- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Klinisk forsøg NCT07777042
Augmented Reality Aided Remote Access and Technical Support for Complex Ablation Procedures (HOLO-Remote)
16. august 2026 opdateret af: Roland Richard Tilz, MD, University of Luebeck
Augmented Reality Aided Remote Access and tecHnical suppOrt for compLex ablatiOn Procedures
Prospective, randomized, controlled, single-center pilot study evaluating the feasibility and safety of augmented reality-based remote technical support using the Microsoft HoloLens and EnSite™ Connected Care compared with conventional on-site support during 3D electroanatomical mapping-guided electrophysiological procedures.
The study also assesses the feasibility of an AI-based algorithm integrated into the Medinbox Link system for automated procedural report generation and detection of protocol deviations from standard clinical practice.
Studieoversigt
Status
Ikke rekrutterer endnu
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Prospective, randomized, controlled, monocentric, pilot study to evaluate the feasibility and safety of remote access and technical support using an augmented reality system (Microsoft HoloLens headset) in association with the EnSite™ Connected Care solution (EnSite™ Connect Remote Support, Abbott and Medinbox system, Medinbox) as compared to the on-site support for three-dimensional (3D) electroanatomical mapping-based electrophysiological (EP) procedures.
Moreover, the study will evaluate the feasibility of an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm integrated within the Medinbox Link system (Medinbox) to analyse video and audio recordings obtained during the procedure, with the aim of automatically generating procedural reports and identifying protocol deviations from the standard of care.
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Anslået)
60
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiekontakt
- Navn: Roland R Tilz, M.D.
- Telefonnummer: +49 451 500 44580
- E-mail: tilz6@hotmail.de
Undersøgelse Kontakt Backup
- Navn: Sorin S Popescu, M.D.
- Telefonnummer: +49 451 500 77072
- E-mail: sorin.popescu29@yahoo.ro
Studiesteder
-
-
-
Lübeck, Tyskland, 23538
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
-
Kontakt:
- Mirco Küchler
- Telefonnummer: +49 451 500 44542
- E-mail: CTU.EP.LUEBECK@uksh.de
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
- Voksen
- Ældre voksen
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ingen
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients age ≥ 18 years
- Indication for 3D electroanatomical mapping-based catheter ablation for the treatment of AF
- Signed written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient is unable or unwilling to provide informed consent
- Patient is included in another randomised clinical trial
- Inability to comply with the study procedures
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Behandling
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: HoloLens Group
Patients undergoing 3D electroanatomical mapping-based AF ablation procedures using the EnSite™ X EP System operated remotely by means of the EnSite™ Connected Care solution (EnSite™ Connect Remote Support, Abbott and Medinbox system, Medinbox) and the Microsoft HoloLens (Microsoft).
|
Patients undergoing 3D electroanatomical mapping-based AF ablation procedures using the EnSite™ X EP System operated remotely by means of the EnSite™ Connected Care solution (EnSite™ Connect Remote Support, Abbott and Medinbox system, Medinbox) and the Microsoft HoloLens (Microsoft).
The HoloLens headset will be implemented to facilitate the communication between the principal operator and the FTE (working in Home Office).
The FTE will not be present on site.
|
|
Aktiv komparator: On-site Group
Patients undergoing 3D electroanatomical mapping-based AF ablation procedures using the EnSite™ X EP System operated by the FTE on site, in the Minimal Invasive Centre (MIC) of the hospital.
The HoloLens headset and the EnSite™ Connected Care solution will not be used.
The communication between the operator (in the operating room) and the FTE (in the control room) will be established by means of radio-based headphones.
|
Patients undergoing 3D electroanatomical mapping-based AF ablation procedures using the EnSite™ X EP System operated by the FTE on site, in the Minimal Invasive Centre (MIC) of the hospital.
The HoloLens headset and the EnSite™ Connected Care solution will not be used.
The communication between the operator (in the operating room) and the FTE (in the control room) will be established by means of radio-based headphones.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility: Number of participants in whom remotely supported 3D electroanatomical mapping-based atrial fibrillation ablation is successfully completed
Tidsramme: At the end of the catheter ablation procedure.
|
Feasibility will be assessed as the number and percentage of participants in whom the planned 3D electroanatomical mapping-guided atrial fibrillation ablation procedure is successfully completed using remote technical support provided through an augmented reality system (Microsoft HoloLens headset) in conjunction with the EnSite™ Connected Care solution (EnSite™ Connect Remote Support, Abbott) and the Medinbox system.
Successful completion is defined as completion of the planned mapping and ablation procedure without conversion to on-site technical support because of technical failure of the remote support system.
|
At the end of the catheter ablation procedure.
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of participants with periprocedural adverse events
Tidsramme: Periprocedural (from initiation of the catheter ablation procedure until hospital discharge)
|
Periprocedural adverse events occurring during the catheter ablation procedure and throughout the index hospitalization will be recorded.
|
Periprocedural (from initiation of the catheter ablation procedure until hospital discharge)
|
|
Procedural time
Tidsramme: At the end of catheter ablation procedure
|
Procedural time
|
At the end of catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Fluoroscopy time
Tidsramme: End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
Total fluoroscopy time (minutes) recorded during the catheter ablation procedure.
|
End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Number of participants with successful completion of the intended catheter ablation procedure (the minimum procedural endpoint is successful pulmonary vein isolation)
Tidsramme: End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
Procedural success will be assessed as successful completion of the intended catheter ablation procedure.
A minimum procedural endpoint is successful pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), confirmed by entrance block in all pulmonary veins.
Additional ablations may be performed at the operator's discretion based on the patient's clinical characteristics and the planned treatment strategy.
When additional ablations are planned or performed, procedural success also requires successful completion of these additional lesion sets according to the predefined procedural objectives.
|
End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Number of participants requiring conversion from remote technical support to on-site technical support
Tidsramme: End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
The number of participants in whom the planned remote technical support could not be maintained and conversion to conventional on-site technical support was required because of technical or procedural reasons (only for interventional group)
|
End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Technical issues
Tidsramme: At the end of catheter ablation procedure
|
Technical issues with the remote support system and technical issues with the augmented reality system
|
At the end of catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Estimated carbon dioxide emissions associated with technical support
Tidsramme: End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
Estimated carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions (kg CO₂ equivalent) associated with travel of field technical engineers to and from the participating study site.
Emissions will be calculated from the recorded driving distance using a predefined standardized emission factor.
In the remote support group, CO₂ emissions will be calculated based on the estimated distance the field technical engineers would drive if they would have to be on site.
|
End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Operator satisfaction with the procedural workflow assessed using 10-point numeric rating scales
Tidsramme: End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
Operator satisfaction with the procedural workflow will be assessed immediately after completion of the catheter ablation procedure using a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "completely satisfied."
|
End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Successful development of an artificial intelligence algorithm for analysis of recorded catheter ablation procedures to assess predefined procedural quality criteria
Tidsramme: By completion of the AI algorithm development phase, up to 3 months after completion of data collection
|
Feasibility will be assessed by whether the recorded procedural data from the intervention group are sufficient to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm capable of analyzing predefined procedural quality criteria .
The outcome will be reported as successful or unsuccessful algorithm development according to predefined technical performance criteria.
|
By completion of the AI algorithm development phase, up to 3 months after completion of data collection
|
|
Radiation dose
Tidsramme: End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
Total radiation exposure recorded during the catheter ablation procedure, reported as dose area product (DAP, Gy·cm²).
|
End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Number of participants requiring conversion from HoloLens-assisted remote support to conventional remote support
Tidsramme: End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
The number of participants in the intervention group in whom HoloLens-assisted remote technical support could not be maintained and support was continued using conventional remote communication without the Microsoft HoloLens headset because of technical or procedural reasons.
|
End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Driving time of field technical engineers
Tidsramme: End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
Driving time (minutes) required for field technical engineers to travel to and from the participating study site.
For participants assigned to the remote support group, driving time will be estimated based on the hypothetical travel time that field technical engineers would have required had conventional on-site technical support been provided.
|
End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Driving distance of field technical engineers
Tidsramme: End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
Driving distance (kilometers) traveled by field technical engineers to and from the participating study site.
For participants assigned to the remote support group, driving distance will be estimated based on the hypothetical distance that field technical engineers would have traveled had conventional on-site technical support been provided.
|
End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Field technical engineer satisfaction with the procedural workflow assessed using 10-point numeric rating scales
Tidsramme: End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
Field technical engineer satisfaction with the procedural workflow will be assessed immediately after completion of the catheter ablation procedure using a 10-point numeric rating scale (NRS), where 0 indicates "not satisfied at all" and 10 indicates "completely satisfied."
|
End of the catheter ablation procedure
|
|
Successful development of an artificial intelligence algorithm for analysis of recorded catheter ablation procedures to generate automated procedural reports
Tidsramme: By completion of the AI algorithm development phase, up to 3 moths after completion of data collection
|
Feasibility will be assessed by whether the recorded procedural data from the intervention group are sufficient to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-based algorithm capable of generating automated procedural reports.
The outcome will be reported as successful or unsuccessful algorithm development according to predefined technical performance criteria.
|
By completion of the AI algorithm development phase, up to 3 moths after completion of data collection
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Sponsor
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Roland R Tilz, M.D., University of Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology
- Ledende efterforsker: Sorin S Popescu, M.D., University of Lübeck, Department of Rhythmology
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Anslået)
1. august 2026
Primær færdiggørelse (Anslået)
1. februar 2028
Studieafslutning (Anslået)
1. februar 2028
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
5. august 2026
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
16. august 2026
Først opslået (Faktiske)
20. august 2026
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
20. august 2026
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
16. august 2026
Sidst verificeret
1. august 2026
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Nøgleord
Yderligere relevante MeSH-vilkår
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- 2025-221
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
INGEN
IPD-planbeskrivelse
Data supporting the study are curated at the Clinical Trial Unit of the Department of Rhythmology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany.
These data are not shared openly but are available on reasonable request from the corresponding authors.
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Ingen
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Ingen
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .