Combination Tonsillectomy and Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulation for OSA Patients With Lateral Pharyngeal Collapse (HGNS+T)

July 23, 2026 updated by: Daniel Vena, PhD, Brigham and Women's Hospital

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether removing the tonsils at the time of hypoglossal nerve stimulation improves treatment of obstructive sleep apnea in adults whose airway collapses from the side of the upper airway during sleep. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. Does hypoglossal nerve stimulation combined with tonsillectomy reduce the severity of obstructive sleep apnea more than hypoglossal nerve stimulation alone?
  2. Does tonsillectomy improve how effectively hypoglossal nerve stimulation opens and stabilizes the upper airway?

Researchers will compare participants who receive hypoglossal nerve stimulation with tonsillectomy to participants who receive hypoglossal nerve stimulation alone.

Participants will:

  • Complete sleep studies, questionnaires, and other assessments before and after treatment
  • Be randomly assigned to receive hypoglossal nerve stimulation either with or without tonsillectomy
  • Return for follow-up visits and sleep testing to evaluate treatment effectiveness
  • In a subset of participants, complete additional overnight testing to measure how treatment changes upper-airway collapsibility

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is commonly treated with hypoglossal nerve stimulation (HGNS), but treatment efficacy is substantially reduced in patients with complete oropharyngeal lateral wall (OPLW) collapse. HGNS primarily enlarges the airway by protruding the tongue and is therefore most effective in patients with anteroposterior patterns of airway collapse. Tonsillectomy reduces tissue contributing to lateral pharyngeal narrowing and may complement the mechanism of HGNS by addressing residual lateral wall obstruction. Preliminary clinical data suggest that combining tonsillectomy with HGNS substantially improves treatment response compared with HGNS alone in patients with OPLW collapse, but this strategy has not been evaluated in a randomized clinical trial.

This prospective, randomized controlled trial will enroll 72 adults with moderate-to-severe OSA, complete OPLW collapse identified on drug-induced sleep endoscopy, and candidacy for both HGNS implantation and tonsillectomy. Participants will be randomized 1:1 to receive either concurrent HGNS implantation plus tonsillectomy or HGNS implantation alone. All participants will undergo standard postoperative device activation and titration. The primary efficacy endpoint will be assessed after approximately one month of optimized HGNS therapy using sleep studies and patient-reported outcomes. Participants in the HGNS-alone group with persistent OSA may subsequently undergo delayed tonsillectomy as part of standard clinical care, permitting additional within-subject mechanistic comparisons.

The primary objective is to determine whether concurrent tonsillectomy improves the effectiveness of HGNS in reducing OSA severity compared with HGNS alone. Secondary objectives are to determine whether tonsillectomy enhances HGNS-induced improvements in upper-airway collapsibility and to evaluate whether tonsillectomy modifies the physiological effects of HGNS beyond the effects of either treatment alone. In an optional mechanistic substudy, approximately 30 participants will undergo detailed physiological sleep studies to measure pharyngeal collapsibility using gold-standard techniques, providing insight into the mechanisms underlying any observed improvement in clinical outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea with apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥ 15 events/hour
  • Complete oropharyngeal lateral wall (OPLW) collapse identified on DISE
  • Candidate for HGNS implantation based on standard clinical criteria
  • Presence of small (1-2+) tonsils and eligibility for tonsillectomy
  • Untreated OSA at the time of enrollment
  • Willing and able to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of tonsils
  • Presence of large tonsils (3-4+; not eligible for HGNS)
  • Predominant central or mixed sleep apnea (>25% central or mixed events)
  • Any unstable or serious medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would increase risk or interfere with study participation
  • Ineligibility for HGNS implantation based on standard clinical or surgical criteria
  • Inability to comply with study procedures or follow-up assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HGNS plus tonsillectomy
HGNS plus concomitant tonsillectomy
Tonsillectomy
HGNS alone (without concomitant tonsillectomy)
Active Comparator: HGNS
HGNS alone (without concomitant tonsillectomy)
HGNS alone (without concomitant tonsillectomy)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percent reduction in apnea-hypopnea index (AHI)
Time Frame: 1 month of optimized therapy.
Percent reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), measured by overnight polysomnography, from baseline to the primary follow-up sleep study. Higher values indicate greater improvement in obstructive sleep apnea.
1 month of optimized therapy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Absolute change in apnea-hypopnea index
Time Frame: 1 month of optimized therapy.
Absolute change in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), measured in events per hour by overnight polysomnography, from baseline to the primary follow-up sleep study. Negative values indicate improvement in obstructive sleep apnea.
1 month of optimized therapy.
Treatment success
Time Frame: 1 month of optimized therapy
Treatment success is defined as a ≥50% reduction in the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) from baseline and a follow-up AHI <15 events per hour. The outcome is reported as the proportion of participants meeting this definition (0-100%), with higher values indicating greater treatment success.
1 month of optimized therapy
Change in Sleep Apnea Hypoxic Burden from Baseline
Time Frame: 1 month of optimized therapy
Sleep apnea hypoxic burden will be calculated from overnight polysomnography using the validated Azarbarzin method (PMID: 30376054) as the cumulative area under the oxygen desaturation curve associated with apneas and hypopneas, normalized to total sleep time and expressed as %min/hour. Higher values indicate greater hypoxic burden.
1 month of optimized therapy

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PROMIS Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: 1 month of optimized therapy
The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Short Form 8b assesses perceptions of sleep quality, sleep depth, and difficulties with sleep. Scores are reported as standardized T-scores (mean = 50 and SD = 10), with higher scores indicating greater sleep disturbance (worse outcome).
1 month of optimized therapy
PROMIS Sleep-Related Impairment
Time Frame: 1 month of optimized therapy
The PROMIS Sleep-Related Impairment Short Form 8a assesses daytime impairment associated with poor sleep, including sleepiness, fatigue, and reduced alertness. Scores are reported as standardized T-scores (mean = 50 and SD = 10), with higher scores indicating greater sleep-related impairment (worse outcome).
1 month of optimized therapy
PROMIS Fatigue
Time Frame: 1 month of optimized therapy
The PROMIS Fatigue Short Form 7a assesses the experience and impact of fatigue on daily functioning. Scores are reported as standardized T-scores (mean = 50 and SD = 10), with higher scores indicating greater fatigue (worse outcome).
1 month of optimized therapy
Sleep apnea quality of life
Time Frame: 1 month of optimized therapy
The Sleep Apnea Quality of Life Index (SAQLI) assesses disease-specific quality of life in obstructive sleep apnea. Total scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating better sleep-related quality of life (better outcome).
1 month of optimized therapy
Epworth sleepiness scale
Time Frame: 1 month of optimized therapy
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale assesses subjective daytime sleepiness. Total scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater daytime sleepiness (worse outcome).
1 month of optimized therapy
VAS treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: 1 month of optimized therapy
Participants rate overall satisfaction with treatment on a 0-10 visual analog scale, where 0 indicates not at all satisfied and 10 indicates completely satisfied. Higher scores indicate greater treatment satisfaction (better outcome).
1 month of optimized therapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 14, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 24, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 23, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Clinical Trials on Tonsillectomy

Subscribe