A Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Onasemnogene Abeparvovec (Zolgensma) Intrathecal Injection in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Patients

August 11, 2026 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Specified Use-Results Survey of Zolgensma Intrathecal Injection (Spinal Muscular Atrophy)

This study aims to assess the safety and effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec intrathecal injection in spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) patients in clinical practice in Japan.

This is a non-interventional study and does not impose a therapy protocol, diagnostic/therapeutic procedure, or a visit schedule. Patients will be treated according to the Japan package insert. Data will be collected using a case registration form (CRF) completed by the investigator at each study site.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

SMA patients administered onasemnogene abeparvovec by intrathecal injection in Japan.

Description

Inclusion criteria:

• All patients treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec.

Exclusion criteria:

• Patients who have received onasemnogene abeparvovec for unapproved indications under the Clinical Trials Act or GCP (eg, investigator-initiated clinical trial).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Onasemnogene Abeparvovec Intrathecal Group
SMA patients treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec intrathecal injection in Japan.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Patients With Serious Adverse Events and Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Number of Patients With Serious Adverse Events and ADRs Corresponding to the Safety Specifications
Time Frame: Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Safety specifications include hepatotoxicity, transient thrombocytopenia, thrombotic microangiopathy, cardiac adverse events, dorsal root ganglia toxicity, tumorigenicity due to chromosomal integration, and long-term monitoring of gene therapy.
Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events and ADRs
Time Frame: Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Incidence based on the person-year method will be calculated.
Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Incidence of Serious Adverse Events and ADRs Corresponding to the Safety Specifications
Time Frame: Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Incidence based on the person-year method will be calculated.
Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Number of Patients by Time to Onset of Serious Adverse Events and ADRs
Time Frame: Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Number of Patients by Time to Onset of Serious Adverse Events and ADRs Corresponding to the Safety Specifications
Time Frame: Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Up to approximately 4 years and 5 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
The HFMSE is a validated SMA specific assessment devised for use in children with SMA to give objective information on motor ability and clinical progression. The HFMSE contains 33 items rated from 0 (unable to perform) to 2 (performs without modification/adaptation/compensation). Total scores range from 0-66. Higher scores indicate higher levels of motor ability.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Change From Baseline in Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months

RULM is a tool used to assess upper limb function in SMA patients. It consists of 20 items in total. The first entry item classifies overall functional ability and is not scored. The remaining 19 tasks are scored with 1 task scored as can/cannot (1 is the highest score) and 18 tasks rated on a 3-point scale as follows:

  • 0 - unable to perform the task
  • 1 - able to perform the task with some modification
  • 2 - able to perform the task with no difficulty The total RULM score ranges from 0 to 37 with higher scores indicating better upper limb function.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Change From Baseline in Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Infant Test of Neuromuscular Disorders (CHOP-INTEND) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
CHOP-INTEND is a tool used to measure the motor abilities in infants with SMA. It consists of 16 items scored on a scale from 0 (no response/unable to perform the movement) to 4 (complete response/able to perform the task). CHOP-Intend total score ranges from 0 to 64 with higher scores indicating higher motor function.
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity (CGI-S) Score
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months

The CGI-S scale is a physician-rated measure used to assess the severity of a patient's illness. Severity of illness is assessed with consideration for the overall clinical experience of patients of the same age. The CGI-S scores range from:

  • 0 = Not evaluated
  • 1 = Normal, not at all ill
  • 2 = Borderline normal and ill
  • 3 = Mildly ill
  • 4 = Moderately ill
  • 5 = Markedly ill
  • 6 = Severely ill
  • 7 = Among the most extremely ill
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Number of Patients Categorized by Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) Score
Time Frame: 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months

The CGI-I scale is a physician-rated measure used to assess a patient's overall clinical status. The patient's overall clinical status is scored on a 7-point scale of the extent of change relative to before treatment initiation as follows:

  • 1 = Very much improved
  • 2 = Much improved
  • 3 = Minimally improved
  • 4 = No change
  • 5 = Minimally worse
  • 6 = Much worse
  • 7 = Very much worse Number of patients and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) will be calculated for two categories: improved (CGI-I score: 1 to 3) and unchanged or worsened (CGI-I score: 4 to 7).
6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Number of Patients Achieving Each Developmental Milestone
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months

Developmental milestones include:

  • Sitting without support
  • Hands-and-knees crawling
  • Standing with assistance
  • Walking with assistance
  • Standing alone
  • Walking alone
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Number of Patients Maintaining Each Developmental Milestone
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months
Baseline, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, and every year thereafter, up to approximately 4 years and 5 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe