Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

Efficacy and Safety Study of Fibrin Sealant With 4 IU/mL Thrombin, Vapor Heated, Solvent Detergent Treated (FS VH S/D 4) in Face-Lift Procedures

perjantai 19. lokakuuta 2012 päivittänyt: Baxter Healthcare Corporation

An Exploratory Phase 2 Clinical Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of the Adjuvant Use of Fibrin Sealant With 4 IU/mL Thrombin, Vapor Heated, Solvent Detergent Treated Containing Synthetic Aprotinin (FS VH S/D 4) in Subjects Undergoing Rhytidectomy

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fibrin sealant with 4 IU/mL thrombin, vapor heated, solvent detergent treated (FS VH S/D 4) when used to reduce early postoperative bruising in participants undergoing a rhytidectomy (face-lift).

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Tila

Valmis

Ehdot

Interventio / Hoito

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Todellinen)

45

Vaihe

  • Vaihe 2

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskelupaikat

  • Yhdysvallat
    • California
      • Beverly Hills, California, Yhdysvallat
      • Los Angeles, California, Yhdysvallat
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, Yhdysvallat
      • Evans, Georgia, Yhdysvallat
    • New York
      • Hewlett, New York, Yhdysvallat
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, Yhdysvallat

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

18 vuotta - 75 vuotta (Aikuinen, Vanhempi Aikuinen)

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Ei

Sukupuolet, jotka voivat opiskella

Kaikki

Kuvaus

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects planned for facial rhytidectomy
  • Subjects who read, understand and sign the written informed consent
  • Healthy female or male subjects as determined by the investigator using standard pre-operative assessments to include laboratory tests and ECG
  • Subjects 18-75 years old, inclusively
  • Subjects who are able and willing to comply with the protocol requirements
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential with a negative urine or serum pregnancy test within 72 hours of surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • Subjects who have undergone previous face-lift surgery
  • Subjects undergoing abbreviated face-lift procedures such as deep plane procedures, minimal undermining procedures, thread lifts, and minimal access cranial suspension
  • Subjects indicated for concurrent facial surgeries during the operation (e.g. forehead plasty, blepharoplasty, rhinoplasty, buccal fat removal, any filler injections including fat injections, lip augmentation, skin resurfacing procedures etc.)
  • Subjects indicated for additional procedures during the same operation (e.g., liposuction, mastoplasty etc.)
  • Subjects who had prior silicone injections to their face (Botox and/or Restylane are allowed)
  • Subjects considered by the investigator to be smokers
  • Subjects with ecchymosis and/or edema on the face on day 0, prior to surgery
  • Subjects with known (documented) bleeding or coagulation disorders
  • Subjects currently being treated with anti-coagulants
  • Subjects treated with Aspirin in the last 7 days or use of other Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) within the last 7 days prior to surgery
  • Subjects with vascular disorders, cardiovascular disease, and/or uncontrolled hypertension
  • Subjects with diabetes mellitus
  • Subjects with a history of Bell´s palsy
  • Subjects with connective tissue disorders
  • Subjects with documented history of pathologically or pharmacologically induced immune deficiency
  • Subjects receiving systemic corticosteroid treatment for a chronic condition within 2 to 30 days prior to the surgery
  • Subjects with a known sensitivity to fibrin sealants
  • Subjects with a known psychiatric disorder (e.g., depression, obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety, eating disorders, etc)
  • Subjects who have participated in another clinical study within 30 days prior to this study

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Hoito
  • Jako: Satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Yksittäinen ryhmätehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Yksittäinen

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Kokeellinen: 1
One side of the face is treated with FS VH S/D 4; the other side of the face is treated using standard of care.
Biologinen: Fibrin Sealant with 4 IU/ml Thrombin, Vapor-Heated, Solvent Detergent Treated Containing Synthetic Aprotinin (FS VH S/D 4)
Each subject received fibrin sealant with 4 IU/mL thrombin, vapor heated, solvent detergent treated containing synthetic aprotinin (FS VH S/D 4 ) to one side of the face. The dosing volume to be applied is 0.02 mL/cm2 to 0.04 mL/cm2. The study product will be applied to the subcutaneous plane in both the neck and the face area. The product will be applied using the spray device provided by the sponsor. (The other side of the face will be treated using standard of care.)
Muut nimet:
  • Fibriinitiiviste
  • TISSEEL

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Postoperative Day 3
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 3
Comparison between the FS VH S/D 4 treated side of the face and the side treated using standard of care (SoC) assessed by 5 separate blinded reviewers using standard digital photographs.
Through Postoperative Day 3
Incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) Related to Study Product (FS VH S/D 4) Throughout the Study Period
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 14 (± 1)
Through Postoperative Day 14 (± 1)

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Day 1
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 1
Comparison between the FS VH S/D 4 treated side of the face and the side treated using standard of care (SoC) assessed by 5 separate blinded reviewers using standard digital photographs.
Through Postoperative Day 1
Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Day 5
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 5
Comparison between the FS VH S/D 4 treated side of the face and the side treated using standard of care (SoC) assessed by 5 separate blinded reviewers using standard digital photographs.
Through Postoperative Day 5
Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Day 7
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 7
Comparison between the FS VH S/D 4 treated side of the face and the side treated using standard of care (SoC) assessed by 5 separate blinded reviewers using standard digital photographs.
Through Postoperative Day 7
Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Day 10
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 10
Comparison between the FS VH S/D 4 treated side of the face and the side treated using standard of care (SoC) assessed by 5 separate blinded reviewers using standard digital photographs.
Through Postoperative Day 10
Visual Comparison of Ecchymosis at Day 14
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 14
Comparison between the FS VH S/D 4 treated side of the face and the side treated using standard of care (SoC) assessed by 5 separate blinded reviewers using standard digital photographs.
Through Postoperative Day 14
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 1
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 1

Reviewers used photographs from postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color and affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color and covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color and covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color and covers more than just a very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP) specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 1
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 3
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 3

Reviewers used photographs from postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color and affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color and covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color and covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color and covers more than just a very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 3
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 5
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 5

Reviewers used photographs from postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color and affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color and covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color and covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color and covers more than just a very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 5
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 7
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 7

Reviewers used photographs from postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color and affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color and covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color and covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color and covers more than just a very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 7
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 10
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 10

Reviewers used photographs from postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color and affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color and covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color and covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color and covers more than just a very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 10
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by 5 Independent, Blinded Reviewers- Day 14
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 14

Reviewers used photographs from postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color and affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color and covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color and covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color and covers more than just a very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 14
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by a Blinded On-site Evaluator-Day 3
Aikaikkuna: Postoperative Day 3

Difference between each side of the face are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color and affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color and covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color and covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color and covers more than just a very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Postoperative Day 3
Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 1
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 1

Investigators used the modified Marchac grading to evaluate edema during participant examinations on postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. The evaluations were performed on both sides of the face. Differences are calculated as Grade for Standard of Care - Grade for FS VH S/D 4.

Marchac Scale for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Edema: Grade 1= Nil, Grade 2= Minor, Grade 3= Moderate, Grade 4= Marked/unusual amount.

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 1
Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 3
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 3

Investigators used the modified Marchac grading to evaluate edema during participant examinations on postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. The evaluations were performed on both sides of the face. Differences are calculated as Grade for Standard of Care - Grade for FS VH S/D 4. Marchac Scale for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Edema: Grade 1= Nil; Grade 2= Minor; Grade 3= Moderate; Grade 4= Marked/unusual amount.

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 3
Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 5
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 5

Investigators used the modified Marchac grading to evaluate edema during participant examinations on postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. The evaluations were performed on both sides of the face. Differences are calculated as Grade for Standard of Care - Grade for FS VH S/D 4. Marchac Scale for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Edema: Grade 1= Nil; Grade 2= Minor; Grade 3= Moderate; Grade 4= Marked/unusual amount.

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 5
Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 7
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 7

Investigators used the modified Marchac grading to evaluate edema during participant examinations on postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. The evaluations were performed on both sides of the face. Differences are calculated as Grade for Standard of Care - Grade for FS VH S/D 4. Marchac Scale for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Edema: Grade 1= Nil; Grade 2= Minor; Grade 3= Moderate; Grade 4= Marked/unusual amount.

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 7
Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 10
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 10

Investigators used the modified Marchac grading to evaluate edema during participant examinations on postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. The evaluations were performed on both sides of the face. Differences are calculated as Grade for Standard of Care - Grade for FS VH S/D 4. Marchac Scale for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Edema: Grade 1= Nil; Grade 2= Minor; Grade 3= Moderate; Grade 4= Marked/unusual amount.

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 10
Difference in Marchac Grades of Edema Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator Day 14
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 14

Investigators used the modified Marchac grading to evaluate edema during participant examinations on postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. The evaluations were performed on both sides of the face. Differences are calculated as Grade for Standard of Care - Grade for FS VH S/D 4. Marchac Scale for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Edema: Grade 1= Nil; Grade 2= Minor; Grade 3= Moderate; Grade 4= Marked/unusual amount.

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 14
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 1
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 1

Investigators used MMS during examinations- postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color & affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color & covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color & covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color & covers more than just very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 1
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 3
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 3

Investigators used MMS during examinations- postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color & affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color & covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color & covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color & covers more than just very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 3
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 5
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 5

Investigators used MMS during examinations- postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color & affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color & covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color & covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color & covers more than just very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 5
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 7
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 7

Investigators used MMS during examinations- postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color & affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color & covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color & covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color & covers more than just very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 7
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 10
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 10

Investigators used MMS during examinations- postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color & affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color & covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color & covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color & covers more than just very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 10
Difference in Marchac Grades Using A Modified Marchac Scale (MMS) of Ecchymosis Between Two Sides of Face Assessed by Investigator- Day 14
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 14

Investigators used MMS during examinations- postoperative Day 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14. Differences are calculated as (SoC Grade) - (FS VH S/D 4 Grade). MMS for Post Rhytidectomy (Facelift) Ecchymosis: Grade 0= No bruising; Grade 1= Barely perceivable (easily hidden with makeup, yellowish color & affects limited area); Grade 2= Present, minimal (yellow color & covers ≤25% of operated area); Grade 3= Moderate (yellow color & covers >25% of operated area, red color, blue color but covers a very small area); Grade 4= Extensive (blue color & covers more than just very small area, dark purple color)

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Through Postoperative Day 14
Resolution of Ecchymosis as Assessed by Investigators
Aikaikkuna: Postoperative Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14
Resolution of ecchymosis (grade 0 on the Modified Marchac Scale for ecchymosis (Grade 0 = No bruising at all))
Postoperative Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14
Resolution of Edema as Assessed by Investigators.
Aikaikkuna: Postoperative Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14
Resolution of edema (grade 1 on the Marchac Scale for Edema (Grade 1 = Nil)
Postoperative Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14
Total Volume of Drainage on Each Side of the Face
Aikaikkuna: 24 hours postoperative
24 hours postoperative
Participants With Hematoma/Seroma
Aikaikkuna: Days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7,10, and 14
Investigators assessed each side of the face for the presence of hematoma/seroma
Days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7,10, and 14
Participants With Hematoma/Seroma During the Study
Aikaikkuna: Through Postoperative Day 14 (± 1)
Investigators assessed each side of the face for the presence of hematoma/seroma
Through Postoperative Day 14 (± 1)
Differences From Day 0 in Two-Point Discrimination Tests Days 3, 7, 10, 14
Aikaikkuna: Postoperative Days 3, 7, 10, and 14
Two-point discrimination test performed by investigators to assess nerve regeneration. Testing performed on each side of the face (SoC and FS VH S/D 4). Differences are calculated as: Postoperative Day - Day 0, reported as minimal distance at which participants were able to discern feeling at two distinct points
Postoperative Days 3, 7, 10, and 14
Differences in Subjects' Assessments of Pain for Each Side of Face (SoC and FS VH S/D 4)
Aikaikkuna: Days 1, 3, 5, 7,10, and 14

Differences are calculated as (Grade for SoC) - (Grade for FS VH S/D 4). Participants used a 10-point visual analogue scale to complete a pain assessment for each side of their face during each postoperative study visit (Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14). The higher the number, the greater the pain experienced, i.e. 10 = worst, 1 = least.

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Days 1, 3, 5, 7,10, and 14
Differences in Subjects' Assessments of Numbness for Each Side of Face (SoC and FS VH S/D 4)
Aikaikkuna: Days 1, 3, 5, 7,10, and 14

Differences are calculated as (Grade for SoC) - (Grade for FS VH S/D 4). Participants used a 10-point visual analogue scale to complete a numbness assessment for each side of their face during each postoperative study visit (Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14). The higher the number, the greater the numbness experienced, i.e. 10 = worst, 1 = least.

The planned and approved SAP specified a pre-aggregation of the data whereby differences between the two sides of the face were computed first within participants to retain the inherent correlation (pairings) in the measures. Summary statistics and statistical tests were then computed on the differences between the two sides of the face using paired sample tests.
Days 1, 3, 5, 7,10, and 14
Participants' Assessment of Side of Face Preference (SoC and FS VH S/D 4)
Aikaikkuna: Postoperative Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14
Participants compared the levels of bruising on each side of their face and determine if they had a preference for the look of 1 side over another.
Postoperative Days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 14

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Sponsori

Baxter Healthcare Corporation

Tutkijat

  • Opintojohtaja: Steve Z Abrams, MD, Baxter Healthcare Corporation

Julkaisuja ja hyödyllisiä linkkejä

Tutkimusta koskevien tietojen syöttämisestä vastaava henkilö toimittaa nämä julkaisut vapaaehtoisesti. Nämä voivat koskea mitä tahansa tutkimukseen liittyvää.

Yleiset julkaisut

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus

Sunnuntai 1. kesäkuuta 2008

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Maanantai 1. syyskuuta 2008

Opintojen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Maanantai 1. syyskuuta 2008

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Maanantai 30. kesäkuuta 2008

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Maanantai 30. kesäkuuta 2008

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Arvio)

Keskiviikko 2. heinäkuuta 2008

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Arvio)

Tiistai 23. lokakuuta 2012

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Perjantai 19. lokakuuta 2012

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Maanantai 1. lokakuuta 2012

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja

Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot

  • 550703

Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta

Ei

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta

Ei

Yhdysvalloissa valmistettu ja sieltä viety tuote

Ei

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Tilaa