- ICH GCP
- Registr klinických studií v USA
- Klinická studie NCT07620015
Turkish Version of the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM-TR): A Multi-Centre Validation Study (A-FORM-TR)
Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Psychometric Validation of the Turkish Version of the Ankle Fracture Outcome of Rehabilitation Measure (A-FORM-TR): A Multi-Centre Prospective Observational Study
Přehled studie
Postavení
Podmínky
Detailní popis
Background and Rationale: Ankle fractures are among the most common lower-limb injuries in orthopedic practice. Patient-reported recovery, including physical function, sleep, mood, and social participation, is not adequately captured by traditional clinician-based outcome measures such as the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score or the Olerud-Molander Ankle Score. The A-FORM, developed by McPhail et al. (2014), is a 15-item, Rasch-calibrated patient-reported outcome measure designed specifically to evaluate the rehabilitation experience after ankle fracture. No validated Turkish-language version currently exists.
Methodological Framework: The study follows the eight-stage cross-cultural adaptation and validation protocol described by Cruchinho et al. (2024), which incorporates the recommendations of Beaton et al. (2000) and the COSMIN framework (Mokkink et al., 2010). Written permission to translate and use the instrument has been granted by Prof. Steven McPhail (Queensland University of Technology).
Translation and Adaptation: Forward translation is carried out by two independent bilingual translators (one faculty member from the Department of English Language and Literature, providing linguistic expertise; one bilingual orthopedic surgeon, providing clinical content expertise). A reconciliation committee produces a synthesised Turkish version, which is then back-translated by two independent translators blinded to the original. A harmonisation expert committee compares the source, forward, and back versions for semantic, idiomatic, experiential, and conceptual equivalence. The harmonised pre-test version is evaluated through cognitive debriefing interviews with 10 to 15 ankle-fracture patients before field testing.
Field Testing: In the field testing phase, 150 adult patients with a radiographically confirmed unilateral ankle fracture (Weber A, B, or C; treated surgically by open reduction and internal fixation or conservatively with cast, walker boot, or functional brace) are enrolled across three orthopedic centres. Patients between 3 weeks and 12 months post-injury are eligible. The A-FORM-TR is administered together with the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score and the OMAS-TR. A sub-cohort of approximately 50 patients is re-administered the A-FORM-TR at 7 to 14 days, with a Global Rating of Change item used to identify clinically stable patients for the test-retest reliability analysis.
Statistical Analysis Plan: Developed in consultation with the institutional biostatistics team. Internal consistency is assessed by Cronbach's alpha (target greater than or equal to 0.80). Test-retest reliability is assessed by the intraclass correlation coefficient on stable patients (target greater than or equal to 0.90). Structural validity is assessed by confirmatory factor analysis against the a priori structure established by the original developers. Rasch measurement analysis examines item fit, threshold ordering, person separation reliability, person-item targeting, local independence, unidimensionality, and differential item functioning by sex, age group, treatment modality, recruiting centre, and time since injury. Construct validity is assessed via pre-specified hypotheses about correlation patterns with the AOFAS and OMAS-TR. Content validity is assessed via item-level and scale-level Content Validity Index and the Kappa coefficient from the expert committee. Floor and ceiling effects are reported. Responsiveness is not formally evaluated in this initial validation study and is reserved for a planned subsequent longitudinal study. Analyses use SPSS version 26 or later and R (lavaan, psych, eRm, and TAM packages).
Ethics and Registration: Ethics approval is sought from the Girne University Clinical Research Ethics Committee. An institutional permission letter is obtained from Ankara Bilkent City Hospital. Data are handled in accordance with the Turkish Personal Data Protection Law (KVKK No. 6698): pseudonymised, securely stored, and retained for a maximum of 5 years post-publication.
Typ studie
Zápis (Odhadovaný)
Kontakty a umístění
Studijní kontakt
- Jméno: Utku Gurhan, MD
- Telefonní číslo: +90 539 112 6898
- E-mail: utkugrhn@gmail.com
Studijní místa
-
-
-
Kyrenia, Kypr
- University of Kyrenia, Dr. Suat Gunsel Hospital - Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
-
Kontakt:
- Utku Gurhan, MD
- E-mail: utkugrhn@gmail.com
-
Vrchní vyšetřovatel:
- Utku Gurhan, MD
-
Nicosia, Kypr
- Near East University Hospital - Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
-
Dílčí vyšetřovatel:
- Enes Sari, MD
-
-
-
-
-
Ankara, Turecko (Türkiye)
- Ankara Bilkent City Hospital - Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology
-
Kontakt:
- Yakup Kahve, MD
- E-mail: ykahve@hotmail.com
-
Dílčí vyšetřovatel:
- Yakup Kahve, MD
-
-
Kritéria účasti
Kritéria způsobilosti
Věk způsobilý ke studiu
- Dospělý
- Starší dospělý
Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky
Metoda odběru vzorků
Studijní populace
Popis
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 years or older
- Radiographically confirmed unilateral ankle fracture (Weber A, B, or C)
- Either surgical (open reduction and internal fixation) or conservative (cast, walker boot, or functional brace) treatment completed
- Currently in the rehabilitation phase, 3 weeks to 12 months post-injury
- Native Turkish speaker, able to read and self-complete a questionnaire
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Bilateral ankle fracture
- Previous ipsilateral ankle fracture or any prior orthopedic surgery on the same ankle
- Pathological fracture (tumour, metastasis, or other underlying bone pathology)
- Concurrent significant ipsilateral lower-limb injury (for example pilon fracture, ipsilateral tibial or fibular shaft fracture, ipsilateral femoral or tibial plateau fracture)
- Polytrauma (significant head, spine, abdominal, or contralateral lower-limb injury affecting function)
- Cognitive or psychiatric impairment precluding self-completion of the questionnaire
- Insufficient Turkish literacy
- Inability to attend a follow-up visit for the test-retest assessment
Studijní plán
Jak je studie koncipována?
Detaily designu
Co je měření studie?
Primární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Internal consistency of the A-FORM-TR
Časové okno: At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
Cronbach's alpha coefficient calculated across all scored items of the A-FORM-TR.
Target greater than or equal to 0.80.
|
At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
|
Test-retest reliability of the A-FORM-TR
Časové okno: 7 to 14 days between the two administrations
|
Intraclass correlation coefficient (two-way mixed effects, absolute agreement, single measures) calculated for the A-FORM-TR Summary Score, restricted to patients reporting clinical stability (no change) on a Global Rating of Change item between the two administrations.
Target greater than or equal to 0.90.
|
7 to 14 days between the two administrations
|
Sekundární výstupní opatření
Měření výsledku |
Popis opatření |
Časové okno |
|---|---|---|
|
Construct validity assessed by a priori hypothesis testing
Časové okno: At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
Pearson or Spearman correlations between the A-FORM-TR Summary Score and the AOFAS Ankle-Hindfoot Score and OMAS-TR.
Pre-specified hypotheses: H1, strong positive correlation between A-FORM-TR and OMAS-TR (r greater than or equal to 0.60); H2, moderate positive correlation between A-FORM-TR and AOFAS (r between 0.40 and 0.60); H3, the psychosocial items of the A-FORM-TR correlate more weakly with the AOFAS than the physical-function items.
Construct validity is considered supported if at least 75 percent of the a priori hypotheses are confirmed.
|
At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
|
Content validity of the A-FORM-TR
Časové okno: Pre-testing phase, prior to field testing
|
Item-level and scale-level Content Validity Index and the Kappa coefficient of agreement derived from the expert committee evaluation conducted in the pre-testing phase.
|
Pre-testing phase, prior to field testing
|
|
Distribution properties: floor and ceiling effects
Časové okno: At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
Percentage of participants scoring at the floor (lowest possible score) and ceiling (highest possible score) of the A-FORM-TR Summary Score.
Effects are considered acceptable if less than 15 percent at either extreme.
|
At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
|
Rasch model fit of the A-FORM-TR
Časové okno: At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
Rasch measurement analysis serves as the primary framework for evaluating dimensionality and measurement properties of the A-FORM-TR.
Examined: item fit (infit and outfit mean-square 0.5 to 1.5), category threshold ordering, person separation reliability (target greater than or equal to 2.0), local independence (residual correlations less than 0.30), unidimensionality (residual principal component analysis first contrast less than 2.0), and differential item functioning by sex, age group, treatment modality, centre, and time since injury.
A priori decision rules: items showing substantive misfit will be reviewed for rescoring or removal; disordered thresholds will trigger response category collapsing and re-analysis; items showing significant DIF will be split or removed and the analysis re-run on the modified scale.
|
At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
|
Structural validity by confirmatory factor analysis
Časové okno: At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
Confirmatory factor analysis testing the prespecified single-factor (unidimensional) structure established in the original A-FORM development by McPhail et al. (2014).
CFA serves as a complementary structural check from a latent-variable perspective alongside the primary Rasch analysis.
Model fit assessed by CFI and TLI (target greater than or equal to 0.95), RMSEA (target less than or equal to 0.08), and SRMR (target less than or equal to 0.08).
|
At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
|
Known-groups validity by time since injury and treatment modality
Časové okno: At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
Known-groups validity assessed by testing whether A-FORM-TR Summary Scores differ across pre-specified clinical subgroups.
Pre-specified hypotheses: H4, patients in the 3-week to 3-month post-injury subgroup will score significantly lower (greater impairment) than patients in the 6- to 12-month subgroup; H5, A-FORM-TR Summary Scores will differ between surgically treated and conservatively treated patients (no a priori directional hypothesis).
Analyses by independent-samples t-test or Mann-Whitney U as appropriate, with Cohen's d or effect size reporting.
Added in response to peer review feedback from the original instrument developer.
|
At the single study visit (baseline administration)
|
Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé
Sponzor
Vyšetřovatelé
- Vrchní vyšetřovatel: Utku Gurhan, MD, University of Kyrenia
Publikace a užitečné odkazy
Obecné publikace
- Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Dec 15;25(24):3186-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014. No abstract available.
- Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):539-49. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
- McPhail SM, Williams CM, Schuetz M, Baxter B, Tonks P, Haines TP. Development and validation of the ankle fracture outcome of rehabilitation measure (A-FORM). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Jul;44(7):488-99, B1-2. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4980. Epub 2014 May 22.
- Cruchinho P, Lopez-Franco MD, Capelas ML, Almeida S, Bennett PM, Miranda da Silva M, Teixeira G, Nunes E, Lucas P, Gaspar F; Handovers4SafeCare. Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Validation of Measurement Instruments: A Practical Guideline for Novice Researchers. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2024 May 31;17:2701-2728. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S419714. eCollection 2024.
Termíny studijních záznamů
Hlavní termíny studia
Začátek studia (Odhadovaný)
Primární dokončení (Odhadovaný)
Dokončení studie (Odhadovaný)
Termíny zápisu do studia
První předloženo
První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality
První zveřejněno (Aktuální)
Aktualizace studijních záznamů
Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)
Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality
Naposledy ověřeno
Více informací
Termíny související s touto studií
Klíčová slova
Další relevantní podmínky MeSH
Další identifikační čísla studie
- AFORM-TR-2026
Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)
Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?
Popis plánu IPD
Časový rámec sdílení IPD
Kritéria přístupu pro sdílení IPD
Typ podpůrných informací pro sdílení IPD
- PROTOKOL STUDY
- MÍZA
- ICF
Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty
Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA
Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA
Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .