Study to Evaluate Change in Disease Activity and Adverse Events of Subcutaneous Etentamig Compared With Daratumumab Plus Cyclophosphamide Plus Bortezomib Plus Dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in Adults With Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

August 26, 2026 updated by: AbbVie

A Phase 3 Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Etentamig (ABBV-383) Compared to Daratumumab, Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in Subjects With Newly Diagnosed Amyloid Light Chain (AL) Amyloidosis

Amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis is a rare disease caused by abnormal plasma cells producing misfolded light chain proteins that deposit in organs, leading to organ dysfunction and failure. The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of etentamig compared to daratumumab plus cyclophosphamide plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in participants with newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis.

Etentamig is an investigational drug being developed for the treatment of newly diagnosed AL amyloidosis. This is an open-label study. The study consists of 2 parts: a Safety Run-in where participatns will receive etentamig, and a Randomized Portion with 2 treatment arms where participants will receive etentamig, or Dara-CyBorD. Approximately 370 participants will be enrolled in the study at approximately 130 sites worldwide.

Participants will receive injected etentamig, in the Safety Run-in. Participants will receive injected etentamig, or Dara-CyBorD per the local label, in the Randomized Portion of the study. The total study duration is approximately 96 months.

There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care due to study procedures. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at a hospital or clinic. The effects of the treatment will be checked by medical assessments, blood tests, checking for side effects and completing questionnaires.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

370

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histopathological diagnosis of amyloidosis based on detection by immunohistochemistry and polarizing light microscopy of green bi-refringent material in congo red-stained tissue specimens (in an organ other than bone marrow) or characteristic electron microscopy appearance.
  • Evidence of a monoclonal plasma cell proliferative disorder (serum or urine monoclonal protein, abnormal free light-chain ratio, or clonal plasma cells in the bone marrow).
  • Measurable disease of amyloid light chain (AL) amyloidosis as defined by difference in free light chains (dFLC) >= 50 mg/L
  • No history of treatment with anti-amyloidosis therapy.
  • Presence of an amyloid-related systemic syndrome with at least 1 organ impacted by AL amyloidosis according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) diagnostic criteria.
  • Considered AL amyloidosis cardiac risk stage 1, 2, or 3a (or 3b [randomized portion only]).
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status <= 2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergic reaction, significant sensitivity, or intolerance to constituents of the study treatments.
  • Active hepatitis B or hepatitis C infection.
  • History of other active malignancies within the past 3 years (with specified exceptions).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Safety Run-in: Etentamig
Participants receive etentamig, as part of a 96 month study duration.
Injection
Experimental: Randomized Portion: Etentamig
Participants will receive etentamig , as part of a 96 month study duration.
Injection
Active Comparator: Daratumumab + Cyclophosphamide + Bortezomib + Dexamethasone
Participants will receive daratumumab plus cyclophosphamide plus bortezomib plus dexamethasone (Dara-CyBorD) in accordance with the local approved label, as part of a 96 month study duration..
Injection
Oral
Oral
Injection
Infusion
Infusion
Infusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 96 Months
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. The investigator assesses the relationship of each event to the use of study drug. Safety and tolerability assessed through adverse events, laboratory tests, vital signs, physical examinations, and other safety assessments.
Up to Approximately 96 Months
Randomized Portion: Complete Hematologic Response (HemeCR) Rate
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
HemeCR rate is defined as the proportion of subjects with the best overall response of hemeCR as determined by International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria (IACC) and assessed by the independent review committee (IRC)
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Major Organ Deterioration Progression-Free Survival (MOD-PFS)
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
MOD-PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of MOD-PFS event or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. MOD-PFS includes: Development of hematologic progressive disease per consensus guidelines or high-risk difference in free light chain (dFLC) progression; Clinical manifestation of cardiac failure (defined as need for cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device, or intra-aortic balloon pump); Clinical manifestation of renal failure (defined as development of end-stage renal disease needing hemodialysis or renal transplant); Death. MOD-PFS will be assessed by an Independent Review Committee.
Up to Approximately 60 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety Run-In: Major Organ Deterioration Progression-Free Survival (MOD-PFS)
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
MOD-PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of MOD-PFS event or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. MOD-PFS includes: Development of hematologic progressive disease per consensus guidelines or high-risk difference in free light chain (dFLC) progression; Clinical manifestation of cardiac failure (defined as need for cardiac transplant, left ventricular assist device, or intra-aortic balloon pump); Clinical manifestation of renal failure (defined as development of end-stage renal disease needing hemodialysis or renal transplant); Death.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Overall survival defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Percentage of participants achieving hematologic very good partial response or better based on International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Cardiac Response Rate
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Percentage of participants achieving cardiac response as assessed per graded criteria.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Renal Response Rate
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Percentage of participants achieving renal response as assessed per the International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria (IACC) criteria.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Liver Response Rate
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Percentage of participants achieving liver response as assessed per the International Amyloidosis Consensus Criteria (IACC) criteria.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Next Treatment
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from randomization to initiation of next anti-AL amyloidosis treatment.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Complete Hematologic Response
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from randomization to first documentation of complete hematologic response (hemeCR) as determined by International Amyloidosis Criteria Committee.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Complete Hematologic Response
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Duration of complete hematologic response (hemeCR) defined as the time from first documentation of hemeCR to the date of loss of hemeCR.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Time to Cardiac Response
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from randomization to first achievement of cardiac response.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Renal Response
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from randomization to first achievement of renal response.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Liver Response
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from randomization to first achievement of liver response.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Cardiac Response
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from first achievement of cardiac response to cardiac progression.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Renal Progression
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from first achievement of renal response to renal progression.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Duration of Liver Response
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from first achievement of liver response to liver progression.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Cardiac Progression
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from randomization to first occurrence of cardiac progression.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Renal Progression
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from randomization to first occurrence of renal progression.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Liver Progression
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Time from randomization to first occurrence of liver progression.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Maximum Serum Concentration (Cmax) of Etentamig
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Cmax of etentamig.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Time to Maximum Serum Concentration (Tmax) of Etentamig
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Tmax of etentamig.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of Etentamig
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
AUC of etentamig.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Safety Run-In and Randomized Portion: Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA)
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
Immunogenicity assessed through summary of antidrug antibody (ADA) status, ADA titers, and neutralizing antidrug antibodies (NAbs), if NAbs samples are analyzed.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Physical Functioning as Measured by 36-Item Short Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36 v2) Physical Component Summary Score
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
The SF-36 v2 is a 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life across eight domains. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Mental Functioning as Measured by SF-36 v2 Mental Component Summary Score
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
The SF-36 v2 is a 36-item questionnaire measuring health-related quality of life across eight domains. Higher scores indicate better health status.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life as Measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Fatigue Scale Score
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire assessing cancer-specific quality of life. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Fatigue as Measured by EORTC QLQ-C30 Fatigue Scale Score
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a 30-item questionnaire assessing cancer-specific quality of life. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms.
Up to Approximately 60 Months
Randomized Portion: Change from Baseline in Disease Symptoms as Measured by Additional EORTC Questionnaire Symptom Scales/Items
Time Frame: Up to Approximately 60 Months
The EORTC questionnaires assess cancer-specific symptoms and quality of life.
Up to Approximately 60 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Study Director: ABBVIE INC., AbbVie

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 29, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2034

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

AbbVie is committed to responsible clinical trial data sharing. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

For details on when studies are available for sharing, visit https://vivli.org/ourmember/abbvie/

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

To learn more about the process, or to submit a request, visit the following link https://www.abbvieclinicaltrials.com/hcp/data-sharing/

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe