Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Testing and Handheld Near Infrared Spectroscopy Technology CEREBO in India.

Prehospital Rapid Evaluation and Detection in Cerebrovascular Triage: A Multicenter Study of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Point of Care Testing and Handheld Near Infrared Spectroscopy Technology CEREBO in India.

CEREBO is an ICMR award winning point-of-care (POC) adjunct CT scanning device for detecting brain hematomas in patients with head injury. The study aims to validate the diagnostic accuracy of the PREDICT Assessment Model (CEREBO-NIRS plus GFAP/D-Dimer POC Assay) in patients with suspected stroke. The study will be conducted as part of the Indian Council of Medical Research's National Health Research Priority (ICMR-NHRP) under the INDIA-EMS project using a two phase design.

PHASE I: Validation of a diagnostic accuracy and feasbility of PREDICT assessment model (a combined approach using GFAP/ D-dimer POC lateral flow assay plus CEREBO-NIRS technology).

Study Design: Prospective, Multicenter, Validation and Feasibility Study.

PHASE II: Pilot RCT to assess integration of the PREDICT assessment model into pre-hospital pathways.

Study Design: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) (Year 3-5)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study, titled "Prehospital Rapid Evaluation and Detection in Cerebrovascular Triage: A Multicenter Study of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein Point-of-Care Testing and Handheld Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Technology (CEREBO) in India," aims to validate the PREDICT Assessment Model, which combines GFAP/D-Dimer point-of-care testing with handheld CEREBO Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) technology for the rapid differentiation of ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage in the prehospital setting.

The study will be conducted under the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) National Health Research Priority (NHRP) programme as part of the INDIA-EMS project and will use a two-phase design. Phase I is a prospective, multicenter validation and feasibility study involving patients with suspected acute stroke presenting by ambulance or directly to the emergency department. Participants will undergo clinical assessment, including BE-FAST and neurological assessment, finger-prick blood testing for GFAP/D-Dimer, and CEREBO-NIRS assessment. All participants will subsequently undergo standard diagnostic evaluation with a CT head scan, which will serve as the gold standard for stroke subtype classification. The diagnostic accuracy, feasibility, process times, and safety of the combined PREDICT Assessment Model will be evaluated.

Phase II will be a pilot randomized controlled trial evaluating the integration of the PREDICT Assessment Model into prehospital stroke pathways. Ambulance services within the catchment areas of CMC Ludhiana and JIPMER Puducherry will be randomized to intervention or control groups. In the intervention group, ambulance personnel will use GFAP/D-Dimer testing and CEREBO-NIRS technology to support prehospital stroke classification and triage, in coordination with the on-call stroke team. The control group will receive standard care, including transport to the hospital for CT-based diagnosis and subsequent treatment decisions.

The primary objective of the study is to validate the diagnostic accuracy and feasibility of the combined GFAP/D-Dimer and CEREBO-NIRS approach and to assess its potential impact on prehospital stroke triage. Phase II will additionally assess the effect of the intervention on the time from ambulance dispatch to initiation of stroke-specific treatment. Secondary outcomes include functional outcome at 90 days measured by the modified Rankin Scale, in-hospital mortality, and adverse events.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

232

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Puducherry
      • Puducherry, Puducherry, India, 605006
        • Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Puducherry JIPMER
        • Contact:
    • Punjab
      • Ludhiana, Punjab, India, 141008
        • Christian Medical College and Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Phase 1

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients of any gender ≥18 years with clinically suspected stroke
  • Transported by ambulance or presenting directly to ED of participating hospitals
  • Time from symptom onset/ Lost known well time (within 24 hours)
  • Consent provided by patient/ next of kin

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with known pre-existing neurological conditions that may confound diagnosis (Concurrent traumatic brain injury, recent TBI in last 3months, IS/ICH in last 3 months, Diagnosis of brain tumour/SOL)
  • Patients with known medical condition with estimated life expectancy ≤ 3 months
  • Those refusing consent

Phase 2

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adult patients of any gender ≥18 years with clinically suspected stroke
  • Transported by ambulance to ED of participating hospitals
  • Time from symptom onset/ Last well known time (≤ 24 hours)
  • NIHSS ≥ 5
  • Consent provided by patient/ next of kin

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with known pre-existing neurological conditions that may confound diagnosis (Concurrent traumatic brain injury, recent TBI in last 3months, IS/ ICH in last 3 months, Diagnosis of brain tumour/ SOL)
  • Patients with known medical condition with estimated life expectancy ≤ 3 months
  • Those refusing consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PREDICT Assessment Model

Ambulances in the intervention group will use the GFAP/D-Dimer point-of-care test and CEREBO Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) technology to classify suspected acute stroke in the prehospital setting. Patients suspected of ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion will be rapidly triaged to a comprehensive stroke centre, while patients suspected of intracerebral hemorrhage will receive stringent blood pressure control in the ambulance according to established protocols. Decision-making will be undertaken in conjunction with the on-call stroke team through the PREDICT App.

A finger-prick blood sample will be obtained from patients with suspected acute stroke and tested using a GFAP/D-Dimer lateral flow assay. The test will provide rapid biomarker results to support differentiation between ischemic stroke and intracerebral hemorrhage in the prehospital setting and The handheld CEREBO-NIRS device will be applied non-invasively to the patient's scalp to detect intracranial hematoma by assessing asymmetry in near-infrared optical density. The findings will be recorded and used as part of the PREDICT Assessment Model for stroke subtype classification.

Active Comparator: Standard Care

Ambulances in the control group will follow standard care procedures, including rapid transport of patients to the hospital for CT head imaging, followed by treatment decisions based on the CT findings.

Standard care CT head imaging

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PREDICT assessment model
Time Frame: 30 mins

(Phase 1) Sensitivity and Specificity and PREDICT assessment model. Accurate identification of ICH >90% using PREDICT model.

30 mins
Time for Device Application by Paramedics
Time Frame: 30 mins

(Phase 1) The time taken by paramedics/ ED personnel to apply the CEREBO NIRS device and obtain GFAP/D Dimer results. Lesser time indicates good outcome.

30 mins
Treatment initiation
Time Frame: 30 mins

(Phase 2) Time from Ambulance dispatch to initiation of stroke-specific treatment (Triage to Stroke ready centre or rapid BP control). Lesser time indicates better outcome.

30 mins

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inter-Center Variability
Time Frame: 2 years

(Phase 1) Comparison of diagnostic accuracy and feasibility metrics between CMC Ludhiana and JIPMER Puducherry to assess consistency across centres. More consistency indicates good outcome.

2 years
Correlation with Gold Standard
Time Frame: 2 years

(Phase 1) Agreement between the PREDICT assessment model and the CT head scan diagnosis (the gold standard). More correlation indicates better outcome.

2 years
Safety Metrics
Time Frame: 2 years

Phase 1 Documentation of adverse events related to the testing procedure. Fewer events indicate a better outcome.

2 years
modified Rankin Scale
Time Frame: 90 days

Phase 2 Functional outcome at 90 days Lower score (0-3) indicates good outcome

90 days
In-hospital mortality
Time Frame: 7 days

Phase 2 In-hospital mortality. Lesser mortality indicates better outcome

7 days
Adverse events
Time Frame: 90 days

Phase 2 Incidence of adverse events (e.g., symptomatic ICH). Lesser events indicate better outcome.

90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dr Ivy A Sebastian, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India
  • Principal Investigator: Dr Jeyaraj D Pandian, MD DM, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Ludhiana, India

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2031

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 30, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The study protocol does not currently specify a plan for sharing individual participant data (IPD) with other researchers. Any future IPD sharing will be considered in accordance with applicable ethical, regulatory, and data-protection requirements.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe