- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07828002
The GranStone Trial
Prevention of Kidney Stones Due to Paraffin Oil Induced Granuloma: A Prospective Interventional Study
This study will investigate whether treatment with empagliflozin or losartan can reduce the risk of kidney stone formation in patients with paraffin disease, a condition caused by the injection of paraffin oil into muscle tissue for cosmetic muscle enlargement.
Paraffin disease can lead to chronic inflammation, disturbances in calcium regulation, high blood calcium levels, kidney stones, and impaired kidney function. Previous studies from Herlev-Gentofte Hospital have shown that kidney stones occur in nearly half of affected patients, while approximately one-third develop reduced kidney function. Current treatment primarily consists of high-dose corticosteroids, which can reduce blood calcium levels but cause substantial adverse effects and may not adequately control the underlying disease process.
Both empagliflozin and losartan are widely used medications with documented kidney-protective effects in other chronic kidney diseases. This randomized clinical trial will evaluate whether either treatment can prevent kidney stone formation and slow kidney-related complications in patients with paraffin disease.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether treatment with empagliflozin or losartan can prevent kidney stone formation and improve kidney health in patients with paraffin disease.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Cosmetic treatments are becoming increasingly popular, now also encompassing injection of different sorts of fillers. One such approach is the injection of paraffin oil into muscular regions for the sole purpose of enhancing muscular size. During the last 4 years we have experienced that injections with paraffin oil are being more widely used than anticipated. Usage is mainly seen in the younger segment of the male Danish population, causing severe morbidity including hypercalcemia, kidney stones and renal failure in patients often in their thirties. Injected paraffin oil causes foreign body reactions, leading to inflammation and granuloma formation. Granulomas are rich in macrophages capable of producing large amount of activated vitamin D (1,25OH2D3) that may cause severe hypercalcemia. Although, the link between foreign body granuloma, and hypercalcemia has been known for more than 60 years sparse evidence-based treatments exist to control calcium and vitamin D balance in these patients. Physiologically, cutaneous produced or orally absorbed 25OH2D3 (cholecalciferol) needs activation before it can activate the vitamin D receptor (VDR) and exert its actions. This activation occurs through hydroxylation by CYP27B1 in the kidneys creating the active 1,25(OH)2D3 (calcitriol). CYP27B1 is the rate-limiting step in calcitriol synthesis and is tightly regulated under physiologic conditions. Control of high 1,25(OH)2D3 is achieved by a feedback system, where 1,25(OH)2D3 stimulates the enzyme CYP24A1, which in turn hy-droxylate 1,25(OH)2D3 to the inactive 1,24,25OH2D3. Several other players, e.g. parathy-roid hormone (PTH) and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) regulate calcium homeostasis. However, in macrophages, CYP27B1 is upregulated by interleukin 2, and the inhibiting enzyme CYP24A1 is not upregulated. Therefore, granulomas can produce large amounts of 1,25OH2D3, and this production is not counteracted by the otherwise tight regulatory and physiological mechanisms. Unimpeded 1,25OH2D3 in turn increase calcium absorption from the intestines, reabsorption from the kidneys and to some extent calcium release from bones, all leading to hypercalcemia. Hypercalcemia is a late feature of accelerated 25OH2D3 activation, as several counter regulatory mechanisms will attempt to maintain normocalcemia. As a result, these patients suffer from nephrolithiasis or progressive kidney disease due to nephrocalcinosis and/or nephrolithiasis, with some patients progressing to end stage renal dis-ease (ESRD).
SGLT2 inhibitors were developed for treatment of type 2 diabetes to lower blood glucose levels but they had a more pronounced effect in patients with heart or renal failure irrespective of diabetes status. SGLT2 inhibitors could prevent or reduce eGFR decline in patients with renal failure and it appeared in some trials that it could also lower the risk of nephrolithiasis. SGLT2 inhibitors have few adverse effects in non-diabetics and may be used to prevent progression of paraffin oil disease by protecting the kidney and reducing the risk of kidney stones in these patients. ACEi's and ARB's have also been shown to reduce progression of kidney disease. Although the data on prevention of kidney stones is less convincing for ACEi/ARB's the renoprotective effects make them a potential treatment option.
