Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Procedures

September 27, 2026 updated by: Dr Mudassar Saeed Pansota

Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Procedures

ERAS protocols are still only partially and unevenly implemented in many hospitals in developing nations, despite substantial worldwide evidence to the contrary. Because of institutional regulations, lack of understanding, or budget constraints, local surgical units frequently stick to traditional perioperative care approaches. Furthermore, there is a dearth of local data assessing the viability and efficacy of ERAS protocols in patients undergoing significant abdominal surgeries in our healthcare settings. Thus, the purpose of this study is to evaluate how ERAS protocols affect the postoperative results of patients having major abdominal surgery at our facility. The study's findings will be useful in determining whether ERAS pathways will assist our patient population heal more quickly, experience fewer issues, and spend less time in the hospital. The results might potentially encourage the use of standardized ERAS procedures in surgical practice, which would enhance patient care and maximize the use of medical resources

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Significant postoperative morbidity, extended hospital stays, delayed recovery, and higher healthcare expenditures are linked to major abdominal surgeries, including colorectal, hepatobiliary, and gastric procedures. Prolonged fasting, copious IV fluids, delayed mobilization, and delayed oral meals are common components of traditional perioperative care, which may raise physiological stress and hinder surgical recovery. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines have become a contemporary perioperative care strategy in recent years, with the goal of improving surgical outcomes and speeding recovery after major procedures.

In order to reduce surgical stress, maintain physiological function, and encourage early postoperative recovery, ERAS is a multidisciplinary, evidence-based treatment route that incorporates a number of perioperative techniques. Preoperative counseling, reduced fasting with carbohydrate loading, less invasive surgical procedures, multimodal analgesia, early mobilization, early oral feeding introduction, and other coordinated preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative therapies are all part of these protocols. ERAS protocols have been extensively used in various surgical specialties over the last ten years, especially in colorectal and other significant abdominal procedures. When compared to traditional perioperative treatment, a number of recent research and systematic reviews have shown that ERAS approaches considerably improve postoperative outcomes. Without raising readmission or death rates, ERAS implementation has been linked to fewer postoperative complications, an earlier recovery of bowel function, a shorter hospital stay, and lower healthcare costs

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

166

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients of either gender between the ages of 18 and 70 years.
  • Individuals having elective major abdominal surgery (such as small bowel resection, right hemicolectomy, left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, anterior resection, or similar colorectal resection).
  • ASA class I-III patients

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who need to stay in the intensive care unit (ICU) after surgery for more than twenty-four hours.
  • Individuals suffering from significant organ malfunction, such as advanced heart, liver, or kidney failure.
  • Individuals who have had significant abdominal surgery within the recent three months.
  • Patients who withdraw their consent or decline to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ERAS

Patients managed by the surgical team according to the ERAS pathway will be included in Group A (ERAS group)

Placebo Comparator: Standard care

Patients managed according to routine conventional perioperative care during the study period will be included in Group B (conventional care group)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: 30 days

Surgical site infection: superficial, deep, or organ-space infection diagnosed clinically by the treating surgeon or supported by wound findings, culture results, imaging, or the need for antibiotics or drainage. Anastomotic leak: clinical or radiological evidence of leakage from a surgical anastomosis, including feculent discharge from drain or wound, intra-abdominal collection related to anastomosis, or leak confirmed on imaging or reoperation. Ileus: failure of return of bowel function requiring continued nil per oral status, nasogastric decompression, or delayed oral intake beyond routine postoperative recovery as documented by the surgical team). As recorded in the patient's medical file, complications will be found by radiological results, laboratory tests, and clinical examinations

30 days
Mean hospital stay
Time Frame: 1 week

described as the total number of days between the day of surgery and the day of hospital discharge. For every patient, it will be computed in days and documented

1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: muhammad ali armughan, MBBS, Allama Iqbal Teaching Hospital, DG Khan

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 27, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe