Improving Autism Program Quality in Special Education Units: The Use of an APERS-based Model to Support Student Learning and Participation

September 15, 2026 updated by: Hampus Bejno, Stockholm University

This study assesses the effect of using the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale (APERS) as a tool for providing feedback, in-service training, and coaching to school staff in order to improve program quality in special education units (SEUs) for children with autism or related sociocommunicative challenges (SCCs). APERS is used in its culturally validated Swedish version (APERS-Primary-SE). Using a quasi-randomized parallel-group design, SEUs will be allocated to either an experimental (APERS+) or control (TAU) condition. In the APERS+ condition, school staff receive continuous and systematic feedback provided by trained coaches based on the initial APERS assessment. In the TAU condition, schools will also receive feedback based on the initial APERS assessment, but no continuous coaching.

It is hypothesized that the APERS based intervention will improve overall program quality for children with autism or related SCCs as compared to TAU. Additionally, we also expect the intervention to improve student functioning, students' individual goal attainment, students' perception of their schools, and teacher self-efficacy as compared to TAU.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden
        • Stockholm University
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Isak Laghem, Doctoral student
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hampus Bejnö, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

5 years to 13 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for schools:

  • Located within the Stockholm Region
  • To have one or more SEUs for preschool class, primary school, or middle school students

Inclusion Criteria for students:

  • To be enrolled in a SEU in preschool class, primary school, or middle school
  • To have a documented formal community diagnosis of autism according to ICD-10, DSM-IV or DSM-5 or having related challenges with social communication and interaction as assessed by school staff and guardians.

Exclusion Criteria:

- No exclusion criteria not already mentioned.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group

In the experimental group, labeled APERS+, APERS assessments will be carried out to rate the overall program quality for students with autism/SCCs within the SEUs. These ratings will be made by researchers (PI and doctoral candidate) and a team of specially trained coaches consisting of 5-6 special educators working for the educational administration unit (Utbildningsförvaltningen) of Stockholm Municipality. The SEUs will be provided written and oral feedback based on the ratings

In the APERS+ contingency, the coaches then develop an action plan in order to improve program quality of the SEUs. Staff in the participating SEUs will also participate in a half-day of lectures and workshops about autism and other SCCs. Coaches will lastly provide weekly or bi-weekly coaching sessions in the SEUs based on the action plan to promote program quality and implement evidence-based practices. The intervention for each SEU will last for approximately 7-8 months.

APERS assessments with written and oral feedback. Creation of an action plan that is continuously followed up by specially trained coaches weekly or bi-weekly in coaching sessions designed to support the use of evidence-based practices in school settings. Half-day lecture about autism and related SCCs.

No Intervention: Control group

In the control group, APERS assessments will also be carried out by researchers and/or coaches. Written and oral feedback will be provided, but no further coaching will be given and no action plan will be created.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in autism program quality as assessed with the Swedish Autism Program Environment Rating Scale - Primary school (APERS-Primary-SE)
Time Frame: Baseline and about 8 months from baseline

The APERS-Primary-SE is a rating scale designed to examine primary school program quality for students with autism or related sociocommunicative challenges in Sweden. It contains 10 domains including areas such as students' personal independence and competence, and challenging behaviors. The scale consists of 58 items rated on a five-point Likert scale (1= low quality, 5 = high quality) resulting in individual item scores, subdomain scores, domain scores, and a total score.

Baseline and about 8 months from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in how students feel about their school as assessed with How I Feel About My School (HIFAMS)
Time Frame: Baseline and about 8 months from baseline

The HIFAMS is a questionnaire designed to assess the happiness and subjective well-being of children in school. It will be completed by all participating children in the study. The questionnaire consists of 8 items where the child is asked how they feel about their school life. The items are scored using a three-point facial Likert scale (sad face, neutral face, happy face). The faces are converted into numerical scores (0-2).

Baseline and about 8 months from baseline
Change from baseline in parent ratings on their child's bodily functions, activities, and participation and contextual factors as assessed with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Core Sets for Autism
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 months follow-up.

The ICF Core Sets for Autism is a questionnaire where parents rate their child's functioning. It contains 37 items pertaining bodily functions, activities and participation as well as contextual factors that may affect the child's functioning. Responses are given on a Likert scale ranging from either 0 to 10 (individual factors) or -5 to 5 (contextual factors), where higher ratings indicate higher levels of functioning and/or participation.

At baseline and 8 months follow-up.
Change in teachers' perceived self-efficacy in supporting students with autism using the Autism Self-Efficacy Scale for Teachers (ASSET)
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 months follow-up.

The Autism Self-Efficacy Scale for Teachers is a questionnaire where teachers rate their perceived self-efficacy in supporting students with autism and related SCCs in their classroom. It consists of 28 items and is rated on a six-point Likert scale from 0 to 5. Higher ratings indicate higher self-efficacy.

At baseline and 8 months follow-up.
Individual goal attainment as assessed with a Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)
Time Frame: At baseline and 8 months follow-up

The Goal Attainment Scale is a scale used to support, monitor and assess individual goal attainment in children with autism. Goals are created collaboratively by teachers and coaches at baseline and tailored to each child's individual needs and capacity. Goal attainment is assessed by coaches at follow-up on a five-step Likert scale, where 0 is baseline and 4 is exceeding goals.

At baseline and 8 months follow-up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Social validity as assessed with the Social Validity Scale
Time Frame: Rated at follow-up approximately 8 months after study start

A scale designed to asses the social validity of the procedures, goals, and outcomes of the study by participating school staff and coaches. It consists of 12 items rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 5, where higher ratings indicate higher levels of perceived social validity.

Rated at follow-up approximately 8 months after study start
Social responsiveness as assessed with the Social Responsiveness Scale 2 (SRS-2)
Time Frame: Baseline assessment

The SRS-2 is a scale designed to identify the presence and severity of social impairment within the autism spectrum and to differentiate it from difficulties associated with other conditions. Used in the current study to assess the level of social challenges for the participating children. The scale contains 65 items and is rated by the children's parents or guardians. Each item is rated on a 4-point Likert scale ranging from 1 to 4, where 1 is "not true" and 4 is "almost always true". Higher scores indicate more severe social impairment associated with autism.

Baseline assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 15, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 15, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe