Tato stránka byla automaticky přeložena a přesnost překladu není zaručena. Podívejte se prosím na anglická verze pro zdrojový text.

Preoperative Decision-Making in Patients With Pulmonary Nodules Suspected of Lung Cancer

14. května 2026 aktualizováno: Xing Wei, MD, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute

Preoperative Decision-Making Characteristics and Associated Mechanisms in Patients With Pulmonary Nodules Suspected of Lung Cancer

Patients with pulmonary nodules that are highly suspected to be lung cancer often need to make important treatment decisions before a definite pathological diagnosis is available. These decisions may include whether to undergo surgery, whether to continue follow-up, whether to have further diagnostic tests, and how to understand the potential benefits and risks of different management options.

This prospective observational study aims to describe the preoperative decision-making status of adult patients with pulmonary nodules suspected of lung cancer. The study will assess patients' decision self-efficacy, decisional conflict, shared decision-making experience, and decision regret using standardized questionnaires. It will also explore factors associated with better or worse decision quality, such as demographic characteristics, clinical information, health literacy, doctor-patient communication, family involvement, and emotional status.

No treatment or intervention will be assigned by the study. Participants will receive routine clinical care, and study data will be collected mainly through questionnaires before surgery or during the preoperative period. The findings may help clinicians identify patients who need additional decision support and improve communication during preoperative decision-making for suspected lung cancer.

Přehled studie

Postavení

Zatím nenabíráme

Podmínky

Intervence / Léčba

Detailní popis

Pulmonary nodules that are highly suspected of malignancy represent a common and clinically challenging scenario in thoracic surgery. Before a definite pathological diagnosis is available, patients may need to make complex decisions regarding surgery, additional diagnostic procedures, active surveillance, or other management strategies. These decisions are often made under uncertainty and may be influenced by patients' understanding of medical information, perceived cancer risk, fear of treatment delay, concerns about unnecessary surgery, family involvement, and communication with clinicians.

This is a single-center, prospective observational study conducted at Sichuan Cancer Hospital. The study plans to enroll approximately 200 adult patients with pulmonary nodules highly suspected of lung cancer who are facing preoperative clinical decision-making. The study will not assign any treatment, diagnostic procedure, or behavioral intervention. All clinical management decisions will be made according to routine clinical practice and shared discussion between patients and their treating clinicians.

The primary aim of the study is to characterize preoperative decision-making among patients with pulmonary nodules suspected of lung cancer. Specifically, the study will assess decision self-efficacy, decisional conflict, and decision quality. Decision self-efficacy will be evaluated using the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale. Decisional conflict will be assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale. Decision quality and shared decision-making experience will be evaluated using instruments such as the SDM-Q-9 and decision regret-related measures, as applicable.

The study will also explore the relationships among decision self-efficacy, decisional conflict, and decision quality. Potential associated factors may include demographic characteristics, clinical characteristics, health literacy, quality of doctor-patient communication, family involvement, emotional status, and patient preferences. Data will be collected using structured questionnaires during the preoperative outpatient or inpatient period.

Descriptive statistics will be used to summarize participant characteristics and questionnaire scores. Correlation analyses, multivariable regression models, and, if appropriate, structural equation modeling will be used to examine the associations and potential pathways linking decision self-efficacy, decisional conflict, and decision quality. The study is expected to provide evidence for identifying patients at risk of poor decision quality and for developing future decision support strategies in thoracic surgical practice.

Typ studie

Pozorovací

Zápis (Odhadovaný)

200

Kontakty a umístění

Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.

Studijní kontakt

Studijní záloha kontaktů

Studijní místa

  • Čína
    • Sichuan
      • Chengdu, Sichuan, Čína, 610041
        • Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
        • Kontakt:
        • Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
          • Xing Wei, MD

Kritéria účasti

Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.

Kritéria způsobilosti

Věk způsobilý ke studiu

  • Dospělý
  • Starší dospělý

Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky

Ne

Metoda odběru vzorků

Vzorek nepravděpodobnosti

Studijní populace

The study population will include adult patients treated at Sichuan Cancer Hospital who have pulmonary nodules highly suspected of lung cancer before pathological confirmation and who are facing preoperative clinical decision-making. Eligible participants will be identified from thoracic surgery outpatient clinics and inpatient wards. Participants will receive routine clinical care, and study data will be collected using structured questionnaires during the preoperative period.

Popis

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 years or older.
  2. Adult patients with pulmonary nodules that are highly suspected of malignancy based on clinical and radiological assessment.
  3. No definite pathological diagnosis of lung cancer before enrollment.
  4. Patients who are facing preoperative clinical decision-making with more than one reasonable management option, such as surgery, additional diagnostic evaluation, or follow-up.
  5. Able to understand the study procedures and complete the study questionnaires.
  6. Able and willing to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients without a real clinical decision-making choice regarding the management of the pulmonary nodule.
  2. Patients with severe cognitive impairment or a history of severe psychiatric disease that would interfere with valid questionnaire completion.
  3. Patients who are unable to communicate effectively with the study staff.
  4. Patients who decline to participate or are unable to provide written informed consent.

Studijní plán

Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.

Jak je studie koncipována?

Detaily designu

Kohorty a intervence

Skupina / kohorta
Intervence / Léčba
Patients With Pulmonary Nodules Suspected of Lung Cancer
Adult patients with pulmonary nodules highly suspected of lung cancer who are facing preoperative clinical decision-making before pathological confirmation. Participants will receive routine clinical care. No intervention, treatment assignment, or diagnostic procedure will be assigned by the study. Study data will be collected using structured questionnaires to assess decision self-efficacy, decisional conflict, shared decision-making experience, decision regret, and related clinical and demographic factors.
Jiný: Questionnaire-Based Decision-Making Assessment
Participants will complete structured questionnaires during the preoperative outpatient or inpatient period. The questionnaires will assess decision self-efficacy, decisional conflict, shared decision-making experience, decision regret, and related demographic and clinical factors. The study will not assign any treatment, diagnostic procedure, surgery, or decision-support intervention. All clinical care and management decisions will follow routine practice.

Co je měření studie?

Primární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Decisional Conflict Scale Score
Časové okno: At enrollment during the preoperative period, before surgery
Decisional conflict will be assessed using the Decisional Conflict Scale. The scale evaluates uncertainty in decision-making, feeling uninformed, unclear personal values, inadequate support, and perceived ineffective decision-making. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater decisional conflict. A score of 37.5 or higher indicates clinically important decisional conflict.
At enrollment during the preoperative period, before surgery

Sekundární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Decision Self-Efficacy Scale Score
Časové okno: At enrollment during the preoperative period, before surgery
Decision self-efficacy will be assessed using the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale. The scale measures participants' confidence in obtaining information, understanding risks and benefits, clarifying personal values, expressing preferences, and making healthcare decisions. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater decision self-efficacy.
At enrollment during the preoperative period, before surgery
Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire-9 Score
Časové okno: After preoperative clinical consultation and before surgery
The shared decision-making experience will be assessed using the 9-item Shared Decision-Making Questionnaire. The questionnaire evaluates the participant's perception of involvement in the clinical decision-making process. The total score will be transformed to a 0-to-100 scale, with higher scores indicating a better shared decision-making experience.
After preoperative clinical consultation and before surgery
Decision Regret Scale Score
Časové okno: 1 month after the preoperative clinical decision
Decision regret will be assessed using the Decision Regret Scale. The scale measures distress or remorse after a healthcare decision has been made. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater decision regret.
1 month after the preoperative clinical decision

Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé

Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.

Sponzor

Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Research Institute

Vyšetřovatelé

  • Vrchní vyšetřovatel: Xing Wei, MD, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China

Publikace a užitečné odkazy

Osoba odpovědná za zadávání informací o studiu tyto publikace poskytuje dobrovolně. Mohou se týkat čehokoli, co souvisí se studiem.

Obecné publikace

Termíny studijních záznamů

Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.

Hlavní termíny studia

Začátek studia (Odhadovaný)

1. května 2026

Primární dokončení (Odhadovaný)

30. června 2027

Dokončení studie (Odhadovaný)

31. července 2027

Termíny zápisu do studia

První předloženo

10. května 2026

První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality

10. května 2026

První zveřejněno (Aktuální)

15. května 2026

Aktualizace studijních záznamů

Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)

18. května 2026

Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality

14. května 2026

Naposledy ověřeno

1. května 2026

Více informací

Termíny související s touto studií

Klíčová slova

Další identifikační čísla studie

  • CN-SDM-Lung 2

Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)

Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?

NE

Popis plánu IPD

Individual participant data will not be publicly shared because the study collects sensitive clinical and decision-making information from patients before pathological confirmation. De-identified aggregate results may be reported in publications or conference presentations. Requests for de-identified data may be considered by the principal investigator and the ethics committee, subject to applicable institutional policies and participant consent.

Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty

Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA

Ne

Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA

Ne

Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .

Předplatit