- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07827521
Seltoplasmid Plus Revascularization for Diabetic Infrapopliteal Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Seltoplasmid Injection Combined With Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia Caused by Infrapopliteal Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes
The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether Seltoplasmid Injection can improve outcomes after lower-extremity revascularization. Revascularization is a procedure used to restore blood flow to the leg. The study will include adults with type 2 diabetes, a foot ulcer caused by poor blood flow, and disease mainly affecting the arteries below the knee.
The main questions are:
- Does adding Seltoplasmid lower the risk of major amputation, another procedure to restore blood flow, or death?
- What medical problems occur after treatment with Seltoplasmid? About 180 participants will undergo standard lower-extremity revascularization. After the procedure, eligible participants will be assigned by chance to one of two groups. One group will receive Seltoplasmid plus standard care. The other group will receive standard care alone.
Participants in the Seltoplasmid group will receive injections into the muscles of the affected lower leg. The injections will be given on Day 0, Day 14, and Day 28.
Participants will be followed for 12 months. Researchers will also assess wound healing, survival without amputation, heart and blood vessel problems, pain, and blood flow in the affected leg.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Chronic limb-threatening ischemia in patients with diabetes is commonly associated with diffuse, calcified, and multilevel infrapopliteal arterial disease. In patients with ischemic diabetic foot ulcers, revascularization is recommended to restore blood flow, support wound healing, and reduce the risk of limb loss. However, restoration of patency in the main arteries does not always result in adequate perfusion of the distal tissue. Persistent microvascular dysfunction, impaired collateral formation, endothelial dysfunction, inflammation, infection, neuropathy, and abnormal wound-repair responses may continue after technically successful revascularization. Restenosis, repeat revascularization, delayed wound healing, major amputation, cardiovascular events, and death therefore remain important residual risks.
Seltoplasmid Injection is a plasmid-based gene therapy designed to produce local expression of two human hepatocyte growth factor isoforms. Hepatocyte growth factor activates c-Met-dependent signaling pathways involved in endothelial-cell survival, migration, angiogenesis, collateral-vessel development, microvascular repair, and tissue regeneration. Previous clinical studies in patients with severe lower-extremity ischemia have shown a potential benefit for ischemic ulcer healing. However, those studies primarily involved patients who were unsuitable for revascularization or in whom revascularization had produced an inadequate result.
Revascularization and Seltoplasmid Injection may have complementary biological effects. Revascularization restores blood flow and perfusion pressure through the main arterial pathway, whereas locally expressed hepatocyte growth factor may support distal collateral formation, microvascular perfusion, endothelial repair, and wound healing. This combined strategy is intended to address both macroscopic arterial obstruction and persistent impairment of distal tissue perfusion. Nevertheless, the clinical benefit and safety of administering Seltoplasmid Injection after revascularization have not been established in an adequately controlled randomized study.
This investigator-initiated trial is designed to evaluate the benefit-risk profile of this combined strategy in a high-risk population with diabetes, Rutherford category 5 chronic limb-threatening ischemia, ischemic foot ulceration, and predominantly infrapopliteal arterial disease. Randomization will occur only after completion of the index revascularization procedure and postoperative confirmation of eligibility and safety. This design ensures that treatment assignment cannot influence the revascularization procedure and excludes participants who cannot complete the procedure or do not meet the prespecified postoperative safety conditions.
The trial is open-label because the experimental group receives multiple intramuscular injections and the control group does not receive placebo injections. To reduce potential assessment bias, suspected primary endpoint events will be adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee whose members are blinded to treatment assignment. Standardized definitions will be used for major amputation, clinically driven target-limb revascularization, ulcer healing, cardiovascular events, and other clinical outcomes. Wound assessments and photographs, vascular examinations, and tissue-perfusion measurements will be performed using prespecified procedures whenever possible.
Seltoplasmid use after completed revascularization is outside its currently approved indication in China. Participants will be specifically informed of this off-label use, the uncertainty regarding additional benefit, the possibility of unknown risks, and the potential for increased injection-site bleeding or hematoma during antiplatelet or other antithrombotic treatment. Safety will be monitored throughout the study. An independent Data Monitoring Committee will periodically review accumulating safety information and may recommend continuation, modification, temporary suspension, or termination of the study in accordance with its charter.
The study is intended to determine whether adding Seltoplasmid Injection to contemporary revascularization and standardized background care can improve clinically meaningful limb and survival outcomes, wound healing, pain, and distal tissue perfusion without introducing unacceptable safety risks. The findings may provide evidence regarding a combined treatment strategy that targets both large-vessel blood flow and persistent microvascular impairment after infrapopliteal revascularization.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jingyong Huang
- Phone Number: +8613600672565
- Email: 43737136@qq.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Xiang Su
- Phone Number: +8613616631391
- Email: suxiang0815@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Zhejing
-
Hangzhou, Zhejing, China, 310003
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Hongkun Zhang, M.D., Ph.D.
- Phone Number: +86-571-87236745
- Email: doczhk@163.com
-
Hangzhou, Zhejing, China, 310006
- Hangzhou First People's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Xin Fang, M.D., Ph.D.
- Phone Number: +86-571-56007032
- Email: hzsyyy1@163.com
-
Hangzhou, Zhejing, China, 310014
- Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital
-
Hangzhou, Zhejing, China, 310016
- Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Jing Yang, M.D., Ph.D.
- Phone Number: 86-571-86090073
- Email: Yangjinsir@163.com
-
Taizhou, Zhejing, China, 317000
- Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province
-
Contact:
- Wenjun Zhao, M.D., Ph.D.
- Phone Number: +86-139-5856-1810
- Email: zhaowj@enzemed.com
-
Wenzhou, Zhejing, China, 325000
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
-
Contact:
- Jingyong Huang, M.D.
- Phone Number: +8613616631391
- Email: 43737136@qq.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female, aged 18 years or older at the time of signing informed consent
- Clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus with a diabetic foot ulcer and chronic limb-threatening ischemia classified as Rutherford category 5. The target limb must have an ischemic foot ulcer corresponding to WIfI wound grade 1 or 2. After at least 2 weeks of optimal standard wound care, including debridement, offloading, and infection control as clinically indicated, the ulcer must show no clear healing tendency, defined as a reduction in area of less than 30%, and infrapopliteal revascularization must be considered necessary to improve perfusion and promote wound healing.
- Color duplex ultrasonography, computed tomography angiography (CTA), or digital subtraction angiography (DSA) demonstrates at least 70% stenosis or occlusion in one or more infrapopliteal arteries, the anterior tibial, posterior tibial, or peroneal artery, and the investigator considers this disease to be the principal cause of ischemia in the target limb.
- No severe stenosis in the supra-popliteal inflow arteries, including the iliac, femoral, and popliteal arteries, defined as less than 70% stenosis; alternatively, any severe inflow stenosis can be treated during the index procedure. The infrapopliteal lesion or lesions must remain the principal revascularization target.
- Objective evidence of severe limb ischemia meeting at least one of the following criteria: ankle-brachial index (ABI) ≤0.50; ankle systolic pressure measured at the dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial artery ≤70 mmHg; or transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO₂) <30 mmHg. If ABI is >1.30 or otherwise considered unreliable because of arterial incompressibility, eligibility will be determined using toe-brachial index (TBI), toe pressure where available, and/or TcPO₂.
- Willing and able to comply with study procedures and complete all scheduled follow-up assessments.
- Provides written informed consent voluntarily before any study-specific procedure.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Unable or unwilling to undergo lower-extremity arterial revascularization.
- WIfI foot-infection grade 3, including systemic infection or severe local infection requiring urgent surgical debridement. A potential participant may be reassessed after adequate antimicrobial and surgical management if the infection has improved to WIfI infection grade 1 or 2, systemic infection has resolved, and relevant infection indicators have returned to an acceptable range.
- Gangrene or tissue destruction of the target limb for which above-ankle major amputation is considered immediately necessary or unavoidable.
- Any contraindication to seltoplasmid injection according to the current prescribing information.
- Acute myocardial infarction, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, or unstable angina within 3 months before randomization.
- Acute limb ischemia or acute exacerbation of chronic limb ischemia within 3 months before randomization.
- New York Heart Association class IV heart failure.
- Severe hepatic impairment, including decompensated cirrhosis, jaundice, ascites, or variceal bleeding.
- Severe renal impairment, defined as serum creatinine >2.5 times the upper limit of normal or estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m², or current dialysis.
- Coagulation disorder, defined as platelet count <75 × 10⁹/L or international normalized ratio >1.5 that cannot be corrected.
- Hemoglobin <80 g/L or white blood cell count <3.0 × 10⁹/L.
- Alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >3 times the upper limit of normal.
- Poorly controlled diabetes mellitus, defined as glycated hemoglobin >10%.
- Active malignant tumor or a history of malignant tumor within 5 years before enrollment. Any broader malignancy-related contraindication in the current seltoplasmid prescribing information will take precedence.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman, or woman of childbearing potential unwilling to use effective contraception during the protocol-defined period. Pregnancy testing and contraceptive requirements will follow the protocol and current prescribing information.
- Life expectancy <12 months or, in the investigator's judgment, inability to complete follow-up.
- Participation in another interventional clinical study within 30 days before enrollment.
- Positive human immunodeficiency virus antibody; positive hepatitis C virus antibody; or positive hepatitis B surface antigen together with detectable peripheral-blood hepatitis B virus DNA when, in the investigator's judgment, active chronic hepatitis B may increase participant risk.
- Current treatment with immunosuppressive therapy, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy.
- Any serious comorbidity that may interfere with assessment of study outcomes, or any psychological or social circumstance that may materially prevent optimal participation in the study, in the investigator's judgment.
- Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment and with the reason documented, makes participation inappropriate or exposes the participant to unacceptable risk.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Seltoplasmid Plus Revascularization
Following completion of the index lower-extremity revascularization procedure, participants will receive Seltoplasmid Injection in addition to protocol-defined standard care.
Seltoplasmid will be administered at a total dose of 8 mg by intramuscular injection at 32 sites in the affected lower leg on Day 0, Day 14 (±3 days), and Day 28 (±3 days), provided that the prespecified safety conditions are met.
Standard care includes wound care, offloading, glycemic control, treatment of infection, antiplatelet therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, and other clinically indicated treatment.
|
All participants will undergo index lower-extremity revascularization before randomization, with infrapopliteal arterial disease as the principal treatment target.
The revascularization strategy and technique will be selected by the treating vascular specialist according to the participant's vascular anatomy, clinical condition, and protocol-defined procedural standards.
After completion of the procedure and confirmation of postoperative eligibility and safety, participants will be randomized to one of the two study arms.
Seltoplasmid will be administered at a total dose of 8 mg per treatment session by intramuscular injection at 32 prespecified sites in the affected lower leg.
Treatment will be administered on Day 0 after revascularization, Day 14 (±3 days), and Day 28 (±3 days), provided that the prespecified dosing and safety conditions are met.
|
|
Active Comparator: Revascularization
Following completion of the index lower-extremity revascularization procedure, participants will receive protocol-defined standard care without Seltoplasmid Injection or placebo injections.
Standard care includes wound care, offloading, glycemic control, treatment of infection, antiplatelet therapy, lipid-lowering therapy, and other clinically indicated treatment.
Participants will be followed according to the same visit schedule and outcome-assessment procedures as those in the experimental group.
|
All participants will undergo index lower-extremity revascularization before randomization, with infrapopliteal arterial disease as the principal treatment target.
The revascularization strategy and technique will be selected by the treating vascular specialist according to the participant's vascular anatomy, clinical condition, and protocol-defined procedural standards.
After completion of the procedure and confirmation of postoperative eligibility and safety, participants will be randomized to one of the two study arms.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to First Clinically Driven MALE or All-Cause Death
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Time from randomization to the first occurrence of a clinically driven major adverse limb event (MALE) or all-cause death, whichever occurs first.
MALE is defined as target-limb major amputation (amputation at or above the ankle) or clinically driven target-limb revascularization.
Participants without an event will be censored at the date of their last available assessment.
All suspected endpoint events will be adjudicated by an independent clinical event committee blinded to treatment assignment.
|
From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Number and percentage of participants with treatment-emergent adverse events, serious adverse events, adverse reactions, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, and deaths.
Events will be coded using MedDRA and graded according to the protocol-specified version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
|
From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
|
Incidence of Clinically Driven Target-Lesion Revascularization
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Cumulative incidence of clinically driven target-lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) in the target limb.
CD-TLR is defined as repeat endovascular or surgical treatment of the index target lesion prompted by recurrent or worsening clinical symptoms, wound deterioration, or objective evidence of impaired perfusion.
Death and target-limb major amputation will be treated as competing events.
|
From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
|
Amputation-Free Survival
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Time from randomization to the first occurrence of target-limb major amputation or all-cause death, whichever occurs first.
Major amputation is defined as amputation at or above the ankle.
Participants without an event will be censored at the date of their last available assessment.
|
From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
|
Proportion of Participants With Confirmed Complete Ulcer Healing
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Proportion of participants with complete healing of the target ulcer, defined as complete epithelialization without drainage or the need for a dressing, confirmed at two consecutive scheduled assessments.
Healing assessments will be supported by standardized wound measurement and photography.
|
From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
|
Time to Confirmed Complete Ulcer Healing
Time Frame: Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Change from baseline in target-limb rest pain measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
A decrease from baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Target-Limb Rest Pain Score
Time Frame: Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Change from baseline in target-limb rest pain measured using an 11-point numerical rating scale ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
A decrease from baseline indicates improvement.
|
Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Target-Limb Transcutaneous Oxygen Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO₂) will be measured in mmHg under standardized conditions at a prespecified, reproducible site near the target wound.
The same device, probe location, participant position, and measurement conditions should be used whenever possible.
An increase from baseline indicates improved tissue oxygenation and microcirculatory perfusion.
|
Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
|
Change From Baseline in Target-Limb Ankle-Brachial Index
Time Frame: Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Change from baseline in the ankle-brachial index (ABI) of the target limb at each scheduled assessment.
ABI will be calculated as the higher target-ankle systolic pressure divided by the higher brachial systolic pressure, using a standardized measurement procedure.
An increase from baseline generally indicates improved limb perfusion.
ABI will be interpreted cautiously in participants with noncompressible arteries.
|
Baseline and scheduled assessments through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
|
Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events
Time Frame: From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Cumulative incidence of the first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), defined as cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke.
Only the first qualifying event will be counted in the time-to-first-event analysis.
|
From randomization through Day 360 (±14 days)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Powell RJ, Goodney P, Mendelsohn FO, Moen EK, Annex BH; HGF-0205 Trial Investigators. Safety and efficacy of patient specific intramuscular injection of HGF plasmid gene therapy on limb perfusion and wound healing in patients with ischemic lower extremity ulceration: results of the HGF-0205 trial. J Vasc Surg. 2010 Dec;52(6):1525-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.07.044.
- Zeller T, Baumgartner I, Scheinert D, Brodmann M, Bosiers M, Micari A, Peeters P, Vermassen F, Landini M, Snead DB, Kent KC, Rocha-Singh KJ; IN.PACT DEEP Trial Investigators. Drug-eluting balloon versus standard balloon angioplasty for infrapopliteal arterial revascularization in critical limb ischemia: 12-month results from the IN.PACT DEEP randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Oct 14;64(15):1568-76. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.06.1198.
- Shishehbor MH, Powell RJ, Montero-Baker MF, Dua A, Martinez-Trabal JL, Bunte MC, Lee AC, Mugglin AS, Mills JL, Farber A, Clair DG; PROMISE II Investigators. Transcatheter Arterialization of Deep Veins in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. N Engl J Med. 2023 Mar 30;388(13):1171-1180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2212754.
- Weissler EH, Wang Y, Gales JM, Feldman DN, Arya S, Secemsky EA, Aronow HD, Hawkins BM, Gutierrez JA, Patel MR, Curtis JP, Jones WS, Swaminathan RV. Cardiovascular and Limb Events Following Endovascular Revascularization Among Patients >/=65 Years Old: An American College of Cardiology PVI Registry Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Jun 21;11(12):e024279. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.024279. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
- Conte MS, Azene E, Doros G, Gasper WJ, Hamza T, Kashyap VS, Guzman R, Mena-Hurtado C, Menard MT, Rosenfield K, Rowe VL, Strong M, Farber A. Secondary interventions following open vs endovascular revascularization for chronic limb threatening ischemia in the BEST-CLI trial. J Vasc Surg. 2024 Jun;79(6):1428-1437.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.02.005. Epub 2024 Feb 17.
- Gu Y, Cui S, Yu T, Liao L, Guo J. Nine-year follow-up of patients receiving recombinant human hepatocyte growth factor nude plasmid DNA for critical limb ischemia: updated safety and efficacy results. 2024.
- Di X, Liu C, Ni L, Ye W, Rong Z, Zhang R, Niu S, Li F, Zheng Y, Han C, Liu Y. Rationale and design for the study of recombinant human hepatocyte growth factor plasmid in the treatment of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (HOPE CLTI): Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase III clinical trials. Am Heart J. 2022 Dec;254:88-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2022.08.007. Epub 2022 Aug 21.
- Di X, Wang P, Li F, Han W, Ni L, Liu CW. Recombinant Human Hepatocyte Growth Factor Plasmids for Treating Patients with Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024 Nov;68(5):619-628. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2024.07.016. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
- Shigematsu H, Yasuda K, Iwai T, Sasajima T, Ishimaru S, Ohashi Y, Yamaguchi T, Ogihara T, Morishita R. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial of hepatocyte growth factor plasmid for critical limb ischemia. Gene Ther. 2010 Sep;17(9):1152-61. doi: 10.1038/gt.2010.51. Epub 2010 Apr 15.
- Di X, Liu C, Sun S, Qin J, Guo X, Chen Y, Li X, Zhang H, Liu M, Yang L, Zhao H, Lu S, Huang J, Zhang Y, Li J, Lin X, Yao K, Tang J, Wang J, Gao Z, Wang J, Huang X, Xu S, Liu Y, Han W, Ni L, Ye W, Zheng Y, Chen Y, Liu B. Seltoplasmid promotes ulcer healing versus placebo for treating patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: HOPE CLTI-2 trial. Mol Ther. 2025 Jul 2;33(7):3423-3433. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2025.04.009. Epub 2025 Apr 11.
- Gu Y, Cui S, Wang Q, Liu C, Jin B, Guo W, Liu C, Chu T, Shu C, Zhang F, Han C, Liu Y. A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of Hepatocyte Growth Factor in the Treatment of Critical Limb Ischemia. Mol Ther. 2019 Dec 4;27(12):2158-2165. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.10.017. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
- Hahn W, Pyun WB, Kim DS, Yoo WS, Lee SD, Won JH, Shin GJ, Kim JM, Kim S. Enhanced cardioprotective effects by coexpression of two isoforms of hepatocyte growth factor from naked plasmid DNA in a rat ischemic heart disease model. J Gene Med. 2011 Oct;13(10):549-55. doi: 10.1002/jgm.1603.
- Pyun WB, Hahn W, Kim DS, Yoo WS, Lee SD, Won JH, Rho BS, Park ZY, Kim JM, Kim S. Naked DNA expressing two isoforms of hepatocyte growth factor induces collateral artery augmentation in a rabbit model of limb ischemia. Gene Ther. 2010 Dec;17(12):1442-52. doi: 10.1038/gt.2010.101. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
- Zhao J, Wang W, Ha CH, Kim JY, Wong C, Redmond EM, Hamik A, Jain MK, Feng GS, Jin ZG. Endothelial Grb2-associated binder 1 is crucial for postnatal angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2011 May;31(5):1016-23. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.224493. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
- Jin ZG, Ueba H, Tanimoto T, Lungu AO, Frame MD, Berk BC. Ligand-independent activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 by fluid shear stress regulates activation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Circ Res. 2003 Aug 22;93(4):354-63. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000089257.94002.96. Epub 2003 Jul 31.
- Tzima E, Irani-Tehrani M, Kiosses WB, Dejana E, Schultz DA, Engelhardt B, Cao G, DeLisser H, Schwartz MA. A mechanosensory complex that mediates the endothelial cell response to fluid shear stress. Nature. 2005 Sep 15;437(7057):426-31. doi: 10.1038/nature03952.
- Hammad TA, Rundback J, Bunte M, Miller L, Patel PD, Sadanandan S, Fitzgerald M, Pastore J, Kashyap V, Henry TD, Shishehbor MH. Stromal Cell-Derived Factor-1 Plasmid Treatment for Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease (STOP-PAD) Trial: Six-Month Results. J Endovasc Ther. 2020 Aug;27(4):669-675. doi: 10.1177/1526602820919951. Epub 2020 May 18.
- Shishehbor MH, Rundback J, Bunte M, Hammad TA, Miller L, Patel PD, Sadanandan S, Fitzgerald M, Pastore J, Kashyap V, Henry TD. SDF-1 plasmid treatment for patients with peripheral artery disease (STOP-PAD): Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Vasc Med. 2019 Jun;24(3):200-207. doi: 10.1177/1358863X18817610. Epub 2019 Feb 21.
- Miyake K, Kikuchi S, Uchida D, Doita T, Miyagawa S, Azuma N. The impact of angiographic pedal circulation status on wound healing in chronic limb-threatening ischemia after bypass surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2024 Dec;80(6):1836-1846. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2024.08.023. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
- Antonopoulos CN, Lazaris A, Venermo M, Geroulakos G. Predictors of Wound Healing Following Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2019 Nov;53(8):649-657. doi: 10.1177/1538574419868863. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
- Lehtola T, Nummenmaa E, Tuure L, Hamalainen M, Nieminen RM, Moilanen T, Pemmari A, Moilanen E. Dexamethasone Attenuates the Expression of MMP-13 in Chondrocytes through MKP-1. Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Mar 31;23(7):3880. doi: 10.3390/ijms23073880.
