Painhunting Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Event-Related Depression (PH-CBT)

July 28, 2026 updated by: Uzakova Sanemkhan, Painhunting LLP

Painhunting Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Event-Related Depression: Active-Comparator Randomized Pilot Trial With Adaptive Sample-Size Re-Estimation

This randomized, active-comparator pilot trial will compare Painhunting Therapy with manualized Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) in adults with event-related depressive symptoms. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Painhunting Therapy or CBT. The primary outcome is depressive symptom severity measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at six weeks after randomization. Secondary outcomes include anxiety symptoms, event-related distress, functional impairment, treatment response and remission, treatment retention, and durability of outcomes at 10 to 12 weeks. The study will also assess treatment fidelity, therapeutic alliance, and selected potential moderators of treatment response. The trial uses a randomized, rater-blinded, parallel-group design with an adaptive sample-size approach.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Painhunting Therapy with manualized Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT), an established psychological treatment for depression, in adults experiencing depressive symptoms associated with adverse life events.

Eligible participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two treatment groups. The Painhunting Therapy arm will receive a brief structured course of therapy, with a minimum planned dose of three sessions except for participants meeting prespecified early-remission criteria, and additional sessions permitted when clinically indicated. The CBT arm will receive manualized CBT for depression delivered over approximately six to eight sessions. The intended primary treatment comparison is approximately three Painhunting sessions versus six CBT sessions, reflecting the typical delivery format of each intervention rather than a matched-dose comparison.

The primary endpoint is PHQ-9 score at six weeks after randomization. Additional assessments will examine depressive symptoms at earlier and later time points, anxiety symptoms, event-related distress, functional impairment, treatment response and remission, treatment retention, and maintenance of outcomes at 10 to 12 weeks.

Outcome assessments at key follow-up time points will be conducted by assessors blinded to treatment allocation. Treatment adherence and fidelity will be independently assessed in both treatment arms using prespecified treatment-specific rating instruments.

The trial will initially enroll 30 participants, with 15 participants per treatment arm. An interim analysis and prespecified adaptive sample-size procedure will determine continuation toward a planned final analyzed sample of 60 participants, with 30 participants per arm, unless a prespecified stopping criterion is met.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Astana
      • Astana, Astana, Kazakhstan, 010000
        • Central Painhunting Office
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • PHQ-9 score of 9 or greater at screening.
  • At least one adverse life event within the prior 24 months, documented using the Life Events Threshold (LTE) instrument.
  • Resident of Kazakhstan.
  • Fluent in Russian.
  • Capacity to provide written informed consent.
  • Willing to attend at least six sessions within the protocol treatment schedule.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active suicidal ideation requiring immediate referral, defined as PHQ-9 item 9 score of 3 or clinical judgment of imminent risk.
  • Active psychosis or mania.
  • Active substance use disorder meeting DSM criteria.
  • Current psychotherapy with another provider.
  • Initiation of pharmacotherapy within the prior four weeks.
  • Pre-existing stable antidepressant monotherapy unchanged for eight weeks or longer is permitted.
  • Inability to provide informed consent in Russian.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Painhunting Therapy
Participants assigned to this arm will receive Painhunting Therapy, a structured psychotherapeutic intervention. The intended treatment dose is three sessions. Early stopping after session 2 is permitted only when prespecified remission criteria are met. Additional sessions, up to a maximum of six, may be provided according to prespecified symptom-based and clinical criteria.
Painhunting Therapy is a structured psychotherapeutic intervention targeting event-related distress through a standardized treatment protocol. The intended treatment dose is three sessions. Early stopping after session 2 is permitted only when prespecified remission criteria are met. Additional sessions, up to a maximum of six, may be provided according to prespecified symptom-based and clinical criteria.
Active Comparator: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
Participants assigned to this arm will receive manualized Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for depression, delivered over 6 to 8 sessions at approximately twice-weekly frequency. Treatment will be delivered by independent CBT practitioners who are not affiliated with the Painhunting practice or training programme.
Manualized Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for depression delivered over 6 to 8 sessions at approximately twice-weekly frequency. Treatment is delivered by independent CBT practitioners who meet prespecified training and competence requirements and are not affiliated with the Painhunting practice or training programme.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressive symptom severity measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 6 weeks post-randomization
Depressive symptom severity will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 consists of 9 items, each scored from 0 to 3, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms. The primary comparison between treatment groups will evaluate PHQ-9 scores at six weeks post-randomization, adjusting for baseline PHQ-9.
6 weeks post-randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Depressive symptom severity measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: 2 weeks and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Depressive symptom severity will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 consists of 9 items scored from 0 to 3, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms.
2 weeks and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Anxiety symptom severity measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Anxiety symptom severity will be assessed using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). The scale consists of 7 items scored from 0 to 3, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety symptoms.
Baseline, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Event-related distress measured by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Event-related distress will be assessed using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R). The instrument contains 22 items rated from 0 to 4. Higher scores indicate greater severity of event-related distress.
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Complicated grief symptoms measured by the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Complicated grief symptoms will be assessed using the Inventory of Complicated Grief (ICG) only among participants in the prespecified bereavement/loss stratum, defined as participants whose qualifying index event is the death of a significant other. Participants outside this stratum will not complete the ICG. Higher scores indicate greater severity of complicated grief symptoms.
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Functional impairment measured by the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO-DAS 2.0)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 weeks, and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Functional impairment will be assessed using the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHO-DAS 2.0). Higher scores indicate greater disability and functional impairment.
Baseline, 6 weeks, and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Treatment response based on PHQ-9
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Treatment response is defined as a reduction of 50% or greater in PHQ-9 score from baseline. The proportion of participants meeting the response criterion will be assessed by treatment arm.
6 weeks and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Remission based on PHQ-9
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Remission is defined as a PHQ-9 score below 5. The proportion of participants meeting the remission criterion will be assessed by treatment arm.
6 weeks and 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Number of treatment sessions received
Time Frame: From treatment initiation through completion of the active treatment period, approximately 4 weeks
The total number of treatment sessions received by each participant during the active treatment period will be recorded and summarized by treatment arm.
From treatment initiation through completion of the active treatment period, approximately 4 weeks
Treatment and study dropout rate
Time Frame: Through 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
The proportion of participants who discontinue treatment or study participation will be recorded and summarized by treatment arm and assessment timepoint.
Through 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
Protocol deviation rate
Time Frame: Through 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization
The number and proportion of participants with documented protocol deviations will be summarized by treatment arm.
Through 10 to 12 weeks post-randomization

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Painhunting mechanism recognition across treatment sessions
Time Frame: Across Painhunting treatment sessions, approximately 2 to 4 weeks
Prespecified Painhunting treatment mechanisms will be assessed across sessions in participants assigned to the Painhunting arm using the Painhunting mechanism recognition checklist. A stratified sample of 20% of Painhunting session recordings will be independently rated to triangulate self-report against rater-coded mechanism content.
Across Painhunting treatment sessions, approximately 2 to 4 weeks
Therapeutic alliance measured by the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form
Time Frame: Session 2 and Session 4 (Week 1 and Week 2)
Therapeutic alliance will be assessed in both treatment arms using the Working Alliance Inventory - Short Form (WAI-SF). The WAI-SF consists of 12 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale, yielding a total score ranging from 12 to 84. Higher scores indicate a stronger therapeutic alliance.
Session 2 and Session 4 (Week 1 and Week 2)
Per-session trajectory of depressive symptoms measured by PHQ-9
Time Frame: 1 to 2 days after each treatment session during the active treatment period (Week 1-3)
Depressive symptoms will be assessed 1 to 2 days after each treatment session using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The PHQ-9 consists of 9 items, each scored from 0 to 3, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate greater severity of depressive symptoms. Scores will be collected after each treatment session in both treatment arms to characterize session-level symptom trajectories and dose-response patterns.
1 to 2 days after each treatment session during the active treatment period (Week 1-3)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 28, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 31, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data underlying the results reported in the primary publication, together with analysis scripts, will be made publicly available on the Open Science Framework (OSF).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data and supporting materials will become available concurrent with publication of the primary study results and will remain available indefinitely.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

De-identified data and supporting materials will be publicly available through the Open Science Framework (OSF).

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe