Formative Evaluation of a Mobile Application Facilitated Self-directed Rehabilitation Programme for Knee Osteoarthritis

August 14, 2026 updated by: Singapore General Hospital

Formative Evaluation of a Mobile Application Facilitated Self-Directed Rehabilitation Programme for the Conservative Management of Knee Osteoarthritis

In Singapore, knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition, reflecting global trends of an aging population and lifestyle factors. With Singapore's rapidly aging population and the rising prevalence of obesity and sedentary lifestyles, knee OA has become increasingly common. According to recent studies, symptomatic OA of the knee affects around one-fifth (~300K) of Singaporeans aged 50 years or older. Individuals with advanced knee OA and severe disability often require a total knee replacement (TKR) surgery. While knee replacement surgery is an effective option for severe knee OA, it is costly and there are risks of complications, and should only be considered when all appropriate non-surgical treatment options have been exhausted. Existing research suggests at least a quarter of knee replacements could have been avoided through more optimal conservative treatments.

Despite established healthcare systems and treatment pathways, studies in several settings report that the majority of patients with OA do not receive appropriate and optimal medical care. In Singapore, several factors such as cost, extended wait times, cultural factors and travel inconvenience pose barriers to accessing physiotherapy services. These factors hinder patients' ability to access care resulting in suboptimal care, poor outcomes, and needless economic burden. Thus, there is a large unmet need for innovative and flexible strategies to deliver effective conservative management and treatment for knee OA widely and at a relatively low cost.

Solutions that empower individuals and allow for self-directed rehabilitation without the need for real-time human supervision could be the key to improve effectiveness, accessibility and reduce the reliance on healthcare manpower. Given the prevalence of mobile phone, mobile applications offer a promising avenue for delivering self-directed rehabilitation programs to adults with knee OA. Previous self-directed rehabilitation programs for patients with knee OA have shown promise, however, the adoption and adherence to these programmes remain low, particularly among older adults who may not be technologically savvy. Developing an application that is tailored to the needs and capabilities of older adults with knee osteoarthritis is crucial to improve engagement and long-term adherence to the programme.

The investigators have previously developed a technology-enabled self-directed rehabilitation program for patients who have undergone TKR for primary knee OA. Subsequently, Managing Osteoarthritis of the knee using Therapist-Technology Optimized Rehabilitation (MO-knee-TOR) - a standalone mobile app to facilitate self-directed rehabilitation and complement a "blended" care approach involving an initial face-to-face session with the physiotherapist was developed. MO-knee-TOR was developed for patients with TKR and subsequently evaluated in 2 pilot randomised controlled trials (RCTs). In one of the RCTs, it was found that self-directed rehabilitation post TKR facilitated using the mobile application improved exercise adherence without compromising safety and clinical outcomes. In this current proposal, MO-knee-TOR is adapted for conservative knee OA management through a single-arm pre-post feasibility study with a nested qualitative component.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Meet the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) osteoarthritis clinical criteria (7)
  • aged 45 years and over
  • activity related knee joint pain
  • morning stiffness ≤30 min
  • History of knee pain on most days for ≥3 months
  • Able to give informed consent and to participate fully in the interventions and assessment procedures
  • Has a smartphone and be willing to use it during the study.
  • Able to share photos/ videos with other phone contacts using smartphone

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who meet any of the exclusion criteria mentioned below will be excluded from participation.
  • Rheumatoid arthritis and other systemic arthritis
  • A previous history of stroke and other major neurological conditions
  • An intention to undergo knee joint replacement surgery or have had a knee joint replacement
  • Has significant back or other non-knee pain

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Self-directed rehabilitation using the mobile application
Participants will be instructed on the installation and use of the mobile application on their personal mobile phones. Participants will then have to perform the assigned tasks using the mobile application for 12 weeks
Participants will be instructed on the installation and use of the mobile application on their personal mobile phones during their first outpatient physiotherapy session. Participants will then have to perform the assigned tasks using the mobile application for 12 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility
Time Frame: 12 weeks after using the mobile application
The feasibility of evaluating the prototype in a larger trial will be assessed using predefined progression criteria including, including recruitment and retention rates, adherence to the program, incidence of adverse events, and improvement in function. Progression will be guided using thresholds categorized as "proceed," "proceed with protocol amendments," or "significant amendments required" based on the criteria defined for each feasibility domain.
12 weeks after using the mobile application

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gait speed
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Gait speed will be measured from walking a distance of 4m at comfortable pace and 9m at fast pace with a 2m acceleration and deceleration zone before and after the timed section of 9m.
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Knee range-of-motion
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
A long-arm goniometer will be used to measure active-assisted knee flexion and extension range-of-motion with the participants in supine position
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Incidental and planned exercise (IPEQ)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after using the mobile application
This is a tool developed to measure physical activity, distinguishing between incidental exercise (activities that are not planned but contribute to overall physical activity, like walking to work or taking the stairs) and planned exercise (deliberate, structured exercise like going to the gym or running)
12 weeks after using the mobile application
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
The EQ5D-5L is a standardised instrument to measure health related quality of life in cost-effectiveness analysis
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Muscle strength
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Isotonic quadriceps strength will be determined using the one-repetition maximum test, which is the maximum load the patient could lift once in good form. A submaximal warm-up was provided by instructing the patient to perform bilateral knee extension at < 10 kgs. The range of-motion for the test was set from 90° to 40° of knee flexion to avoid the increased patellofemoral joint stress associated with terminal knee extension
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Handgrip strength test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Participants' grip strength will be measured using Jamar hand dynamometer
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Weight bearing symmetry
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
This assesses the ability of the participants to weight bear on their limb. With their feet on 2 portable force plates, participants will stand up from a standard chair, and weight-bearing symmetry is calculated by expressing the peak force produced by the operated leg as a percentage of that produced by the unoperated leg.
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
5-repetition-sit-to-stand test
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
A test to assess participants' ability to rise from a chair and return to the sitting position. The time taken for participant to stan up and sit down five times as fast as posible from standard chair (43-47cm) without the use of their hands will be recorded. This test is a measure that is performed as part of standard clinical practice and is also a measure of lower limb strength and dynamic balance.
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Physical function
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Participants will report their physical function using the Short Modified Arthritis Measure for Function (Short-MAC-F), which assesses difficulty in performing common daily activities related to knee function, including stair negotiation, rising from sitting, walking on a flat surface, getting in and out of a car, and dressing. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, where 0 indicates "none" and 4 indicates "extreme" difficulty. Higher scores indicate greater functional limitation.
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Treatment satisfaction
Time Frame: 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Participants will rate their satisfaction with the rehabilitation programme using the prototype on a 11 point Likert scale, with 0 indicating "no satisfaction" and 10 indicating "complete satisfaction".
12 weeks after using the mobile application
Exercise Compliance/Adherence
Time Frame: 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Self-reported compliance will be collected by asking participants how many times they completed their exercises. Compliance will also be determined from the data logs captured by the mobile application.
12 weeks after using the mobile application
Brief Fear of Movement
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Participants will report their fear of movement related to knee osteoarthritis using the Brief Fear of Movement Scale (BFOM). The scale consists of multiple statements assessing beliefs about movement, injury, and pain. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates "strongly disagree" and 4 indicates "strongly agree."
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Psychological distress
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Four-dimensional symptom questionnaire (4DSQ) will be used to assess psychological distress, anxiety, depression and
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Perceived Need for Knee Replacement Surgery
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Participants will rate how necessary they perceive knee replacement surgery for their condition based on knee symptoms over the past week using an 11-point numeric rating scale from 0 to 10 (allowing increments of 0.5), where 0 indicates "not at all necessary" and 10 indicates "totally necessary." Participants will also provide a categorical rating of perceived necessity, ranging from "not at all necessary" to "totally necessary." Higher scores indicate a greater perceived need for knee replacement surgery.
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Pain
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Participants will rate their knee pain intensity during specific activities using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates "no pain" and 11 indicates "worst imaginable pain." Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity.
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Participant Experience and Perceptions (Exit Interview)
Time Frame: 12 weeks after using the mobile application

Participants will attend an exit interview session at study completion to evaluate their experiences and perceptions of using the mobile application and force platforms for self-directed rehabilitation.

Qualitative data will be collected through guided interviews, recorded, and analyzed thematically to assess usability, acceptability, and user experience. Findings from these interviews will be used to inform refinements to optimize the application design and overall user experience.

12 weeks after using the mobile application
Physical Function
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Participants will provide an overall rating of their knee condition using a global rating scale reflecting their perception of their knee and associated problems. Higher scores indicate greater perceived severity of impairment.
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Education
Time Frame: Pre-intervention
Participants will report their highest level of education attained, categorized into predefined levels (e.g., primary, secondary, tertiary).
Pre-intervention
Race
Time Frame: Pre-intervention
Race will be self-reported by participants and categorized into predefined groups (e.g., Chinese, Malay, Indian, Others) based on standard demographic classifications.
Pre-intervention
Co-morbidities
Time Frame: Pre-intervention
Co-morbidities will be recorded based on participant self-report and/or medical records, including the presence of chronic conditions such as hypertension, diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and others.
Pre-intervention
Kellgren-Lawrence Grading
Time Frame: Pre-intervention
Severity of knee osteoarthritis will be assessed using the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grading scale based on radiographic findings, with grades ranging from 0 (no radiographic features of osteoarthritis) to 4 (severe osteoarthritis).
Pre-intervention
Height
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Height (in centimeters) will be measured or self-reported and used to calculate body mass index (BMI) in kg/m².
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Weight
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Weight (in kilograms) will be measured or self-reported and used to calculate body mass index (BMI) in kg/m².
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Gender
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Gender will be self-reported by participants and categorized as male or female
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Comfort With Technology
Time Frame: Pre-intervention;

Participants will report their confidence and frequency of using technology in daily life. Confidence in using technology will be assessed using a 4-point scale, where 0 indicates "not at all confident" and 3 indicates "extremely confident," with higher scores indicating greater confidence.

Frequency of technology use will be assessed across a range of common digital tools (e.g., mobile phone, SMS, computer, email, tablet, video conferencing platforms, online shopping, internet use, and social media). Each item will be rated on a 6-point scale ranging from "never" to "every day," with higher scores indicating more frequent use of technology.

Pre-intervention;
Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Knowledge of knee osteoarthritis will be assessed using the Knee Osteoarthritis Knowledge Scale, with higher scores indicating greater understanding of the condition, its management, and treatment options.
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
E-Health Literacy
Time Frame: Pre-intervention
Participants will rate their agreement with statements assessing their ability to find and use online health information using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates "strongly disagree" and 5 indicates "strongly agree." Higher scores indicate greater perceived eHealth literacy.
Pre-intervention
Perceived Social Support (Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support - MSPSS, Family Subscale)
Time Frame: Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application
Participants will rate their perceived social support from family using the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Items are rated on a 7-point Likert scale, where 1 indicates "very strongly disagree" and 7 indicates "very strongly agree." The scale assesses perceived emotional and practical support from family, including help with decision-making, availability of support, and ability to discuss problems. Higher scores indicate greater perceived social support.
Pre-intervention; 12 weeks after using the mobile application

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 2, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 19, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-4180

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe