AI-Based Personalized Digital Management for High-Risk Pulmonary Nodule Follow-up

September 1, 2026 updated by: Jianxing He, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

AI-Based Personalized Digital Management to Improve Follow-up Care Adherence Among Patients With High-Risk Pulmonary Nodules: A Pragmatic Randomized Clinical Trial

The goal of this pragmatic clinical trial is to learn whether AI-based personalized digital management can help patients with high-risk pulmonary nodules complete appropriate follow-up care. The study will include adults aged 40 years or older whose pulmonary nodules were identified on chest CT scans already performed at the hospital for clinical care, health examinations, or other reasons. The hospital's AI-based lung nodule evaluation system will be used to identify nodules classified as high risk. Patients who have already completed follow-up or entered an active pulmonary nodule management pathway will not be included.

The main question this study aims to answer is:

- Does personalized digital management increase the proportion of patients who complete appropriate pulmonary nodule follow-up within 16 weeks after randomization compared with usual care?

Researchers will compare personalized digital management with usual care. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following groups:

  • The personalized digital management group will receive individualized information about the pulmonary nodule and recommendations for appropriate follow-up through the hospital's official WeChat account.
  • The usual care group will not receive the study-specific personalized digital message. Participants in both groups may continue to receive routine clinical care.

Participants will:

  • Provide electronic informed consent
  • Answer a brief questionnaire about pulmonary nodule care received outside the hospital and selected health information, including smoking history
  • Continue their usual medical care
  • Allow researchers to review relevant hospital records to determine whether pulmonary nodule follow-up was completed

The study will not arrange an additional initial chest CT solely for research purposes. Appropriate follow-up may include specialist evaluation, follow-up chest CT, PET/CT, tissue sampling, surgery, or a documented clinical decision that no further evaluation is needed. Researchers will also examine subsequent diagnostic procedures, lung cancer diagnoses, treatments, complications, and longer-term clinical outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

4000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 40 years or older.
  2. Completion of a chest CT at the study hospital for clinical care, health examination, or another reason.
  3. At least one pulmonary nodule classified as high risk by the Linc model, with a predicted malignancy probability of 75% or greater. The index CT, index nodule, model version, and risk score must be traceable.
  4. Follow-up management for the index nodule has not been completed before randomization, and the participant has not entered a clearly documented active pulmonary nodule management pathway.
  5. Ability to provide valid electronic informed consent and receive study messages through the hospital's official WeChat account.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior or current lung cancer, or ongoing diagnostic evaluation, treatment, postoperative care, or surveillance for the index nodule.
  2. Active malignancy for which the pulmonary nodule should be evaluated or managed as possible metastatic disease or within another established cancer care pathway.
  3. Completion before randomization of a qualifying chest CT, pulmonary nodule specialist or multidisciplinary team evaluation, PET/CT, tissue sampling, surgery or lesion-directed treatment, or verified clinical closure related to the index nodule.
  4. An existing valid order, appointment, referral, or documented active management plan for the index nodule, including active management by thoracic surgery, a pulmonary nodule clinic or multidisciplinary team, oncology, or radiation oncology.
  5. Maximum diameter of the index lesion greater than 30 mm. These patients will receive standardized safety notification and accelerated specialist referral and will not be randomized.
  6. Lung-RADS category 4B or 4X, or an equivalent highly suspicious finding, when Lung-RADS is applicable or can be reliably reconstructed, if clinical safety review determines that immediate notification or accelerated clinical care is required.
  7. Another major clinical safety, ethical, technical, or data-protection concern that cannot be reasonably mitigated.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Personalized Digital Management
Following common AI-based identification, eligibility confirmation, and randomization, participants assigned to this arm will receive personalized information about their high-risk pulmonary nodule and recommendations for appropriate specialist follow-up through the hospital's official WeChat account. Participants will otherwise continue routine clinical care.
Shortly after randomization, participants receive a study-specific personalized digital message through the hospital's official WeChat account. The message provides understandable information about the participant's AI-classified high-risk pulmonary nodule, explains that a high-risk classification does not establish a diagnosis of lung cancer, and recommends returning to a pulmonary nodule-related specialist for further evaluation. Subsequent imaging, diagnostic procedures, treatment, or observation will be determined by the treating clinician using the official radiology report, prior imaging, and the participant's clinical condition. Message delivery, opening, link clicks, and technical delivery failures will be recorded.
No Intervention: Usual Care
Participants assigned to this arm will not receive the study-specific personalized digital information or follow-up recommendations after randomization. They will continue routine clinical care. Standard clinical communication and any necessary safety notifications will remain available.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulmonary Nodule Follow-up Completion Within 16 Weeks After Randomization
Time Frame: From randomization through 16 weeks (Day 112)
The proportion of all randomized participants who complete at least one qualifying pulmonary nodule follow-up event by Day 112. Qualifying events include: (1) chest CT related to the index nodule; (2) pulmonary nodule specialist or multidisciplinary team evaluation with a documented assessment and management plan; (3) PET/CT; (4) bronchoscopy, percutaneous biopsy, or other tissue sampling; (5) surgery, image-guided ablation, or lesion-directed radiotherapy; or (6) documented clinical closure by a qualified clinician after adequate evaluation. Orders or appointments alone do not count. Patient refusal, loss to follow-up, or death alone do not constitute clinical closure. The denominator includes all randomized participants analyzed according to assigned group. Only hospital records or verified outside-hospital records count as completion.
From randomization through 16 weeks (Day 112)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Follow-up Completion Within 30 Days After Randomization
Time Frame: From randomization through 30 days
Proportion of all randomized participants completing at least one qualifying A-F follow-up event, using the same event and evidence rules as the primary outcome.
From randomization through 30 days
Time From Recommended Management Due Date to First Follow-up Completion
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 112
Difference in days between the first qualifying follow-up event and the prespecified due date. Negative values indicate early completion; positive values indicate delay. Limited to participants with a valid due date.
From randomization through Day 112
Time From Index Chest CT to First Follow-up Completion
Time Frame: From index chest CT through Day 112
Days from the index chest CT to the first qualifying A-F event, described within prespecified 3-, 6-, or 12-month management strata.
From index chest CT through Day 112
Lung Cancer Diagnosis
Time Frame: From randomization through 12 months
Proportion of all randomized participants meeting the prespecified lung cancer diagnosis standard. Pathologic confirmation is preferred; adjudicated clinical diagnosis is permitted when prespecified criteria are met.
From randomization through 12 months
Diagnostic Closure
Time Frame: From randomization through 12 months
Proportion achieving malignant diagnosis, specific benign diagnosis, or adequate clinical evaluation documenting that no further diagnostic work-up is required.
From randomization through 12 months
Stage of Diagnosed Lung Cancers
Time Frame: From randomization through 12 months
Clinical and pathologic TNM stage distribution among diagnosed lung cancers, including the proportion diagnosed at stage I or II.
From randomization through 12 months
Histologic Type of Diagnosed Lung Cancers
Time Frame: From randomization through 12 months
Distribution of histologic types among participants with pathologically confirmed lung cancer.
From randomization through 12 months
Invasive Procedures Related to the Index Nodule
Time Frame: From randomization through 12 months
Proportion of all randomized participants undergoing bronchoscopy, percutaneous biopsy, surgical sampling or resection, or image-guided ablation related to the index nodule.
From randomization through 12 months
Complications Following an Invasive Procedure
Time Frame: From randomization through 12 months
Proportion of all randomized participants experiencing prespecified related complications, including pneumothorax, bleeding, infection, hospitalization, intensive care, or death.
From randomization through 12 months
Benign Biopsy
Time Frame: From randomization through 12 months
Proportion of all randomized participants undergoing tissue sampling with a final benign result and no lung cancer diagnosis during the prespecified follow-up.
From randomization through 12 months
Nondiagnostic Tissue Sampling
Time Frame: From randomization through 12 months
Proportion of all randomized participants undergoing tissue sampling that does not establish a malignant or specific benign diagnosis.
From randomization through 12 months
Time From Index Chest CT to Lung Cancer Diagnosis
Time Frame: From index chest CT through 12 months after randomization
Days from the index chest CT to the prespecified lung cancer diagnosis date.
From index chest CT through 12 months after randomization
Time From Randomization to Lung Cancer Diagnosis
Time Frame: From randomization through 12 months
Days from randomization to the prespecified lung cancer diagnosis date.
From randomization through 12 months
Time From Recommended Due Date to Lung Cancer Diagnosis
Time Frame: Through 12 months after randomization
Difference in days between the prespecified management due date and lung cancer diagnosis; limited to participants with a valid due date.
Through 12 months after randomization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 1, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 1, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe