Self-management Intervention for People With Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

September 2, 2026 updated by: Rui She, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

A Multi-faceted Self-management Intervention for Improving Patient Activation and Lifestyle Behavior Modification Among People With Cardiometabolic Multimorbidity: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial

This pilot randomized controlled trial aims to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary effects of a telephone-based self-management intervention for adults with cardiometabolic multimorbidity. Cardiometabolic multimorbidity refers to having two or more chronic cardiometabolic conditions, such as hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, metabolic syndrome, coronary heart disease, or stroke.

The intervention integrates motivational interviewing, self-affirmation, and problem-solving training to support participants in improving their motivation, confidence, and skills for chronic disease self-management and lifestyle behavior modification.

Participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention group or the usual care group. The intervention group will receive two biweekly telephone consultation sessions. The control group will receive usual care according to government guidelines. All participants will complete assessments at baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 months after the intervention.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

72

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged ≥18 years
  • having at least two chronic cardiometabolic diseases (i.e., hypertension, type 2 diabetes, hyperlipidemia, metabolic syndrome, coronary heart disease, or stroke) as confirmed by a doctor or the use of corresponding prescription medications/treatment
  • having mobile phones
  • mentally competent to understand the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • current participation in similar projects or serious or life-threatening medical conditions (e.g., cancer, end-stage renal disease with dialysis, dementia) that would hinder study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MSP-MI
The intervention will comprise two biweekly telephone consultations, conducted by well-trained RAs with expertise in social science, health psychology, or behavioral medicine. These consultations will utilize MI blended with behavioral change techniques, including self-affirmation and problem-solving training.
The proposed study will use an MI-based intervention, blended and strengthened by self-affirmation and problem-solving techniques (MSP-SMI) to improve patient activation and lifestyle modification in patients with multimorbidity in HK. This integrated intervention is designed to tackle key behavioral change processes as posited in the IMB model and thus may have enhanced efficacy.
Other Names:
  • motivational interviewing
  • problem-solving
  • self-affirmation
  • MSP-MI
Placebo Comparator: Usual care
The control group will receive usual care accordingly to government guidelines.
The control group will receive usual care accordingly to government guidelines.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Retention rate at 3 months
Time Frame: From randomization to the end of intervention at 3 months
Proportion of randomized participants who complete the 3-month primary assessment
From randomization to the end of intervention at 3 months
Intervention adherence rate
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention
Proportion of participants who attend all the scheduled intervention sessions
From enrollment to the end of intervention
Recruitment rate
Time Frame: From the start of recruitment to completion of enrollment
Proportion of eligible individuals who consent and are randomized.
From the start of recruitment to completion of enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in mental health from baseline to 3 months
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Mental health will be assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-4, with higher scores indicating greater mental distress.
From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Change in patient activation from baseline to 3 months
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Patient activation will be assessed using the 13-item Patient Activation Measure. The PAM-13 consists of 13 items on a 4-point Likert scale. Item scores are summed up to a raw sum score resulting in theoretical values between 13 and 52, which are then transformed to a standardized metric ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater patient activation.
From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Change in health behavior from baseline to 3 months
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Health behavior will be assessed using the 12-item Simple Lifestyle Indicator Questionnaire. The SLIQ has 5 components: diet (3 questions), activity (3 questions), alcohol consumption (3 questions), smoking (2 questions), and stress (1 question). For each component, a raw score and a category score can be calculated. To provide equal weighting for each component, the overall SLIQ score is based on the 5 category scores. Each component has a category score of 0, 1, or 2, so overall SLIQ scores can range from 0 to 10. The higher the score, the healthier the lifestyle.
From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Change in motivation for behavior change from baseline to 3 months
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Motivation for behavior change will be assessed using the Contemplation Ladder. It displays a picture of a ladder numbered from 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater readiness or motivation to change health behavior.
From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Change in self-efficacy for managing chronic disease from baseline to 3 months
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Self-efficacy for managing chronic disease will be assessed using the six-item Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease Scale. It has a 10-point Likert-type scoring system (1 = Not at all confident, 10 = Totally confident). The total scores range from 6 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy.
From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Change in health-related quality of life from baseline to 3 months
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Health-related quality of life will be assessed using the 5 levels of severity for each of the 5 dimensions from the EuroQoL Group (EQ-5D-5L), which consists of 2 parts: the EQ-5D and EQ visual analog scale. The EQ-5D-5L utility index score will be calculated using the value set of the appropriate population (typically range from less than 0 up to 1 for full health), with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Change in self-rated health status from baseline to 3 months
Time Frame: From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months
Self-rated health status will be assessed using the EQ visual analog scale of 5 levels of severity for each of the 5 dimensions from the EuroQoL Group (EQ-5D-3L). Scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better self-rated health.
From baseline to the end of intervention at 3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Qualitative process evaluation of intervention feasibility and acceptability
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 months
Approximately 20-30 participants will be invited to participate in semi-structured interviews, or until thematic saturation is reached. Interviews will explore participants' experiences, perceived feasibility, acceptability, barriers, and facilitators related to the intervention. Qualitative data will be audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Findings will be reported narratively and will not be aggregated into a single quantitative score.
From enrollment to the end of intervention at 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: rui she, PhD, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 31, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

he data sharing plan has not yet been finalized and will be determined in accordance with participant consent, institutional policies, and ethics approval requirements.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe