Parenting Program for Young Children With Spina Bifida

October 29, 2026 updated by: Phoenix Children's Hospital

Addressing Health Disparities in Underserved Families of Young Children With Spina Bifida Through a Community-Informed Intervention

The goal of this clinical trial is to test and improve an online program for caregivers of young children with spina bifida. Investigators hope to learn whether the program can improve caregiver stress and positive parenting behaviors during early childhood. In the preliminary phase of this clinical trial, investigators are aiming to answer these questions:

  1. Are caregivers of young children with spina bifida willing to participate in the program and complete assessments before and after the program?
  2. Do caregivers rate the program as easy to use and helpful?
  3. How can the program be improved in the future?
  4. Does the program result in clinically meaningful reductions in caregivers' stress and increase caregivers' use of positive parenting strategies?

Caregivers of young children with spina bifida who agree to participate will complete surveys when they begin the study and a videotaped interaction task playing with their child. Children will complete a brief developmental test.

Caregivers will then complete the program, involving completing 6 weekly online modules that are paired with a 1-hour group meeting with other caregivers. Sessions will focus on helping caregivers connect with others who have a young child with spina bifida, as well as helping families cope with stress and support early child development.

Caregivers will repeat the surveys and videotaped interaction task again three months later, after the program is completed, and again six months later. They will also be invited to participate in an interview to learn about their experience in the program.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will involve rapid-cycle testing of the program with 10 caregivers of young children with spina bifida to examine usability, feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept (i.e., clinically meaningful change for individual families) to refine the intervention and implementation plan. Rapid-cycle testing will determine the program's optimal duration and format. This will be completed in partnership with advisory boards comprised of 10 caregivers of children with spina bifida and 10 healthcare providers ("co-designers"), with an emphasis on families from low-income and rural backgrounds who can experience barriers to care. The proposed study is an important first step towards developing an evidence-based treatment that can be used to support families of young children with spina bifida.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85016
        • Phoenix Children's
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Adrien Winning, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria for the Caregiver:

  • Caregiver is the parent or legal guardian of the child
  • Caregiver lives with the child at least 50% of the time
  • Caregiver is fluent in English

Inclusion Criteria for the Child with Spina Bifida:

  • Child has Spina Bifida (e.g., myelomeningocele, meningocele, lipomyelomeningocele)
  • Child is between the ages of 2.5 and 6 years old, but no older than 6.5 years old at study enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not applicable

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Positive Parenting Program

This digital health intervention involves completing 6 online modules focusing on caregiver stress management and positive parenting skills.

The digital health intervention is based on the Parent Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (PACT) and positive parenting literature. Caregivers in the program will complete 6 self-directed online modules that are paired with group sessions, where caregivers can meet others who have a child with spina bifida and discuss how to use what they learned in the modules in daily life.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
System Usability Scale
Time Frame: 3 months post-enrollment

This is a 10-item measure that will quantitatively assess usability of our online program. The SUS measures how accessible the website is and whether participants can understand the content of the website on a scale of 0-100. We will continue to recruit until our website has achieved an average score of >68% (above average).

3 months post-enrollment
Adapted Website Evaluation Questionnaire (WEQ)
Time Frame: 3 months post-enrollment

This measure will assess accessibility and satisfaction with the Program. Four overall items will be rated from 1-10 by participants. The overall score will be the average response across items. A higher score indicates higher satisfaction with the program. Overall scores of 8 or higher (> 80%) are an indication of satisfaction with the program.

3 months post-enrollment
Enrollment rate
Time Frame: 3 and 6 month post-enrollment

Enrollment rate (#enrolled/#approached; milestone greater than or equal to 50%) will indicate feasibility of the program.

3 and 6 month post-enrollment
Completion rate
Time Frame: 3 and 6 month post-enrollment

Completion rate (# completing sessions/#enrolled; milestone greater than or equal to 75%) will indicate feasibility of the program.

3 and 6 month post-enrollment
Retention rate
Time Frame: 3 and 6 month post-enrollment

Retention rate (#completers of 3 and 6 month assessments/ # enrolled at baseline; milestone greater than or equal to 70%) will indicate feasibility of the program.

3 and 6 month post-enrollment
Feasibility Intervention Measure (FIM)
Time Frame: 3 and 6 month post-enrollment

The four-item FIM (milestone greater than or equal to 80%) will be used to indicate feasibility of the program. Each item is rated from 1-5 and the final score for the measure is the average number for all answers. A higher score means a participant rated the program as more feasible, an overall score of 4 or higher (80%) means a participant found the program to be feasible.

3 and 6 month post-enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Depression and Anxiety Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months post-enrollment

Caregivers will complete the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) which yields Anxiety and Depression Total Scores. The HADS Anxiety/Depression subscales each include 7 items and total scores can range from 0-21, with higher scores reflecting greater symptomatology. Proof-of-concept will be determined if at least 6 caregivers report maintenance of non-clinical levels of anxiety/depression or demonstrate clinically meaningful reductions in caregiver distress (i.e., movement from clinical [≥8] to non-clinical range [<8] on HADS anxiety/depression scale).

Baseline, 3 and 6 months post-enrollment
Play and Alternative Learning Strategies parent-child interaction coding
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 month follow up

Caregivers will videorecord themselves engaging in at least 10 minutes of play with their child. Positive parenting behaviors will be rated with the standardized Play and Learning Strategies (PALS) coding scheme by blinded, trained raters. The coding scheme includes overall ratings of responsiveness and warmth (4-point scale), as well as frequency counts of scaffolding, praise, and verbal directives. Proof-of-concept will be determined if at least 6 caregivers demonstrate improvements by greater than 1 point on observed positive parenting behaviors from baseline.

Baseline, 3 and 6 month follow up

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF-P or -2)
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months post-enrollment

Caregivers will complete the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function, Preschool (BRIEF-P; ages 2 to 5 years) or the BRIEF-2 (ages 5 years+), yielding a General Executive Composite. Proof-of-concept will be determined if 6 caregivers report either that the child has maintained non-clinical levels of executive functioning problems or has reduced executive functioning problems to the non-clinical range post-intervention (i.e., General Executive Composite T-score less than or equal to 65).

Baseline, 3 and 6 months post-enrollment
Conners Early Childhood
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 and 6 months post-enrollment

Caregivers will also complete the Conners Early Childhood (Conners EC). Proof-of-concept will be determined if 6 caregivers report that the child has either maintained normative levels on relevant developmental scales (Social Functioning, Mood/Affect, Defiance/Temper scales) or improved to a normative range (i.e., < T-score of 65).

Baseline, 3 and 6 months post-enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Adrien Winning, Phoenix Children's Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2028

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2026

Last Verified

September 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

All collected, deidentified quantitative IPD for the primary and secondary outcomes of the study for participants who consent to have their data shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD will be made available after the primary outcomes manuscript is published and will be available for at least seven years post study closure.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Interested parties will be able to access the IPD by contacting the PI or through request at the Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe