Tato stránka byla automaticky přeložena a přesnost překladu není zaručena. Podívejte se prosím na anglická verze pro zdrojový text.

Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation Using a Free Connective Tissue Graft With an Epithelial Collar

Application of a Free Connective Tissue Graft With an Epithelial Collar for Peri-Implant Soft Tissue Augmentation in Patients With Soft Tissue Deficiency Around Dental Implants

A prospective randomized interventional clinical trial (RCT) with a parallel-group design is planned. The study sample will include 32 patients randomly allocated into two groups according to the surgical intervention performed. In the first group, a free connective tissue graft with an epithelial collar will be used. In the second group, a free connective tissue graft without an epithelial collar will be used. In the postoperative period, assessment of changes in the width of keratinized mucosa, soft tissue thickness, pain severity, postoperative swelling, and patient quality of life will be performed.

Přehled studie

Detailní popis

The aim of this study is to perform a comparative analysis of the effectiveness of free connective tissue grafts with and without an epithelial collar for peri-implant soft tissue augmentation. Examination and treatment of patients will be carried out at the Department of Oral Surgery of the E.V. Borovsky Institute of Dentistry, Sechenov University.

The study population will include patients with bounded or distal edentulous defects of the upper or lower jaw combined with soft tissue thickness deficiency around dental implants (<2 mm), requiring peri-implant soft tissue augmentation using a free connective tissue graft.

All patients will be randomly allocated into two groups according to the surgical intervention method. In the first group (n=16), a free connective tissue graft without an epithelial collar will be used, while in the second group (n=16), a free connective tissue graft with an epithelial collar will be used. The groups will be comparable in terms of age and sex characteristics.

Patient randomization will be performed intraoperatively as follows: after dental implant placement and preparation of the recipient site, an envelope containing the randomly assigned treatment method will be opened. Patients in both groups will undergo dental implant placement according to the standard surgical protocol combined with peri-implant soft tissue augmentation.

A mucosal incision will be performed followed by elevation of a mucoperiosteal flap, preparation of the implant bed, and placement of the dental implant. Subsequently, the recipient site will be prepared and a free connective tissue graft harvested from the maxillary tuberosity or palatal area. Depending on the allocated group, a graft with or without an epithelial collar will be used. The graft will be fixed to the mucoperiosteal flap, followed by tension-free wound closure, while the donor site will be closed primarily.

In the postoperative period, standard antibacterial and anti-inflammatory therapy combined with topical antiseptic agents will be prescribed.

Typ studie

Intervenční

Zápis (Aktuální)

32

Fáze

  • Nelze použít

Kontakty a umístění

Tato část poskytuje kontaktní údaje pro ty, kteří studii provádějí, a informace o tom, kde se tato studie provádí.

Studijní místa

      • Moscow, Rusko
        • I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Kritéria účasti

Výzkumníci hledají lidi, kteří odpovídají určitému popisu, kterému se říká kritéria způsobilosti. Některé příklady těchto kritérií jsou celkový zdravotní stav osoby nebo předchozí léčba.

Kritéria způsobilosti

Věk způsobilý ke studiu

  • Dospělý

Přijímá zdravé dobrovolníky

Ano

Popis

  1. Written informed consent for participation in the study;
  2. Age between 18 and 45 years;
  3. Bounded edentulous defects of the upper or lower jaw involving 1-2 teeth combined with soft tissue thickness deficiency around dental implants (<2 mm);
  4. Teeth without periodontal pathology, with probing depth not exceeding 3 mm throughout the gingival sulcus;
  5. Satisfactory level of oral hygiene;
  6. Absence of systemic diseases in the stage of exacerbation or decompensation.

Non-inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients who previously underwent connective tissue graft harvesting from the same donor site;
  2. Patients with impacted third molars in the donor site area;
  3. Presence of concomitant diseases in the stage of exacerbation or decompensation;
  4. Patients with malignant neoplasms, as well as patients who underwent radiation therapy or chemotherapy within the previous 5 years;
  5. Patients with a smoking history of more than 10 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patient refusal to continue participation in the study;
  2. Pregnant or breastfeeding women;
  3. Patients with coagulation disorders (hemophilia, von Willebrand disease, or anticoagulant therapy);
  4. Patients with diseases affecting soft tissue healing processes (insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus).

Studijní plán

Tato část poskytuje podrobnosti o studijním plánu, včetně toho, jak je studie navržena a co studie měří.

Jak je studie koncipována?

Detaily designu

  • Primární účel: Léčba
  • Přidělení: Randomizované
  • Intervenční model: Paralelní přiřazení
  • Maskování: Žádné (otevřený štítek)

Zbraně a zásahy

Skupina účastníků / Arm
Intervence / Léčba
Aktivní komparátor: first group
Patients will receive a free connective tissue graft without an epithelial collar
  1. Incision the mucosa at the alveolar ridge, mucosal-periosteal flap elevation, preparation of the implant bed and placement of the dental implant according to the standard protocol.
  2. Formation of the recipient site in the vestibular area.
  3. Harvesting of free connective tissue graft from the maxilla tuberosity area or palate and its adaptation to the recipient site.
  4. Fixation of the graft to the vestibular mucosal-periosteal flap and tight suturing of the wound in the recipient area.
  5. Suturing of the wound in the donor site.
Experimentální: second group
Patients will receive a free connective tissue graft with epithelial collar
  1. Incision the mucosa at the alveolar ridge, mucosal-periosteal flap elevation, preparation of the implant bed and placement of the dental implant according to the standard protocol.
  2. Formation of the recipient site in the vestibular area.
  3. Harvesting of free connective tissue graft with epithelial strip from the maxilla tuberosity area or palate and its adaptation to the recipient site.
  4. Fixation of the graft to the vestibular mucosal-periosteal flap and tight suturing of the wound in the recipient area.
  5. Suturing of the wound in the donor site.

Co je měření studie?

Primární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Change in the Width of Keratinized Mucosa
Časové okno: Day 90 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Measurements will be performed using optical impressions obtained with the Primescan intraoral scanner (Dentsply/Sirona) or conventional impressions followed by digital scanning before surgery and on postoperative day 90. Subsequently, STL files will be superimposed using GOM Inspect software, and contour changes will be assessed at three equidistant points.
Day 90 compared to the 0th day (initial value)

Sekundární výstupní opatření

Měření výsledku
Popis opatření
Časové okno
Change in the Width of Keratinized Mucosa
Časové okno: Day 180 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Measurements will be performed using optical impressions obtained with the Primescan intraoral scanner (Dentsply/Sirona) or conventional impressions followed by laboratory scanning before surgery and on postoperative day 180. Subsequently, STL files will be superimposed using GOM Inspect software, and contour changes will be assessed at three equidistant points.
Day 180 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Scar Formation According to the Modified Scar Index (MSI)
Časové okno: Day 90 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of postoperative soft tissue scar quality around dental implants is performed using the Modified Scar Index (MSI) according to Mombelli et al., based on the evaluation of five parameters: scar color, scar contour, soft tissue deformity, scar tissue texture, and wound margin separation. Each parameter is assessed using a 3-point scale, where: 0 = optimal tissue condition; 1 = moderate scar changes; 2 = pronounced scar changes. The total MSI score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating better clinical outcomes and minimal scar formation. Clinical assessment is performed visually and by palpation, with additional evaluation using clinical photographs when necessary.
Day 90 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Scar Formation According to the Modified Scar Index (MSI)
Časové okno: Day 180 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of postoperative soft tissue scar quality around dental implants is performed using the Modified Scar Index (MSI) according to Mombelli et al., based on the evaluation of five parameters: scar color, scar contour, soft tissue deformity, scar tissue texture, and wound margin separation. Each parameter is assessed using a 3-point scale, where: 0 = optimal tissue condition; 1 = moderate scar changes; 2 = pronounced scar changes. The total MSI score ranges from 0 to 10, with lower scores indicating better clinical outcomes and minimal scar formation. Clinical assessment is performed visually and by palpation, with additional evaluation using clinical photographs when necessary.
Day 180 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Pain Severity
Časové okno: 4 hours compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of pain severity is performed postoperatively using patient questionnaires, where: 0 = no pain; 1-2 = mild pain; 2-3 = moderate pain; 4-5 = moderately severe pain; 6-7 = severe pain; 8-10 = unbearable pain.
4 hours compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Pain Severity
Časové okno: Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of pain severity is performed postoperatively using patient questionnaires, where: 0 = no pain; 1-2 = mild pain; 2-3 = moderate pain; 4-5 = moderately severe pain; 6-7 = severe pain; 8-10 = unbearable pain.
Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Pain Severity
Časové okno: Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of pain severity is performed postoperatively using patient questionnaires, where: 0 = no pain; 1-2 = mild pain; 2-3 = moderate pain; 4-5 = moderately severe pain; 6-7 = severe pain; 8-10 = unbearable pain.
Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Pain Severity
Časové okno: Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of pain severity is performed postoperatively using patient questionnaires, where: 0 = no pain; 1-2 = mild pain; 2-3 = moderate pain; 4-5 = moderately severe pain; 6-7 = severe pain; 8-10 = unbearable pain.
Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Pain Severity
Časové okno: Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of pain severity is performed postoperatively using patient questionnaires, where: 0 = no pain; 1-2 = mild pain; 2-3 = moderate pain; 4-5 = moderately severe pain; 6-7 = severe pain; 8-10 = unbearable pain.
Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Postoperative Swelling Severity
Časové okno: Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of collateral soft tissue swelling compared with adjacent tissues is performed using the following scale: 0 = no swelling; 1 = moderate swelling; 2 = severe swelling.
Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Postoperative Swelling Severity
Časové okno: Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of collateral soft tissue swelling compared with adjacent tissues is performed using the following scale: 0 = no swelling; 1 = moderate swelling; 2 = severe swelling.
Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Postoperative Swelling Severity
Časové okno: Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of collateral soft tissue swelling compared with adjacent tissues is performed using the following scale: 0 = no swelling; 1 = moderate swelling; 2 = severe swelling.
Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Postoperative Swelling Severity
Časové okno: Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of collateral soft tissue swelling compared with adjacent tissues is performed using the following scale: 0 = no swelling; 1 = moderate swelling; 2 = severe swelling.
Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Bleeding
Časové okno: Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of the presence of a blood taste in the mouth is performed using the following scale: 0 = no blood taste; 1 = intermittent blood taste; 2 = constant blood taste.
Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Bleeding
Časové okno: Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of the presence of a blood taste in the mouth is performed using the following scale: 0 = no blood taste; 1 = intermittent blood taste; 2 = constant blood taste.
Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Bleeding
Časové okno: Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of the presence of a blood taste in the mouth is performed using the following scale: 0 = no blood taste; 1 = intermittent blood taste; 2 = constant blood taste.
Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Bleeding
Časové okno: Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of the presence of a blood taste in the mouth is performed using the following scale: 0 = no blood taste; 1 = intermittent blood taste; 2 = constant blood taste.
Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Analgesic Intake
Časové okno: Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of the number of Nimesulide 100 mg tablets taken per day.
Day 1 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Analgesic Intake
Časové okno: Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of the number of Nimesulide 100 mg tablets taken per day.
Day 3 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Analgesic Intake
Časové okno: Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of the number of Nimesulide 100 mg tablets taken per day.
Day 5 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of Analgesic Intake
Časové okno: Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of the number of Nimesulide 100 mg tablets taken per day.
Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Quality of Life Assessment According to OHIP-14
Časové okno: Day 0 (initial value)
Assessment of patient quality of life is performed using a questionnaire consisting of 10 questions. The severity of each parameter should be rated from 0 to 4 points, where "0" = absence of the symptom and "4" = symptom is strongly pronounced.
Day 0 (initial value)
Quality of Life Assessment According to OHIP-14
Časové okno: Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of patient quality of life is performed using a questionnaire consisting of 10 questions. The severity of each parameter should be rated from 0 to 4 points, where "0" = absence of the symptom and "4" = symptom is strongly pronounced.
Day 7 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Quality of Life Assessment According to OHIP-14
Časové okno: Day 90-93 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of patient quality of life is performed using a questionnaire consisting of 10 questions. The severity of each parameter should be rated from 0 to 4 points, where "0" = absence of the symptom and "4" = symptom is strongly pronounced.
Day 90-93 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Quality of Life Assessment According to OHIP-14
Časové okno: Day 180-186 compared to the 0th day (initial value)
Assessment of patient quality of life is performed using a questionnaire consisting of 10 questions. The severity of each parameter should be rated from 0 to 4 points, where "0" = absence of the symptom and "4" = symptom is strongly pronounced.
Day 180-186 compared to the 0th day (initial value)

Spolupracovníci a vyšetřovatelé

Zde najdete lidi a organizace zapojené do této studie.

Vyšetřovatelé

  • Vrchní vyšetřovatel: Igor P Ashurko, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University)

Termíny studijních záznamů

Tato data sledují průběh záznamů studie a předkládání souhrnných výsledků na ClinicalTrials.gov. Záznamy ze studií a hlášené výsledky jsou před zveřejněním na veřejné webové stránce přezkoumány Národní lékařskou knihovnou (NLM), aby se ujistily, že splňují specifické standardy kontroly kvality.

Hlavní termíny studia

Začátek studia (Aktuální)

20. června 2024

Primární dokončení (Odhadovaný)

20. června 2026

Dokončení studie (Odhadovaný)

20. srpna 2026

Termíny zápisu do studia

První předloženo

29. května 2026

První předloženo, které splnilo kritéria kontroly kvality

29. května 2026

První zveřejněno (Aktuální)

4. června 2026

Aktualizace studijních záznamů

Poslední zveřejněná aktualizace (Aktuální)

4. června 2026

Odeslaná poslední aktualizace, která splnila kritéria kontroly kvality

29. května 2026

Naposledy ověřeno

1. května 2026

Více informací

Termíny související s touto studií

Plán pro data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)

Plánujete sdílet data jednotlivých účastníků (IPD)?

NE

Informace o lécích a zařízeních, studijní dokumenty

Studuje lékový produkt regulovaný americkým FDA

Ne

Studuje produkt zařízení regulovaný americkým úřadem FDA

Ne

Tyto informace byly beze změn načteny přímo z webu clinicaltrials.gov. Máte-li jakékoli požadavky na změnu, odstranění nebo aktualizaci podrobností studie, kontaktujte prosím register@clinicaltrials.gov. Jakmile bude změna implementována na clinicaltrials.gov, bude automaticky aktualizována i na našem webu .

Předplatit