Development and Dissemination of Exercise Prescription and Intervention for Cancer Populations

A Program for the Development and Dissemination of Exercise Prescription and Intervention for Cancer Populations

The purpose of this study is to establish a safe and systematic exercise assessment and prescription program for cancer survivors. It can be challenging for cancer patients to start exercising due to various health risks, so this study aims to create a personalized and easily reproducible workflow. The study will include cancer patients who have completed their primary curative treatments at least 2 months ago.

Participants will undergo a comprehensive health and fitness evaluation led by a study physician. This evaluation includes:

  • A review of medical history and cardiovascular risk.
  • Functional physical fitness tests.
  • Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) to carefully evaluate heart and lung function during physical exertion.
  • A musculoskeletal ultrasound, if deemed necessary. Based on these combined results, the medical team will determine each participant's exercise risk level and design a personalized exercise prescription. Participants will then be assigned to an appropriate and safe exercise setting.

To ensure safety and maximize health benefits, the study includes a continuous tracking system. Participants will report their exercise progress every 4 weeks and undergo a full reassessment every 3 months. The medical team will use this feedback to safely adjust the participant's risk level and exercise prescription over time.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is designed as a single-arm, open-label interventional research project. The primary objective is to establish and implement a systematic, institution-based exercise prescription protocol tailored for cancer survivors.

The clinical pathway initiates with patient referral and preliminary screening conducted by collaborating physicians or case managers. Eligible participants then undergo a physiatrist-led, multi-faceted pre-exercise evaluation. This comprehensive assessment integrates a medical history review, cardiovascular risk profiling, functional physical fitness testing, and Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET). Additionally, musculoskeletal ultrasound examinations are performed when deemed clinically necessary to objectively evaluate the participant's physical condition.

Based on the integrated assessment results, physiatrists stratify participants into high, moderate, or low exercise risk categories. Individualized exercise prescriptions are then formulated according to the assigned risk level, detailing the required exercise modalities-including aerobic exercise, resistance training, and flexibility exercises-as well as the specific intensity, frequency, duration, and safety precautions.

During the implementation phase, participants execute the prescribed exercise program while utilizing standardized weekly training logs to record their progress. The protocol incorporates an adverse event reporting and data feedback mechanism to ensure continuous safety monitoring and intervention quality. To maintain a dynamic care model, clinical data collection and comprehensive reassessments occur at three distinct time points: baseline (T0), the third month of the intervention (T1), and the sixth month of the intervention (T2). These periodic three-month re-evaluations facilitate the continuous adjustment of both the risk stratification and the personalized exercise prescription, ensuring the intervention remains safe, accurate, and effective.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

150

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Taiwan
      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Taiwan, 807
        • Recruiting
        • Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Aged 18 to 80 years.
  2. Cancer Cohorts: Pathologically confirmed diagnosis of AJCC TNM stage I-III, and having completed curative-intent treatment (including surgery ± adjuvant chemotherapy/radiotherapy, etc) for at least 2 months.
  3. Cancer cohort must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status score of 0-2.
  4. Ability to comply with weekly structured exercise training (3-4 professionally supervised sessions per week) and willingness to accept telephone follow-ups or report exercise status via exercise logs/wearable devices.
  5. Self-reported failure to meet the following physical activity guidelines within the past 3 months: at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise per week OR at least 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity aerobic exercise per week; AND no regular resistance training (≥ 2 sessions per week) within the past 3 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Cardiovascular instability: History of acute coronary syndrome (ACS), myocardial infarction (MI), acute exacerbation of heart failure, or hospitalization for heart failure within the past 3 months; unstable angina; uncontrolled arrhythmia; or uncontrolled hypertension (resting blood pressure > 180/110 mmHg).
  2. Hypoxemia: Resting oxygen saturation (SpO2) < 90%.
  3. Metabolic instability: Severe hypoglycemic event or diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) within the past 3 months.
  4. Musculoskeletal or neurological risks: Unstable bone metastasis or bone metastasis with a high risk of fracture; recent major fracture or orthopedic surgery where weight-bearing is not yet permitted; or other severe neuromuscular diseases that compromise the safety of exercise.
  5. Hematological risks: Thrombocytopenia (Platelet count < 50,000/μL), severe anemia (Hemoglobin [Hb] < 8 g/dL), or neutropenia (Absolute Neutrophil Count [ANC] < 1,000/μL).
  6. Deemed unsuitable for exercise intervention as determined by clinical assessment from the attending physician or study investigator.
  7. Concurrent participation in other formal exercise or weight-loss intervention programs.
  8. Inability to comprehend or complete the informed consent form, or inability to comply with the study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
structured exercise intervention group

This study utilizes a "Personalized Precision Exercise Training Program." Following baseline Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) and comprehensive fitness assessments, physicians prescribe individualized regimens adhering to ACSM guidelines for cancer survivors, applying the FITT principle:

  • Aerobic Exercise: 3-5 days/week at moderate intensity, tailored to treatment tolerance. ≥30 mins/session, flexibly adjusted for treatment side effects. Focuses on rhythmic activities (walking, cycling).
  • Resistance Training: 2-3 days/week (48h rest per muscle group) at 60-80% 1-RM or a load for 6-15 reps. Employs progressive overload without requiring muscular failure. Involves 8-10 major muscle groups; ≥1 set/exercise, ≥6 reps/set, with ≥60s rest between sets. Modalities adapt to patient status.
  • Flexibility Training: ≥2-3 days/week (up to daily). Static stretches (10-30s hold, 2-4 reps, stretching to mild discomfort but avoiding pain) covering all major muscles.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Dominant Handgrip Strength Test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
The participant is evaluated in a seated or standing position with the shoulder adducted, the elbow flexed at approximately 90 degrees, and the forearm and wrist in a neutral position. Using a calibrated handgrip dynamometer, the participant performs a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) with the dominant hand for approximately 3 seconds. The test is repeated 3 times with at least a 30-second rest interval between trials. The highest value obtained from the three trials is recorded as the final result.
Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
30-Second Arm Curl Test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
The participant sits in a chair with their back straight and feet flat on the floor, holding a standard dumbbell in the dominant hand (8 lbs / 3.63 kg for males; 5 lbs / 2.27 kg for females). The participant performs repeated full elbow flexion and extension movements over a 30-second period while maintaining shoulder stability. The total number of correctly completed repetitions within the full range of motion is recorded.
Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
30-Second Chair Stand Test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
Using a standard-height chair without armrests, the participant sits with arms crossed over the chest and their back resting against the backrest. Upon the start signal, the participant repeatedly rises to a full standing position and returns to a fully seated position within a 30-second timeframe. The total number of completed stands is recorded.
Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
Single-Leg Stance Test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
The participant places both hands on their hips and stands on the dominant leg with the contralateral leg lifted off the floor. Timing commences with the participant's eyes open and focused straight ahead, and ceases when any of the following compensatory movements occur: the arms are moved from the hips, the lifted leg moves (toward or away from the stance leg, or touches the floor), the stance foot shifts or lifts, or a loss of balance is observed. The test is repeated 3 times with at least a 30-second rest interval between trials. The average duration of the three trials is recorded as the final result.
Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
6-Minute Walk Distance
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
This outcome measures the maximal distance a participant can travel in 6 minutes on a hard, flat surface. The total distance is recorded in meters (m). Higher values indicate better cardiopulmonary endurance and functional mobility.
Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
Peak Oxygen Consumption (Peak VO2)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
Peak oxygen consumption (Peak VO2) is determined through Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET). It represents the highest rate of oxygen uptake achieved by the participant during the exercise test. The results are measured and reported in milliliters per kilogram per minute (mL/kg/min).
Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
Peak Work Rate
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
Peak work rate is determined through a symptom-limited Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing (CPET) using a progressive, incremental ramp protocol on a stationary cycle ergometer. It represents the maximum mechanical power output that the participant can achieve and sustain immediately prior to reaching volitional exhaustion or clinical symptom limitation. The result is measured and reported in Watts (W).
Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short Form-36 (SF-36)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
The SF-36 is a 36-item patient-reported questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life across eight domains: physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, and mental health. Each domain is scored on a scale from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate a more favorable health state and better quality of life.
Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
The FACT-G is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure health-related quality of life in patients receiving cancer therapy. It assesses four primary domains: Physical Well-Being (7 items), Social/Family Well-Being (7 items), Emotional Well-Being (6 items), and Functional Well-Being (7 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The subscale scores are summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 108, with higher scores representing a better quality of life and lower symptom burden.
Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)
The BFI is a 9-item questionnaire used to rapidly assess the severity of fatigue and its impact on daily functioning, particularly in cancer patients. Patients rate their fatigue severity (at its "worst," "usual," and "now" over the past 24 hours) and the extent to which fatigue interferes with six domains of daily life (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, and enjoyment of life). All items are scored on an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 (no fatigue / does not interfere) to 10 (as bad as you can imagine / completely interferes). A global fatigue score is calculated as the mean of all answered items, ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more severe fatigue and greater interference with daily life.
Pre-intervention (T0), after 3 months of intervention (T1), and 6 months after intervention (T2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 12, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 7, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 3, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

There is no plan to share individual participant data (IPD) in order to maintain participant privacy and confidentiality

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe