Aerobic, Resistance and Inspiratory Muscle Training in Adults With Severe Mental Disorder

August 12, 2026 updated by: Camilo López Sánchez, Universidad Pablo de Olavide

Effects of a 12-Week Supervised Multicomponent Exercise Intervention Combining Interval Aerobic Training, Resistance Training and Inspiratory Muscle Training on Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Muscular Strength, Respiratory Function, Body Composition, Adherence and Acceptability in Adults With Severe Mental Disorder: A Single-Arm Study

People with severe mental disorder, such as schizophrenia, bipolar disorder or major depression, tend to have poorer physical health and a shorter life expectancy than the general population. Exercise can help, but it is often difficult to keep up over time.

In this study, adults with severe mental disorder took part in a 12-week supervised exercise programme, with two sessions per week. Each session combined stationary cycling, strength exercises on machines, and training of the muscles used for breathing. The programme also included ongoing support and follow-up to help participants keep attending.

Fitness, strength, breathing function and body composition were measured before and after the programme. The researchers also recorded how many participants stayed until the end and how often they attended, and interviewed participants about their experience: what motivated them to join, what helped them continue, and what made it difficult.

The aim is to find out whether this kind of programme is feasible, safe and acceptable for people with severe mental illness, and what changes it produces in their physical health.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

Study design and setting

This is a single-arm, 12-week supervised exercise intervention conducted at the Centre for Sport and Physical Performance Research (CIRFD) of Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Seville, Spain. The setting is a university research facility rather than a clinical environment. Participants were recruited in collaboration with three mental health services of differing nature: a community social integration programme (Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Integración Social de Personas con Enfermedad Mental, FAISEM), a mental health day hospital (Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme), and a residential therapeutic community (Comunidad Terapéutica de Salud Mental El Tomillar). Participants continued their usual psychiatric treatment throughout the intervention and received no financial compensation.

Intervention structure

The programme consists of 24 sessions delivered twice weekly over 12 weeks. Each session lasts 45-60 minutes and combines three consecutive training blocks: interval aerobic training, resistance training, and inspiratory muscle training. Participants train in groups of up to eight. Each session is supervised by an exercise professional with more than two years of experience working with adults with severe mental illness, a research support technician holding a degree in Sport and Exercise Sciences, and two Sport and Exercise Sciences students. Training loads are adapted at every session to the physical and mental state of each participant.

Aerobic training

Aerobic training is performed on a cycle ergometer (Ergoselect 200K; Ergoline, Bitz, Germany) using a 20-minute interval protocol alternating 1 minute of high intensity with 1 minute of active recovery. Intensity is individualised from peak power output (PPO), determined by an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test performed at baseline and repeated at week 6 to readjust loads. During testing, intensity is increased progressively until the participant cannot maintain a pedalling cadence of 60-70 rpm; perceived exertion is recorded using the Borg 0-10 scale and cardiopulmonary variables are monitored with a gas analyser (Cosmed K5; Cosmed, Rome, Italy). Load progression is as follows: weeks 1-2 at 65% PPO, weeks 3-4 at 70%, weeks 5-6 at 75%, weeks 7-8 at 80%, weeks 9-10 at 85%, week 11 at 90%, and week 12 at 100% PPO. Recovery intervals are maintained at 30% PPO throughout. Participants sustain a cadence of 60-70 rpm and are monitored in real time by supervisors.

Resistance training

Resistance training consists of a circuit of digitally controlled machines (eGym, Stuttgart, Germany) comprising pec deck, chest press, seated row, shoulder press, lat pulldown, leg press and leg extension. Each session includes three complete circuits (approximately 20 minutes), with 20 seconds of transition between machines and 1 minute of rest between circuits. Loads are individualised through the maximal strength estimation integrated in the eGym system, assessed at baseline and reconfigured periodically. Estimation is performed on each machine using a gamified test in which the participant executes one repetition at maximal force on three occasions, with the highest value used to configure training. Periodisation follows three blocks: weeks 1-4 at 50-60% 1RM, weeks 5-8 at 55-65% 1RM, and weeks 9-12 at 60-70% 1RM, with 10-16 repetitions and a work-to-rest ratio progressing from 30:20 to 45:20 seconds. Technical execution is prioritised and muscular failure is avoided.

Inspiratory muscle training

Inspiratory muscle training is performed with a pressure threshold loading device (POWERbreathe Classic Medium Resistance; POWERbreathe International Ltd., UK), in standing position, consisting of 6 sets of 5 maximal-effort inspirations with complete expirations and 60 seconds of rest between sets. Loads are individualised from maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), measured with a portable mouth pressure meter (MicroRPM; Micro Medical Inc., Chatham, Kent, UK), with the highest of several maximal inspiratory efforts used to configure training. Progression is as follows: week 1 at 15% MIP, week 2 at 30%, week 3 at 35%, week 4 at 40%, weeks 5-6 at 45%, weeks 7-8 at 50%, weeks 9-10 at 55%, and weeks 11-12 at 60% MIP. MIP is reassessed at week 6 to adjust loads. In contrast to protocols commonly applied in other clinical populations, training frequency is set at two days per week to maximise initial tolerance and adherence in a population characterised by respiratory muscle deconditioning and reduced exercise capacity.

Adherence support strategies

Motivational strategies are integrated throughout the programme, grounded in Self-Determination Theory and classified according to the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1, with the aim of supporting the basic psychological needs of competence, autonomy and relatedness. These include: an individualised step challenge based on daily monitoring with activity wristbands (Xiaomi Mi Band 4) and weekly personalised step goals derived from a 10-day rolling window; weekly educational and motivational content delivered by instant messaging the day before each session; a mid-intervention peer support group meeting facilitated by staff acting solely as moderators; continuous bidirectional communication between professionals and participants; systematic positive feedback during sessions and remote contacts; advance planning through a fixed structure of schedules, locations and session duration; promotion of social support through the group format and collaboration with mental health services; intermediate fitness assessments to monitor progress and make gains visible; active follow-up after any absence through direct contact to identify barriers and offer support; continuous supervision by exercise professionals; and individualised, flexible adaptation of training according to clinical status and exercise response.

Assessment schedule

Assessments are conducted at baseline (two weeks before the intervention), at mid-intervention (week 6, to readjust training loads), and after completion of the 12-week programme. Semi-structured interviews exploring participants' experience of the programme are conducted at the end of the intervention with participants who completed the programme and with those who withdrew and could be contacted.

Reporting and methodological framework

The intervention was designed following the PADEX guideline for promoting exercise adherence in people with chronic conditions. Reporting of the intervention follows the Consensus on Exercise Reporting Template (CERT). Reporting of study findings follows the TREND statement for non-randomised evaluations and, for the qualitative component, the Reflexive Thematic Analysis Reporting Guidelines

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

49

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • SEVILLA
      • Seville, SEVILLA, Spain, 41013
        • Centro de Investigación en Rendimiento Físico y Deportivo (CIRFD), Universidad Pablo de Olavide

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Medical diagnosis of severe mental disorder according to ICD-10 criteria
  • Aged between 18 and 65 years
  • Clinical stability confirmed by the participant's mental health professionals
  • Physically able to perform exercise
  • Able to travel to the intervention site
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute psychiatric decompensation at the time of enrolment
  • Medical condition contraindicating exercise participation, including uncontrolled cardiovascular disease
  • Inability to complete baseline assessments
  • Currently participating in another structured exercise programme

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multicomponent exercise intervention
Participants receive a 12-week supervised multicomponent exercise programme delivered twice weekly (24 sessions, 45-60 minutes each) in groups of up to eight, at a university sport and exercise research facility. Each session combines three consecutive blocks: interval aerobic training on a cycle ergometer individualised to peak power output, resistance training on digitally controlled machines individualised to estimated maximal strength, and inspiratory muscle training with a pressure threshold device individualised to maximal inspiratory pressure. Loads progress throughout the programme and are reassessed at week 6. Behaviour change strategies are applied to support adherence.
Twelve-week supervised programme delivered twice weekly (24 sessions of 45-60 minutes) in groups of up to eight participants, at a university sport and exercise research facility rather than a clinical setting. What distinguishes this intervention is the combination of three training components within every session, delivered consecutively: (1) 20 minutes of interval aerobic training on a cycle ergometer, alternating 1 minute of high intensity with 1 minute of active recovery, individualised to peak power output and progressing from 65% to 100% PPO; (2) 20 minutes of resistance training as a three-round circuit on seven digitally controlled machines, individualised to estimated maximal strength and periodised from 50-60% to 60-70% 1RM; and (3) inspiratory muscle training using a pressure threshold loading device, 6 sets of 5 maximal inspirations, individualised to maximal inspiratory pressure and progressing from 15% to 60% MIP at a frequency of two days per week rather than the daily

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP)
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Maximal inspiratory pressure, an index of inspiratory muscle strength, measured with a portable mouth pressure meter (MicroRPM; Micro Medical Inc., Chatham, Kent, UK). Participants perform repeated maximal inspiratory efforts from residual volume in standing position, and the highest value obtained is recorded. Values are expressed in cmH2O. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Forced vital capacity (FVC)
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Forced vital capacity, measured by spirometry (microQuark; COSMED, Rome, Italy) following standard procedures. Participants perform maximal forced expiratory manoeuvres and the highest acceptable value is recorded. Values are expressed in litres. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Peak oxygen uptake (VO2 peak)
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Peak oxygen uptake, measured during an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test on a cycle ergometer (Ergoselect 200K; Ergoline, Bitz, Germany) with breath-by-breath gas analysis (K5; COSMED, Rome, Italy). Intensity is increased progressively until the participant cannot maintain a pedalling cadence of 60-70 rpm. Values are expressed in mL/kg/min. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Maximal isometric handgrip strength, measured with a hand dynamometer (TKK; Takei Scientific Instruments Co. Ltd., Niigata, Japan) in standing position with the arm extended alongside the body. Participants perform repeated maximal attempts and the highest value is recorded. Values are expressed in kilograms. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Body composition assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Whole-body composition, measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (Horizon A; Hologic Inc., Marlborough, MA, USA) following standard positioning and analysis procedures. Outcomes include total and regional fat mass (kg), lean mass (kg), body fat percentage, and bone mineral density (g/cm2). Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Peak expiratory flow (PEF)
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Peak expiratory flow, measured by spirometry (microQuark; COSMED, Rome, Italy) during maximal forced expiratory manoeuvres. The highest acceptable value is recorded. Values are expressed in litres per minute. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Physical activity and sedentary behaviour
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Physical activity and sedentary behaviour, measured objectively with a triaxial accelerometer (ActiGraph) worn continuously over several consecutive days under standardised wear-time criteria. Outcomes include time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (minutes/day), light physical activity (minutes/day), sedentary time (minutes/day) and daily step count. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Retention rate
Time Frame: Through the 12-week intervention period
Proportion of enrolled participants who completed the 12-week intervention, calculated as the number of participants completing the post-intervention assessment divided by the total number of participants enrolled. Withdrawal is defined as explicit communication of discontinuation of participation.
Through the 12-week intervention period
Session attendance rate
Time Frame: Through the 12-week intervention period
Proportion of scheduled sessions attended, calculated as the number of sessions attended divided by the total number of sessions scheduled. Attendance is recorded as physical presence at the session, irrespective of the degree of completion of the training content. Reasons for non-attendance and for withdrawal are also recorded.
Through the 12-week intervention period
Adverse events
Time Frame: Through the 12-week intervention period
Number and nature of adverse events occurring during the intervention period, defined as any untoward medical occurrence requiring medical attention, hospitalisation or permanent discontinuation of participation. Musculoskeletal complaints or discomfort of mild or moderate severity attributable to the exercise sessions are recorded separately. Events are assessed for their relationship to the intervention.
Through the 12-week intervention period
Acceptability of the intervention
Time Frame: At the end of the 12-week intervention
Acceptability of the intervention, explored through individual semi-structured interviews conducted at the end of the intervention with participants who completed the programme and with those who withdrew and could be contacted. Interviews address perceptions of exercise as part of treatment, motivation for participation, and experiences and perceived benefits. Participants are also asked to rate, on a scale from 1 to 10, the extent to which they would recommend the intervention to other people with severe mental illness.
At the end of the 12-week intervention
Peak power output
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Peak power output achieved during an incremental cardiopulmonary exercise test on a cycle ergometer (Ergoselect 200K; Ergoline, Bitz, Germany), defined as the highest workload sustained before the participant was unable to maintain a pedalling cadence of 60-70 rpm. Values are expressed in watts. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Walking capacity (Incremental Shuttle Walk Test)
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Walking capacity, assessed with the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test, in which participants walk between two markers set 10 metres apart at a pace dictated by audio signals of progressively increasing frequency. The test ends when the participant cannot reach the marker in time or is unable to continue. The total distance covered is recorded in metres. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Lower-limb functional strength (5-repetition Sit-to-Stand test)
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Lower-limb functional strength, assessed with the 5-repetition Sit-to-Stand test. Participants rise from a seated position to full standing and return to sitting five times as quickly as possible, with arms crossed over the chest. The time taken to complete the five repetitions is recorded in seconds. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Body composition assessed by bioelectrical impedance analysis
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Body composition, measured by multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody 770; InBody Co. Ltd., Seoul, South Korea) under standardised conditions. Outcomes include fat mass (kg), skeletal muscle mass (kg) and body fat percentage. This method is used as a secondary approach to body composition assessment alongside dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Isometric strength
Time Frame: Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention
Maximal isometric strength of the knee extensors (quadriceps), measured with a handheld dynamometer (Lafayette Instrument Company, Lafayette, IN, USA). Participants perform maximal voluntary isometric contractions against the dynamometer in a standardised seated position with the knee flexed, and the highest value of several attempts is recorded. Values are expressed in newtons. Change is calculated as the difference between post-intervention and baseline assessment.
Baseline and immediately after the 12-week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 5, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 11, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 14, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 21/3-2
  • PID2020-118262RB-I00 (Other Grant/Funding Number: MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND INNOVATION, STATE RESEARCH AGENCY (Spain))

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe