- ICH GCP
- Registr klinických studií v USA
- Klinická studie NCT01250379
A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) in Combination With Chemotherapy in Patients With Breast Cancer Progressing After First-Line Therapy With Avastin and Chemotherapy (TANIA)
12. ledna 2016 aktualizováno: Hoffmann-La Roche
A Phase III Randomized Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Continued and Re-induced Bevacizumab in Combination With Chemotherapy for Patients With Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer After First-line Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab Treatment
This randomized, open-label, parallel-group study will assess the efficacy and s afety of Avastin (bevacizumab) in combination with chemotherapy versus chemother apy alone as second- and third-line therapy in patients with locally recurrent o r metastatic breast cancer progressing after first-line therapy with Avastin and chemotherapy.
Patients will be randomized to receive either Avastin (15 mg/kg e very 3 weeks or 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously) plus standard chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone.
Anticipated time on study treatment is until third-line disease progression or unacceptable toxicity occurs.
Přehled studie
Postavení
Dokončeno
Podmínky
Intervence / Léčba
Typ studie
Intervenční
Zápis (Aktuální)
494
Fáze
- Fáze 3
Kontakty a umístění
Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.
Studijní místa
-
-
-
Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1199ACI
-
Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1280AEB
-
Buenos Aires, Argentina, C1426ANZ
-
San Miguel de Tucuman, Argentina, T4000IAK
-
-
-
-
GO
-
Goiania, GO, Brazílie, 74140-050
-
-
RS
-
Porto Alegre, RS, Brazílie, 90430-090
-
-
SC
-
Itajai, SC, Brazílie, 88301-220
-
-
-
-
-
Split, Chorvatsko, 21000
-
-
-
-
-
Amiens, Francie, 80090
-
Angers, Francie, 49933
-
Besancon, Francie, 25030
-
Bordeaux, Francie, 33000
-
Boulogne Sur Mer, Francie, 62222
-
Brest, Francie, 29609
-
Caen, Francie, 14076
-
Clermont Ferrand, Francie, 63011
-
Dijon, Francie, 21079
-
Grenoble, Francie, 38028
-
Limoges, Francie, 87039
-
Marseille, Francie, 13285
-
Montpellier, Francie, 34298
-
Nancy, Francie, 54100
-
Nantes, Francie, 44202
-
Paris, Francie, 75970
-
Pierre Benite, Francie, 69495
-
Reims CEDEX, Francie, 51056
-
Rouen, Francie, 76038
-
Saint Gregoire, Francie, 35768
-
Saint Jean, Francie, 31240
-
St Cloud, Francie, 92210
-
St Priest En Jarez, Francie, 42271
-
St Quentin, Francie, 02321
-
Strasbourg, Francie, 67010
-
Toulouse, Francie, 31076
-
-
-
-
Calabria
-
Cosenza, Calabria, Itálie, 87100
-
-
Campania
-
Benevento, Campania, Itálie, 82100
-
Napoli, Campania, Itálie, 80131
-
-
Emilia-Romagna
-
Reggio Emilia, Emilia-Romagna, Itálie, 42100
-
-
Friuli-Venezia Giulia
-
Udine, Friuli-Venezia Giulia, Itálie, 33100
-
-
Lazio
-
Roma, Lazio, Itálie, 00168
-
-
Lombardia
-
Monza, Lombardia, Itálie, 20052
-
-
Marche
-
Macerata, Marche, Itálie, 62100
-
-
Sardegna
-
Cagliari, Sardegna, Itálie, 09121
-
Sassari, Sardegna, Itálie, 07100
-
-
Sicilia
-
Catania, Sicilia, Itálie, 95100
-
-
Toscana
-
Firenze, Toscana, Itálie, 50134
-
Pisa, Toscana, Itálie, 56100
-
Pontedera, Toscana, Itálie, 56025
-
-
Veneto
-
Verona, Veneto, Itálie, 37126
-
-
-
-
-
Beer Sheva, Izrael, 8410101
-
Jerusalem, Izrael, 91120
-
Kfar-Saba, Izrael, 4428164
-
Petach Tikva, Izrael, 4941492
-
Ramat Gan, Izrael, 52620-00
-
Rehovot, Izrael, 7610001
-
Tel Aviv, Izrael
-
Tel Aviv, Izrael, 6423906
-
-
-
-
-
Budapest, Maďarsko, 1122
-
Budapest, Maďarsko, 1145
-
Szeged, Maďarsko, 6720
-
-
-
-
-
Amberg, Německo, 92224
-
Aschaffenburg, Německo, 63739
-
Berlin, Německo, 10367
-
Berlin, Německo, 10719
-
Bielefeld, Německo, 33604
-
Chemnitz, Německo, 09116
-
Dresden, Německo, 01307
-
Düsseldorf, Německo, 40235
-
Essen, Německo, 45122
-
Essen, Německo, 45136
-
Freiburg, Německo, 79110
-
Göttingen, Německo, 37073
-
Hamburg, Německo, 20249
-
Hannover, Německo, 30177
-
Heidelberg, Německo, 69120
-
Heidelberg, Německo, 69115
-
Karlsruhe, Německo, 76135
-
Koeln, Německo, 50935
-
Mannheim, Německo, 68161
-
Muenster, Německo, 48149
-
München, Německo, 80639
-
Naunhof, Německo, 04683
-
Neuss, Německo, 41462
-
Nordhausen, Německo, 99734
-
Osnabrueck, Německo, 49076
-
Ravensburg, Německo, 88212
-
Stade, Německo, 21680
-
Stralsund, Německo, 18435
-
Wiesbaden, Německo, 65199
-
-
-
-
-
Feldkirch, Rakousko, 6807
-
Graz, Rakousko, 8036
-
Innsbruck, Rakousko, 6020
-
Krems, Rakousko, 3500
-
Salzburg, Rakousko, 5020
-
Steyr, Rakousko, 4400
-
Villach, Rakousko, 9500
-
Wien, Rakousko, 1090
-
-
-
-
-
Bardejov, Slovensko, 085 01
-
Bratislava, Slovensko, 812 50
-
Kosice, Slovensko, 04001
-
Nove Zamky, Slovensko, 940 34
-
Presov, Slovensko, 080 01
-
-
-
-
-
Athens, Řecko, 11528
-
Ioannina, Řecko, 455 00
-
Patras, Řecko, 265 00
-
Thessaloniki, Řecko, 546 45
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Španělsko, 08036
-
Barcelona, Španělsko, 08035
-
Barcelona, Španělsko, 08041
-
Castellon, Španělsko, 12002
-
Cordoba, Španělsko, 14004
-
Leon, Španělsko, 24071
-
Lerida, Španělsko, 25198
-
Madrid, Španělsko, 28040
-
Madrid, Španělsko, 28046
-
Madrid, Španělsko, 28034
-
Madrid, Španělsko, 28041
-
Madrid, Španělsko, 28007
-
Madrid, Španělsko, 28033
-
Madrid, Španělsko, 28223
-
Malaga, Španělsko, 29010
-
Murcia, Španělsko, 30008
-
Sevilla, Španělsko, 41014
-
Valencia, Španělsko, 46009
-
Zaragoza, Španělsko, 50009
-
-
Cantabria
-
Santander, Cantabria, Španělsko, 39008
-
-
Guipuzcoa
-
San Sebastian, Guipuzcoa, Španělsko, 20080
-
-
Islas Baleares
-
Palma De Mallorca, Islas Baleares, Španělsko, 07014
-
-
Tenerife
-
La Laguna, Tenerife, Španělsko, 38320
-
-
-
-
-
Aarau, Švýcarsko, 5000
-
Chur, Švýcarsko, 7000
-
Zürich, Švýcarsko, 8038
-
-
Kritéria účasti
Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.
Kritéria způsobilosti
Věk způsobilý ke studiu
18 let a starší (Dospělý, Starší dospělý)
Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky
Ne
Pohlaví způsobilá ke studiu
Ženský
Popis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Female patients, >/= 18 years of age
- Histologically confirmed HER2-negative breast cancer
- Disease progression during or following first-line treatment with Avastin and chemotherapy for locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer
- Avastin treatment in first-line setting must have been a minimum of 4 cycles (15 mg/kg) or 6 cycles (10 mg/kg) in combination with chemotherapy
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- At least 28 days since prior radiation therapy or surgery and recovery from treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
- Anti-angiogenic therapy or anti-vascular endothelial growth factors other than Avastin for first-line treatment
- Active malignancy other than superficial basal cell and superficial squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix or breast within the last 5 years
- Inadequate renal function
- Clinically relevant cardio-vascular disease
- Known CNS disease except for treated brain metastases
- Chronic daily treatment with high-dose aspirin (>325 mg/day) or clopidogrel (>75 mg/day)
- Pregnant or lactating women
Studijní plán
Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.
Jak je studie koncipována?
Detaily designu
- Primární účel: Léčba
- Přidělení: Randomizované
- Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
- Maskování: Žádné (otevřený štítek)
Zbraně a zásahy
Skupina účastníků / Arm |
Intervence / Léčba |
|---|---|
|
Experimentální: 2
|
Standard chemotherapy (doublets not allowed)
10 mg/ kg iv every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg iv every 3 weeks
|
|
Aktivní komparátor: 1
|
Standard chemotherapy (doublets not allowed)
|
Co je měření studie?
Primární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Second-Line Progression-Free Survival (PFS) According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.1 (v1.1)
Časové okno: Baseline (less than or equal to [≤] 28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first.
For target lesions (TLs), PD was defined at least a 20 percent (%) increase in the sum of the largest diameter (SLD), taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For non-target lesions (NTLs), PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
Baseline (less than or equal to [≤] 28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
|
Second-Line PFS
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
The median time, in months, from randomization to second-line PFS event.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
|
Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 6
Časové okno: Month 6
|
Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
Month 6
|
|
Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 12
Časové okno: Month 12
|
Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without secondline PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
Month 12
|
|
Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 18
Časové okno: Month 18
|
Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their secondline of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
Month 18
|
|
Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Alive and Free of Second-Line Disease Progression at Month 24
Časové okno: Month 24
|
Second-line PFS was defined as the time from randomization to PD or death due to any cause during their second-line of treatment with bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy, whichever occurred first.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
Month 24
|
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Second-Line PFS by Baseline Risk Factor (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
The median time, in months, from randomization to second-line PFS event according to the following baseline risk factors: hormone receptor negative, HER2 negative (triple negative), hormone receptor positive/HER-2 negative (HR-pos/HER-neg), first-line PFS less than (<) 6 months, first-line PFS greater than or equal to (≥) 6 months, taxane chemotherapy (chemo), non-taxane chemo, vinorelbine chemo, LDH ≤ 1.5 upper limit of normal (ULN), LDH greater than (>) 1.5 ULN, < 65 years of age, ≥ 65 years of age, < 70 years of age, ≥ 70 years of age, < 3 metastatic organ sites, ≥ 3 metastatic organ sites, bevacizumab-free (B-free) interval ≤ 6 weeks, B-free > 6 weeks, disease-free (D-free) interval ≤ 24 months, D-free > 24 months, D-free ≤ 12 months, and D-free > 12 months.
Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
PD: defined in Outcome measure 1.
The 95% CI was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methodology.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Second-Line Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST v1.1 (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
BOR was defined as a confirmed CR or PR during second-line treatment.
For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD.
For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels.
The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Second-Line CR, PR, Stable Disease, and PD According to RECIST v1.1 (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD; SD was defined as neither sufficient decrease in SLD to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase in SLD to qualify for PD; and PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started.
For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels; stable disease was defined as the persistence of 1 or more NTLs and/or maintenance of tumor marker levels above normal limits; and PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
The 95% CI was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
|
Duration of Second-Line Objective Response (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
The median time, in months, from the date of the first second-line documentation of CR or PR according to RECIST v1.1 to the date of the first second-line documentation of PD or death due to any cause.
For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD; and PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started.
For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels, and PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants with CR or PR who had experienced neither disease progression nor died were censored at the date of the last available tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression free.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 3 years
|
|
Percentage of Participants With a Second-Line Documented CR or PR According to RECIST v1.1 Estimated to be Alive and Free of Disease Progression at Months 3, 6, and 9 (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Months 3, 6, and 9
|
Duration of objective response was defined as the median time, in months, from the date of the first second-line documentation of CR or PR to the date of the first second-line documentation of PD or death due to any cause.
For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs; PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the SLD of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline SLD; and PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the SLD of TLs, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded since the treatment started.
For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels, and PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants with CR or PR who had experienced neither disease progression nor died were censored at the date of the last available tumor assessment when the participant was known to be progression free.
|
Months 3, 6, and 9
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Third-Line PFS According to RECIST v1.1
Časové okno: First dose of third-line treatment until PD or death due to any cause (assessed every 8-9 weeks, over a period of approximately 14 months)
|
Third-line PFS was defined as the time from the date of first dose of third-line bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy to the date of third-line PD or death due to any cause.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without second-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
First dose of third-line treatment until PD or death due to any cause (assessed every 8-9 weeks, over a period of approximately 14 months)
|
|
Third-Line PFS
Časové okno: First dose of third-line treatment until PD or death due to any cause (over a period of approximately 14 months)
|
The median time, in months, from the first dose of third-line bevacizumab and/or chemotherapy to third-line PD or death due to any cause.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
First dose of third-line treatment until PD or death due to any cause (over a period of approximately 14 months)
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Second- and Third-Line PFS According to RECIST v1.1
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years
|
Second- and third-line PFS was defined as the time from the date randomization to the date of third-line PD or death due to any cause.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years
|
|
Second- and Third-Line PFS
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years
|
The median time, in months, from randomization to second-line and third-line PFS event.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Second- and Third-Line Tumor Progression
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years
|
Second- and third-line tumor progression was defined as occurrence of third-line PD according to RECIST v1.1 or death due to progression of disease.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without third-line PD or death due to progression of disease were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years
|
|
Time to Second- and Third-Line Tumor Progression
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years
|
The median time, in months, from randomization to second- and third-line tumor progression.
Second- and third-line tumor progression was defined as third-line PD according to RECIST v1.1 or death due to progression of disease.
For TLs, PD was defined at least a 20% increase in the SLD, taking as reference the smallest SLD recorded from baseline or the appearance of one or more new lesions.
For NTLs, PD was defined as the appearance of 1 or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing NTLs.
Participants without third-line PD or death were censored at the date of last tumor assessment where non-progression was documented.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter according to the standard of care of the treatment site until approximately 4 years
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Died
Časové okno: Baseline until death (up to approximately 4 years)
|
Percentage of participants who died due to any reason were reported.
|
Baseline until death (up to approximately 4 years)
|
|
Overall Survival (OS)
Časové okno: Baseline until death (up to approximately 4 years)
|
OS was defined as the median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of death, due to any cause.
Participants who had not died were censored at the date the patient was last known to be alive.
|
Baseline until death (up to approximately 4 years)
|
|
Percentage of Participants Estimated to be Surviving at Months 6, 12, 18, and 24
Časové okno: Months 6, 12, 18, and 24
|
OS was defined as the median time, in months, from the date of randomization to the date of death, due to any cause.
|
Months 6, 12, 18, and 24
|
|
Percentage of Participants Experiencing Problems by European Quality of Life Instrument (EQ-5D) Category (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
The EQ-5D is composed of 5 single-item measures where participants responded to questions assessing health status by responding with either "no problems", "some problems", or "extreme problems" in the following categories: mobility (M) ("no problems"="I have no problems in walking about" to "extreme problems"="I am confined to bed"), self-care (SC) ("no problems"="I have no problems with self-care" to "extreme problems"="I am unable to wash or dress myself"), usual activities (UA) ("no problems"="I have no problems performing my usual activities" to "extreme problems"="I am unable to perform my usual activities"), pain/discomfort (P/D) ("no problems"="I have no pain or discomfort" to "extreme problems"="I have extreme pain or discomfort"), and anxiety/depression (A/D) ("no problems"="I am not anxious or depressed" to "extreme problems"='I am extremely anxious or depressed").
|
Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
|
Quality of Life Assessed As an Index Score Using the EQ-5D (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
The EQ-5D is composed of 5 single-item measures where participants responded to questions assessing health status by responding with either "no problems", "some problems", or "extreme problems" in the following categories: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Based on large population surveys, an algorithm was used to combine the responses to each of these 5 measures into 1 single EQ-5D index score ranging from -0.59 (extreme problems) to +1 (no problems).
|
Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
|
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D Index Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
The EQ-5D is composed of 5 single-item measures where participants responded to questions assessing health status by responding with either "no problems", "some problems", or "extreme problems" in the following categories: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression.
Based on large population surveys, an algorithm was used to combine the responses to each of these 5 measures into 1 single EQ-5D index score ranging from -0.59 (extreme problems) to +1 (no problems) where a negative value indicated a worsening of perceived quality of life and a positive value indicated an improvement of perceived quality of life.
|
Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
|
Quality of Life Assessed Using the EQ-5D Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
The participant was asked to rate their overall health on a 0-100 millimeter (mm) vertical scale, where the lowest endpoint=0 (labeled as worst imaginable health state) and the highest endpoint =100 (labeled as the best imaginable health state).
The participant marked the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the bottom was measured in millimeters.
A higher value indicated a better health state.
|
Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
|
Change From Baseline in VAS Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
The participant was asked to rate their overall health on a 0-100 mm vertical scale, where the lowest endpoint = 0 (labeled as worst imaginable health state) and the highest endpoint =100 (labeled as the best imaginable health state).
The participant marked the line corresponding to their assessment and the distance from the bottom was measured in millimeters.
A negative value indicated a worsening of perceived quality of life and a positive value indicated an improvement of perceived quality of life.
|
Baseline, during second-line treatment at Weeks 8 and 16 (4-week cycles) or Weeks 9 and 18 (3-week cycles) and at second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
|
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter until second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) is composed of 5 multi-item sections where participants responded to questions assessing symptoms (scale: 0-4; 0="not at all" and 4="very much"), as follows: physical well-being (PWB) (7 items, total score 0-28), social/family well-being (SWB) (7 items, total score 0-28), emotional well-being (EWB) (6 items, total score 0-24), functional well-being (FWB) (7 items, total score 0-28); and breast cancer score based on the additional concerns section of FACT-B (10 items, total score 0-40).
The FACT-B Trial Outcomes Index (TOI) score=sum of PWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscale scores (total score 0-96).
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, and FWB subscales scores (total score 0-108).
The FACT-B total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscales scores (total score 0-148).
In all cases a higher value indicated a better perceived quality of life.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter until second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Scores (Data Cutoff 20 December 2013)
Časové okno: Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter until second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
The FACT-B is composed of 5 multi-item sections where participants responded to questions assessing symptoms (scale: 0-4; 0="not at all" and 4="very much"), as follows: PWB (7 items, total score 0-28), SWB (7 items, total score 0-28), EWB (6 items, total score 0-24), FWB (7 items, total score 0-28); and breast cancer score based on the additional concerns section of FACT-B (10 items, total score 0-40).
The FACT-B TOI score=sum of PWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscale scores (total score 0-96).
The FACT-G total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, and FWB subscales scores (total score 0-108).
The FACT-B total score=sum of PWB, SWB, EWB, FWB, and breast cancer score subscale scores (total score 0-148).
In all cases a higher value indicated a better perceived quality of life.
|
Baseline (≤28 days after randomization), every 8-9 weeks thereafter until second-line PD (up to approximately 3 years)
|
Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé
Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.
Sponzor
Publikace a užitečné odkazy
Osoba odpovědná za zadávání informací o studiu tyto publikace poskytuje dobrovolně. Mohou se týkat čehokoli, co souvisí se studiem.
Obecné publikace
- Vrdoljak E, Marschner N, Zielinski C, Gligorov J, Cortes J, Puglisi F, Aapro M, Fallowfield L, Fontana A, Inbar M, Kahan Z, Welt A, Levy C, Brain E, Pivot X, Putzu C, Gonzalez Martin A, de Ducla S, Easton V, von Minckwitz G. Final results of the TANIA randomised phase III trial of bevacizumab after progression on first-line bevacizumab therapy for HER2-negative locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2016 Nov;27(11):2046-2052. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw316. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
- von Minckwitz G, Puglisi F, Cortes J, Vrdoljak E, Marschner N, Zielinski C, Villanueva C, Romieu G, Lang I, Ciruelos E, De Laurentiis M, Veyret C, de Ducla S, Freudensprung U, Srock S, Gligorov J. Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as second-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer after first-line treatment with bevacizumab plus chemotherapy (TANIA): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Oct;15(11):1269-78. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70439-5. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
Termíny studijních záznamů
Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.
Hlavní termíny studia
Začátek studia
1. února 2011
Primární dokončení (Aktuální)
1. prosince 2013
Dokončení studie (Aktuální)
1. března 2015
Termíny zápisu do studia
První předloženo
25. listopadu 2010
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
26. listopadu 2010
První zveřejněno (Odhad)
30. listopadu 2010
Aktualizace studijních záznamů
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Odhad)
11. února 2016
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
12. ledna 2016
Naposledy ověřeno
1. ledna 2016
Více informací
Termíny související s touto studií
Další relevantní podmínky MeSH
Další identifikační čísla studie
- MO22998
- 2010-020998-16
Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty
Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA
Ne
Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA
Ne
produkt vyrobený a vyvážený z USA
Ne
Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .