- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07766031
Postoperative Pain and Analgesic Use Following Lumbar Discectomy: A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Surgery and Open Surgery (DISCOPAIN)
The lifetime prevalence of lumbosacral radiculopathy is 3 to 5 percent. The most common cause is a lumbar disc herniation. In 10 to 20 percent of patients, medical treatment is insufficient, and surgery is recommended. Lumbar discectomy is the standard surgical treatment. In recent years, minimally invasive techniques-and endoscopic approaches in particular-have become widely adopted.
The main advantage of these techniques lies in their reduced invasiveness, which allows for the preservation of muscle and ligament structures, with less extensive detachment and cutting. This preservation is likely to enable faster rehabilitation during the first few weeks and months after surgery, as well as a shorter hospital stay.
However, the available data focus primarily on medium- and long-term outcomes, and few studies have specifically examined early postoperative pain. Yet this immediate period is a critical factor, particularly regarding patient comfort, analgesic use, and length of hospital stay; it is a major determinant of the quality of immediate recovery. There is very little robust comparative data from real-world clinical settings evaluating the impact of surgical technique on early postoperative pain following lumbar discectomy.
In this context, this study aims to compare changes in short-term low back pain intensity following lumbar discectomy, depending on the technique used (endoscopic versus conventional open surgery), under real-world clinical conditions.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jonathan LEBHAR, Dr
- Phone Number: +332 23 25 30 70
- Email: jlebhar@vivalto-sante.com
Study Locations
-
-
-
Saint-Grégoire, France, 35760
- Recruiting
- Centre hospitalier Privé Saint-Grégoire
-
Contact:
- Marion Mandon, PhD
- Phone Number: +33678277672
- Email: drc@vivalto-sante.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Have had radicular and/or lower back pain for more than 6 weeks despite proper medical treatment, leading to the decision to schedule surgery
- Have symptoms consistent with an MRI showing a herniated disc
Exclusion Criteria:
- History of lumbar surgery
- Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) type 1 or 2
- Multiple affected levels
- Cauda equina syndrome
- Unscheduled surgery
- Spondylolisthesis
- Significantly narrowed lumbar canal (Schizas C or D)
- Pregnant, laboring, or breastfeeding women
- Severe psychiatric disorder
- Unwilling subject who cannot give consent or cannot return for scheduled visits as per the protocol
- Person under legal protection (guardianship, conservatorship, or judicial safeguard)
- Person deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative order
- Person not covered by social security
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Endoscopis surgery
The procedure is performed under general anesthesia, with the patient in the knee-chest position.
After identifying the surgical site using a surgical fluoroscope, sterile skin preparation is performed (by swabbing the area and applying sterile drapes).
The approach is percutaneous and transmuscular, using one channel for instruments and another for the endoscopic camera.
After exposing the spinal canal, the nerve root is identified and protected.
The herniated disc is then accessed following an incision in the posterior longitudinal ligament and resected using a disc forceps.
The procedure concludes with skin closure.
|
The procedure is performed under general anesthesia, with the patient in the knee-chest position.
After identifying the surgical site using a surgical fluoroscope, sterile skin preparation is performed (by swabbing the area and applying sterile drapes).
The approach is percutaneous and transmuscular, using one channel for instruments and another for the endoscopic camera.
After exposing the spinal canal, the nerve root is identified and protected.
The herniated disc is then accessed following an incision in the posterior longitudinal ligament and resected using a disc forceps.
The procedure concludes with skin closure.
|
|
Other: Open surgery
The procedure is performed under general anesthesia, with the patient in the knee-chest position.
After identifying the surgical level using a surgical fluoroscope, sterile skin preparation is performed (by swabbing the area and applying sterile drapes).
A skin incision is made to allow for a posterior approach with muscle dissection.
Recalibration is performed to expose the nerve structures.
The nerve root is identified and protected; the herniated disc is then accessed after incision of the posterior longitudinal ligament and resected using a disc forceps.
Closure is performed layer by layer (fascia, subcutaneous tissue, skin).
|
The procedure is performed under general anesthesia, with the patient in the knee-chest position.
After identifying the surgical level using a surgical fluoroscope, sterile skin preparation is performed (by swabbing the area and applying sterile drapes).
A skin incision is made to allow for a posterior approach with muscle dissection.
Recalibration is performed to expose the nerve structures.
The nerve root is identified and protected; the herniated disc is then accessed after incision of the posterior longitudinal ligament and resected using a disc forceps.
Closure is performed layer by layer (fascia, subcutaneous tissue, skin).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
To compare, under real-world clinical conditions, changes in the intensity of short-term low back pain following lumbar discectomy, based on the surgical technique used: endoscopic versus open surgery
Time Frame: day 3
|
Change in lumbar Visual Analog Scale (VAS) between preoperative and Day 3. VAS provides a pain intensity score out of 10, 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "pain as bad as it could possibly be".
|
day 3
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Pain
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Bone Diseases
- Musculoskeletal Diseases
- Postoperative Complications
- Pathologic Processes
- Pathological Conditions, Anatomical
- Spinal Diseases
- Hernia
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Pain, Postoperative
- Intervertebral Disc Displacement
- Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures
- Diagnosis
- Surgical Procedures, Operative
- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
- Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical
- Endoscopy
- Conversion to Open Surgery
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2025-41-STG
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.