- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07738835
Early Addiction Care Pathway After Acute Drug Intoxication in Emergency Departments (IPAIS)
Interventions Précoces en Addictologie Dans le Cadre Des Urgences Par Intoxications aiguës Aux Stupéfiants (IPAIS)
Acute intoxication with psychoactive substances represents a major public health issue and a frequent reason for emergency department (ED) visits. Beyond the acute medical management of intoxication, one of the main challenges remains the continuity of addiction care after discharge. Many patients disengage rapidly from follow-up services, leading to recurrent intoxication episodes, repeated ED admissions, and increased morbidity.
The IPAIS study (Interventions Précoces en Addictologie dans le cadre des urgences par Intoxications aiguës aux Stupéfiants) is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial designed to evaluate whether an enhanced early addiction care pathway improves retention in addiction treatment among patients admitted to emergency departments for acute intoxication involving at least one illicit psychoactive substance (excluding isolated alcohol intoxication).
All participants will receive an early addiction consultation within 24 to 72 hours following the acute event. In the experimental group, this consultation will be combined with a structured and standardized feedback session on toxicological analysis results and a proactive follow-up strategy including scheduled telephone contacts over a 6-month period. The control group will receive early addiction consultation according to usual care procedures, without the structured feedback and standardized follow-up program implemented in the experimental arm.
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the enhanced intervention improves retention in the addiction care pathway at 6 months after inclusion. Retention is defined as sustained engagement in addiction care, operationalized as at least one addiction-related consultation per month and/or regular telephone-based addiction follow-up over the 6-month period.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Acute intoxication with psychoactive substances is a major public health issue and a frequent reason for emergency department visits. Beyond the acute medical management of intoxication, a key challenge remains ensuring continuity of addiction care after discharge. Many patients quickly disengage from follow-up services, leading to recurrent episodes of intoxication, repeated emergency department admissions, and increased morbidity.
The IPAIS study (Early Addiction Interventions in Emergency Settings for Acute Intoxication with Illicit Drugs) is a multicenter, randomized, parallel-group, open-label clinical trial designed to evaluate whether an enhanced early addiction care pathway improves retention in addiction treatment among patients admitted to the emergency department for acute intoxication involving at least one illicit psychoactive substance (excluding isolated alcohol intoxication).
All participants will receive an early addiction consultation within 24 to 72 hours of the acute event. In the experimental group, this consultation will be combined with a structured, standardized feedback session regarding toxicology results and a proactive follow-up strategy involving scheduled telephone contacts over a 6-month period. The control group will receive an early addiction consultation according to standard care procedures, without the structured feedback and standardized follow-up program implemented in the experimental group.
The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the enhanced intervention improves retention in the addiction care pathway 6 months after enrollment. Retention is defined as sustained engagement in addiction care, operationalized as at least one addiction-related consultation per month and/or regular telephone follow-up over the 6-month period.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: BISSERY Anne
- Phone Number: 0 1 42 16 24 32
- Email: anne.bissery@aphp.fr
Study Locations
-
-
-
Paris, France, 75012
- Hôpital Saint Antoine
-
Contact:
- PANIZZI Vincent, MD
- Email: vincent.panizzi@aphp.fr
-
Paris, France, 75020
- Hôpital Tenon
-
Paris, France
- Hôpital Kremlin Bicêtre
-
Contact:
- SAUNIER Marc, MD
- Email: eric.saunier@aphp.fr
-
Paris, France, 75013
- Unité d'Addictologie Hospitalière/ELSA Hôpital Pitié Salpêtrière
-
Contact:
- NGUYEN An Hung, MD
- Phone Number: 01 42 17 85 16
- Email: an-hung.nguyen@aphp.fr
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients admitted and/or hospitalized in the emergency department or intensive care unit following acute poisoning must:
- Be over 18 years of age
- Have consumed at least one identifiable non-alcoholic narcotic, including psychoactive substances detected by standard urine drug screening (dipstick)
- Have a history of using at least one non-alcoholic psychoactive substance within the last 30 days
- Speak and understand French
- Have at least 1 cm of hair
- Be covered by a social security scheme (member or dependent)
- Be the patient or a relative/close contact/trusted person who has been informed about the study and has given their informed consent (or completed the emergency inclusion procedure)
- Have a mobile phone number or email address to be contacted
Exclusion Criteria:
- Acute suicidal crisis requiring priority psychiatric care
- Acute alcohol intoxication (after confirmation by urine drug screening in the Emergency Department)
- Acute episode related to exclusive opiate use, requiring opiate substitution therapy
- Prolonged hospitalization in intensive care or follow-up care due to complications of alcohol intoxication beyond 8 days after the initial addiction assessment
- Protected patient: under a valid legal guardianship, curatorship, or conservatorship
- Patient requiring involuntary psychiatric hospitalization
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Structured early addiction care
Participants randomized to the experimental arm receive a structured, protocol-based early addiction care pathway initiated during hospitalization for acute intoxication.
The intervention includes a standardized addiction assessment, scheduled addiction follow-up visits (1-2 contacts per month) over a 6-month period, structured harm reduction evaluation, and systematic feedback of biological toxicology results, including hair analysis, at predefined timepoints (Month 1, Month 3, Month 4, and Month 6).
Follow-up contacts may include in-person consultations and protocolized telephone interviews delivered by addiction specialists or trained psychologists.
|
The intervention consists of a structured early addiction care program initiated during hospitalization for acute psychoactive substance intoxication. It includes:
The intervention aims to enhance patient engagement, insight into substance use patterns, and long-term retention in addiction care. |
|
Other: Not structured early addiction care
Participants randomized to the control group receive addiction follow-up with randomized interviews and/or workshops, at least once a month, for a duration of 6 months or as requested by the patient, and harm reduction assessments at months 1, 3, 4, and 6, disregarding toxicology results.
Follow-up contacts may include in-person consultations and structured telephone interviews conducted by trained substance abusers or psychologists.
|
The intervention consists of a streamlined consultation with the implementation of addiction follow-up, possibly via video and telephone, and "treatment as usual" with routine toxicology tests typically used in most emergency departments. This program includes:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Retention in addiction care at 6 months
Time Frame: 6 months after randomization
|
Proportion of randomized participants who are still actively engaged in a structured addiction care pathway 6 months after randomization. Retention is defined as attendance at ≥1 scheduled addiction care contact (in-person visit, structured psychological session, or protocol-defined telephone follow-up) within the predefined follow-up window around Month 6 (±30 days), without documented loss to follow-up or withdrawal from addiction care. |
6 months after randomization
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of recurrent acute intoxication episodes.
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months after randomization
|
Proportion of randomized participants experiencing at least one new episode of acute intoxication requiring emergency department visit or hospitalization within 3 months and within 6 months after randomization.
A recurrent acute intoxication episode is defined as a documented presentation to an emergency department or hospital admission for acute poisoning related to new psychoactive substances (NPS) or other psychoactive drugs occurring after the index episode that led to study inclusion.
Data will be collected through hospital medical records review and structured follow-up interviews.
Separate proportions will be calculated at 3 months and 6 months.
|
3 months and 6 months after randomization
|
|
Change in Anxiety and depression score
Time Frame: Randomisation (Day 7) and Month 1; relapse assessed up to 6 months
|
Assenssment of Anxiety and depression using the HADS scale : Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, between baseline and 6 months. Anxiety subscale from 0 to 21 Depression subscale from 0 to 21 A higher score indicates a more severe condition (worse result). |
Randomisation (Day 7) and Month 1; relapse assessed up to 6 months
|
|
Change in health-related quality score
Time Frame: Randomisation (Day 7) and Month 1; relapse assessed up to 6 months
|
Assenssment of health-related quality usign the Short Form-36 (SF-36), between baseline and 6 months.
SF-36 ranging from 0 to 100.
A higher score indicates a better quality of life (better outcome)
|
Randomisation (Day 7) and Month 1; relapse assessed up to 6 months
|
|
Change in severity of sleep disorders score
Time Frame: Randomisation (Day 7) and Month 1; relapse assessed up to 6 months
|
Assessment of sleep disorders usign the Insomnia Severity Index scale (ISI) between baseline and 6 months, rangin from 0 to 28.
A higher score indicates more severe insomnia.
|
Randomisation (Day 7) and Month 1; relapse assessed up to 6 months
|
|
Change in Need for thrills score
Time Frame: Randomisation (Day 7) and Month 1; relapse assessed up to 6 months
|
Assenssment of the need for thrills using the Sensation Seeking Scale (SSS),between baseline and 6 months, raging from 0 to 40 (for the short version). A higher score indicates a more pronounced need for sensation. |
Randomisation (Day 7) and Month 1; relapse assessed up to 6 months
|
|
Change in drug use practices : weekly Number of Drug Use Sessions
Time Frame: From baseline (inclusion) to 6 months; assessed at Month 1 (M1), Month 3 (M3), Month 4 (M4), and Month 6 (M6)
|
Evolution of individual weekly number of substance use sessions (sessions/week) - all substances combined or by substance, as reported by the participant -, between baseline and 6 months (at M1, M3, M4, and M6), using the CANDITOX questionnaire (Assessment of the infectious risks related to intravenous drug use) -not validated, but routinely used in clinical practice for evaluating patients with injection drug use -, administered at baseline (by day 7 at the latest). A decrease in the number of sessions may indicate an improvement. Analyses will focus on within-participant change between baseline and Month 6, with intermediate assessments used to describe trajectories over follow-up. |
From baseline (inclusion) to 6 months; assessed at Month 1 (M1), Month 3 (M3), Month 4 (M4), and Month 6 (M6)
|
|
Change in drug use practices : daily quantity consumed
Time Frame: From baseline (inclusion) to 6 months; assessed at Month 1 (M1), Month 3 (M3), Month 4 (M4), and Month 6 (M6)
|
Evolution in Daily Quantity of Drug Consumed (grams/day), between baseline and 6 months (at M1, M3, M4, and M6), using the CANDITOX questionnaire (Assessment of the infectious risks related to intravenous drug use) -not validated, but routinely used in clinical practice for evaluating patients with injection drug use -, administered at baseline (by day 7 at the latest). A decrease in the number of sessions may indicate an improvement. Analyses will focus on within-participant change between baseline and Month 6, with intermediate assessments used to describe trajectories over follow-up. |
From baseline (inclusion) to 6 months; assessed at Month 1 (M1), Month 3 (M3), Month 4 (M4), and Month 6 (M6)
|
|
Change in the frequency and/or occurrence of drug-related complications
Time Frame: From baseline (inclusion) to 6 months; assessed at Month 1 (M1), Month 3 (M3), Month 4 (M4), and Month 6 (M6)
|
Evolution of associated complications associated with drug use between baseline and 6 months (at M1, M3, M4, and M6), using the CANDITOX questionnaire ((Assessment of the infectious risks related to intravenous drug use) -not validated, but routinely used in clinical practice for evaluating patients with injection drug use -, administered at baseline (by day 7 at the latest). A decrease in the total number of complications indicates an improvement. |
From baseline (inclusion) to 6 months; assessed at Month 1 (M1), Month 3 (M3), Month 4 (M4), and Month 6 (M6)
|
|
Change in harm reduction knowledge and implementation score
Time Frame: Month 1 (baseline for knowledge assessment), Month 3, and Month 6
|
Assessment of participants' knowledge and implementation of harm reduction strategies related to psychoactive substance use. Knowledge will be evaluated using a structured harm reduction questionnaire. The primary metric will be the change in total knowledge score over time. Secondary analyses will assess the proportion of participants reporting implementation of harm reduction practices between assessments. |
Month 1 (baseline for knowledge assessment), Month 3, and Month 6
|
|
Number of Declarations Submitted to the Regional Health Agency (ARS)
Time Frame: From baseline (Day 0) to Month 6
|
Number of formal notifications and toxicological reports related to newly identified or atypical psychoactive substances generated by the study team during the 6-month study period. Notifications are based on biological samples (urine, blood, hair) and/or powder analyses collected during the study and reported using the SINTES questionnaire framework. The outcome will be reported as a cumulative count over the 6-month follow-up period. |
From baseline (Day 0) to Month 6
|
|
Number of Addiction-Vigilance Notifications Transmitted to the French Addictovigilance Network (CEIP)
Time Frame: From baseline (Day 0) to Month 6
|
Number of Addiction-Vigilance Notifications Transmitted to the French Addictovigilance generated by the study team during the 6-month study period. Notifications are based on biological samples (urine, blood, hair) and/or powder analyses collected during the study and reported using the SINTES questionnaire framework. The outcome will be reported as a cumulative count over the 6-month follow-up period. |
From baseline (Day 0) to Month 6
|
|
Number of Analytical Results Transmitted to the OFDT
Time Frame: From baseline (Day 0) to Month 6
|
Number of Analytical Results Transmitted to the French Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction (OFDT) specifically within the TREND-SINTES surveillance system (Île-de-France). Notifications are based on biological samples (urine, blood, hair) and/or powder analyses collected during the study and reported using the SINTES questionnaire framework. The outcome will be reported as a cumulative count over the 6-month follow-up period. |
From baseline (Day 0) to Month 6
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: NGUYEN An Hung, Pitié Salpétrière
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- APHP210994
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.