- Yin H, Arpino JM, Lee JJ, Pickering JG. Regenerated Microvascular Networks in Ischemic Skeletal Muscle. Front Physiol. 2021 Jun 11;12:662073. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.662073. eCollection 2021.
- Arpino JM, Nong Z, Li F, Yin H, Ghonaim N, Milkovich S, Balint B, O'Neil C, Fraser GM, Goldman D, Ellis CG, Pickering JG. Four-Dimensional Microvascular Analysis Reveals That Regenerative Angiogenesis in Ischemic Muscle Produces a Flawed Microcirculation. Circ Res. 2017 Apr 28;120(9):1453-1465. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.310535. Epub 2017 Feb 7.
- Liu Z, Dumville JC, Hinchliffe RJ, Cullum N, Game F, Stubbs N, Sweeting M, Peinemann F. Negative pressure wound therapy for treating foot wounds in people with diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 17;10(10):CD010318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010318.pub3.
- Game F, Jeffcoate W, Tarnow L, Jacobsen JL, Whitham DJ, Harrison EF, Ellender SJ, Fitzsimmons D, Londahl M; LeucoPatch II trial team. LeucoPatch system for the management of hard-to-heal diabetic foot ulcers in the UK, Denmark, and Sweden: an observer-masked, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Nov;6(11):870-878. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30240-7. Epub 2018 Sep 19.
- Serena TE, Bullock NM, Cole W, Lantis J, Li L, Moore S, Patel K, Sabo M, Wahab N, Price P. Topical oxygen therapy in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers: a multicentre, open, randomised controlled clinical trial. J Wound Care. 2021 May 1;30(Sup5):S7-S14. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2021.30.Sup5.S7.
- Edmonds M, Lazaro-Martinez JL, Alfayate-Garcia JM, Martini J, Petit JM, Rayman G, Lobmann R, Uccioli L, Sauvadet A, Bohbot S, Kerihuel JC, Piaggesi A. Sucrose octasulfate dressing versus control dressing in patients with neuroischaemic diabetic foot ulcers (Explorer): an international, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Mar;6(3):186-196. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30438-2. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
- Bus SA, Armstrong DG, Crews RT, Gooday C, Jarl G, Kirketerp-Moller K, Viswanathan V, Lazzarini PA. Guidelines on offloading foot ulcers in persons with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3647. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3647. Epub 2023 May 25.
- Chen P, Vilorio NC, Dhatariya K, Jeffcoate W, Lobmann R, McIntosh C, Piaggesi A, Steinberg J, Vas P, Viswanathan V, Wu S, Game F. Guidelines on interventions to enhance healing of foot ulcers in people with diabetes (IWGDF 2023 update). Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3644. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3644. Epub 2023 May 25.
- Fitridge R, Chuter V, Mills J, Hinchliffe R, Azuma N, Behrendt CA, Boyko EJ, Conte MS, Humphries M, Kirksey L, McGinigle KC, Nikol S, Nordanstig J, Rowe V, Russell D, van den Berg JC, Venermo M, Schaper N. The intersocietal IWGDF, ESVS, SVS guidelines on peripheral artery disease in people with diabetes and a foot ulcer. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2024 Mar;40(3):e3686. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.3686. Epub 2023 Sep 19.
- Parikh SA, DeRubertis BG, Bonaca MP, Krishnan P, Pin RH, Lee JK, Metzger DC, Kolluri R, Shishehbor MH, Holden AH, Iida O, Armstrong E, Kum SWC, O'Connor DJ, Bajakian DR, Garcia LA, Ying SW, Wang J, Ruster K, Martinsen BJ, Igyarto Z, Varcoe RL. Long-Term Outcomes of a Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold vs Angioplasty in Infrapopliteal Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: 3-Year Results From the LIFE-BTK Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2026 Jul 7;88(1):95-109. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.04.008. Epub 2026 May 13.
- DeRubertis BG, Varcoe RL, Krishnan P, Bonaca MP, O'Connor DJ, Pin R, Metzger DC, Holden A, Lee JK, Iida O, Armstrong EJ, Kum SWC, Kolluri R, Bajakian DR, Garcia LA, Shishehbor MH, Yu S, Ruster K, Martinsen BJ, Igyarto Z, Parikh SA. Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Below-the-Knee Peripheral Artery Disease: 2-Year Results From the LIFE-BTK Trial. Circulation. 2025 Oct 14;152(15):1076-1086. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.125.075080. Epub 2025 Sep 10.
- Varcoe RL, DeRubertis BG, Kolluri R, Krishnan P, Metzger DC, Bonaca MP, Shishehbor MH, Holden AH, Bajakian DR, Garcia LA, Kum SWC, Rundback J, Armstrong E, Lee JK, Khatib Y, Weinberg I, Garcia-Garcia HM, Ruster K, Teraphongphom NT, Zheng Y, Wang J, Jones-McMeans JM, Parikh SA; LIFE-BTK Investigators. Drug-Eluting Resorbable Scaffold versus Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Artery Disease. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 4;390(1):9-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2305637. Epub 2023 Oct 25.
- van Overhagen H, Nakamura M, Geraghty PJ, Rao S, Arroyo M, Soga Y, Iida O, Armstrong E, Nakama T, Fujihara M, Ansari MM, Mathews SJ, Goueffic Y, Jaff MR, Weinberg I, Pinto DS, Ohura N, Couch K, Mustapha JA. Primary results of the SAVAL randomized trial of a paclitaxel-eluting nitinol stent versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in infrapopliteal arteries. Vasc Med. 2023 Dec;28(6):571-580. doi: 10.1177/1358863X231199489. Epub 2023 Oct 16.
- Spreen MI, Martens JM, Knippenberg B, van Dijk LC, de Vries JPM, Vos JA, de Borst GJ, Vonken EPA, Bijlstra OD, Wever JJ, Statius van Eps RG, Mali WPTM, van Overhagen H. Long-Term Follow-up of the PADI Trial: Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Apr 14;6(4):e004877. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004877.
- Spreen MI, Martens JM, Hansen BE, Knippenberg B, Verhey E, van Dijk LC, de Vries JP, Vos JA, de Borst GJ, Vonken EJ, Wever JJ, Statius van Eps RG, Mali WP, van Overhagen H. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty and Drug-Eluting Stents for Infrapopliteal Lesions in Critical Limb Ischemia (PADI) Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb;9(2):e002376. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002376.
- Rastan A, Brechtel K, Krankenberg H, Zahorsky R, Tepe G, Noory E, Schwarzwalder U, Macharzina R, Schwarz T, Burgelin K, Sixt S, Tubler T, Neumann FJ, Zeller T. Sirolimus-eluting stents for treatment of infrapopliteal arteries reduce clinical event rate compared to bare-metal stents: long-term results from a randomized trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Aug 14;60(7):587-91. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.04.035.
- Rastan A, Tepe G, Krankenberg H, Zahorsky R, Beschorner U, Noory E, Sixt S, Schwarz T, Brechtel K, Bohme C, Neumann FJ, Zeller T. Sirolimus-eluting stents vs. bare-metal stents for treatment of focal lesions in infrapopliteal arteries: a double-blind, multi-centre, randomized clinical trial. Eur Heart J. 2011 Sep;32(18):2274-81. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr144. Epub 2011 May 26.
- Bosiers M, Scheinert D, Peeters P, Torsello G, Zeller T, Deloose K, Schmidt A, Tessarek J, Vinck E, Schwartz LB. Randomized comparison of everolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents in patients with critical limb ischemia and infrapopliteal arterial occlusive disease. J Vasc Surg. 2012 Feb;55(2):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.07.099. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
- Er F, Dahlem KM, Nia AM, Erdmann E, Waltenberger J, Hellmich M, Kuhr K, Le MT, Herrfurth T, Taghiyev Z, Biesenbach E, Yuksel D, Eran-Ergoknil A, Vanezi M, Caglayan E, Gassanov N. Randomized Control of Sympathetic Drive With Continuous Intravenous Esmolol in Patients With Acute ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The BEtA-Blocker Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction (BEAT-AMI) Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Feb 8;9(3):231-240. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2015.10.035.
- Scheinert D, Katsanos K, Zeller T, Koppensteiner R, Commeau P, Bosiers M, Krankenberg H, Baumgartner I, Siablis D, Lammer J, Van Ransbeeck M, Qureshi AC, Stoll HP; ACHILLES Investigators. A prospective randomized multicenter comparison of balloon angioplasty and infrapopliteal stenting with the sirolimus-eluting stent in patients with ischemic peripheral arterial disease: 1-year results from the ACHILLES trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 4;60(22):2290-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.08.989.
- Hsu CC, Kwan GN, Singh D, Rophael JA, Anthony C, van Driel ML. Angioplasty versus stenting for infrapopliteal arterial lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischaemia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Dec 8;12(12):CD009195. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009195.pub2.
- Snyder DJ, Zilinyi RS, Pruthi S, George S, Tirziu D, Lansky A, Mintz AJ, Sethi SS, Parikh SA. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for Infrapopliteal Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Primary Patency and Binary Restenosis Rates. J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Oct;32(5):1547-1561. doi: 10.1177/15266028231212133. Epub 2023 Nov 26.
- Mustapha JA, Finton SM, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Saab FA, Miller LE. Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty in Patients With Infrapopliteal Arterial Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 May;9(5):e003468. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.115.003468.
- Simons JP, Schanzer A, Flahive JM, Osborne NH, Mills JL Sr, Bradbury AW, Conte MS. Survival prediction in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia who undergo infrainguinal revascularization. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Jul;58(1S):S120-S134.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 28.
- Neupane S, Edla S, Maidona E, Sweet MC, Szpunar S, Davis T, LaLonde TA, Mehta RH, Rosman HS, Yamasaki H. Long-term outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing percutaneous intervention for popliteal and infrapopliteal peripheral arterial disease. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul;92(1):117-123. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27571. Epub 2018 Mar 14.
- Farber A. Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jul 12;379(2):171-180. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1709326. No abstract available.
- Dua A, Powell RJ, Lee AC, Bernardo N, Mills JL, Cardona LF, Bunte MC, Martinez-Trabal JL, Ghandour S, Gandhi SS, N'Dandu Z, Schneider PA, Clair D, Shishehbor MH. Contemporary outcomes in no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 8;15(1):24446. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-09784-4.
- Bradbury AW, Moakes CA, Popplewell M, Meecham L, Bate GR, Kelly L, Chetter I, Diamantopoulos A, Ganeshan A, Hall J, Hobbs S, Houlind K, Jarrett H, Lockyer S, Malmstedt J, Patel JV, Patel S, Rashid ST, Saratzis A, Slinn G, Scott DJA, Zayed H, Deeks JJ; BASIL-2 Investigators. A vein bypass first versus a best endovascular treatment first revascularisation strategy for patients with chronic limb threatening ischaemia who required an infra-popliteal, with or without an additional more proximal infra-inguinal revascularisation procedure to restore limb perfusion (BASIL-2): an open-label, randomised, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 May 27;401(10390):1798-1809. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00462-2. Epub 2023 Apr 25.
- Farber A, Menard MT, Conte MS, Kaufman JA, Powell RJ, Choudhry NK, Hamza TH, Assmann SF, Creager MA, Cziraky MJ, Dake MD, Jaff MR, Reid D, Siami FS, Sopko G, White CJ, van Over M, Strong MB, Villarreal MF, McKean M, Azene E, Azarbal A, Barleben A, Chew DK, Clavijo LC, Douville Y, Findeiss L, Garg N, Gasper W, Giles KA, Goodney PP, Hawkins BM, Herman CR, Kalish JA, Koopmann MC, Laskowski IA, Mena-Hurtado C, Motaganahalli R, Rowe VL, Schanzer A, Schneider PA, Siracuse JJ, Venermo M, Rosenfield K; BEST-CLI Investigators. Surgery or Endovascular Therapy for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia. N Engl J Med. 2022 Dec 22;387(25):2305-2316. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2207899. Epub 2022 Nov 7.
- Song P, Rudan D, Zhu Y, Fowkes FJI, Rahimi K, Fowkes FGR, Rudan I. Global, regional, and national prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2015: an updated systematic review and analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Aug;7(8):e1020-e1030. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30255-4.
- Conte MS, Bradbury AW, Kolh P, White JV, Dick F, Fitridge R, Mills JL, Ricco JB, Suresh KR, Murad MH; GVG Writing Group. Global vascular guidelines on the management of chronic limb-threatening ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6S):3S-125S.e40. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.016. Epub 2019 May 28.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Endocrine System Diseases
- Vascular Diseases
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Pathologic Processes
- Chronic Disease
- Disease Attributes
- Diabetes Mellitus
- Diabetic Angiopathies
- Diabetes Complications
- Skin Diseases
- Skin Ulcer
- Leg Ulcer
- Diabetic Neuropathies
- Atherosclerosis
- Arteriosclerosis
- Arterial Occlusive Diseases
- Peripheral Vascular Diseases
- Ischemia
- Foot Ulcer
- Peripheral Arterial Disease
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases
- Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
- Diabetic Foot
Other Study ID Numbers
- ky2026-432
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.