Closed-loop Sensorimotor Integrated (CSMI) Control in Exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) for Precise Wrist-hand Rehabilitation After Stroke

July 31, 2026 updated by: Xiaoling Hu, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether using both brain and muscle signals to control a wrist-hand rehabilitation robot can improve recovery in people with chronic stroke.

A total of 48 participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive 20 sessions of wrist-hand rehabilitation using an exoneuromusculoskeleton rehabilitation robot.

In the closed-loop sensorimotor integrated group, the system will use information from both brain-muscle coordination and muscle activity to recognize the participant's movement intention and provide electrical stimulation and robotic assistance. In the electromyography-driven group, the system will use muscle activity alone to control the electrical stimulation and robotic assistance.

The main questions this study aims to answer are:

Does control using both brain and muscle signals improve wrist and hand motor function more than control using muscle signals alone? Does this approach produce greater changes in coordination between the brain and muscles? Participants will complete motor-function and brain-muscle assessments before training, immediately after the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after training.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

48

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Kowloon
      • Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. at least 6 months after the onset of a unilateral lesion due to stroke;
  2. moderate to severe motor disability in the paretic wrist-hand joints (6<Fugl-Meyer Wrist-Hand Assessment (FMAWH)<14) and spasticity in wrist-hand (Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) ≤3);
  3. sensory impairment on their affected forearm with a score of 1 measured by the sensation part of light touch in the FMA;
  4. maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) with detectable EMG (3 times of the standard deviation above the resting EMG baseline) in the muscle union of the flexor digitorum and flexor carpi radialis (FD-FCR) and that of the extensor digitorum and extensor carpi ulnaris (ED-ECU);
  5. sufficient cognition to follow experimental instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination score >21);
  6. aged from 30 to 70 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. currently pregnant;
  2. dysphasia (language deficiency);
  3. skull implantation;
  4. post-stroke neglect;
  5. pacemaker implantation;
  6. involved in drug studies, other clinical trials, or concurrent medication/occupational/physical treatments on the upper limb;
  7. the overall medical condition not suitable for the training (e.g., severe cardiac problem, unstable blood pressure, etc.).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Closed-Loop Sensorimotor Integrated Group
Participants will receive 20 sessions of wrist-hand rehabilitation using an exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS). In this group, corticomuscular coherence (CMC) and electromyographic (EMG) signals will be used together to identify voluntary movement intention and control neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance during wrist and hand movements.
The exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) provides neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance for wrist-hand rehabilitation. In the CSMI-controlled intervention, corticomuscular coherence and electromyographic signals are jointly used to identify voluntary movement intention and trigger assistance. Participants will receive 20 training sessions.
Active Comparator: EMG-Driven Group
Participants will receive 20 sessions of wrist-hand rehabilitation using the same exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS). In this group, electromyographic (EMG) activity alone will be used to identify voluntary movement intention and control neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance during wrist and hand movements.
The exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) provides neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance for wrist-hand rehabilitation. In the EMG-driven intervention, electromyographic activity alone is used to identify voluntary movement intention and trigger assistance. Participants will receive 20 training sessions.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Wrist/Hand Subscale (FMA-WH) Score
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Wrist and Hand Subscore (FMA-WH) evaluates motor impairment of the paretic wrist and hand after stroke. The score ranges from 0 to 24, including a maximum of 10 points for wrist function and 14 points for hand function. Higher scores indicate better wrist-hand motor function.
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Finger Spasticity Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluates resistance to passive movement as an indicator of muscle tone and spasticity at the fingers. Possible grades are 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4, with a minimum grade of 0 and a maximum grade of 4. Higher grades indicate greater resistance to passive movement and more severe spasticity.
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
Wrist Spasticity Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluates resistance to passive movement as an indicator of muscle tone and spasticity at the fingers. Possible grades are 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4, with a minimum grade of 0 and a maximum grade of 4. Higher grades indicate greater resistance to passive movement and more severe spasticity.
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
Elbow Spasticity Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluates resistance to passive movement as an indicator of muscle tone and spasticity at the fingers. Possible grades are 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4, with a minimum grade of 0 and a maximum grade of 4. Higher grades indicate greater resistance to passive movement and more severe spasticity.
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Shoulder/Elbow Subscale Score
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Shoulder/Elbow Subscore evaluates proximal upper-extremity motor impairment, including movements of the shoulder, elbow, and forearm. The score ranges from 0 to 36. Higher scores indicate better proximal upper-extremity motor function.
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) evaluates upper-extremity activity performance through 19 items covering grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement. The total score ranges from 0 to 57. Higher scores indicate better upper-extremity activity performance.
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
EMG Co-contraction Index During Wrist-Hand Tasks
Time Frame: At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
Dynamic Neuromuscular Network Functional Connectivity
Time Frame: At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
Peak Beta-Band Corticomuscular Coherence Value
Time Frame: At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
Cortical Location of Peak Beta-Band Corticomuscular Coherence
Time Frame: At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 31, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe