Parental Experiences of Home-Based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy (ISTTvsVT)

July 22, 2026 updated by: Iqra Khan

Parental Experiences of Home-Based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training in Children With Cerebral Palsy: A Feasibility Study

The goal of this feasibility study is to evaluate the adherence, parental experiences, and perceptions of a home-based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training (ISTT) program for children aged 4-12 with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP) in Pakistan. The main questions it aims to answer are:

What is the rate of caregiver adherence to a home-based ISTT program over 12 weeks? What are the primary barriers, experiences, and perceptions of caregivers implementing the program? What are the preliminary signals of clinical effectiveness on trunk control and gross motor function? Researchers will compare pre- and post-intervention outcomes (baseline vs. week 12) to see if there are statistically significant improvements in trunk control (measured by SATCo) and gross motor function (measured by GMFM-88).

Participants (20 primary caregivers and their children) will:

Attend an initial in-person orientation session to learn trunk stabilization exercises from a senior pediatric physical therapist Complete a 12-week home-based ISTT program with weekly tele-supervision video calls to monitor progress and address challenges Attend monthly face-to-face monitoring visits at the hospital for clinical assessment and technique reinforcement Complete a KABA (Knowledge, Attitudes, Barriers, and Adherence) survey at baseline and week 12 Participate in a semi-structured interview at the end of the 12-week program to share their experiences.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This single-arm feasibility study was conducted at a hospital in Lahore, Pakistan, to investigate parental experiences and adherence to a home-based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training (ISTT) program for children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (CP).

Background: Trunk control is a fundamental prerequisite for gross motor function, postural stability, and functional mobility in children with CP. Conventional clinic-based rehabilitation in Pakistan faces significant challenges including transportation barriers, high costs, and limited access to specialized pediatric physical therapy services, resulting in poor adherence and suboptimal outcomes. Home-based, caregiver-delivered programs offer a promising alternative, but evidence is limited on their feasibility and acceptability in low-resource settings.

Intervention: The ISTT program is a structured, progressive trunk stabilization protocol targeting segmental control of the cervical, upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions of the spine. The 12-week intervention was delivered through a hybrid model:

Week 1: In-person orientation and training session at the hospital, where a senior pediatric physical therapist taught caregivers the exercise protocol, including proper positioning, facilitation techniques, and progression criteria using both verbal instruction and practical demonstration.

Weeks 1-12: Daily home-based sessions (approximately 30 minutes), guided by a library of pre-recorded instructional videos and a picture-based manual developed specifically for this program. Exercises progressed from supported to unsupported positions and from static to dynamic tasks.

Weekly tele-supervision: Synchronous video calls between the therapist and caregiver to monitor progress, correct technique, address barriers, and adjust exercise difficulty as needed.

Monthly in-person visits: Face-to-face monitoring at the hospital for clinical reassessment, technique refinement, and reinforcement of training principles.

Participants: Twenty primary caregivers (mothers or fathers) of children aged 4-12 years with a confirmed diagnosis of spastic diplegic CP, classified at Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels II-IV, who were willing to commit to the 12-week program and had access to a smartphone with video-calling capability.

Outcome Measures:

Primary outcomes:

Adherence rate (percentage of prescribed sessions completed over 12 weeks) Caregiver experiences and perceptions (assessed via the KABA [Knowledge, Attitudes, Barriers, and Adherence] survey administered at baseline and week 12, and a semi-structured qualitative interview at study completion)

Secondary outcomes (pre-post comparison):

Trunk control measured by the Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo) Gross motor function measured by the Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 54000
        • Pediatric Physical Therapy and Neurorehabilitation Department at the University of Lahore Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged 4-12 years with a confirmed diagnosis of spastic diplegic cerebral palsy
  • Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) levels II-IV
  • Primary caregiver (mother or father) willing to commit to the 12-week program
  • Caregiver had access to a smartphone with video-calling capability
  • Caregiver able to understand and follow instructions in Urdu or English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Children with uncontrolled seizures
  • Children who had undergone orthopedic surgery or botulinum toxin injections in the lower extremities within the previous 6 months
  • Children with severe visual or hearing impairments that would interfere with participation
  • Caregivers with a diagnosed physical or mental health condition that would prevent them from safely delivering the home-based program

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Home-Based Intensive segmental Trunk Training Program
All 20 caregiver-child dyads received a 12-week home-based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training (ISTT) program. The intervention included an initial in-person orientation session, daily home-based trunk stabilization exercises guided by pre-recorded instructional videos and a picture-based manual, weekly tele-supervision video calls with a pediatric physical therapist, and monthly face-to-face monitoring visits at the hospital. No control, placebo, or sham comparator arm was included in this feasibility study.
A 12-week structured, progressive trunk stabilization protocol targeting segmental control of the cervical, upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions of the spine. The program consisted of daily home-based sessions (approximately 30 minutes per session), guided by pre-recorded instructional videos and a picture-based manual developed specifically for this study. Exercises progressed from supported to unsupported positions and from static to dynamic tasks. Caregivers received an initial in-person orientation session at a hospital, followed by weekly tele-supervision video calls with a senior pediatric physical therapist to monitor progress, correct technique, address barriers, and adjust exercise difficulty. Monthly face-to-face monitoring visits were conducted at the hospital for clinical reassessment and reinforcement of training principles.
Other Names:
  • Home-based trunk stabilization program
  • caregiver-delivered ISTT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Adherence Rate
Time Frame: Week 12 (end of intervention)
Percentage of prescribed home-based ISTT sessions completed by caregivers over the 12-week intervention period, calculated as (number of sessions completed / number of sessions prescribed) × 100. Adherence was cross-validated through caregiver self-report and observation during weekly tele-supervision video calls.
Week 12 (end of intervention)
Caregiver Experiences and Perceptions (Qualitative)
Time Frame: Week 12 (semi-structured interview)
Measured using a semi-structured qualitative interview conducted at the end of the intervention to explore caregivers' experiences, challenges, and perceived benefits of the home-based program.
Week 12 (semi-structured interview)
Caregiver Knowledge, Attitudes and Barriers
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Measured using the KABA (Knowledge, Attitudes, Barriers, and Adherence) survey, administered at baseline and Week 12, to assess caregivers' knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to the home-based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training program.
Baseline and Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Segmental Assessment Trunk Control (SATCo)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Segmental Assessment of Trunk Control (SATCo) evaluates segmental trunk control across cervical, upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions. Scores range from 0 to 20, with higher scores indicating better trunk control.
Baseline and Week 12
Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 12
Gross Motor Function Measure-88, a standardized observational instrument assessing gross motor function across five dimensions (lying and rolling; sitting; crawling and kneeling; standing; walking, running, and jumping). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better gross motor function.
Baseline and Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ashfaq Ahmad, PhD, University of Lahore

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 12, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 10, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

April 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

This was a small feasibility study conducted at a single center with a limited sample size (n = 20). Individual participant data are not planned for sharing due to confidentiality considerations and the feasibility nature of the study protocol.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy (CP)

Clinical Trials on Home-Based Intensive Segmental Trunk Training (ISTT)

Subscribe