Data from our cohort of patients:
During our initial investigation of 88 patients, milder symptoms of hypercalcemia were often accompanied by hypercalcuria with increased risk of kidney stones and later nephrocalcinosis and ultimately progressive renal failure and vascular calcification as seen in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism or CKD. 3 deaths have been recorded in our cohort of young men, so paraffin disease leads to significant morbidity, but presumably also increased mortality. Currently, paraffin disease is still very sparsely described in the medical literature. The number of affected individuals is presumably large because early disease causes few symptoms and many of these men rarely seek medical attention. At the section of Endocrinology at Herlev-Gentofte Hospital, there is currently more than 310 young males who injected paraffin oil prior to referral. In the first published cohort of 88 males (32 ± 7 years (mean ± SD)) who injected paraffin oil 6 years prior to their first visit, the minority (42%) have managed to maintain an apparent normal calcium metabolism (normocalcemic and normoparathyoid), while the majority have developed an abnormal calcium metabolism ranging from normocalcemic and hypoparathyroid (24%) to hypercalcemic and hypoparathyroid (34%). Renal stone formers ranging from 22 % in patients with an apparent normal calcium homeostasis to a stunning 47-48% in those with abnormal calcium homeostasis (5-10% in back-ground population). Importantly, a significant number of patients (approx. 30%) had already developed mild to severe renal impairment with reduced eGFR. Most patients tended to have increased inflammatory markers (interleukine-2 receptor (IL-2R) and/or pepti-dyldipeptidase (ACE)) - even in those with apparent normal calcium metabolism. Surgical resection may improve both local reactions and pain. However, due to granuloma formation within muscle tissue and oilmigration, it is difficult to remove all the granuloma tissue. Currently, first line of treatment for paraffin disease is prednisolone, which has proven effective in lowering calcium levels in all our patients. However, patients require relatively large (15-75 mg daily) and long term (years) doses of prednisolone to achieve and maintain normal or near normal calcium levels with many possible adverse effects. Noteworthy, after 4 years observation we have not yet seen any decrease in inflammatory markers in any male suggesting that prednisolone monotherapy is not enough when you have large amount of granuloma tissue. Paraffin disease mimics sarcoidosis, both being granulomatous diseases with hypercalcemia due to macrophage mediated 25OH2D3 activation. Interestingly, RAAS activation has been shown to contribute to sarcoidosis granuloma formation in an ex vivo model, highlighting an additional potential role for treatment with ACEi/ARB's. However, paraffin disease appears to be much more progressive, not self-limiting and require more aggressive treatment probably because the volume of granulomatous tissue is so huge.
Since ACEi's, ARB's and SGLTi's are the only drug classes consistently shown to slow progression in CKD in a non-diabetic population, we hypothesize that these treatments will be effective in a cohort of patients with hypercalcemia due to paraffin oil induced granulomatous disease. Furthermore, we hypothesize that SGLTi will have a greater effect due to the potential decrease in incident nephrolithiasis. However, the ketosis associated with this treatment may not be beneficial, which clearly justifies the face-to-face comparison.
Losartan was chosen over an ACE inhibitor due to ease of administration and proven safety in patients with severe kidney disease. Additionally, it has been suggested that ARB's have greater efficacy than ACEi's on survival in patients with granulomatous disease due to sarcoidosis.
This research project will investigate whether it is of value to initiate nephroprotective treatment with an SGLT2 inhibitor or ARB in patients with hypercalciuria due to paraffin oil induced granulomatous disease.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Martin B Jensen, Professor
- Phone Number: +4538687318
- Email: martin.blomberg.jensen@regionh.dk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Emil B Wriedt, MD
- Phone Number: +4551185797
- Email: emil.brink.wriedt@regionh.dk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Herlev, Denmark, 2730
- Division of Translational Endocrinology, Department of Endocrinology and Internal Medicine, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev, Herlev
-
Principal Investigator:
- Martin B Jensen, Professor
-
Sub-Investigator:
- Emil B Wriedt, MD
-
Contact:
- Emil B Wriedt, MD
- Phone Number: +451185797
- Email: emil.brink.wriedt@regionh.dk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Signed informed consent by participant
- Male
- 18-70 years
- Paraffin granuloma disease with hypercalcemia, hypoparathyroidism, hypercalciuria or a history of nephrolithiasis
Exclusion Criteria:
- eGFR < 30 ml/min
- Cancer (past or present, except basal cell skin cancer or squamous cell skin cancer), which in the investigator's opinion could interfere with the results of the trial
- Type 1 DM
- Known chronic kidney disease in whom RAS-blockade and SGLT2-inhibition is indicated.
- Severely impaired liver function
- History of organ transplantation
- Receiving therapy with an SGLT2 inhibitor or ATII antagonist within 8 weeks prior to enrollment or previous intolerance of an SGLT2 inhibitor or ATII antagonist.
- Known history of angioedema
- Mental incapacity, language barriers or unwillingness to comply with the requirements of the protocol, which may preclude adequate understanding or cooperation during the trial, as judged by the investigator
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Empagliflozin
Once daily 25 mg tablet PO
|
Once daily 25 mg tablet PO
|
|
Active Comparator: Losartan
Once daily 100 mg tablet PO
|
Once daily 100 mg tablet PO
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Image verified new or increased nephrolithiasis or nephrocalcinosis (from 0-24 months).
Time Frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
The individual components of the composite outcome are defined as follows:
|
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in calcium homeostasis after 12 and 24 months
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
Change in calcium homeostasis after 12 and 24 months defined by either: 1A Change in p-Calcium ion concentration (mmol/L); 1B Change in p-PTH concen-tration (pmol/L); 1C Change in urine calcium excretion (mmol/L).
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (mL/min/1.73 m²)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in p-Creatinine (μmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in average daily prednisolone dosage (mg) based on cumulative average prednisolone dose.
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in inflammatory activity of the granulomas.
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
Change in inflammatory activity evaluated by changes in p-IL-2R (kU/L) and p-ACE (U/L).
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
Change in physical- and mental health scores assessed by the Short-Form 36 questionnaire (SF-36).
Time Frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
The SF-36 consists of 36 questions designed to assess overall health status.
Results are transformed onto a scale from 0 (worst possible health) to 100 (best possible health).
|
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
Change in serum albumin (g/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in urine albumin (mg/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Changes in serum vitamin D metabolites
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
Changes in serum 25OHD, and 24,25(OH)2D3, and 1,25(OH)2D
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
Changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and other indices of cardiac function as measured by transthoracic echocardiography.
Time Frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Incident or worsening signs of: Systolic- and/or diastolic dysfunction, left ventricular hypertrophy, structural heart disease including valvular pathology
Time Frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Changes in CT Hounsfield Units in the femoral neck and lumbar vertebrae
Time Frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in Coronary Artery Calcium Score on CT-scan
Time Frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
Coronary artery calcium (CAC) score measured using the Agatston method on non-contrast cardiac CT; higher scores indicate greater coronary calcified plaque burden.
|
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
Changes in self-reported kidney stones.
Time Frame: From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in BUN (mmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in serum phosphate (mmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in urine phosphate (mmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in serum magnesium (mmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in urine magnesium (mmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in serum iron (µmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in serum ferritin (µg/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in serum FGF23 (ng/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in serum Klotho
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in urine Ka (mmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in urine Na (mmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in urine pH
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in urine citrate (mmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in urine oxalate (μmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in urine bicarbonate (mmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
|
|
Change in urine uric acid (mmol/L)
Time Frame: From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
From baseline to month 3, 12 and end of follow-up at 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Martin B Jensen, Professor, Herlev Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.
- McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, Inzucchi SE, Kober L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, Ponikowski P, Sabatine MS, Anand IS, Belohlavek J, Bohm M, Chiang CE, Chopra VK, de Boer RA, Desai AS, Diez M, Drozdz J, Dukat A, Ge J, Howlett JG, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Ljungman CEA, Merkely B, Nicolau JC, O'Meara E, Petrie MC, Vinh PN, Schou M, Tereshchenko S, Verma S, Held C, DeMets DL, Docherty KF, Jhund PS, Bengtsson O, Sjostrand M, Langkilde AM; DAPA-HF Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 21;381(21):1995-2008. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1911303. Epub 2019 Sep 19.
- Blomberg Jensen M. Vitamin D and male reproduction. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2014 Mar;10(3):175-86. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.262. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
- Heerspink HJL, Stefansson BV, Correa-Rotter R, Chertow GM, Greene T, Hou FF, Mann JFE, McMurray JJV, Lindberg M, Rossing P, Sjostrom CD, Toto RD, Langkilde AM, Wheeler DC; DAPA-CKD Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2020 Oct 8;383(15):1436-1446. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2024816. Epub 2020 Sep 24.
- Brenner BM, Cooper ME, de Zeeuw D, Keane WF, Mitch WE, Parving HH, Remuzzi G, Snapinn SM, Zhang Z, Shahinfar S; RENAAL Study Investigators. Effects of losartan on renal and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and nephropathy. N Engl J Med. 2001 Sep 20;345(12):861-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011161.
- Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, Gautier I, Laloux B, Guize L, Ducimetiere P, Benetos A. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. 2001 May;37(5):1236-41. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.37.5.1236.
- Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, Rasmussen S, Thijs L, Ibsen H, Jeppesen J. Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population. Circulation. 2006 Feb 7;113(5):664-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.579342.
- Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, Claggett B, de Boer RA, DeMets D, Hernandez AF, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod MN, Lam CSP, Martinez F, Shah SJ, Desai AS, Jhund PS, Belohlavek J, Chiang CE, Borleffs CJW, Comin-Colet J, Dobreanu D, Drozdz J, Fang JC, Alcocer-Gamba MA, Al Habeeb W, Han Y, Cabrera Honorio JW, Janssens SP, Katova T, Kitakaze M, Merkely B, O'Meara E, Saraiva JFK, Tereshchenko SN, Thierer J, Vaduganathan M, Vardeny O, Verma S, Pham VN, Wilderang U, Zaozerska N, Bachus E, Lindholm D, Petersson M, Langkilde AM; DELIVER Trial Committees and Investigators. Dapagliflozin in Heart Failure with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction. N Engl J Med. 2022 Sep 22;387(12):1089-1098. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206286. Epub 2022 Aug 27.
- The EMPA-KIDNEY Collaborative Group; Herrington WG, Staplin N, Wanner C, Green JB, Hauske SJ, Emberson JR, Preiss D, Judge P, Mayne KJ, Ng SYA, Sammons E, Zhu D, Hill M, Stevens W, Wallendszus K, Brenner S, Cheung AK, Liu ZH, Li J, Hooi LS, Liu W, Kadowaki T, Nangaku M, Levin A, Cherney D, Maggioni AP, Pontremoli R, Deo R, Goto S, Rossello X, Tuttle KR, Steubl D, Petrini M, Massey D, Eilbracht J, Brueckmann M, Landray MJ, Baigent C, Haynes R. Empagliflozin in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jan 12;388(2):117-127. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2204233. Epub 2022 Nov 4.
- Schillaci G, Pucci G, Pirro M, Monacelli M, Scarponi AM, Manfredelli MR, Rondelli F, Avenia N, Mannarino E. Large-artery stiffness: a reversible marker of cardiovascular risk in primary hyperparathyroidism. Atherosclerosis. 2011 Sep;218(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 May 18.
- Fares J, El Fadel O, Zhao J, Li M, Sun J, Roman J, Loizidis G, Summer R. Mortality and Health Outcomes Among Patients With Sarcoidosis Treated With Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers. Chest. 2025 Mar;167(3):772-780. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2024.09.009. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
- Crouser ED, Julian MW, Locke LW, Bicer S, Mitchell JR, Singha A, Kramer PJ, Rajaram MVS, Raman SV. The Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Regulates Sarcoidosis Granulomatous Inflammation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug 15;210(4):497-507. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202402-0265OC.
- Yahyavi SK, Theilade S, Hansen D, Berg JO, Andreassen CH, Lorenzen M, Jorgensen A, Juul A, Faber J, Eldrup E, Blomberg Jensen M. Treatment options for hypercalcemia after cosmetic oil injections: Lessons from human tissue cultures and a pilot intervention study. Bone. 2022 Jan;154:116244. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2021.116244. Epub 2021 Oct 29.
- Yahyavi SK, Wall-Gremstrup G, Makki A, Juel J, Theilade S, Berg JO, Juul A, Momsen O, Eldrup E, Blomberg Jensen M. Debulking Surgery After Muscular Paraffin Oil Injections: Effects on Calcium Homeostasis and Patient Satisfaction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Feb 18;110(3):649-657. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgae606.
- Eldrup E, Theilade S, Lorenzen M, Andreassen CH, Poulsen KH, Nielsen JE, Hansen D, El Fassi D, Berg JO, Bagi P, Jorgensen A, Blomberg Jensen M. Hypercalcemia After Cosmetic Oil Injections: Unraveling Etiology, Pathogenesis, and Severity. J Bone Miner Res. 2021 Feb;36(2):322-333. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4179. Epub 2020 Oct 13.
- Alexander RT, McArthur E, Jandoc R, Welk B, Hayward JS, Jain AK, Braam B, Flockerzi V, Garg AX, Quinn RR. Antihypertensive medications and the risk of kidney stones in older adults: a retrospective cohort study. Hypertens Res. 2017 Sep;40(9):837-842. doi: 10.1038/hr.2017.42. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
- Xie X, Liu Y, Perkovic V, Li X, Ninomiya T, Hou W, Zhao N, Liu L, Lv J, Zhang H, Wang H. Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With CKD: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016 May;67(5):728-41. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.10.011. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
- Anderegg MA, Schietzel S, Bargagli M, Bally L, Faller N, Moor MB, Cereghetti GM, Roumet M, Trelle S, Fuster DG. Empagliflozin in nondiabetic individuals with calcium and uric acid kidney stones: a randomized phase 2 trial. Nat Med. 2025 Jan;31(1):286-293. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03330-x. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
- Lieben L, Carmeliet G, Masuyama R. Calcemic actions of vitamin D: effects on the intestine, kidney and bone. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Aug;25(4):561-72. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2011.05.008.
- Moraitis AG, Hewison M, Collins M, Anaya C, Holick MF. Hypercalcemia associated with mineral oil-induced sclerosing paraffinomas. Endocr Pract. 2013 Mar-Apr;19(2):e50-6. doi: 10.4158/EP12092.CR.
- Meyer MB, Pike JW. Mechanistic homeostasis of vitamin D metabolism in the kidney through reciprocal modulation of Cyp27b1 and Cyp24a1 expression. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2020 Feb;196:105500. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105500. Epub 2019 Oct 16.
- Kundu R, Chain BM, Coussens AK, Khoo B, Noursadeghi M. Regulation of CYP27B1 and CYP24A1 hydroxylases limits cell-autonomous activation of vitamin D in dendritic cells. Eur J Immunol. 2014 Jun;44(6):1781-90. doi: 10.1002/eji.201344157. Epub 2014 Apr 10.
- Tebben PJ, Singh RJ, Kumar R. Vitamin D-Mediated Hypercalcemia: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Endocr Rev. 2016 Oct;37(5):521-547. doi: 10.1210/er.2016-1070. Epub 2016 Sep 2.
- Gyldenlove M, Rorvig S, Skov L, Hansen D. Severe hypercalcaemia, nephrocalcinosis, and multiple paraffinomas caused by paraffin oil injections in a young bodybuilder. Lancet. 2014 Jun 14;383(9934):2098. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60806-0. No abstract available.
- Solling ASK, Tougaard BG, Harslof T, Langdahl B, Brockstedt HK, Byg KE, Ivarsen P, Ystrom IK, Mose FH, Isaksson GL, Hansen MSS, Nagarajah S, Ejersted C, Bendstrup E, Rejnmark L. Non-parathyroid hypercalcemia associated with paraffin oil injection in 12 younger male bodybuilders: a case series. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018 Jun;178(6):K29-K37. doi: 10.1530/EJE-18-0051. Epub 2018 Mar 29.
- Nerild HH, Theilade KS, Eldrup E. [Paraffin oil injecions due to bigorexia may cause hypercalcaemia]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2018 Nov 26;180(48):V04180256. Danish.
- Tachamo N, Donato A, Timilsina B, Nazir S, Lohani S, Dhital R, Basnet S. Hypercalcemia associated with cosmetic injections: a systematic review. Eur J Endocrinol. 2018 Apr;178(4):425-430. doi: 10.1530/EJE-17-0938. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
- Levy LL, Emer JJ. Complications of minimally invasive cosmetic procedures: prevention and management. J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2012 Apr;5(2):121-32. doi: 10.4103/0974-2077.99451.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Urogenital Diseases
- Wounds and Injuries
- Pathologic Processes
- Male Urogenital Diseases
- Kidney Diseases
- Urologic Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases
- Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
- Urolithiasis
- Metabolic Diseases
- Water-Electrolyte Imbalance
- Granuloma
- Calcium Metabolism Disorders
- Calcinosis
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
- Foreign Bodies
- Foreign-Body Reaction
- Nephrolithiasis
- Hypercalcemia
- Nephrocalcinosis
- Granuloma, Foreign-Body
- Organic Chemicals
- Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring
- Heterocyclic Compounds
- Azoles
- Hydrocarbons
- Hydrocarbons, Cyclic
- Hydrocarbons, Aromatic
- Imidazoles
- Benzene Derivatives
- Tetrazoles
- Biphenyl Compounds
- Losartan
- empagliflozin
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2026-525608-85-00 (Ctis)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.