Using sit-stand workstations to decrease sedentary time in office workers: a randomized crossover trial

Nirjhar Dutta, Gabriel A Koepp, Steven D Stovitz, James A Levine, Mark A Pereira, Nirjhar Dutta, Gabriel A Koepp, Steven D Stovitz, James A Levine, Mark A Pereira

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to determine whether installation of sit-stand desks (SSDs) could lead to decreased sitting time during the workday among sedentary office workers.

Methods: A randomized cross-over trial was conducted from January to April, 2012 at a business in Minneapolis. 28 (nine men, 26 full-time) sedentary office workers took part in a 4 week intervention period which included the use of SSDs to gradually replace 50% of sitting time with standing during the workday. Physical activity was the primary outcome. Mood, energy level, fatigue, appetite, dietary intake, and productivity were explored as secondary outcomes.

Results: The intervention reduced sitting time at work by 21% (95% CI 18%-25%) and sedentary time by 4.8 min/work-hr (95% CI 4.1-5.4 min/work-hr). For a 40 h work-week, this translates into replacement of 8 h of sitting time with standing and sedentary time being reduced by 3.2 h. Activity level during non-work hours did not change. The intervention also increased overall sense of well-being, energy, decreased fatigue, had no impact on productivity, and reduced appetite and dietary intake. The workstations were popular with the participants.

Conclusion: The SSD intervention was successful in increasing work-time activity level, without changing activity level during non-work hours.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant flow (cross-over design). January–April, 2012, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Percent of time spent sitting, during the entire day and during work-hours only, measured using the objective MSR accelerometer (*p < 0.05). January–April, 2012, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total activity, activity during work, and activity outside of work, measured objectively by the Gruve accelerometer (*p < 0.05). January–April, 2012, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Sedentary time per hour, for total hours, work-hours only, and non-work-hours, measured objectively by the Gruve accelerometer (*p < 0.05). January–April, 2012, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

References

    1. Haskell W.L., Lee I.M., Pate R.R., Powell K.E., Blair S.N., Franklin B.A., Macera C.A., Heath G.W., Thompson P.D., Bauman A. Physical activity and public health: Updated recommendation for adults from the american college of sports medicine and the american heart association. Circulation. 2007;116:1081–1093. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185649.
    1. Basner M., Fomberstein K.M., Razavi F.M., Banks S., William J.H., Rosa R.R., Dinges D.F. American time use survey: Sleep time and its relationship to waking activities. Sleep. 2007;30:1085–1095.
    1. Norton K., Norton L., Sadgrove D. Position statement on physical activity and exercise intensity terminology. J. Sci. Med. Sport. 2010;13:496–502. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.09.008.
    1. Levine J. Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT) Baillière's Best Pr. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2002;16:679–702. doi: 10.1053/beem.2002.0227.
    1. Finni T., Haakana P, Pesola A.J., Pullinen T. Exercise for fitness does not decrease the muscular inactivity time during normal daily life. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports. 2012;24:211–219.
    1. Bankoski A., Harris T.B., McClain J.J., Brychta R.J., Caserotti P., Chen K.Y., Berrigan D., Troiano R.P., Koster A. Sedentary activity associated with metabolic syndrome independent of physical activity. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:497–503. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0987.
    1. Hamilton M.T., Hamilton D.G., Zderic T.W. Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes. 2007;56:2655–2667. doi: 10.2337/db07-0882.
    1. Dunstan D.W., Kingwell B.A., Larsen R., Healy G.N., Cerin E., Hamilton M.T., Shaw J.E., Bertovic D.A., Zimmet P.Z., Salmon J., et al. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:976–983. doi: 10.2337/dc11-1931.
    1. Healy G.N., Dunstan D.W., Salmon J., Cerin E., Shaw J.E., Zimmet P.Z., Owen N. Breaks in sedentary time: Beneficial associations with metabolic risk. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:661–666.
    1. Miller R., Brown W. Steps and sitting in a working population. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2004;11:219–224. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1104_5.
    1. Jans M.P., Proper K.I., Hildebrandt V.H. Sedentary behavior in dutch workers: Differences between occupations and business sectors. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2007;33:450–454. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.033.
    1. Dunstan D.W., Thorp A.A., Healy G.N. Prolonged sitting: Is it a distinct coronary heart disease risk factor? Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2011;26:412–419. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3283496605.
    1. Alkhajah T.A., Reeves M.M., Eakin E.G., Winkler E.A., Owen N., Healy G.N. Sit-stand workstations: A pilot intervention to reduce office sitting time. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2012;43:298–303. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.027.
    1. Kozey K.S., Libertine A., Staudenmayer J., Freedson P. The feasibility of reducing and measuring sedentary time among overweight, non-exercising office workers. J. Obes. 2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/282303.
    1. Benden M.E., Blake J.J., Wendel M.L., Huber J.C., Jr. The impact of stand-biased desks in classrooms on calorie expenditure in children. Am. J. Public Health. 2011;101:1433–1436. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.300072.
    1. Levine J.A., Baukol P.A., Westerterp K.R. Validation of the tracmor triaxial accelerometer system for walking. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2001;33:1593–1597. doi: 10.1097/00005768-200109000-00024.
    1. Levine J., Melanson E.L., Westerterp K.R., Hill J.O. Tracmor system for measuring walking energy expenditure. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2003;57:1176–1180. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601673.
    1. Chau J., VAN DER Ploeg H.P., Dunn S., Kurko J., Bauman A. Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2012;44:118–125.
    1. Manohar C., Koepp G., McCrady-Spitzer S., Levine J. A stand-alone accelerometer system for free-living individuals to measure and promote physical activity. ICAN: Infant, Child, & Adolescent Nutrition. 2012;4:222–229.
    1. Moskowitz D.S., Young S.N. Ecological momentary assessment: What it is and why it is a method of the future in clinicalpsychopharmacology. J. Psychiatry Neurosci. 2006;31:13–20.
    1. Subar A.F., Kipnis V., Troiano R.P., Midthune D., Schoeller D.A., Bingharm S., Sharbaugh C.O., Trabulsi J., Runswick S., Ballard-Barbash R., et al. Using intake biomarkers to evaluate the extent of dietary misreporting in a large sample of adults: The OPEN study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2003;158:1–13. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwg092.
    1. Moshfegh A.J., Rhodes D.G., Baer D.J., Murayi T., Clemens J.C., Rumpler W.V., Paul D.R., Sebastian R.S., Kuczynski K.J., Ingwersen L.A., et al. The US department of agriculture automated multiple-pass method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2008;88:324–332.
    1. Reilly M.C., Zbrozek A.S., Dukes E.M. The validity and reproducibility of a work productivity and activity impairment instrument. Pharmacoeconomics. 1993;4:353–365. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199304050-00006.
    1. Novak C.M., Levine J.A. Central neural and endocrine mechanisms of non-exercise activity thermogenesis and their potential impact on obesity. J. Neuroendocrinol. 2007;19:923–940. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2826.2007.01606.x.
    1. Husemann B., Von Mach C.Y., Borsotto D., Zepf K.I., Scharnbacher J. Comparisons of musculoskeletal complaints and data entry between a sitting and a sit-stand workstation paradigm. Hum. Factors. 2009;51:310–320. doi: 10.1177/0018720809338173.
    1. Ebara T., Kubo T., Inoue T., Murasaki G., Takeyama H., Sato T., Suzumura H., Niwa S., Takanishi T., Tachi N., et al. Effects of adjustable sit-stand VDT workstations on workers’ musculoskeletal discomfort, alertness and performance. Ind. Health. 2008;46:497–505. doi: 10.2486/indhealth.46.497.

Source: PubMed

Upcoming Clinical Trials

Subscribe