Prevalence and Clinical Outcome of Eosinophilic COPD

July 25, 2026 updated by: Hagar Awadallah Fahmy Ragheb, Assiut University

Prevalence and Clinical Outcome of Eosinophilic COPD at Assiut University

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a lung condition characterized by chronic breathing symptoms and progressive airflow blockages. A specific type of COPD, known as eosinophilic COPD, involves higher levels of white blood cells called eosinophils and is known to influence disease outcomes and treatment responses. Currently, there is limited data regarding the prevalence and clinical outcomes of eosinophilic COPD in Upper Egypt, particularly among patients at Assiut University Hospitals.

The main objective of this prospective observational study is to determine how common eosinophilic COPD is among patients experiencing an acute worsening of their COPD symptoms (an exacerbation) at Assiut University Hospitals. The study also aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with this specific phenotype.

Researchers will observe patients over the age of 40 with a confirmed COPD diagnosis who are admitted to the hospital for an acute exacerbation. As part of their standard hospital care, participants will undergo routine clinical assessments, including a review of their medical history, physical examinations, lung function tests (spirometry), and standard blood tests to measure their blood eosinophil count.

The study will compare patients with eosinophilic COPD to those with non-eosinophilic COPD. Researchers will specifically evaluate differences in the severity of the exacerbation, the duration of the hospital stay, and the need for ventilator support. The findings aim to contribute to better, more personalized treatment strategies and improved clinical outcomes for COPD patients in the region.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study seeks to evaluate the clinical significance and prevalence of the eosinophilic phenotype in patients presenting with an acute exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (AECOPD). While elevated blood eosinophil counts have emerged as a practical biomarker for eosinophilic airway inflammation, often guiding treatment decisions, there is limited data regarding its prevalence and impact on clinical outcomes in Upper Egypt.

Upon admission, enrolled patients will undergo a comprehensive clinical assessment as part of their standard care. The study procedures and data collection methods include the following:

  • Clinical History and Examination: Researchers will collect demographic data, smoking status (pack-years), and a history of comorbidities, such as cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and obstructive sleep apnea. The frequency of previous exacerbations over the past 12 months will be recorded, alongside current maintenance therapies (e.g., LAMA, LABA, ICS, triple therapy, and long-term oxygen therapy). A full physical examination will be conducted to evaluate vital signs, Body Mass Index (BMI), and room air oxygen saturation.
  • Laboratory Investigations: A complete blood count (CBC) will be performed from a venous blood sample at admission and before discharge to measure the absolute peripheral blood eosinophil count. Arterial blood gases (ABG) will be analyzed on room air. To exclude parasitic infestations that could skew eosinophil counts, a stool analysis will be conducted.
  • Sputum Cytology: A single induced sputum sample will be collected following nebulization with 3% hypertonic saline. The sample will be homogenized, centrifuged, and stained to perform differential cell counts via light microscopy, allowing researchers to evaluate the correlation between sputum and blood eosinophilia.
  • Pulmonary Function and Radiological Assessment: Standard spirometry will be utilized to measure FEV1, FVC, and the FEV1/FVC ratio, classifying the patient's baseline COPD severity according to GOLD criteria (Mild to Very Severe). Radiological assessments will include a chest X-ray, with a CT scan performed if clinically indicated.
  • Exacerbation Management and Classification: The severity of the acute exacerbation will be classified (mild, moderate, or severe) based on GOLD 2026 thresholds, which incorporate dyspnea visual analog scale (VAS) scores, respiratory rate, heart rate, resting SaO2, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Patients will receive standard pharmacological management for AECOPD as soon as possible, which may include short-acting bronchodilators, a short course of systemic corticosteroids, and antibiotics if purulent sputum or prior infection history is present.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

70

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged > 40 years with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD according to GOLD 2026 guidelines, presenting with an acute exacerbation at the Department of Chest Disease and Tuberculosis at Assiut University Hospitals.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged > 40 years.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of COPD according to GOLD 2026 guidelines.
  • Presented with acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD) characterized by the onset or worsening of at least two symptoms (cough, phlegm, purulent sputum, wheezing, or dyspnea) persisting for a minimum of 48 hours, excluding other potential causes, such as left or right cardiac dysfunction, pulmonary embolism, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, arrhythmia and other related diseases.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with asthma or asthma-COPD overlap.
  • Patients who need ICU admission.
  • Patients receiving systemic corticosteroids within the previous 4 weeks.
  • Hematological disorders affecting eosinophil count.
  • Active pulmonary tuberculosis.
  • Parasitic infections confirmed by stool analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Eosinophilic COPD
Patients > 40 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD (according to GOLD 2026 guidelines) presenting with an acute exacerbation, who are identified as having a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/µL.
Non-eosinophilic COPD
Patients > 40 years of age with a confirmed diagnosis of COPD (according to GOLD 2026 guidelines) presenting with an acute exacerbation, who do not meet the criteria for eosinophilia (blood eosinophil count ≤ 300 cells/µL).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Prevalence of Eosinophilic COPD
Time Frame: Baseline
The proportion of patients presenting with an acute exacerbation of COPD who are identified as having the eosinophilic phenotype, defined as a peripheral blood eosinophil count greater than 300 cells/µL.
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of Hospital Stay
Time Frame: From admission up to discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Total number of days the patient remains hospitalized from the time of admission until discharge.
From admission up to discharge, assessed up to 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe