Team-based Implementation of Hypertension Management in Childhood Lupus (ABOUT TIME)

August 25, 2026 updated by: Joyce Chang, Boston Children's Hospital

Comparing Implementation Strategies to Advance Cardiovascular Health in Children With Lupus

The goal of this study is to compare the effectiveness of widely used implementation strategies to promote adherence to guideline-concordant evidence-based practices for monitoring and controlling blood pressure in patients with lupus who are in pediatric care. A total of 16 pediatric lupus care teams will be randomly assigned one or more of these implementation strategies. The investigators will determine which strategy is better at ensuring the evidence-based practices reach all patients as intended and concurrently gather additional information about health outcomes as they pertain to children with childhood-onset lupus.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

1200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria for EHR Data Collection:

  • ICD-10-CM or SNOMED-CT diagnosis code for SLE
  • Completed a pediatric rheumatology outpatient clinical visit at a participating implementation site within 12 months of each data collection timepoint

Inclusion Criteria for the Patient Survey Group:

  • Diagnosis of childhood-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (cSLE)
  • Must have had a pediatric rheumatology clinical visit at a participating implementation site within 12 months of each data collection timepoint
  • Age 12 years or older at enrollment

Inclusion Criteria for the Caregiver Survey Group:

  • Individuals at least 18 years of age
  • Parent or guardian of a child with cSLE who is followed by a care team at a participating site

Inclusion Criteria for the Lupus Care Team Member Survey Group:

  • Individuals at least 18 years of age
  • Health care team members within a pediatric subspecialty that manages patients with cSLE at a participating site

Inclusion Criteria for the Patient Interview Group:

  • Diagnosis of childhood-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (cSLE)
  • Completed a clinical visit in the participating site's outpatient rheumatology clinic within the 12 months prior to enrollment
  • Age 12 years or older at enrollment
  • Able to provide verbal assent if below age 18 years of age or verbal consent if age 18 years and older. For minors, verbal parental/guardian permission (informed consent) is required.
  • Have access to a device with audio or audiovisual conferencing capabilities

Inclusion Criteria for the Caregiver Interview Group:

  • Individuals 18 years old or older at enrollment
  • Parent or guardian of a child with cSLE who is followed by a care team at a participating pediatric rheumatology site and has completed a clinical visit within the 12 months prior to enrollment
  • Able to provide verbal informed consent prior to the interview
  • Have access to a device with audio or audiovisual conferencing capabilities

Inclusion Criteria for the Lupus Care Team Member Interview Group:

  • Individuals ages 18 years of age or older at enrollment
  • Health care team members that are in a pediatric subspecialty clinic that manages patients with cSLE at a participating site
  • Able to provide verbal informed consent prior to the interview
  • Have access to a device with audio or audiovisual conferencing capabilities

Exclusion Criteria for all Interview Groups:

  • Unable or without cognitive capacity to participate in an interview, as determined by the investigator(s).
  • No prospective interview participants will be excluded on the basis of sex, race, ethnicity, or language preference.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Health Navigator without a Pre-Visit Worksheet
Adding only the health navigator engagement intervention
Adding a health navigator to the healthcare team to improve coordination among providers from different specialties and work closely with patients and their families. The health navigator acts as a bridge between families and the care team by helping facilitate care coordination, ensuring patient and family voices are heard, and explaining medical information in clear language. They also assist families with keeping track of medical appointments, connecting to local community resources, and providing extra support throughout the care process.
Active Comparator: Team Charter with Performance Monitoring without a Pre-Visit Worksheet
Adding only the team charter with performance monitoring intervention.
Care teams will work together to build clear plans that explain everyone's goals, roles, and daily responsibilities. The team will regularly check its performance data to see what is working well and what needs improvement. By making small, step-by-step changes over time, the team can continuously refine its approach until it reaches its goals.
Active Comparator: Health Navigator with a Pre-Visit Worksheet
Adding both the health navigator engagement and pre-visit worksheet interventions
Adding a health navigator to the healthcare team to improve coordination among providers from different specialties and work closely with patients and their families. The health navigator acts as a bridge between families and the care team by helping facilitate care coordination, ensuring patient and family voices are heard, and explaining medical information in clear language. They also assist families with keeping track of medical appointments, connecting to local community resources, and providing extra support throughout the care process.
Care teams will give patients and families a short worksheet to fill out before their appointment. This form helps them prepare to talk with their doctor about high blood pressure and heart disease risk. It helps patients and caregivers feel ready to ask questions and take an active role in planning their heart health care.
Active Comparator: Team Charter and Performance Monitoring with a Pre-Visit Worksheet
Adding both the team charter and performance monitoring and pre-visit worksheet interventions.
Adding a health navigator to the healthcare team to improve coordination among providers from different specialties and work closely with patients and their families. The health navigator acts as a bridge between families and the care team by helping facilitate care coordination, ensuring patient and family voices are heard, and explaining medical information in clear language. They also assist families with keeping track of medical appointments, connecting to local community resources, and providing extra support throughout the care process.
Care teams will give patients and families a short worksheet to fill out before their appointment. This form helps them prepare to talk with their doctor about high blood pressure and heart disease risk. It helps patients and caregivers feel ready to ask questions and take an active role in planning their heart health care.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Representative Reach of the Implementation Strategies
Time Frame: Evaluated at months 0, 6, 9, and then every 3 months through month 18.
The absolute difference in proportion of cSLE patients living in areas with low/very low child opportunity that receive evidence-based intervention components (ABPM and RAS inhibitors) vs. those living in areas with high/very high opportunity. Child opportunity, defined as neighborhood resources and conditions that support healthy childhood development, will be measured by linking FIPS codes to the Child Opportunity Index (COI) version 3.0, a multidimensional area-level composite of 44 indicators in domains of education, physical environment and economic conditions, and categorized according to national rank.
Evaluated at months 0, 6, 9, and then every 3 months through month 18.
Fidelity: The extent to which the hypertension evaluation and management interventions are delivered as intended.
Time Frame: Evaluated at months 0, 6, 9, and then every 3 months through month 18.
The pre-post intervention change in proportion of cSLE patients that receive core components of the hypertension evaluation and management interventions. 1) Adherence to hypertension evaluation will be measured by change in the % of SLE patients with LN or elevated BP who have an ABPM procedure code within the last year. Elevated BP will be defined according to AAP/AHA guidelines: ≥120/80 if age ≥13 years; ≥90th%ile or 120/80 (whichever is lower) if age <13 years,17 on 2 or more occasions. 2) Adherence to pharmacologic treatment will be change in % of SLE patients with LN or elevated BP who are prescribed RAS inhibitors.
Evaluated at months 0, 6, 9, and then every 3 months through month 18.
Improvement in Blood Pressure Control
Time Frame: Evaluated at months 0, 6, 9, and then every 3 months through month 18.
The change in percentage of SLE patients that achieve target clinic BP (<130/80 if age 13 years or older; lower of <130/80 or <90th%ile if age <13) using the average of the last two clinic SBP or DBP readings on separate days for each patient (oscillometric or auscultory). If ≥1 BP reading is taken on a single day, the daily mean will be used.
Evaluated at months 0, 6, 9, and then every 3 months through month 18.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fidelity to Dietary Sodium Counseling
Time Frame: Evaluated at months 0, 18, and 30.
The change in % of sampled patients with elevated blood pressure that report having discussed dietary sodium reduction with their care team.
Evaluated at months 0, 18, and 30.
Maintenance of Intervention Fidelity
Time Frame: Months 18-42
The change in adherence to the hypertension evaluation and management intervention at each site between month 18 and month 42. Adherence is defined by the % of SLE patients with lupus nephritis (LN) or elevated blood pressure who have an ABPM procedure code within the last year, and the % of SLE patients with LN or elevated BP who are prescribed RAS inhibitors.
Months 18-42
Maintenance of Intervention Reach
Time Frame: Months 18-42
The change in % of SLE patients who receive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibition in low/very low vs. high/very high COI between months 18 and 42.
Months 18-42
Maintenance of Blood Pressure Control
Time Frame: Months 18-42
The change in proportion of SLE patients that maintain their target average clinic blood pressure, defined as <130/80 if age 13 years or older; lower of <130/80 or <90th%ile if age <13, between months 18 and 42.
Months 18-42
24-hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure Control among Patients with Lupus Nephritis
Time Frame: Evaluated at months 0, 6, 9, and then every 3 months through month 18.
Based on their most recent ABPM study, defined as the change in % of patients with a most recent 24-hour mean arterial pressure (MAP) of <125/75 if age 13 years and older or the lower of <125/75 or 90th%ile if age <13 years old.
Evaluated at months 0, 6, 9, and then every 3 months through month 18.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • P00054342
  • BPS-2025C1-43826 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe