Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms in China.

tiistai 2. lokakuuta 2018 päivittänyt: He xuying, Zhujiang Hospital

The Safety and Efficacy of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms Embolized Assisted With Stents（SERIAES）.

Ruptured intracranial aneurysms is currently a common disease that seriously affects human health and quality of life due to its high morbidity,high mortality and high disability. At present,Ruptured intracranial aneurysms are treated with craniotomy clipping and interventional embolization ,but for ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms, the treatment of craniotomy clipping and coiling embolization are not effective.With the improvement of endovascular treatment materials and techniques, three dimensional coil basket technique, double microcatheter technique, balloon assisted ONYX embolization, simple stent covered aneurysm neck, balloon or stent assisted neck remodeling and coil embolization are used in endovascular treatment of ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms. The treatment methods are different in the intervention effect of ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms, for example, the complications of interventional therapy are lower than craniotomy clipping,but the rate of well functional outcome (mRS ≤2) differed significantly by 3 months follow-up (65.0% vs.75.0%), and there is not standard of treatment in different parts of ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms in our country, the choice of interventional therapy or craniotomy clipping are different in different clinical centers; on the other hand, there are serious problems in the treatment of ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms, because without the relevant guidelines of diagnosis and treatment of ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms, different clinical centers will cause excessive treatment of ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms, not only bring unreasonable utilization of medical resources, but also cause the subject's life and property to be threatened.

The patients with ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms(n=1084) and unruptured intracranial aneurysms(n=300) were included in prospective cohort study, after interventional therapy and craniotomy clipping, setting fixed time for postoperative follow-up, the clinical data and image data were recorded, the safety, efficacy and economic benefits of interventional treatment and craniotomy clipping were compared, providing strategies for the standardized treatment of ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms.

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Tila

Tuntematon

Ehdot

Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus

For this study, investigators consulted and hired professionals and experts about data collection, data and methodology, including Data Monitoring Committee, Data Management Committee, Project Academic Committee,Executive Group Project Manager, Project Statistician, Technical Support Center, investigators have a scientific regulations for this project, Project Manager and Executive Group: To ensure the successfully implementation of this project, including charging the daily operations of the study in 6 different research hospitals, organizing the monthly meeting to consider issues raised during the monthly progress of the study, liaising with the steering committee the data management center and statistical center , Data management Committee: To be responsible for setting up and maintain the Electronic Data Capture(EDC) System according to the paper case Report Form (pCRF) designed by principal investigators. To collect and save the pCRF coming from sub-centers. To entry the data into EDC system and keep the same with CRF. To organize training for the investigators about the rules in filling the EDC and pCRF.To determine the frequency of the Data Management Report and to fed it back to the steering committee every three months, Data Monitoring Committee: To determine the frequency of the data monitoring including the source data(Medical records) accuracy, completeness and representativeness comparing the external data(EDC,pCRF） in 12 centers.To report the results after the monitoring back to the steering committee about the missing data, non-reported and other problems about the study. To make a Standard Operation Procedure (SOP) from getting data to using data. Academic Committee: To supervise the academic issues including patient recruitment, protocol deviation, adverse events evaluating. To settle down the question and problem in the process of the study, Project Statistician: We cooperate with the Statisticians of Medical Research & Biometrics center National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, China ti get the professional statistical report. Technical Support Center: To provide technical support during the process of the study.

Opintotyyppi

Havainnollistava

Ilmoittautuminen (Odotettu)

1384

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskelupaikat

  • Kiina
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, Kiina, 510282
        • Southern medical university, zhujiang hospital

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

14 vuotta ja vanhemmat (Lapsi, Aikuinen, Vanhempi Aikuinen)

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Ei

Sukupuolet, jotka voivat opiskella

Kaikki

Näytteenottomenetelmä

Ei-todennäköisyysnäyte

Tutkimusväestö

Patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms and un-ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Kuvaus

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. At least one imaging methods( CTA/ MRA/DSA ) confirmed ruptured wide-neck intracranial aneurysms (fundus-to-neck ratio < 2 or neck diameter > 4 mm );
  2. Stent-Assisted Coiling of un-ruptured intracranial aneurysms, whether have clinical symptoms or no;
  3. For multiple aneurysms, regardless of previous treatment, the requirement for treatment interval should >6 months;
  4. The subjects age 14 years;
  5. subjects or family members agree to sign informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subjects with other intracranial vascular malformations, such as AVM, AVF. Etc;
  2. Subjects with malignant tumors in the intracranial or other parts of the body;
  3. Fusiform, traumatic, bacterial or dissecting aneurysm;
  4. Subjects with severe mental illness unable to communicate when diagnosing disease;
  5. The body condition is poor, the survival time is less than 1 year or poor physical condition, cannot tolerate the general anesthesia or aneurysm surgery;
  6. Subjects involved in other intracranial aneurysms related clinical research;
  7. A patient who received surgical clipping or endovascular treatment at once;
  8. Subjects who were not followed up；

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
The safety evaluation of interventional therapy and craniotomy clipping.
Aikaikkuna: 6 months later after operation.
2.The safety evaluation including the mortality(mRS=6) rate and disability(3<mRS<6) rate of subjects.
6 months later after operation.
The safety evaluation of interventional therapy and craniotomy clipping.
Aikaikkuna: 6 months later after operation.
The safety evaluation including the mortality(mRS=6) rate of subjects.
6 months later after operation.
Modified Rankin score ( mRS ).
Aikaikkuna: 1 year.

0. completely silent.

  1. despite symptoms, but not visibly disabled, can complete all regular duties and activities
  2. mild disabilities, not all activities previously possible, but can deal with personal affairs without need of assistance
  3. moderate disability requires some help, but walking does not need assistance
  4. severe disabilities, unable to walk independently, no others can not meet their needs
  5. severely disabled, bedridden, Urine, requiring continuous care and care
  6. mortality.
1 year.
Raymond classification.
Aikaikkuna: 1 year.
  1. Complete occlusion
  2. Partial occlusion
  3. Recurrence.
1 year.
The effectiveness evaluation of craniotomy clipping.
Aikaikkuna: 6 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation including the complete occlusion( Raymond classification=1) rate of aneurysms.
6 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation of interventional treatment.
Aikaikkuna: 6 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation including the recurrence ( Raymond classification =3) rate of aneurysms.
6 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation of craniotomy clipping.
Aikaikkuna: 6 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation including the recurrence( Raymond classification=3) rate of aneurysms.
6 months later after operation.

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
The safety evaluation interventional therapy.
Aikaikkuna: 12 months later after operation.
The safety evaluation including the mortality( mRS=6)rate and disability(3<mRS<6 ) rate of subjects.
12 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation of interventional treatment.
Aikaikkuna: 12 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation including the complete occlusion( Raymond classification=1 ) rate of aneurysms.
12 months later after operation.
The success rate of treatment.
Aikaikkuna: 6 months later after operation.
Angiography revealed total or near total occlusion of aneurysm in 6 months after operation, no recurrence of aneurysm was found. the treatment was considered successful.
6 months later after operation.
The incidence of major adverse events after 3 months of surgery.
Aikaikkuna: 3 months.
3 months.
The incidence of major adverse events in 3 months and 6 months later after operation.
Aikaikkuna: 3 months and 6 months later after operation.
3 months and 6 months later after operation.
The incidence of major adverse events in 6 months and 12 months later after operation.
Aikaikkuna: 6 months and 12 months later after operation.
6 months and 12 months later after operation.
The safety evaluation of craniotomy clipping.
Aikaikkuna: 12 months later after operation.
The safety evaluation including the mortality( MRS=6 ) rate and disability(3<MRS <6) rate of subjects.
12 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation of interventional treatment.
Aikaikkuna: 12 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation including the recurrence( Raymond classification=3 ) rate of aneurysms.
12 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation of craniotomy clipping.
Aikaikkuna: 12 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation including the complete occlusion( Raymond classification=1 ) rate of aneurysms.
12 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation of craniotomy clipping.
Aikaikkuna: 12 months later after operation.
The effectiveness evaluation including the recurrence( Raymond classification=3) rate of aneurysms.
12 months later after operation.

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Sponsori

Zhujiang Hospital

Yhteistyökumppanit

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Xuanwu Hospital, Beijing
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University
Air Force Military Medical University, China
First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University
First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University

Tutkijat

  • Päätutkija: Xuying He, PH. D, Study Principal Investigator Department of Neurosurgery, Southern Medical University, Zhujiang Hospital

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus (Odotettu)

Torstai 1. marraskuuta 2018

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Odotettu)

Sunnuntai 31. toukokuuta 2020

Opintojen valmistuminen (Odotettu)

Sunnuntai 31. toukokuuta 2020

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Keskiviikko 7. helmikuuta 2018

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Torstai 8. maaliskuuta 2018

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)

Maanantai 12. maaliskuuta 2018

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Keskiviikko 3. lokakuuta 2018

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Tiistai 2. lokakuuta 2018

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Maanantai 1. lokakuuta 2018

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Avainsanat

Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja

Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot

  • 2016YFC1300800

Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)

Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?

JOO

IPD-suunnitelman kuvaus

investigators can share the original data 5 years after the study

Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta

Ei

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta

Ei

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Tilaa