- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07732465
Adductor Canal Block: Efficacy in Postoperative Pain Management for Cardiac Surgery (AddEase)
Effectiveness of Adductor Canal Block in Postoperative Co-analgesia for Cardiac Surgery With Saphenous Vein Harvesting
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Christian Ayoub, MD
- Phone Number: 5147088999
- Email: ayoub_christian@hotmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H1T 1C8
- Montreal Heart Institute
-
Contact:
- Abir Attia, Msc.
- Phone Number: 5143763330
- Email: abir.attia@icm-mhi.org
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Planned CABG with unilateral or bilateral great saphenous vein (GSV) harvesting, without concomitant valve surgery
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Ability to understand the protocol and provide written informed consent
- ASA physical status I-IV
Exclusion Criteria:
- Refusal to participate in the study or inability to provide written informed consent
- Contraindication to adductor canal block (e.g., local infection, allergy to local anesthetics)
- Pre-existing chronic pain associated with chronic use of analgesic medications other than acetaminophen
- Pre-existing peripheral neuropathy affecting the leg
- Participation in two other interventional studies at the Montreal Heart Institute
- Endoscopic vein harvesting performed by the surgical team instead of open saphenectomy technique
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Adductor canal bloc with bupivacaine + dexmedetomidine
|
Adductor canal bloc with 0,25% bupivacaine + 20 ucg of dexmedetomidine
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Control arm
Saline solution
|
Needle insertion mimicking the ACB procedure with injection of a saline solution
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Leg Pain at Rest
Time Frame: Numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10) will be performed at 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after the block injection.
|
The primary outcome will be leg pain at rest, measured using a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10) at 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after the block injection. The NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) is a validated and widely used tool for assessing pain intensity in adults, particularly in postoperative and critical care settings. It allows for a simple, reproducible, and easily administered measurement, including during repeated assessments at the patient's bedside. The NRS scale consists of asking the patient to rate their pain on a numeric scale from 0 to 10, where: 0 corresponds to no pain at all 10 corresponds to the worst pain imaginable |
Numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10) will be performed at 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after the block injection.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Total opioid consumption
Time Frame: The first 48 postoperative hours after procedure
|
Cumulative amount administered, expressed in morphine milligram equivalents (MME), during the first 48 postoperative hours (conversion factors used: hydromorphone 1 mg = morphine 5 mg; fentanyl 100 µg = morphine 10 mg).
|
The first 48 postoperative hours after procedure
|
|
Postoperative pain unrelated to the saphenous territory
Time Frame: Numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10) performed at 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after the block injection.
|
Incidence and characterization of postoperative pain unrelated to the saphenous territory (e.g., thoracic or musculoskeletal pain), assessed at the same time points as saphenous pain using a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10). The NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) is a validated and widely used tool for assessing pain intensity in adults, particularly in postoperative and critical care settings. It allows for a simple, reproducible, and easily administered measurement, including during repeated assessments at the patient's bedside. The NRS scale consists of asking the patient to rate their pain on a numeric scale from 0 to 10, where: 0 corresponds to no pain at all 10 corresponds to the worst pain imaginable |
Numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10) performed at 3 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours after the block injection.
|
|
Persistent Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, assessed using the NRS.
|
Proportion of patients reporting pain ≥4/10 at the harvest site at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, assessed using the NRS. The NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) is a validated and widely used tool for assessing pain intensity in adults, particularly in postoperative and critical care settings. It allows for a simple, reproducible, and easily administered measurement, including during repeated assessments at the patient's bedside. The NRS scale consists of asking the patient to rate their pain on a numeric scale from 0 to 10, where: 0 corresponds to no pain at all 10 corresponds to the worst pain imaginable |
At 3 and 6 months postoperatively, assessed using the NRS.
|
|
Overall persistent postoperative pain
Time Frame: At 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
Proportion of patients reporting pain ≥4/10 (all sites combined) at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) is a validated and widely used tool for assessing pain intensity in adults, particularly in postoperative and critical care settings. It allows for a simple, reproducible, and easily administered measurement, including during repeated assessments at the patient's bedside. The NRS scale consists of asking the patient to rate their pain on a numeric scale from 0 to 10, where: 0 corresponds to no pain at all 10 corresponds to the worst pain imaginable |
At 3 and 6 months postoperatively.
|
|
Presence of hypoesthesia
Time Frame: Numeric rating scale at 3 and 6 months.
|
Presence of hypoesthesia (non-painful) at the saphenectomy site at 3 and 6 months using a numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10). The NRS (Numeric Rating Scale) is a validated and widely used tool for assessing pain intensity in adults, particularly in postoperative and critical care settings. It allows for a simple, reproducible, and easily administered measurement, including during repeated assessments at the patient's bedside. The NRS scale consists of asking the patient to rate their pain on a numeric scale from 0 to 10, where: 0 corresponds to no pain at all 10 corresponds to the worst pain imaginable |
Numeric rating scale at 3 and 6 months.
|
|
Neuropathic characterization
Time Frame: At 48 hours, 3 months, and 6 months.
|
Quantification of the modified DN4 score at the harvest site at 48 hours, 3 months, and 6 months. Modified DN4 ≥ 3/8: high probability of neuropathic pain Modified DN4 < 3/8: neuropathic pain unlikely |
At 48 hours, 3 months, and 6 months.
|
|
Block safety
Time Frame: Assessed daily during hospitalization until patient is discharge from the hospital (an average of 7 days), up to 60 days.
|
Number of adverse events related to the adductor canal block observed during the hospital stay, including hematoma, infection, nerve injury, cardiovascular complications, motor block, and signs of local anesthetic systemic toxicity.
|
Assessed daily during hospitalization until patient is discharge from the hospital (an average of 7 days), up to 60 days.
|
|
Opioid-related side effects
Time Frame: Each time the patient takes opioids during in the postoperative period until discharge from the hospital (an average of 7 days), up to 60 days.
|
Incidence of common opioid-related side effects in each group, including nausea, vomiting, and constipation.
|
Each time the patient takes opioids during in the postoperative period until discharge from the hospital (an average of 7 days), up to 60 days.
|
|
Time to extubation
Time Frame: At extubation
|
Time to extubation after adductor canal block
|
At extubation
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Use of co-analgesia
Time Frame: Assessed once daily total co-analgesic doses administered, until discharge (an average of 7 days), up to 60 days.
|
Number of treatments used and frequency of use (lidocaine-ketamine cream, NSAIDs, gabapentinoids, etc.)
|
Assessed once daily total co-analgesic doses administered, until discharge (an average of 7 days), up to 60 days.
|
|
Postoperative quality of life
Time Frame: At 3 and 6 months postoperatively
|
EQ-5D score quantification measured at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. The EQ-5D (EuroQol - 5 Dimensions) is a standardized and validated instrument used to assess health-related quality of life across two components. It is widely used in clinical research to measure the overall impact of a medical intervention on patients' functional status and well-being. It explores five dimensions of health:
Each dimension is assessed across 5 levels of severity:
The combination of responses generates a 5-digit health profile, which can be converted into an EQ-5D index. 1.0: Represents perfect health. 0.0: Represents a state considered equivalent to death. Negative values: Health states deemed "worse than death." |
At 3 and 6 months postoperatively
|
|
Opioid use
Time Frame: At 3 and 6 months postoperatively
|
Opioid use at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, assessed by the presence or absence of opioid use and the type of opioid used.
|
At 3 and 6 months postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bignami E, Castella A, Pota V, Saglietti F, Scognamiglio A, Trumello C, Pace MC, Allegri M. Perioperative pain management in cardiac surgery: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2018 Apr;84(4):488-503. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.12142-5. Epub 2017 Oct 12.
- Liu SS, Buvanendran A, Rathmell JP, Sawhney M, Bae JJ, Moric M, Perros S, Pope AJ, Poultsides L, Della Valle CJ, Shin NS, McCartney CJ, Ma Y, Shah M, Wood MJ, Manion SC, Sculco TP. A cross-sectional survey on prevalence and risk factors for persistent postsurgical pain 1 year after total hip and knee replacement. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012 Jul-Aug;37(4):415-22. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e318251b688.
- Moradian ST, Najafloo M, Mahmoudi H, Ghiasi MS. Early mobilization reduces the atelectasis and pleural effusion in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized clinical trial. J Vasc Nurs. 2017 Sep;35(3):141-145. doi: 10.1016/j.jvn.2017.02.001.
- Gan TJ. Poorly controlled postoperative pain: prevalence, consequences, and prevention. J Pain Res. 2017 Sep 25;10:2287-2298. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S144066. eCollection 2017.
- Routledge FS, Tsuyuki RT, Hervas-Malo M, LeBlanc P, McFetridge-Durdle JA, King KM. The influence of coronary artery bypass graft harvest site on women's pain, functional status, and health services utilization throughout the first post-operative year: a longitudinal study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Aug;46(8):1054-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.003. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
- Hasabo EA, Assar A, Mahmoud MM, Abdalrahman HA, Ibrahim EA, Hasanin MA, Emam AK, AbdelQadir YH, AbdelAzim AA, Ali AS. Adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block for pain control after total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review and Meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Aug 26;101(34):e30110. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000030110.
- Xiao MZX, Khan JS, Dana E, Rao V, Djaiani G, Richebe P, Katz J, Wong D, Clarke H. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Chronic Postsurgical Pain after Cardiac Surgery: A Single-center Prospective Cohort Study. Anesthesiology. 2023 Sep 1;139(3):309-320. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004621.
- Grant MC, Crisafi C, Alvarez A, Arora RC, Brindle ME, Chatterjee S, Ender J, Fletcher N, Gregory AJ, Gunaydin S, Jahangiri M, Ljungqvist O, Lobdell KW, Morton V, Reddy VS, Salenger R, Sander M, Zarbock A, Engelman DT. Perioperative Care in Cardiac Surgery: A Joint Consensus Statement by the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Cardiac Society, ERAS International Society, and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS). Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Apr;117(4):669-689. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2023.12.006. Epub 2024 Jan 28.
- Yin W, Luo D, Xu W, Yang W, Jia S, Lin J. Effect of adductor canal block combined with infiltration between the popliteal artery and posterior capsular of the knee on chronic pain after total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2024 Sep 10;24(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12871-024-02707-2.
- Guimaraes-Pereira L, Reis P, Abelha F, Azevedo LF, Castro-Lopes JM. Persistent postoperative pain after cardiac surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis regarding incidence and pain intensity. Pain. 2017 Oct;158(10):1869-1885. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000997.
- El Tallawy SN, Ali WA, Thallaj AK, Ahmed RS, Manaa EM, Mostafa MS, Aljasser FF, Amlih HF, Hassanin AA. Comparative study between surgical wound catheter, femoral nerve block, and adductor canal block for postoperative analgesia after knee arthroplasty: A double blind randomized clinical trial. Saudi J Anaesth. 2023 Jul-Sep;17(3):359-367. doi: 10.4103/sja.sja_894_22. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
- Moon, N., & Lin, E. (2025, May 23). Adductor canal block. OpenAnesthesia. https://www.openanesthesia.org/keywords/adductor-canal-block
- Fujita Y, Mera H, Watanabe T, Furutani K, Kondo HO, Wakai T, Kawashima H, Ogose A. Significantly earlier ambulation and reduced risk of near-falls with continuous infusion nerve blocks: a retrospective pilot study of adductor canal block compared to femoral nerve block in total knee arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Aug 12;23(1):768. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05735-6.
- Al Wahbi AM. Evaluation of pain during endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2017 Aug 10;13:305-309. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S135308. eCollection 2017.
- Li YH, Wang T, Qian C, Chen GP, Lou WS, Gu JP. Application of Femoral Nerve Block in Treating Great Saphenous Vein Insufficiency by Endovenous Radiofrequency Ablation Combined with Punctate Stripping. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2023 Jan-Dec;29:10760296231220054. doi: 10.1177/10760296231220054.
- Dzieciuchowicz L, Espinosa G, Grochowicz L. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided femoral nerve block in endoluminal laser ablation of the greater saphenous vein. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Oct;24(7):930-4. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2009.10.022. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
- Thomazeau J, Rouquette A, Martinez V, Rabuel C, Prince N, Laplanche JL, Nizard R, Bergmann JF, Perrot S, Lloret-Linares C. Predictive Factors of Chronic Post-Surgical Pain at 6 Months Following Knee Replacement: Influence of Postoperative Pain Trajectory and Genetics. Pain Physician. 2016 Jul;19(5):E729-41.
- Noiseux N, Prieto I, Bracco D, Basile F, Hemmerling T. Coronary artery bypass grafting in the awake patient combining high thoracic epidural and femoral nerve block: first series of 15 patients. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Feb;100(2):184-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem370.
- Jaya AAGPS, Tantri AR, Heriwardito A, Mansjoer A. Single-centre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, superiority study to evaluate the effectiveness of general anaesthesia and ultrasound-guided transversus thoracis muscle plane block combination in adult cardiac surgery for reducing the surgical stress response: clinical trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 11;11(11):e051008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051008.
- Vloka JD, Hadzic A, Mulcare R, Lesser JB, Kitain E, Thys DM. Femoral and genitofemoral nerve blocks versus spinal anesthesia for outpatients undergoing long saphenous vein stripping surgery. Anesth Analg. 1997 Apr;84(4):749-52. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199704000-00009.
- Arnold, C., Alvarado, A. C., & Brady, M. F. (2023, May 23). Saphenous nerve block. In StatPearls [Internet]. StatPearls Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK536967/
- Rafiq S, Steinbruchel DA, Wanscher MJ, Andersen LW, Navne A, Lilleoer NB, Olsen PS. Multimodal analgesia versus traditional opiate based analgesia after cardiac surgery, a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Mar 20;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-9-52.
- Del Rio JM, Jake Abernathy J 3rd, Taylor MA, Habib RH, Fernandez FG, Bollen BA, Lauer RE, Nussmeier NA, Glance LG, Petty JV 3rd, Mackensen GB, Vener DF, Kertai MD. The Adult Cardiac Anesthesiology Section of STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database: 2020 Update on Quality and Outcomes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Jan;35(1):22-34. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
- Fayaz MK, Abel RJ, Pugh SC, Hall JE, Djaiani G, Mecklenburgh JS. Opioid-sparing effects of diclofenac and paracetamol lead to improved outcomes after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2004 Dec;18(6):742-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2004.08.012.
- Krakowski JC, Hallman MJ, Smeltz AM. Persistent Pain After Cardiac Surgery: Prevention and Management. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2021 Dec;25(4):289-300. doi: 10.1177/10892532211041320. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
- Charlton E, Atkins KJ, Evered L, Silbert B, Scott DA. The long-term incidence of chronic post-surgical pain after coronary artery bypass surgery - A prospective observational study. Eur J Pain. 2024 Apr;28(4):599-607. doi: 10.1002/ejp.2203. Epub 2023 Nov 15.
- Chernyavskiy A, Volkov A, Lavrenyuk O, Terekhov I, Kareva Y. Comparative results of endoscopic and open methods of vein harvesting for coronary artery bypass grafting: a prospective randomized parallel-group trial. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Nov 12;10:163. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0353-3.
- Page MG, Ganty P, Wong D, Rao V, Khan J, Ladha K, Hanlon J, Miles S, Katznelson R, Wijeysundera D, Katz J, Clarke H. A Prospective Cohort Study of Acute Pain and In-Hospital Opioid Consumption After Cardiac Surgery: Associations With Psychological and Medical Factors and Chronic Postsurgical Pain. Anesth Analg. 2024 Jun 1;138(6):1192-1204. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006848. Epub 2024 Jan 31.
- Feizerfan, A., & Sheh, G. (2014). Transition from acute to chronic pain. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain, 15(2), 98-102. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjaceaccp/mku044
- National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. (2023). Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). In Coronary Artery Disease (pp. 1-10). National Institutes of Health. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507836/
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2026-3693 MHI
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.