The Necessity of Surgery in Patients With mGC Achieving Radiological Response After Conversion Therapy (ESMGC)

August 5, 2026 updated by: Dazhi Xu, Fudan University

Phase II Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Necessity of Surgery in Patients With Advanced Metastatic Gastric Cancer Achieving Radiological Response After Conversion Therapy

The core of this study lies in directly addressing the most pressing clinical uncertainty in the current field: For patients with advanced metastatic gastric cancer who have achieved significant radiological remission after conversion therapy, should the addition of radical surgical intervention on top of the best medical treatment bring clear survival benefits to these patients? Answering this question is of extreme importance and urgency, directly affecting the treatment decisions, quality of life, and survival outcomes of a large number of patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The innovation and scientific nature of this study lie in its adoption of a multi-center, randomized controlled Phase II study design for the first time. It directly compares the efficacy differences between "surgery + postoperative adjuvant therapy" and "simple continuation of medical treatment" for this specific population, aiming to eliminate selection bias and confirm the causal relationship. We strictly limited the enrolled population to those with "significant imaging remission and technically resectable at R0 level" by MDT assessment, ensuring the homogeneity of the research subjects and the specificity of the questions. The primary research endpoint was set as progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), R0 resection rate, quality of life (QoL), and treatment-related toxic side effects, allowing for a comprehensive evaluation.

Carrying out this study has significant scientific and clinical value. Its results will provide Level 1 evidence-based medical evidence for the treatment strategy of this population. If the surgical group shows superiority, it will firmly establish the position of surgery and promote it to become the standard treatment; if the results are negative (equivalence between the two groups or the surgical group is inferior), it will avoid a large number of patients suffering from unnecessary surgical trauma, promoting the treatment model to return to a core of systematic treatment, thereby changing global clinical guidelines. At the same time, the study has important health economics significance, helping to allocate limited medical resources to truly benefit patients. Through exploratory research on biological specimens, it can also deepen the understanding of the biological behavior of advanced gastric cancer and provide clues for more precise patient screening in the future.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

126

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Xu Dazhi Director of Gastric Surgery Department, Doctoral candidate
  • Phone Number: +8618121299796
  • Email: xudzh@shca.org.cn

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200032
        • Recruiting
        • Fudan University Cancer Hospital
        • Contact:
          • Weijing Zhang
          • Phone Number: +86 21 3477 8299

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age and Informed Consent: The age range is 18 to 75 years (inclusive), and the participant must voluntarily participate in this study and sign the patient informed consent approved by the ethics committee.
  2. Pathological Diagnosis: Gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma confirmed by histological or cytological examination.
  3. Disease Staging: Newly diagnosed, unresectable stage IV disease (according to the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system), confirmed by the multidisciplinary team (MDT) of the research center to be unable to undergo radical surgical resection. The types of metastasis include but are not limited to: unresectable distant lymph node metastasis (such as beyond the abdominal aorta trunk, supraclavicular lymph nodes, etc.); distant organ metastasis (such as liver, lungs, peritoneum, ovaries, etc.).
  4. Conversion Therapy and Efficacy:

    1. Has received 4-6 cycles of first-line standard conversion therapy. The treatment plan should be based on the latest clinical guidelines and molecular typing (such as fluorouracil/platinum double or triple drug chemotherapy, combined with anti-HER2 treatment (for HER2-positive patients) or immune checkpoint inhibitors (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, such as when CPS ≥ 5 or MSI-H, etc.).
    2. After conversion therapy, according to the RECIST 1.1 standard, confirmed by the independent imaging assessment committee (IRC) or at least two senior radiologists, the efficacy reaches complete response (CR) or partial response (PR).
  5. Surgical Feasibility Assessment: Re-evaluated by the MDT of the research center (must include senior gastrointestinal surgeons, oncologists, and radiologists), it is considered that all known lesions (primary and metastatic lesions) can be technically achieved R0 resection, and the patient is expected to be safely and tolerably able to undergo surgery.
  6. Physical Condition: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score (PS) of 0 or 1.
  7. Good Organ Function (measured within 14 days before randomization), meeting the following laboratory test value standards:

    1. Hematological System:

      Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 × 10⁹/L Platelet count (PLT) ≥ 100 × 10⁹/L Hemoglobin (Hb) ≥ 90 g/L

    2. Liver Function:

      Serum total bilirubin (TBIL) ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ≤ 2.5 × ULN (if liver metastasis, then ≤ 5 × ULN)

    3. Renal Function:

    Serum creatinine (Cr) ≤ 1.5 × ULN, or creatinine clearance rate (Ccr) ≥ 50 mL/min (Cockcroft-Gault formula)

  8. Female patients of childbearing age must have a negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days before randomization, and all patients (regardless of gender) must agree to take effective contraceptive measures during the study and within 6 months after treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pathological type: Other pathological types, such as squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), etc.
  2. Treatment and efficacy:

    1. During the conversion therapy, disease progression (PD) was confirmed after assessment.
    2. Previously received systemic anti-tumor treatment for advanced gastric cancer (except for conversion therapy).
    3. Previously received radical radiotherapy for the stomach or metastatic lesions.
  3. Surgical contraindications:

    1. According to MDT assessment, there are residual lesions that cannot be surgically removed (such as diffuse peritoneal metastasis that cannot achieve satisfactory tumor reduction, extensive liver metastasis that cannot preserve sufficient functional liver tissue, etc.).
    2. There are severe internal medical comorbidities that significantly affect surgical safety, and the anesthesiology and surgical physicians have evaluated that the surgical risk is extremely high, for example:

    Uncontrolled heart failure (NYHA cardiac function class III-IV), unstable angina or myocardial infarction within 6 months.

    Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or other severe respiratory diseases, which are expected to be intolerant to general anesthesia.

    Uncontrollable severe infection.

  4. Past and coexisting disease history:

    1. In the past 5 years, had other active malignant tumors, except for cured skin basal cell carcinoma, cervical carcinoma in situ, etc.
    2. Had any uncontrolled severe clinical problems (such as severe mental or neurological diseases) that affected the compliance with the protocol or interfered with the interpretation of the research results.
  5. Laboratory test abnormalities: Any serious and uncontrolled laboratory test abnormalities were found. The investigator considered that participating in this study would bring significant risks.
  6. Pregnancy and lactation: Pregnant or lactating women.
  7. Other: Known to have a severe allergic history to any drugs (chemotherapy drugs, targeted drugs, immunotherapies, anesthetics, etc.) used in the study protocol. The investigator believed that there were any other situations that were not suitable for participating in this clinical study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: The surgical group
Surgical radical resection (primary lesion + metastatic lesion) + postoperative adjuvant therapy
Surgical radical resection (primary lesion + metastatic lesion)
Experimental: The non-surgical group
Without surgery, continue with the original medical treatment plan until the disease progresses or intolerable toxicity occurs.
Without surgery, continue with the original medical treatment plan until the disease progresses or intolerable toxicity occurs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-year PFS
Time Frame: 2 year
Two-year progression-free survival rate
2 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
2-year OS
Time Frame: 2 year
2 year Overall Survival
2 year
The R0 resection rate
Time Frame: 2 year
The R0 resection rate of surgery group
2 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2026

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ESMGC

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe