A Study in Dentinal Hypersensitivity (DH) Participants to Assess the Efficacy of an Occluding Dentifrice.
26. juli 2018 opdateret af: GlaxoSmithKline
A Clinical Study Investigating the Efficacy of Two Experimental Oral Rinses in Providing Long Term Relief From Dentinal Hypersensitivity
This study will investigate the longitudinal efficacy of two experimental oral rinses, one containing 1.5% weight/weight (w/w) dipotassium oxalate monohydride (KOX) /0 Parts per Million (ppm fluoride) and the other 2.0% w/w KOX /45ppm fluoride, for the relief of dentinal hypersensitivity (DH), compared to a placebo oral rinse, when used as an adjunct to twice daily brushing with a standard fluoride toothpaste.
Studieoversigt
Status
Afsluttet
Betingelser
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
240
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiesteder
-
-
Indiana
-
Fort Wayne, Indiana, Forenede Stater, 46825
- GSK Investigational Site
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
18 år til 55 år (Voksen)
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ja
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants in good general health with no clinically significant/ relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon oral examination
- Pre-existing self reported and clinically diagnosed tooth sensitivity
- At screening a minimum of 20 natural teeth and at least two accessible, non-adjacent teeth (incisors, canines or pre-molars) preferably in different quadrants with a signs of facial/cervical gingival recession and/or signs of erosion or abrasion (EAR),tooth with modified gingival index (MGI) score =0 adjacent to the test area (exposed dentine) only and a clinical mobility of ≤1 and tooth with signs of sensitivity measured by qualifying evaporative air assessment (Y/N response).
- At baseline, a minimum of 2 non-adjacent accessible teeth (incisors, canines or premolars) with DH (qualifying tactile threshold Yeaple ≤ 20g, Schiff Sensitivity Score ≥ 2)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participants with a known or suspected intolerance or hypersensitivity to study products
- Presence of chronic debilitating disease which could affect study outcomes
- Any condition which is causing dry mouth
- Use of an oral care product indicated for the relief of dentine hypersensitivity
- Participation in a DH treatment study in the 8 weeks prior to screening
- Taking daily doses of a medication/ treatment which could interfere with perception of pain or is causing dry mouth
- Require antibiotic prophylaxis for dental procedures
- Dental prophylaxis within 4 weeks of screening
- Treatment of periodontal disease within 12 months of screening
- Scaling or root planning within 3 months of screening
- Tooth bleaching within 8 weeks of screening
- Active caries or periodontitis
- Partial dentures, orthodontic appliances or dental implants which could affect study outcomes
- Pregnant and breast-feeding females
- Main Exclusions for Test Teeth: evidence of current or recent caries; treatment of decay within 12 months of screening; teeth with exposed dentine but with deep, defective or facial restorations; teeth used as abutments for fixed or removable partial dentures; teeth with full crowns or veneers, orthodontic bands or cracked enamel; sensitive teeth with contributing aetiologies other than erosion, abrasion or recession
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Dobbelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: Experimental Oral Rinse 2
Brushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Experimental Oral Rinse 2 for 1 minute.
This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
Oral rinse containing 1000ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
Oral rinse containing 2.0% w/w KOX, 45ppm F, pH 4.5
|
|
Placebo komparator: Placebo Oral Rinse
Brushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Placebo Oral Rinse 2 for 1 minute.
This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
Oral rinse containing 1000ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
Oral rinse containing 0% w/w KOX 0ppm F, pH 4.5
|
|
Eksperimentel: Experimental Oral Rinse 1
Brushing with fluoride toothpaste for 1 minute followed by rinsing with 10 ml of Experimental Oral Rinse 1 for 1 minute.
This regimen will be performed twice daily for 8 weeks.
|
Oral rinse containing 1.5% w/w KOX, 0ppm F, pH 4.5
Oral rinse containing 1000ppm fluoride as sodium monofluorophosphate
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 Against a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 8
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 8
|
The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each selected two teeth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in VRS of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse) at Week 8
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 8
|
Participants rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 10 point VRS.
The Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 1 ("No Pain") to 10 ("Intense Pain").
A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 at Week 8
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 8
|
The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each selected two teeth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Schiff Sensitivity Score of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1 and 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 4
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 4
|
The examiner assessed the participant's response to an evaporative air stimulus for each selected two teeth using the Schiff Sensitivity Scale scored as follows - 0: Participant does not respond to air stimulation; 1: responds to air stimulus but does not request discontinuation of stimulus; 2: Participant responds to air stimulus and requests discontinuation or moves from stimulus; 3: Participant responds to stimulus, considers stimulus to be painful, and requests discontinuation of the stimulus.
A reduction in Schiff Sensitivity score indicate improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold (Gram [g]) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1, 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 4
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 4
|
The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached.
The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort.
The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold.
The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.
At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
However, in situations where participants did not give a 'yes' response at force of 80g, the tactile threshold was recorded as >80g.
For analysis purposes values recorded as >80g were treated as 90g values.
|
Baseline, Week 4
|
|
Change From Baseline in Tactile Threshold (g) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1, 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 8
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 8
|
The examiner assessed the response to tactile sensitivity using a Yeaple probe which allowed application of a known force to the dentin surface, starting at 10g and rising in increments of 10g until the tactile threshold or maximum force has reached.
The tactile threshold for each tooth was determined by asking the participant whether the sensation caused discomfort.
The pressure setting at which the participant gave two consecutive 'yes' responses was recorded as the tactile threshold.
The higher the tactile threshold, the less sensitive the tooth.
At baseline, the maximum force used was 20g; at all subsequent visits, it was 80g.
However, in situations where participants did not give a 'yes' response at force of 80g, the tactile threshold was recorded as >80g.
For analysis purposes values recorded as >80g were treated as 90g values.
|
Baseline, Week 8
|
|
Change From Baseline in Visual Rating Scale (VRS) of Two Experimental Oral Rinses 1, 2 and a Placebo Oral Rinse at Week 4
Tidsramme: Baseline, Week 4
|
Participants rated the intensity of their response to the evaporative (air) stimulus using a 10 point VRS.
The Participants were asked to rate their pain on a scale of 1 (No Pain) to 10 (intense Pain).
A reduction in the score is indicative of an improvement in sensitivity.
|
Baseline, Week 4
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Sponsor
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart
8. september 2015
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
1. december 2015
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
18. december 2015
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
25. april 2016
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
25. april 2016
Først opslået (Skøn)
27. april 2016
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
27. august 2018
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
26. juli 2018
Sidst verificeret
1. juli 2018
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- 204773
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .