Silent Evaluation of DeepTRG for Assessing Tumor Response After Preoperative Treatment in Stomach and Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer

September 24, 2026 updated by: Qun Zhao

Prospective Observational Study of the Feasibility and Accuracy of DeepTRG for Automated Pathological Response Assessment After Neoadjuvant Therapy in Gastric and Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Single-Center Silent Validation Study

This study will evaluate whether an artificial intelligence (AI) system called DeepTRG can reliably assess cancer tissue removed during surgery after treatment given before surgery. It will include adults with stomach cancer or cancer at the junction between the stomach and the food pipe who have received treatment before surgery.

Pathologists are doctors who examine tissue to diagnose disease. After cancer surgery, they assess how much living cancer remains and whether cancer is present in nearby lymph nodes. DeepTRG analyzes digital images of tissue slides to measure remaining cancer and describe tissue changes, such as scarring and inflammation. It combines information from the original tumor site and lymph nodes to produce a structured assessment.

The main question is:

* How often can DeepTRG complete the required assessment and produce a clear result without a person correcting the AI analysis?

The study will also examine:

  • How closely the system's measurements agree with assessments made by independent expert pathologists.
  • How accurately it detects remaining cancer, including small amounts of cancer and cancer in lymph nodes.
  • How long the analysis takes and how often it fails or produces an uncertain result.
  • Whether its performance differs across treatment types and cancer tissue types.

This study will take place at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University in China. Eligible patients will be enrolled consecutively. Researchers will use tissue collected during the patients' planned surgery. No additional surgery or biopsy is required for this study.

DeepTRG will run in the background in "silent mode." The doctors responsible for the patients' routine pathology reports and treatment decisions will not receive its results. Patients will continue to receive usual care. The AI model and its grading rules will be fixed before validation begins.

Independent expert pathologists will assess the tissue without seeing the AI results. Researchers will then compare the expert assessments, routine pathology reports, and DeepTRG outputs. Cases with poor-quality images, failed analyses, or uncertain outputs will remain part of the assessment of how reliably the system works.

Researchers will also collect information about subsequent treatment, cancer recurrence, and survival during follow-up. The initial analysis will focus on feasibility and measurement performance. A separate future study would be needed to determine whether using DeepTRG in clinical care improves doctors' decisions or patient outcomes.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • None Selected
      • Shijiazhuang, None Selected, China, 050011
        • Recruiting
        • the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Consecutive adults with histologically confirmed gastric or Siewert type II or III gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have received neoadjuvant treatment and are scheduled for surgical resection with curative intent at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, China. Eligible patients will be approached consecutively during the recruitment period, before postoperative pathological response is known. Routinely collected primary tumor and regional lymph node specimens will be evaluated. DeepTRG will operate in silent mode, with its outputs withheld from routine reporting pathologists and treating clinicians. Technical failures and unassessable cases will be retained in the feasibility analysis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction (Siewert type II or III), diagnosed before neoadjuvant treatment.
  • Received neoadjuvant anticancer treatment before planned surgical resection.
  • Scheduled to undergo surgical resection with curative intent at the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, with routine pathological examination of the primary tumor site and regional lymph nodes.
  • Written informed consent obtained in accordance with the ethics-approved study protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-adenocarcinoma malignancies, including squamous cell carcinoma, lymphoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumor, or neuroendocrine carcinoma.
  • Surgery for recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
  • Previous inclusion of the patient's tissue or data in DeepTRG model training, grading-rule development, or parameter tuning.

Patients will not be excluded because of a complete pathological response, positive surgical margins, poor-quality or unavailable slides, digitization failure, algorithm failure, or uncertain or unassessable DeepTRG results. Technical limitations identified after enrollment will be recorded and retained in the feasibility analysis. Patients who do not proceed to surgical resection will be documented in the study flow and will not contribute to the specimen-based primary outcome denominator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: COHORT
  • Time Perspectives: PROSPECTIVE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient-Level Complete Automated Assessment Rate
Time Frame: Within 14 days after receipt of the surgical specimen by the pathology department.

Percentage of enrolled patients undergoing surgical resection for whom DeepTRG generates a complete patient-level pathological response assessment within the specified assessment window, without manual correction of AI-generated segmentations, measurements, or grades. A successful assessment must include the final DeepTRG grade and all required primary tumor and regional lymph node outputs, meet prespecified quality criteria, and have no unresolved uncertainty requiring manual adjudication. The AI model, grading rules, required outputs, and quality criteria will be locked before enrollment. The denominator will include all enrolled patients undergoing eligible surgical resection, including those with unavailable or inadequate slides, digitization failures, processing failures, or unassessable or uncertain outputs. These cases will be counted as unsuccessful assessments. The rate will be reported with a 95% confidence interval.

Within 14 days after receipt of the surgical specimen by the pathology department.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 24, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 30, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • DeepTRG-SV-001

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe