Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

Working With Veterans Organizations to Improve Blood Pressure (POWER)

6. april 2015 opdateret af: US Department of Veterans Affairs
The primary purpose of this project is to establish the efficacy of a novel peer support intervention to reduce hypertension among members of veteran service organizations (VSOs). Specifically, we plan to demonstrate that veterans participating in a peer support intervention, as opposed to a purely didactic educational program, will have better blood pressure (BP) control, increased engagement in blood pressure lowering activities (such as exercise), and a more active stance as patients.

Studieoversigt

Status

Afsluttet

Betingelser

Detaljeret beskrivelse

IMPACT ON VETERANS HEALTH It is anticipated that this intervention will help participating veterans achieve optimal hypertension (HTN) control. Doing so will reduce their risks for heart disease and stroke, and improve their quality of life. It is hoped that the collaborative nature of this intervention will strengthen the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)'s ties to the veteran community, and establish important "partnerships for health." If successful, this intervention could serve as a model for managing chronic disease both within and outside the VA system.

BACKGROUND/RATIONALE Despite consensus that effective hypertension treatment reduces morbidity and mortality, many patients in the United States continue to have suboptimal blood pressure control. Even with the provider resources and motivated patients inherent in a randomized clinical trial, over a third of patients participating in the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial (ALLHAT) were not at their goal blood pressure of 140/90 after five years. Similarly, within the Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 12 we have found that as many as 30% of patients with hypertension are above the target BP of 140/90, despite routine physician reminders to patients who are above these goals. Moreover, preliminary results of an internally funded randomized trial suggest minimal impact of further physician-focused interventions to reduce patients' blood pressure.

OBJECTIVES We will have two primary objectives. First, because the intervention proposed is novel, we believe we need to demonstrate its efficacy in a methodologically rigorous fashion. Specifically we plan to demonstrate that veterans participating in a peer support intervention will have improved blood pressure control, knowledge of blood pressure treatment, both generally and for themselves, and a more active stance as patients.

Second, we will carefully examine the process by which our intervention achieves these goals, including examining such key structural variables as the frequency of peer support meetings, attendance of participants at these meetings, and use of healthcare professional support by the group leaders. As part of this second objective, we also seek to understand the fidelity with which the peer leaders are to deliver the intervention, and the satisfaction of both support group participants and leaders with the intervention.

METHODS There are three primary activities in the present project.

First, academicians from the Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center (VAMC) are working with the Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) and other community groups to develop a community-academic partnership that follows the principles of community-based participatory research. This key activity is underway and will continue beyond the present period of funding. Second, the centerpiece of the present grant is a cluster randomized clinical trial (RCT) of the use of peer-led support groups to improve BP control in patients with hypertension. Fifty posts drawn from the VFW, American Legion, Vietnam Veterans Association, and National Association of Black Veterans will be randomly assigned to receive professionally delivered education regarding hypertension or to a peer support intervention. The third activity is an evaluation of the processes involved in delivering the peer support intervention that will allow for successful replication, or to provide insight into why the expected improvement in BP control did not occur.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

404

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Wisconsin
      • Milwaukee, Wisconsin, Forenede Stater, 53295-1000
        • Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

  • Barn
  • Voksen
  • Ældre voksen

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Member of a post or auxiliary of a participating veterans' service organization or Elks Lodge in the 70 miles surrounding the Milwaukee VAMC.
  2. Hypertension as established by one of: a) Average systolic blood pressure (SBP) greater than 140 or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) greater than 90 at two baseline visits; b) SBP greater than 130 or DBP greater than 90 at two baseline visits, plus patient report of diabetes mellitus and use of a hypoglycemic agent at the baseline visit; or c) self-reported hypertension plus self-reported current treatment with at least one antihypertensive drug at baseline visit.
  3. Willingness to sign informed consent document.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Medical or social condition preventing routine attendance at a monthly meeting.
  2. Inability to communicate with other post members because of language barrier or physical limitation (e.g., prior stroke).

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Sundhedstjenesteforskning
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Peer Led
Post provided with blood pressure cuffs, pedometers and scale. Two post members trained as peer leaders who encourage post members to take positive steps to improve BP. Peer leader training involves 20 hours of training over 12 months, telephone/email access to clinical experts and educational materials to share with post members.
Post provided with blood pressure cuffs, pedometers and scale. Two post members trained as peer leaders who encourage post members to take positive steps to improve BP. Peer leader training involves 20 hours of training over 12 months, telephone/email access to clinical experts and educational materials to share with post members.
Andre navne:
  • Peer led education and support
Aktiv komparator: Seminar
Post provided with blood pressure cuffs, pedometers and scale. Post members, including study participants invited to didactic sessions on cardiovascular health.
Post provided with blood pressure cuffs, pedometers and scale. Post members, including study participants invited to didactic sessions on cardiovascular health.
Andre navne:
  • Professional didactic education

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in Systolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Mean/Standard Error (SE) change in systolic blood pressure
9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Sekundære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Change in Diastolic Blood Pressure
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Mean/SE change in diastolic blood pressure
9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Weight
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Mean/SE change in weight, measured in pounds (lbs)
9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in BMI
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Mean/SE change in Body Mass Index (BMI) (kg/m2)
9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Health Status
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Response to the question "How would you rate your general health status?". Response options are scored as follows.

  1. Excellent
  2. Very Good
  3. Good
  4. Fair
  5. Poor We report the change in health status from baseline to 12 months.
9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Time Since Last Physician Visit
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in mean # of months since last visit to a physician
9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Non-Clinic Blood Pressure Checks
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
% reporting non-clinic blood pressure (BP) checks at least once a month
9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Number of Blood Pressure Medications
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in mean # of prescription blood pressure medications
9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Hypertension Knowledge
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in score on:

Scale: Hypertension Evaluation of Lifestyle and Management (HELM) Construct: Knowledge of hypertension and lifestyle factors related to hypertension Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 14 Interpretation of Score: Higher is better

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Hypertension Attitudes
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in score on:

Scale: Not applicable; series of agree/disagree statements that we wrote Construct: Attitudes around blood pressure diagnosis, treatment (including lifestyle changes), and seriousness of the condition Minimum Score: 12 Maximum Score: 60 Interpretation of Score: Lower is better

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Satisfaction With Blood Pressure Treatment
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in score on:

Scale: Modified Holmes-Ravnor Satisfaction with Decision (SWD) Construct: Satisfaction with current blood pressure treatment Minimum Score: 1 Maximum Score: 5 Interpretation of Score: Lower is better (NOTE: Original instrument's scoring is reversed; i.e., higher is better)

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Alcohol Use
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in score on:

Scale: Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) Construct: Alcohol use and abuse Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 12 Interpretation of Score: Lower is better

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Sodium Intake
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in score on:

Scale: Hopkins Dietary Questionnaire (only the dietary salt avoidance questions) Construct: Dietary sodium intake Minimum Score: 2 Maximum Score: 12 Interpretation of Score: Higher is better

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Physical Activity Level
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in score on:

Scale: International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), Metabolic Equivalent of Task (MET) Construct: Total metabolic equivalents (a measure of energy expenditure) in the last 7 days Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: Not applicable; based on physical activity done Interpretation of Score: Higher is better

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Daily Steps
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Mean/SE change in # of steps per day (self report)
9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Fruit and Vegetable Intake
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Mean/SE change in # of servings per day; questions taken from the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Questionnaire
9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Medication Adherence
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in score on:

Scale: Morisky Adherence; questions modified to ask specifically about blood pressure medication Construct: Adherence to prescribed medication-taking regimen Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 4 Interpretation of Score: Lower is better

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Self Efficacy
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in score on:

Scale: Schwarzer General Perceived Self-Efficacy Construct: Perceived self-efficacy Minimum Score: 10 Maximum Score: 40 Interpretation of Score: Higher is better

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Social Support
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in overall score on:

Scale: Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey Construct: Overall measure of social support, including tangible, affectionate, positive social interaction, and emotional/informational Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 100 Interpretation of Score: Higher is better

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Health Opinions
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in overall score on:

Scale: Krantz Health Opinion Survey Construct: Opinions about healthcare and healthcare providers Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 16 Interpretation of Score: Higher is better

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months
Change in Patient Activation
Tidsramme: 9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Mean/SE change in score on:

Scale: Hibbard Patient Activation Measure (PAM) Construct: Level of patient activation and engagement in health care Minimum Score: 0 Maximum Score: 100 Interpretation of Score: Lower is better (NOTE: Original instrument's scoring is reversed; i.e., higher is better)

9/16/2008-8/9/2010; baseline and 12 months

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Publikationer og nyttige links

Den person, der er ansvarlig for at indtaste oplysninger om undersøgelsen, leverer frivilligt disse publikationer. Disse kan handle om alt relateret til undersøgelsen.

Generelle publikationer

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. februar 2008

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. august 2010

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. december 2010

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

7. december 2007

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

10. december 2007

Først opslået (Skøn)

11. december 2007

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Skøn)

24. april 2015

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

6. april 2015

Sidst verificeret

1. august 2014

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Abonner