform serial subtraction of 7 from random numbers ranging from 400 to 600 while maintaining standing posture. The balance board records COP movement speed under both single-task and dual-task standing states. This indicator objectively assesses balance control and adaptability to different surfaces; abnormal increases indicate impaired balance, aiding evaluation of balance disorder severity and intervention effectiveness.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Fundamental frequency (F₀)
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Fundamental frequency (F₀) range of subjects' phonation is measured using Praat software. Fundamental frequency range is the interval between the minimum and maximum F₀ (unit: Hz) during phonation, reflecting the variability of voice pitch. This indicators is used to objectively evaluate the functional status of the subjects' vocal system. Abnormalities in F₀ range may indicate impairments in vocal cord movement, laryngeal muscle control, or related neural regulation, which is of great significance for assessing the severity of vocal function disorders and the effect of intervention.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Range of center of pressure (COP) sway
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Center of pressure (COP) sway range of subjects on stable and unstable surfaces is measured via a balance board during two standing conditions: single-task quiet standing and dual-task standing. The dual-task standing requires subjects to continuously perform serial subtraction of 7 from random numbers ranging from 400 to 600 while maintaining standing posture. The balance board records the maximum displacement range of COP deviation under both single-task and dual-task standing states. This indicator objectively assesses postural stability and balance regulation ability on different surfaces; abnormal increases indicate deteriorated postural control, aiding evaluation of balance disorder severity and intervention effectiveness.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Path of center of pressure (COP) sway
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Center of pressure (COP) sway path of subjects on stable and unstable surfaces is measured via a balance board during two standing conditions: single-task quiet standing and dual-task standing. The dual-task standing requires subjects to continuously perform serial subtraction of 7 from random numbers ranging from 400 to 600 while maintaining standing posture. The balance board records the total traveling path length of COP movement under both single-task and dual-task standing states. This indicator objectively reflects the complexity and stability of postural adjustment during standing on different surfaces; abnormal increases indicate inefficient balance control and postural instability, aiding evaluation of balance disorder severity and intervention effectiveness.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Area of center of pressure (COP) sway
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Center of pressure (COP) sway area of subjects on stable and unstable surfaces is measured via a balance board during two standing conditions: single-task quiet standing and dual-task standing. The dual-task standing requires subjects to continuously perform serial subtraction of 7 from random numbers ranging from 400 to 600 while maintaining standing posture. The balance board records the planar enclosed area covered by continuous COP movement under both single-task and dual-task standing states. This indicator objectively evaluates the overall stability of standing posture and anti-interference ability on different surfaces; abnormal increases represent expanded postural sway range and impaired balance function, aiding evaluation of balance disorder severity and intervention effectiveness.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Time
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
The time consumed by subjects to complete the standard Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is recorded as the evaluation outcome. During the test, subjects are required to finish a series of standardized movements including standing up from a chair, straight walking, turning around, and sitting back down independently. This indicator objectively assesses basic walking ability, functional mobility and gross motor control ability of subjects; prolonged completion time indicates impaired walking and mobility function, aiding the evaluation of motor dysfunction severity and intervention effectiveness.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
Dual-Task Timed Up and Go (Dual-Task TUG) Test Time
Time Frame: From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment
The time consumed by subjects to complete the dual-task Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is recorded as the evaluation outcome. During the dual-task test, subjects are required to finish the entire standard TUG motor sequence while simultaneously performing continuous serial subtraction of 7 from random numbers within 100, which imposes additional cognitive load during walking. This indicator comprehensively reflects subjects' dual-task execution ability, integrating walking mobility and cognitive-motor coordination capacity. Increased completion time represents declined dual-task processing efficiency and compromised gait stability under cognitive interference, aiding the evaluation of comprehensive motor-cognitive function and intervention effectiveness.
From the enrollment to 1 month after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

July 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 23, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 19, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease (PD)

Clinical Trials on Temporal Interference Stimulation

Subscribe