Functional Recovery After a Recent Lateral Ankle Sprain With Early Initiation of Rehabilitation: Changes in the Ankle-GO Score and Its Association With Return to Sport and Recurrent Sprains. (ASGO)

October 29, 2026 updated by: Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis

Functional Recovery After a Recent Lateral Ankle Sprain With Early Initiation of Rehabilitation: Changes in the Ankle-GO Score and Its Association With Return to Sport and Recurrent Sprains: ASGO Study

Lateral ankle sprains are common musculoskeletal injuries, particularly among young adults and athletes. Although recovery is often favorable, lateral ankle sprains may be associated with persistent pain, chronic ankle instability, delayed return to sport, and an increased risk of recurrence. The Ankle-GO score is a recently developed tool for assessing functional recovery after a lateral ankle sprain. Available data mainly concern assessments performed from the second month after injury onward. To our knowledge, changes in this score during the early recovery phase have not yet been evaluated. The ASGO study aims to describe changes in the Ankle-GO score in patients enrolled early after a lateral ankle sprain and followed for four months.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Lateral ankle sprains are among the most common musculoskeletal injuries in young adults and athletes. Although often considered minor injuries, they can result in substantial morbidity, including persistent pain, functional limitations, reduced physical activity levels, and frequent recurrences.

The literature indicates that a substantial proportion of patients experience persistent symptoms after an initial lateral ankle sprain, and approximately 20% to 40% develop chronic ankle instability. Return to sport after an ankle sprain remains insufficiently standardized and is still frequently based on time-based or subjective criteria, despite the recent emergence of international recommendations based on clinical, functional, and psychological criteria.

Current recommendations favor early functional management, including limiting immobilization, progressively resuming weight-bearing, implementing an appropriate rehabilitation program, and applying the principles of the PEACE & LOVE protocol. Despite these recommendations, management practices remain heterogeneous in primary care and emergency departments.

To improve the assessment of functional recovery after a lateral ankle sprain, researchers have developed and subsequently validated the Ankle-GO score. This tool combines several functional tests and validated questionnaires to assess the physical and psychological dimensions of recovery, as well as readiness to return to sport.

Studies have shown that a low Ankle-GO score measured two months after a lateral ankle sprain is associated with delayed return to sport, an increased risk of recurrence, and a lower likelihood of complete functional recovery. These studies primarily assessed patients from the second month after injury onward.

To the investigator's knowledge, no study has specifically described changes in the Ankle-GO score in patients enrolled within the first few days after a sprain or investigated the potential value of assessment during the first month of follow-up.

Furthermore, several studies suggest that delayed initiation of rehabilitation may be associated with an increased risk of recurrence and less favorable functional recovery. To investigate this early recovery phase and document the actual time to rehabilitation initiation, only patients enrolled within seven days of injury will be included.

The ASGO study builds on the work of a reseracher by investigating a population enrolled within seven days of injury, a period during which early initiation of rehabilitation may influence functional recovery and the risk of recurrence.

The investigator's hypothesis is that early management following a lateral ankle sprain, combined with early initiation of functional rehabilitation after injury, is associated with better functional recovery, as assessed by the Ankle-GO score at two months.

Investigator also hypothesize that a higher Ankle-GO score at one month may be associated with a faster return to sport and a lower risk of recurrence during follow-up. This hypothesis is based on the findings of a researcher, who showed that a higher Ankle-GO score at two months was associated with better return-to-sport outcomes and a reduced risk of recurrence following a lateral ankle sprain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

76

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. . Criteria related to the study population

    • Male or female aged 18 to 50 years, inclusive
    • Affiliated with a social security system
    • Sufficient understanding of French to understand the information sheet and complete the questionnaires
    • Free, informed, and signed consent provided by the participant and the investigator (no later than the day of enrollment and before any examination required for the clinical research), following oral and written information
    • Ability to complete all follow-up assessments planned in the study protocol
  2. . Criteria related to the condition under study

    • Recent lateral ankle sprain clinically diagnosed by a physician
    • Sprain occurring within the 7 days preceding enrollment
    • Initial management provided at one of the participating centers
  3. . Criteria related to sports participation

    • Regular participation in a sporting activity before the injury, defined as at least one session per week during the three months preceding the sprain
    • Willingness to return to sport

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. . Criteria related to the study population

    - Patients under 18 years of age or over 50 years of age

  2. . Criteria related to the condition under study

    • Clinically or radiologically confirmed associated fracture
    • Ankle sprain requiring prolonged strict immobilization
    • Suspected or diagnosed severe syndesmotic injury requiring specific management
    • Suspected or diagnosed Chopart or Lisfranc injury
    • Initial indication for surgery
    • Sprain of the same ankle within the six months preceding enrollment
    • Known chronic ankle instability
  3. . Criteria related to medical history

    - History of surgery or fracture involving the affected ankle

  4. . Criteria related to associated conditions

    • Neurological disorder likely to impair balance or motor control
    • Known condition affecting balance
    • Concomitant musculoskeletal injury of the lower limb likely to limit performance of functional tests
  5. . Criteria related to follow-up

    • Anticipated inability to complete the follow-up assessments planned in the study protocol
    • Refusal to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group

Participants will be enrolled within seven days of a recent lateral ankle sprain and followed for four months, with a telephone call on day 10 and follow-up visits (Ankle-GO test and questionnaires) at months 1, 2, and 4.

After enrollment, a telephone call will be conducted on day 10, followed by follow-up visits (Ankle-GO test and questionnaires) at months 1, 2, and 4.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total Ankle-GO score measured at M2
Time Frame: 2 months

Total Ankle-GO score measured two months (M2) after the lateral ankle sprain

2 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ankle-GO score measured at M1
Time Frame: 1 month

Ankle-GO score measured at month 1 (M1) after the lateral ankle sprain.

1 month
Ankle-GO score measured at M4
Time Frame: 4 months

Ankle-GO score measured at month 4 (M4) after the lateral ankle sprain.

4 months
Return to sport at M2
Time Frame: 2 months

Actual return to sport assessed at month 2 (M2)

2 months
Return to sport at M4
Time Frame: 4 months

Actual return to sport assessed at month 4 (M4)

4 months
Time to return to sport at M2
Time Frame: 2 months

Time to return to sport, expressed as the number of days between the date of injury and the first return to sport measured at month 2 (M2)

2 months
Time to return to sport at M4
Time Frame: 4 months

Time to return to sport, expressed as the number of days between the date of injury and the first return to sport measured at month 4 (M4)

4 months
Level of return to sport at M2
Time Frame: 2 months

Level of return to sport, compared with the self-reported pre-injury sports level (same or lower level) measured at month 2 (M2)

2 months
Level of return to sport at M4
Time Frame: 4 months

Level of return to sport, compared with the self-reported pre-injury sports level (same or lower level) measured at month 4 (M4)

4 months
Occurrence of a recurrent lateral ankle sprain
Time Frame: 4 months

Occurrence of a recurrent lateral ankle sprain affecting the initially injured ankle between enrollment (day 0) and the end of follow-up (month 4)

4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Corentin Boulay Le Soleuz, Resident physician, Groupe Hospitalier de la Rochelle Ré Aunis

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data will be made available with publication. A Digital Object Identifier will be used and Data will be available at www.recherche.data.gouv.fr

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available immediately following publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal will have access to the data

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe