- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07737431
Closed-loop Sensorimotor Integrated (CSMI) Control in Exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) for Precise Wrist-hand Rehabilitation After Stroke
The goal of this randomized controlled trial is to determine whether using both brain and muscle signals to control a wrist-hand rehabilitation robot can improve recovery in people with chronic stroke.
A total of 48 participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. Both groups will receive 20 sessions of wrist-hand rehabilitation using an exoneuromusculoskeleton rehabilitation robot.
In the closed-loop sensorimotor integrated group, the system will use information from both brain-muscle coordination and muscle activity to recognize the participant's movement intention and provide electrical stimulation and robotic assistance. In the electromyography-driven group, the system will use muscle activity alone to control the electrical stimulation and robotic assistance.
The main questions this study aims to answer are:
Does control using both brain and muscle signals improve wrist and hand motor function more than control using muscle signals alone? Does this approach produce greater changes in coordination between the brain and muscles? Participants will complete motor-function and brain-muscle assessments before training, immediately after the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after training.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Xiaoling Hu, Phd
- Phone Number: 852 3400 3206
- Email: xiaoling.hu@polyu.edu.hk
Study Locations
-
-
Kowloon
-
Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong
- Recruiting
- The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
-
Contact:
- Xiaoling Hu, Phd
- Phone Number: 852 3400 3206
- Email: mailxiaoling.hu@polyu.edu.hk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- at least 6 months after the onset of a unilateral lesion due to stroke;
- moderate to severe motor disability in the paretic wrist-hand joints (6<Fugl-Meyer Wrist-Hand Assessment (FMAWH)<14) and spasticity in wrist-hand (Modified Ashworth Score (MAS) ≤3);
- sensory impairment on their affected forearm with a score of 1 measured by the sensation part of light touch in the FMA;
- maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) with detectable EMG (3 times of the standard deviation above the resting EMG baseline) in the muscle union of the flexor digitorum and flexor carpi radialis (FD-FCR) and that of the extensor digitorum and extensor carpi ulnaris (ED-ECU);
- sufficient cognition to follow experimental instructions (Mini-Mental State Examination score >21);
- aged from 30 to 70 years.
Exclusion Criteria:
- currently pregnant;
- dysphasia (language deficiency);
- skull implantation;
- post-stroke neglect;
- pacemaker implantation;
- involved in drug studies, other clinical trials, or concurrent medication/occupational/physical treatments on the upper limb;
- the overall medical condition not suitable for the training (e.g., severe cardiac problem, unstable blood pressure, etc.).
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Closed-Loop Sensorimotor Integrated Group
Participants will receive 20 sessions of wrist-hand rehabilitation using an exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS).
In this group, corticomuscular coherence (CMC) and electromyographic (EMG) signals will be used together to identify voluntary movement intention and control neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance during wrist and hand movements.
|
The exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) provides neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance for wrist-hand rehabilitation.
In the CSMI-controlled intervention, corticomuscular coherence and electromyographic signals are jointly used to identify voluntary movement intention and trigger assistance.
Participants will receive 20 training sessions.
|
|
Active Comparator: EMG-Driven Group
Participants will receive 20 sessions of wrist-hand rehabilitation using the same exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS).
In this group, electromyographic (EMG) activity alone will be used to identify voluntary movement intention and control neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance during wrist and hand movements.
|
The exoneuromusculoskeleton (ENMS) provides neuromuscular electrical stimulation and robotic assistance for wrist-hand rehabilitation.
In the EMG-driven intervention, electromyographic activity alone is used to identify voluntary movement intention and trigger assistance.
Participants will receive 20 training sessions.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Wrist/Hand Subscale (FMA-WH) Score
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Wrist and Hand Subscore (FMA-WH) evaluates motor impairment of the paretic wrist and hand after stroke.
The score ranges from 0 to 24, including a maximum of 10 points for wrist function and 14 points for hand function.
Higher scores indicate better wrist-hand motor function.
|
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Finger Spasticity Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluates resistance to passive movement as an indicator of muscle tone and spasticity at the fingers.
Possible grades are 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4, with a minimum grade of 0 and a maximum grade of 4. Higher grades indicate greater resistance to passive movement and more severe spasticity.
|
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
|
Wrist Spasticity Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluates resistance to passive movement as an indicator of muscle tone and spasticity at the fingers.
Possible grades are 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4, with a minimum grade of 0 and a maximum grade of 4. Higher grades indicate greater resistance to passive movement and more severe spasticity.
|
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
|
Elbow Spasticity Assessed by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
The Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) evaluates resistance to passive movement as an indicator of muscle tone and spasticity at the fingers.
Possible grades are 0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4, with a minimum grade of 0 and a maximum grade of 4. Higher grades indicate greater resistance to passive movement and more severe spasticity.
|
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment Shoulder/Elbow Subscale Score
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment Shoulder/Elbow Subscore evaluates proximal upper-extremity motor impairment, including movements of the shoulder, elbow, and forearm.
The score ranges from 0 to 36.
Higher scores indicate better proximal upper-extremity motor function.
|
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
|
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) Score
Time Frame: At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
The Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) evaluates upper-extremity activity performance through 19 items covering grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement.
The total score ranges from 0 to 57.
Higher scores indicate better upper-extremity activity performance.
|
At three pre-training assessments conducted over 2 weeks, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
EMG Co-contraction Index During Wrist-Hand Tasks
Time Frame: At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
|
Dynamic Neuromuscular Network Functional Connectivity
Time Frame: At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
|
Peak Beta-Band Corticomuscular Coherence Value
Time Frame: At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
|
Cortical Location of Peak Beta-Band Corticomuscular Coherence
Time Frame: At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
At the pre-training assessment, immediately after completion of the 20 training sessions, and 3 months after completion of training
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- GRF15218324
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.