Comparison of Bacillus Clausii and Saccharomyces Boulardii for Acute Diarrhea at Day 3

September 29, 2026 updated by: Syeda Sabeen Fatima Naqvi

Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Bacteria-Based Probiotics to Fungi-Based Probiotics in Acute Watery Diarrhea in Pediatric Outpatient Department

THIS STUDY WILL BE CONDUCTED ON OPD PATIENTS IN CENTRAL PARK TEACHING HOSPITAL LAHORE TO SEE THE EFFECT OF PROBIOTICS ON DIARRHEA ALL PATIENTS INCLUDED WILL HAVE ACUTE WATERY DIARRHEA AND THE OUTCOME WILL BE CHECKED ON THE THIRD DAY OF ADMISSION

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is planning to compare the clinical efficacy of bacterial ( Bacillus clausii) versus fungal (Sacchromyces boulardii) probiotic in acute watery diarrhea. A clear consensus has not been reached regarding the use of appropriate probiotic. Some pediatricians are of the opinion that bacterial probiotic are suprerior to fungal probiotics along with rehydration for improvement of diarrhea. However, others experience is that fungal probiotics are better along with rehydration for the improvement of diarrhea. A high-quality evidence basis must be established that guides the pediatrician regarding the choice of probiotic.The results of this study will help guide pediatricians to the better probiotic for the clinical improvement of acute diarrhea in our setup.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

86

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 54000
        • Central Park Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 second to 4 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Children aged 0 to 59 months
  2. Acute Watery Diarrhea
  3. The child's parents or caregiver understands, agrees to participate, and complies with the study protoco

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with bloody diarrhea, severe dehydration, severe electrolyte imbalance, immunocompromised children, or malabsorption disorders and systemic illnesses (sepsis, pneumonia, urinary infections)
  2. Those who have already used antibiotics or probiotics during this illness
  3. Known hypersensitivity to probiotics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: BACILLUS CLAUSII

Participants will receive bacterial-based probiotic Bacillus clausii (2 billion spores), administered orally twice daily, in addition to standard diarrheal treatment. Participants will be followed for 3 days to assess clinical efficacy based on stool frequency and consistency.

Bacillus clausii, a bacterial-based probiotic, will be administered orally at a dose of 2 billion spores twice daily for 3 days, in addition to standard diarrheal treatment. Clinical efficacy will be assessed on the 3rd day based on stool frequency and consistency.

Active Comparator: SACCHROMYCES BOULARDII

Participants will receive fungal-based probiotic Saccharomyces boulardii 250 mg, administered orally twice daily, in addition to standard diarrheal treatment. Participants will be followed for 3 days to assess clinical efficacy based on stool frequency and consistency.

Saccharomyces boulardii, a fungal-based probiotic, will be administered orally at a dose of 250 mg twice daily for 3 days, in addition to standard diarrheal treatment. Clinical efficacy will be assessed on the 3rd day based on stool frequency and consistency.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical efficacy of probiotic treatment
Time Frame: 3 days

Clinical efficacy will be assessed on the 3rd day. A positive outcome will be defined as ≤3 episodes of stool with Bristol stool grade 5 or less. The clinical efficacy of Bacillus clausii will be compared with Saccharomyces boulardii in children with acute watery diarrhea.

3 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Awais M, Alam S, Wali N, Mehmood R, Nasir U, Waheed A. Comparison of the Clinical Efficacy of Bacteria-Based Probiotics to Fungi-Based Probiotics. 7.
  • Sharif A, Ardakani AT, Kashani HH, Rabiee F, Sharif MR. Comparison Efficacy of Bacterial and Fungal Probiotics on Acute Pediatric Diarrhea A Randomized Clinical Trial [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2024 Sept 3]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2183/v1
  • Erdogan O, Tanyeri B, Torun E, Gonullu E, Arslan H, Erenberk U, Oktem F. The comparition of the efficacy of two different probiotics in rotavirus gastroenteritis in children. J Trop Med. 2012;2012:787240. doi: 10.1155/2012/787240. Epub 2012 Jun 19.
  • Khan MH, Khan MS. Comparison of Multispecies Probiotic and Saccahomyces Boulardii in Children with Acute Watery Diarrhea in Terms of Mean Duration of Diarrhea.
  • Sharma AK, Puri N, Mathur M, Mathur A. A randomized controll trial to compare the efficacy of saccharomyces boulardii, bacillus clausii, and lactobacillus rhamnosus GG preparation in the treatment of acute diarrhea in children. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2022 Mar 14;63-7.
  • Syed M, Gondi S, D V, P U. Study on efficacy of probiotic use in pediatric acute diarrhea: A prospective open-labeled study. Natl J Physiol Pharm Pharmacol. 2023;14(5):1

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 2, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 2, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 7, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 29, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CPMC/IRB-No/1503

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe