Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

Optimization of Drug Prescribing in an Elderly Population of Geriatric Consultations (OPTIM)

torstai 2. elokuuta 2018 päivittänyt: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Optimization of Drug Prescribing in an Elderly Population of Geriatric Consultations and Living at Home

Aging is often associated with multiple chronic conditions conducting increased consumption of drugs. Drug therapy is necessary for the treatment of many diseases. However, misuse of drugs, particularly linked to the potentially inappropriate prescribing and polypharmacy, increases the iatrogenic risks and can lead to adverse events such as falls, cognitive decline, increased use to the health system: hospital admissions, emergency room visits, and institutionalization. These problems are common since about 20% of emergency room use in elderly patients due to an adverse event related to drugs. Nearly 28% of adverse events related to drug prescriptions could be avoided.

Interventions to optimize drug therapy showed a reduction in the number of potentially inappropriate medications, but their impact on health, has rarely been evaluated. If an association with death has been established, the link with the loss of functional autonomy, which leads to reduced quality of life and significant cost of care, has not been investigated. The evolution towards functional disabilities, frequent with aging has many causes, among which some could be prevented. The optimization of drug prescriptions could thereby delay or prevent the loss of functional autonomy by reducing the risk of adverse events, such as falls or cognitive decline and improving the management of chronic diseases. Our hypothesis is that an optimization program of the drug prescribing may slow progression to functional dependence. To assess the effect of the optimization program of drug prescribing on the level of functional autonomy, a multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial will be conducted in geriatric and memory consultations.

Expected results The implementation of the "OPTIM" program should enable optimization of drug prescribing in elderly patients and therefore slow or prevent progression to addiction. It should also help to develop and strengthen collaboration and communication between the team of geriatric consultation, the clinician pharmacist and referring physicians in town (private practice). In addition, pharmaceutical notice sent to referring physicians should help raise awareness of the prescription of drugs in these patients.

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Tila

Tuntematon

Ehdot

Interventio / Hoito

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Odotettu)

302

Vaihe

  • Ei sovellettavissa

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskelupaikat

  • Ranska
      • Albigny sur Saône, Ranska
        • Ei vielä rekrytointia
        • Hôpital gériatrique du Mont d'Or
        • Ottaa yhteyttä:
          • Aurélia MARFISI - DUBOST, PH
        • Alatutkija:
          • Ahmed SALMI, PH
      • Lyon, Ranska
        • Rekrytointi
        • Hopital des Charpennes
        • Ottaa yhteyttä:
          • Pierre Krolak Salmon, PU PH

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

65 vuotta ja vanhemmat (Vanhempi Aikuinen)

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Ei

Sukupuolet, jotka voivat opiskella

Kaikki

Kuvaus

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 65 and over;
  • Patients received for the first time in a geriatric or memory consultation of a study recruiting centers;
  • Patients living at home;
  • Patients with the ability to express themselves orally or in writing in French sufficiently to carry out clinical assessments;
  • Patients who led the last drugs prescription from his referring physician, at the geriatric/memory consultation (in current practice, patients should take the last prescription established by the referring physician);
  • Patients accompanied by a caregiver.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with no discernment;
  • Patient put under legal protection;

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Ennaltaehkäisy
  • Jako: Satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Kokeellinen: Optimization of drug prescribing
The group with optimization program will have: (i) a medical history of the drug prescribing; (ii) analysis and pharmaceutical recommendations and (iii) preparation of a management plan. Notices will be sent only to referring physicians in this experimental group.
Muut: Optimization of drug prescribing
The patients included in this group will have the intervention. The optimization of drug prescribing consists to a history of the drugs prescribing leading to pharmaceutical recommendations by the pharmacist-clinician, accepted by the specialist physicians in charge of the patient at the hospital and sent to the referring physicians of patients, who can accept or not the recommendations.
Ei väliintuloa: No intervention
This group will receive the current management of patients in geriatric or memory consultation, during which the intervention of a clinician pharmacist is not provided. There will be a history of the drugs prescribing leading to pharmaceutical recommendations by the pharmacist-clinician, accepted by the specialist physicians in charge of the patient at the hospital, but the recommendations will not be transmitted to the referring physicians of patients.

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
The evolution of the level of functional autonomy of the patients assessed using the scale IADL of Lawton
Aikaikkuna: At inclusion

The primary outcome will be calculated using the 4 successive evaluations of IADL scale.

The IADL scale assesses the level of functional autonomy of a patient through the assessment of instrumental activities of daily living: ability to use the telephone, transportation, shopping, managing medications, manage a budget, prepare meals, maintain the house and do the laundry. The rating scale provides a score from 0 to 8. A higher score indicates a higher level of dependency, while a lower score reflects a lower level of dependence. The IADL scale consists of 8 questions.
At inclusion
The evolution of the level of functional autonomy of the patients assessed using the scale IADL of Lawton
Aikaikkuna: At 1 month
The primary outcome will be calculated using the 4 successive evaluations of IADL scale.
At 1 month
The evolution of the level of functional autonomy of the patients assessed using the scale IADL of Lawton
Aikaikkuna: At 6 months
The primary outcome will be calculated using the 4 successive evaluations of IADL scale.
At 6 months
The evolution of the level of functional autonomy of the patients assessed using the scale IADL of Lawton
Aikaikkuna: At 18 months
The primary outcome will be calculated using the 4 successive evaluations of IADL scale.
At 18 months
The evolution of the level of functional autonomy of the patients assessed using the scale DAD-6.
Aikaikkuna: At inclusion

The primary outcome will be calculated using the 4 successive evaluations of DAD-6 scale.

The scale DAD-6 assesses the patient's activities in his daily life. It includes six questions assessing the degree of autonomy for the following activities: Food, use the telephone or the computer, moving outside, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure and home maintenance. The score ranges from 0 to 18 points, the higher the score, the more the patient is autonomous.
At inclusion
The evolution of the level of functional autonomy of the patients assessed using the scale DAD-6.
Aikaikkuna: At 1 month

The primary outcome will be calculated using the 4 successive evaluations of DAD-6 scale.

The scale DAD-6 assesses the patient's activities in his daily life. It includes six questions assessing the degree of autonomy for the following activities: Food, use the telephone or the computer, moving outside, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure and home maintenance. The score ranges from 0 to 18 points, the higher the score, the more the patient is autonomous.
At 1 month
The evolution of the level of functional autonomy of the patients assessed using the scale DAD-6.
Aikaikkuna: At 6 months

The primary outcome will be calculated using the 4 successive evaluations of DAD-6 scale.

The scale DAD-6 assesses the patient's activities in his daily life. It includes six questions assessing the degree of autonomy for the following activities: Food, use the telephone or the computer, moving outside, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure and home maintenance. The score ranges from 0 to 18 points, the higher the score, the more the patient is autonomous.
At 6 months
The evolution of the level of functional autonomy of the patients assessed using the scale DAD-6.
Aikaikkuna: At 18 months

The primary outcome will be calculated using the 4 successive evaluations of DAD-6 scale.

The scale DAD-6 assesses the patient's activities in his daily life. It includes six questions assessing the degree of autonomy for the following activities: Food, use the telephone or the computer, moving outside, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure and home maintenance. The score ranges from 0 to 18 points, the higher the score, the more the patient is autonomous.
At 18 months

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Number of Hospitalizations
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
the occurrence of hospitalizations within 18 months after baseline
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
Number of days before hospitalizations
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
delay between baseline and the hospitalization
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
Occurrence of recourse to emergency service
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
occurrence of recourse to emergency service within 18 months after baseline
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
Number of days before the recourse to emergency service
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
delay between baseline and the recourse to emergency service
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
The occurrence of admission in institution
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
the occurrence of admission in institution within 18 months after baseline
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
Number of days before admission in institution
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
delay between baseline and the admission in institution
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
Death
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
the occurrence of death within 18 months after baseline
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
Number of days before death
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
delay between baseline and death
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
Falls
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
the occurrence of falls within 18 months after baseline
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
Number of days before falls
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
the delay between baseline and falls
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
Cognitive functions
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
The cognitive function is measured by the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) at every visit, as part of the routine care pathway of the patient. Successive scores will be used to measure the evolution of MMSE.
Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
Quality of life 1
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
Quality of life measured by questionnaire QoL-AD
Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
Quality of life 2
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
Quality of life measured by questionnaire EUROQOL 5D
Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
depression disorders
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
depression measured with the mini-GDS scale
Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
Anxiety disorders
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
Anxiety disorders will be measured with the Hamilton scale
Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
Compliance of patients with treatment
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
compliance is measured with the questionnaire Girerd
Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
Pain
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
Pain is measured with an ordinal scale from 0 to 10
Baseline, 6 months and 18 months
Proportion of potential inappropriate medication
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
The proportion of potential inappropriate medication will be measured on the drug prescribing of the patients issued from the referring physician
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
Problems associated with drug therapy
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
The proportion of problems associated with drug therapy will be measured on the drugs prescribing of the patients issued from the referring physician
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months
acceptance rate by the referring physicians of pharmaceutical recommendation
Aikaikkuna: Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months

The acceptance rate of the pharmaceutical review will be evaluated in 2 complementary ways:

  • By comparing patients' prescriptions issued by the referring physician before and after the pharmaceutical review.
  • By interviewing the referring physician
Baseline, 1 month, 6 months and 18 months

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Sponsori

Hospices Civils de Lyon

Julkaisuja ja hyödyllisiä linkkejä

Tutkimusta koskevien tietojen syöttämisestä vastaava henkilö toimittaa nämä julkaisut vapaaehtoisesti. Nämä voivat koskea mitä tahansa tutkimukseen liittyvää.

Yleiset julkaisut

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)

Sunnuntai 1. toukokuuta 2016

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Odotettu)

Sunnuntai 1. marraskuuta 2020

Opintojen valmistuminen (Odotettu)

Sunnuntai 1. marraskuuta 2020

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Keskiviikko 6. huhtikuuta 2016

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Torstai 14. huhtikuuta 2016

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Arvio)

Perjantai 15. huhtikuuta 2016

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Perjantai 3. elokuuta 2018

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Torstai 2. elokuuta 2018

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Keskiviikko 1. elokuuta 2018

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Avainsanat

Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot

  • 69HCL15-0104

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Tilaa