Endoscopic Papillectomy Versus Surgery for Ampullary Tumors: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study

November 2, 2026 updated by: Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Investigation of the Indications and Clinical Outcomes of Endoscopic Papillectomy Versus Surgery for Ampullary Tumors

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of endoscopic treatment (endoscopic papillectomy [EP] with or without intraductal radiofrequency ablation [RFA]) and surgical treatment (transduodenal ampullectomy [TSA] and pancreatoduodenectomy [PD]) in patients with ampullary tumors (ampullary adenoma and early ampullary carcinoma), focusing on residual disease, recurrence, postoperative complications, and overall costs.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter, two-arm, prospective cohort study. The diagnosis of ampullary adenoma must be confirmed by biopsy.

The endoscopic treatment group receives EP; patients without intraductal extension receive EP alone, while patients with intraductal extension receive additional RFA in the same or a subsequent session. The surgical treatment group receives TSA or PD. Patients are followed up at 3, 6, and 12 months after the initial treatment, then annually for at least 5 years, with side-viewing duodenoscopy, targeted biopsy, and CT assessment. To control confounding between the two groups, propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting will be applied.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

306

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China, 250012
        • Qilu Hospital of Shandong University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients with histologically confirmed ampullary adenoma or early ampullary carcinoma (Tis/T1) without invasion into the duodenal muscularis propria, staged M0/N0 by EUS , MRCP and CT , with intraductal tumor extension ≤ 20 mm on EUS, MRCP, or IDUS, undergoing endoscopic papillectomy or surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients aged ≥18 years
  2. Patients with histologically confirmed ampullary adenoma or early ampullary carcinoma (Tis/T1) based on endoscopic biopsy (i.e., without tumor invasion into the duodenal muscularis propria).
  3. Preoperative staging by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) , magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) or computed tomography (CT) showing no distant metastasis (M0) and no lymph node metastasis (N0).
  4. Intraductal tumor extension (ITE) ≤ 20 mm assessed by EUS, MRCP or Intraductal ultrasound (IDUS ).
  5. Planned to undergo EP, with or without intraductal RFA, or surgical treatment (TSA or PD).
  6. Patients who provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients unable to tolerate general anesthesia or surgery.
  2. Ectopic duodenal papilla.
  3. Contraindications to endoscopic procedures (e.g., severe esophageal stenosis, gastric outlet obstruction, or other conditions precluding endoscopic access to the papilla).
  4. Major upper abdominal surgery or previous biliary surgery history.
  5. Uncorrectable coagulopathy (INR > 1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000/μL), or inability to withhold antithrombotic (anticoagulant or antiplatelet) therapy for the planned endoscopic or surgical procedure..
  6. Pregnant or lactating women.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: COHORT
  • Time Perspectives: PROSPECTIVE

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Endoscopic treatment group

Patients undergoing EP with or without RFA.

Endoscopic papillectomy (EP); EP combined with intraductal RFA for lesions with intraductal tumor extension.

Surgical treatment group

Patients undergoing surgical treatment.

TSA or PD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence rate at 12 months
Time Frame: At 12 months after the initial treatment

Recurrence confirmed by endoscopic biopsy after an interval ≥ 3 months from the end of treatment, assessed at the 12-month follow-up.

At 12 months after the initial treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
R0 resection rate
Time Frame: Periprocedural

Proportion of patients with complete resection achieved at the first endoscopic or surgical intervention and confirmed by histology (negative margins).

Periprocedural
Procedure-related adverse event rate
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after the initial treatment

Proportion of patients who experienced at least one adverse event attributable to the initial endoscopic or surgical procedure within 30 days after the procedure, irrespective of severity.

Up to 90 days after the initial treatment
Recurrence rate at 6 months
Time Frame: At 6 months after the initial treatment

Recurrence confirmed by endoscopic biopsy after an interval ≥ 3 months from the end of treatment, assessed at the 6-month follow-up.

At 6 months after the initial treatment
Residual lesion rate
Time Frame: Up to 3 months after the initial treatment

Presence of residual adenoma tissue at the next endoscopy after treatment.

Up to 3 months after the initial treatment
Clinical success rate
Time Frame: Up to 5 years after the initial treatment

Proportion of patients who achieved complete excision of the lesion (regardless of the number of procedures) with no histologically confirmed adenoma regrowth, no evidence of invasive cancer, and without the need for surgical resection, during follow-up up to 5 years after the initial treatment.

Up to 5 years after the initial treatment
Endoscopic treatment failure rate
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after the initial treatment

Inability to completely resect the lesion endoscopically (regardless of the number of procedures), histopathologically invasive malignancy, or recurrence no longer amenable to endoscopic treatment.

Up to 12 months after the initial treatment
Total number of readmissions within 12 months
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after the initial treatment

All readmissions due to disease-related symptoms (e.g., cholangitis, pancreatitis, obstructive jaundice) or treatment-related events (e.g., bleeding, perforation, anastomotic problems).

Up to 12 months after the initial treatment
Technical success rate
Time Frame: Periprocedural

Proportion of patients in whom the planned procedure was completed as intended.

Periprocedural
Total treatment cost
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after the initial treatment

All direct medical costs from admission to 12 months after the initial treatment (including procedure, anesthesia, hospitalization, medication, examinations, and readmission costs).

Up to 12 months after the initial treatment
Index hospitalization length of stay
Time Frame: Periprocedural

Number of calendar days from the date of admission for the initial treatment to the date of discharge for the initial treatment,including the day of admission

Periprocedural
Total length of stay within 12 months
Time Frame: Up to 12 months after the initial treatment

Total number of calendar days spent in hospital within 12 months after the initial treatment, including the index hospitalization and all readmissions due to disease-related symptoms or treatment-related events.

Up to 12 months after the initial treatment
Postprocedural pancreatitis rate
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after the initial treatment

Defined by two of three criteria: characteristic abdominal pain; amylase or lipase > 3× upper limit of normal; imaging features of pancreatitis; severity graded mild / moderate / severe per protocol.

Up to 90 days after the initial treatment
Postprocedural bleeding rate
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after the initial treatment

Proportion of patients with clinically significant post-procedural bleeding within 30 days after the procedure, defined as any of the following after achieving primary haemostasis: overt bleeding symptoms (hematemesis, melena, hematochezia, or blood aspirated via nasogastric tube); haemodynamic instability attributable to bleeding; a decrease in haemoglobin greater than 2 g/dL; or direct endoscopic evidence of bleeding from the papillectomy site.

Up to 90 days after the initial treatment
Postprocedural perforation rate
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after the initial treatment

Direct visualization of a transmural defect during endoscopy, or radiographic evidence of extraluminal free air on abdominal CT or plain radiograph.

Up to 90 days after the initial treatment
Postprocedural cholangitis rate
Time Frame: Up to 90 days after the initial treatment

New onset temperature >38 °C for more than 24 hours combined with cholestasis. Severity will be graded separately according to the TG18 severity classification (Grade I / II / III) and reported descriptively.

Up to 90 days after the initial treatment
Cumulative recurrence rate
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 5 years

Cumulative recurrence during annual follow-up up to 5 years

Through study completion, an average of 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

October 20, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 20, 2032

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 20, 2036

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 2, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe