Digital Therapeutics for Social Cognitive Function in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder

August 19, 2026 updated by: Jung-Seok Choi, Samsung Medical Center

A Prospective, Randomized Parallel, Single Institution, Researcher-led Clinical Trial on the Effect of Improving Social Cognitive Function by Using Digital Therapy Devices in Patients With Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and preliminary effectiveness of a smartphone-based digital therapeutic application (AffectUs) for improving social cognition, particularly emotion processing and social cue perception, in individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

In this randomized controlled trial, participants will be assigned either to use AffectUs for 10 weeks in addition to treatment as usual or to receive psychoeducational materials and treatment as usual. Participants will complete assessments at baseline, week 5, week 10, and week 15 to evaluate social cognition, clinical outcomes, and safety.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Social cognition refers to the mental processes involved in perceiving, interpreting, and reasoning about others' emotions, intentions, and behaviors. Patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders consistently exhibit deficits in social cognition, which are associated with impaired social functioning and psychosocial outcomes and remain an important treatment target despite pharmacological management.

Although psychosocial interventions targeting social cognition have demonstrated beneficial effects, their implementation is often limited by the need for prolonged, therapist-led, in-person treatment. Recent studies suggest that digital interventions may improve accessibility while producing meaningful improvements in core social cognitive domains, particularly emotion processing and social cue perception.

Based on this evidence, AffectUs was developed as a smartphone-based digital therapeutic application that provides brief, repeated, remote training in emotion processing and social cue perception for individuals with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. This exploratory study evaluates the safety and preliminary effectiveness of AffectUs and aims to provide foundational evidence for future confirmatory clinical trials of digital therapeutics for schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Seoul, South Korea, 06351
        • Recruiting
        • Samsung Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

A. Inclusion Criteria

Participants must meet all of the following criteria:

  1. Adults aged 19 to 60 years.
  2. Meet the diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder according to DSM-5 and ICD-11.
  3. Have completed at least a middle school education.
  4. Be able to read and write in Korean.
  5. Be able to use a smartphone application independently.
  6. Provide written informed consent before participation.
  7. Receiving stable antipsychotic treatment (dose variation ≤30%) for at least 3 months before enrollment.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Current or past diagnosis of intellectual disability.
  2. Initiation of or current participation in structured psychosocial interventions (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy or social cognition training) within the past 3 months.
  3. Considered by the investigator to be at significant risk of suicide. 4, Pregnant or having a positive pregnancy test at screening.

5. Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make participation unsafe or interfere with study participation or data interpretation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Digital Therapeutic (AffectUs)
Participants use the AffectUs digital therapeutic application, which provides structured social cognition training focused on emotion processing and social cue perception, five times per week for approximately 10-15 minutes per session over a 10-week period (total 50 sessions), in addition to standard psychiatric care.
A smartphone-based digital therapeutic application (AffectUs) that provides structured social cognition training focused on emotion processing and social cue perception. Participants use the application five times per week for approximately 10-15 minutes per session over a 10-week period (total 50 sessions). The program is self-guided and delivered through a smartphone application.
Other Names:
  • Digital therapeutic application for social cognition training
Active Comparator: Active Control (Psychoeducation)
Participants receive standard psychiatric care in addition to weekly psychoeducational materials covering schizophrenia, medication adherence, stress management, sleep, self-care, and crisis coping strategies over a 10-week period.
Structured psychoeducational materials providing information about schizophrenia, medication adherence, stress management, and daily self-management. Participants receive one psychoeducational module per week over a 10-week period. The content is informational and does not include social cognition training components.
Other Names:
  • Schizophrenia management education

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Emotion Recognition Performance
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 10 (end of treatment)

hange from baseline to Week 10 in performance on the Korean Facial Emotion Identification Test (K-FEIT) and Korean Facial Emotion Differentiation Test (K-FEDT).

Performance is measured as the proportion of correct responses across all items, ranging from 0 to 1. Higher scores indicate greater accuracy and better emotion recognition performance.

Baseline and Week 10 (end of treatment)
Change in Social Cue Perception Performance
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 10 (end of treatment)
Change from baseline to Week 10 in performance on a video-based social cue perception task assessing the ability to interpret social situations and contextual social cues. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating better social cue perception performance.
Baseline and Week 10 (end of treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Emotion Recognition Performance (Week 5)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 5
Change from baseline to Week 5 in performance on the Korean Facial Emotion Identification Test (K-FEIT) and Korean Facial Emotion Differentiation Test (K-FEDT). Performance is measured as the proportion of correct responses across all items, ranging from 0 to 1. Higher scores indicate greater accuracy and better emotion recognition performance.
Baseline and Week 5
Change in Emotion Recognition Performance (Week 15)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 15
Change from baseline to Week 15 in performance on the Korean Facial Emotion Identification Test (K-FEIT) and Korean Facial Emotion Differentiation Test (K-FEDT). Performance is measured as the proportion of correct responses across all items, ranging from 0 to 1. Higher scores indicate greater accuracy and better emotion recognition performance.
Baseline and Week 15
Change in Social Cue Perception Performance (Week 5)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 5
Change from baseline to Week 5 in performance on a clinician-rated, video-based social cue perception task assessing the ability to interpret social situations and contextual social cues. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating better social cue perception performance.
Baseline and Week 5
Change in Social Cue Perception Performance (Week 15)
Time Frame: Baseline and Week 15
Change from baseline to Week 15 in performance on a clinician-rated, video-based social cue perception task assessing the ability to interpret social situations and contextual social cues. The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating better social cue perception
Baseline and Week 15
Change in Social Functioning
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change from baseline in social functioning as measured by the Social and Occupational Functioning Assessment Scale (SOFAS), a clinician-rated scale. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better social functioning.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change in Schizophrenia Symptom Severity
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change from baseline in total and subscale scores on the Korean version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (K-PANSS). The Positive and Negative subscale scores each range from 7 to 49, the General Psychopathology subscale score ranges from 16 to 112, and the total score ranges from 30 to 210. Higher scores indicate greater schizophrenia symptom severity.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change in Emotional Intelligence
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change from baseline in emotional intelligence as measured by the Emotional Intelligence Diagnostic Test. The total score ranges from 50 to 250, with higher scores indicating better emotional intelligence.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change from baseline in quality of life as measured by the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF). The WHOQOL-BREF includes four domain scores: Physical Health, Psychological, Social Relationships, and Environment. Each domain score is transformed to a scale ranging from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Two additional single items assess overall quality of life and satisfaction with general health, each ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating better overall quality of life and greater satisfaction with health, respectively.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change in Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change from baseline in depressive symptom severity as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). The total score ranges from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change in Anxiety Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change from baseline in anxiety symptom severity as measured by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7). The total score ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change in Perceived Stress
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change from baseline in perceived stress as measured by the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10). The total score ranges from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change in Resilience
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
It's not strictly necessary just to satisfy the reviewer's request, but it prevents ambiguity because someone seeing a 6-item scale might otherwise expect the possible score to be 6-30. Stating that the mean score ranges from 1 to 5 makes it immediately clear why the reported range is 1-5.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change in Self-Esteem
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change from baseline in self-esteem as measured by the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (R-SES). The total score ranges from 10 to 40, with higher scores indicating higher self-esteem.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change in Insight
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change from baseline in insight as measured by the Birchwood Insight Scale (BIS). The total score ranges from 0 to 16, with higher scores indicating better insight.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change in Disability and Functioning
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15
Change from baseline in disability and functioning as measured by the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0), 36-item version. Using the complex scoring method, the summary score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater disability and functional impairment.
Baseline, Week 10, and Week 15

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Adherence
Time Frame: Week 1 to Week 10
Treatment adherence will be assessed based on AffectUs training completion during the 10-week intervention. The training completion rate will be calculated as the percentage of prescribed training sessions completed out of 50 total sessions, ranging from 0% to 100%, with higher percentages indicating greater treatment adherence.
Week 1 to Week 10
User Satisfaction With AffectUs
Time Frame: Week 5 and Week 10
User satisfaction with the AffectUs program assessed using a single-item satisfaction question in the digital therapeutic group. The score ranges from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction.
Week 5 and Week 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jung-Seok Choi, M.D., Samsung Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 4, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 4, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SMC IRB_2026-04-190
  • HR21C0885 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe