A Real World Study of Treatment Patterns and Effectiveness of Standard of Care in Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia Patients

September 1, 2026 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Treatment Patterns and Real World Effectiveness of Standard of Care in Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) Patients: A Real-world Retrospective Cohort Study Using the Optum® Market Clarity Database

The aim of this study was to describe real-world treatment patterns and standard of care treatment effectiveness and utilization outcomes in adult primary ITP patients indicated for second-line treatment with any prior corticosteroid treatment in real-world treatment settings in the United States (US) identified in an electronic health record (EHR) and claims database.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

3714

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Jersey
      • East Hanover, New Jersey, United States, 07936
        • Novartis

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients diagnosed with primary ITP from a US medical claim and EHR data source during the study period.

Description

Inclusion criteria

  1. Evidence of a diagnosis of primary ITP during the study identification period.
  2. Evidence of treatment with any allowed second-line treatment during the study identification period after the first primary ITP diagnosis.
  3. Evidence of treatment with any allowed first-line treatment prior to index.
  4. Aged ≥18 years at index.

Exclusion criteria

  1. Fewer than 12 months continuous enrollment or activity prior to index.
  2. Fewer than one inpatient or fewer than two outpatient records during baseline.
  3. Evidence of any allowed second-line therapies or splenectomy prior to index.
  4. Evidence of diagnosis of Evans syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, autoimmune lymphoproliferative syndrome, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis C virus (HCV), Helicobacter pylori, Sjogren's antiphospholipid syndrome prior to index, or active b-cell malignancies (not in remission) in the baseline period.
  5. Continuous enrollment end date or death date prior to index.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
ITP Cohort
Primary ITP patients with prior corticosteroid treatment being treated with second-line treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number and Percentage of Patients With Prescribed Second-line Treatments of Interest
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years

Second-line treatments of interest, either as monotherapy or in a combination therapy, included:

  • Thrombopoietin Receptor Agonists (TPO-RAs): romiplostim, eltrombopag, avatrombopag.
  • Clusters of differentiation 20 (CD20) inhibitors: rituximab
  • Other therapies: fostamatinib
  • Immunosuppressants: azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil
  • Splenectomy
Up to approximately 8 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Time to Next Treatment (TTNT)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Up to approximately 8 years
Duration of Patient Follow-up
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Up to approximately 8 years
Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD)
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Up to approximately 8 years
Time to Next Treatment or Initiation of Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Up to approximately 8 years
Number and Percentage of Patients Who Discontinued Treatment Within 1, 3, and 6 Months of Second-line Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
1, 3, and 6 months
Number and Percentage of Patients by First Type of Activity Observed Following Treatment Discontinuation
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months

Activities included:

  • Switch to new treatment
  • Restart the same second-line treatment
  • Have rescue treatment without second-line treatment
  • First-line treatment without second-line treatment
  • Enter a treatment-free interval
  • End of EHR/claims disenrollment
  • Death
1, 3, and 6 months
Number of Patients Who Entered a Treatment-free Interval
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Treatment free interval was defined as at least 6 months with no second-line treatment or rescue treatment.
Up to approximately 8 years
Duration of Treatment-free Interval
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Treatment free interval was defined as at least 6 months with no second-line treatment or rescue treatment.
Up to approximately 8 years
Number and Percentage of Combination Second-line Treatment Treated Patients Who Underwent Reductions
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Reduction was defined as a discontinuation of at least one therapeutic agent with maintenance of at least one therapeutic agent.
Up to approximately 8 years
Number and Percentage of Patients Who Used Add-on, Rescue, or Supportive Treatment During Second-line Treatment
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
An add-on was the inclusion of a new, additional second-line treatment ≥28 days after initiation of the initial second-line treatment.
Up to approximately 8 years
Time to Initiation of Add-on or Rescue Treatment During Second-line Treatment
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Up to approximately 8 years
Time to Initiation of Supportive Treatment During Second-line Treatment
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Up to approximately 8 years
Platelet Counts
Time Frame: 1, 3, and 6 months
1, 3, and 6 months
Number and Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Pre-defined Platelet Counts Within 3 Months of Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: 3 months

Measured among patients with at least one platelet count within 3 months of treatment initiation.

Pre-defined platelet counts were categorized as follows:

  • ≥30 × 10^9/L,
  • ≥ 50 × 10^9/L, and
  • ≥100 × 10^9/L
3 months
Number and Percentage of Patients With no Initial Response to Second-line Treatment
Time Frame: 3 months
Measured among patients with at least one platelet count within 3 months of treatment initiation. No initial response was defined as platelet counts <30 × 10^9/L within 3 months of treatment initiation.
3 months
Number and Percentage of Patients Who Achieved Pre-defined Response Levels Within 6 Months of Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: 6 months

Measured among patients with at least one platelet count within 6 months of treatment initiation. Response levels were categorized as follows:

  • response (≥ 50 × 10^9/L), and
  • complete response (≥100 × 10^9/L)
6 months
Among Patients With At Least Two Platelet Counts From 3 to 6 Months, Number and Percentage of Patients Who Reached Real-world Durable Response
Time Frame: From 3 to 6 months
Real-world durable response was defined as ≥75% of platelet counts ≥50 × 10^9/L with a minimum of 2 platelet measurements and without other therapies.
From 3 to 6 months
Among Patients With At Least Two Platelet Counts From 6 to 12 months, Number and Percentage of Patients Who Reached Real-world Durable Response
Time Frame: From 6 to 12 months
Real-world durable response was defined as ≥75% of platelet counts ≥50 × 10^9/L with a minimum of 2 platelet measurements and without other therapies.
From 6 to 12 months
Number and Percentage of Patients With Emergency Department (ED) or Inpatient (IP) Thrombotic Events Within 12 Months After Second-line Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
Thrombotic events may have included pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, cerebral venous thrombosis, transient ischemic attack.
12 months
Number of Thrombotic Events Within 12 Months After Second-line Treatment Initiation, per 1000 Person-years
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number and Percentage of Patients With Infection Events Within 12 Months After Second-line Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of Infection Events Within 12 Months After Second-line Treatment Initiation, per 1000 Person-years
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number and Percentage of Patients With Bleeding Events Within 12 Months After Second-line Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of Bleeding Events Within 12 Months After Second-line Treatment Initiation, per 1000 Person-years
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number and Percentage of Patients With At Least One Healthcare Visit After Second-line Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
Healthcare visits included outpatient visits, IP admissions, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions, and ED visits.
12 months
Number of Healthcare Visits After Second-line Treatment Initiation, per Patient per Year (PPPY)
Time Frame: 12 months
Healthcare visits included outpatient visits, IP admissions, ICU admissions, and ED visits.
12 months
Number of Oral Corticosteroid Medication Fills Within 12 Months After Second-line Treatment Initiation, PPPY
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of Days With Active Oral Corticosteroid Prescriptions Within 12 Months After Second-line Treatment Initiation, PPPY
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Duration of IP and ICU Admissions Among Patients Who Were Hospitalized After Second-line Treatment Initiation
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number and Percentage of Patient Responders From Date of First Response Through the End of Follow-up, Who Failed Treatment
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Patient responders were defined as patients who reach a response level of ≥ 50 × 10^9/L within 6 months. Treatment failure was defined as platelet count <30 × 10^9/L.
Up to approximately 8 years
Number and Percentage of Patient Responders From Date of First Response Through the End of Follow-up, Who Received Rescue Treatment
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Patient responders were defined as patients who reach a response level of ≥ 50 × 10^9/L within 6 months.
Up to approximately 8 years
Number and Percentage of Patient Responders From Date of First Response Through the End of Follow-up, Who Initiated a New Second-line Treatment or Added Oral Corticosteroids
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Patient responders were defined as patients who reach a response level of ≥ 50 × 10^9/L within 6 months.
Up to approximately 8 years
Number and Percentage of Patient Responders From Date of First Response Through the End of Follow-up, Who Died
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Patient responders were defined as patients who reach a response level of ≥ 50 × 10^9/L within 6 months.
Up to approximately 8 years
Number and Percentage of Patient Responders From Date of First Response Through the End of Follow-up, Who Reached the End of the Study Period
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Patient responders were defined as patients who reach a response level of ≥ 50 × 10^9/L within 6 months.
Up to approximately 8 years
Among Patient Responders, Time From Second-line Treatment Initiation to Response
Time Frame: Up to 6 months
Patient responders were defined as patients who reach a response level of ≥ 50 × 10^9/L within 6 months.
Up to 6 months
Among Patient Responders, Duration of Platelet Response
Time Frame: Up to approximately 8 years
Patient responders were defined as patients who reach a response level of ≥ 50 × 10^9/L within 6 months.
Up to approximately 8 years
Number and Percentage of Patient Responders With Treatment-free Response
Time Frame: Up to 3 months
Patient responders were defined as patients who reach a response level of ≥ 50 × 10^9/L within 6 months. Treatment-free response was defined as platelet count ≥30 × 10^9/L at 3 months after discontinuing second-line treatment.
Up to 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 16, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 11, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe