Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

adaptatiVe Endovascular Strategy to the CloT MRI in Large Intracranial Vessel Occlusion (VECTOR)

torstai 10. syyskuuta 2026 päivittänyt: Nantes University Hospital

In the VECTOR trial, the aim is to analyze, in case of SVS+ occlusions, a first line Embotrap II added to CA combined strategy compare to CA alone strategy.

Many practitioners are convinced that a first line strategy with CA alone is easy, safe, rapid and efficient. Maybe, after two, three, four ... passes and with the secondary help of a combined strategy, a high rate of eTICI 2b/3 could be reached with a CA first line strategy. But this could go with a higher number of passes, a waste of time and a suboptimal angiographic results (eTICI 2b) due to distal emboli, especially in case of friable, non-well organized, red blood cell rich (RBC) i.e. SVS + thrombi (25-28). This could, be related to worst clinical outcome at 3 months. VECTOR asks a relevant question: Do the invetigators have to add the use of an Embotrap II or III to the CA, from the first passes, in case of SVS+ clots?

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus

Sudden occlusion of an intracranial artery by a thrombus represents the initial and pivotal event of large vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke (AIS). The primary goal of AIS treatment is to re-open this artery with intravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator infusion (IV t-PA) and/or endovascular therapy (EVT). Thrombus characterization could be useful to predict AIS etiology, IV t-PA response and to adapt the device or technique for EVT. Especially, approaching the red blood cell (RBC) content of the thrombus would be helpful to plan a treatment strategy or identify specific EVT approaches in order to maximize the rate of early successful reperfusion .

The susceptibility vessel sign (SVS) on T2*-MRI sequence is defined as a hypo-intense signal exceeding the diameter of the contralateral artery located at the site of the thrombus. Several studies have demonstrated SVS to be a negative predictor of early reperfusion after IV t-PA and an incentive to EVT . Two studies identified a correlation between the SVS and the thrombus composition (specifically the RBC composition). In the ASTER trial, the presence of SVS impacted the success rate of the EVT strategy. In the SVS (+) sub-population of this study, compared to contact aspiration (CA), patients treated with stent retrievers achieved higher rates of complete reperfusion within fewer passes, which translated into a better functional outcome. In the absence of SVS, no differences were observed between the two techniques. Furthermore; based on the ASTER and THRACE trial populations treated with stent retriever as a first line strategy, a higher rate of favorable clinical outcome at 3 months in SVS (+) patients was recently found . Hence, that differences in terms of reperfusion results are thought to be related to different clot compositions between SVS + and SVS - occlusions.

In the VECTOR trial, the aim is to analyze, in case of SVS+ occlusions, a first line Embotrap II added to CA combined strategy compare to CA alone strategy.

Many practitioners are convinced that a first line strategy with CA alone is easy, safe, rapid and efficient. Maybe, after two, three, four passes and with the secondary help of a combined strategy, a high rate of eTICI 2b/3 could be reached with a CA first line strategy. But this could go with a higher number of passes, a waste of time and a suboptimal angiographic results (eTICI 2b) due to distal emboli, especially in case of friable, non-well organized, red blood cell rich (RBC) i.e. SVS + thrombi. This could, be related to worst clinical outcome at 3 months.

VECTOR asks a relevant question: Do the investigators have to add the use of an Embotrap II or III to the CA, from the first passes, in case of SVS+ clots? The hypothesis in the VECTOR trial is that the Embotrap II or III, thanks to its dedicated design will help to the stabilization of friable clots and allow better retrieving of SVS + thrombi in a lower number of passes.

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Todellinen)

526

Vaihe

  • Ei sovellettavissa

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskelupaikat

      • Amiens, Ranska
        • CHU Amiens-Picardie
      • Angers, Ranska
        • CH Angers
      • Bayonne, Ranska, 64109
        • CH Côte Basque
      • Bordeaux, Ranska
        • Hôpital Pellegrin - CHU Bordeaux
      • Brest, Ranska
        • CHRU Brest
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Ranska
        • Hôpital Bicêtre
      • Lille, Ranska
        • Hôpital Roger Salengro - CHR Lille
      • Limoges, Ranska
        • CHU Limoges
      • Lyon, Ranska
        • Hospices Civils Lyon
      • Marseille, Ranska, 13385
        • CHU Marseille - Hôpital la Timone
      • Montpellier, Ranska
        • CHU Gui de Chauliac
      • Nancy, Ranska
        • CHU Nancy
      • Nantes, Ranska
        • CHU de Nantes
      • Paris, Ranska, 75019
        • Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
      • Paris, Ranska
        • La Pitié Salpétrière
      • Paris, Ranska
        • Hôpital Ste Anne
      • Pau, Ranska, 64000
        • CH Pau
      • Reims, Ranska
        • Hôpital Maison Blanche - CHU Reims
      • Rennes, Ranska
        • Hôpital Pontchaillou - CHU Rennes
      • Strasbourg, Ranska, 67000
        • CHU Strasbourg
      • Suresnes, Ranska
        • Hôpital Foch
      • Tours, Ranska
        • Hôpital Bretonneau - CHU Tours
      • Vannes, Ranska
        • CH Bretagne Atlantique

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

18 vuotta ja vanhemmat (Aikuinen, Vanhempi Aikuinen)

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Ei

Kuvaus

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18 and older (i.e., candidates must have had their 18th birthday)
  • Puncture carried out within 24 hours of first symptoms
  • Suitable 1.5T MRI T2 * Gradient echo that shows a clear susceptibility vessel sign facing the occlusion
  • Neuroimaging demonstrates large vessel proximal occlusion (distal ICA through MCA bifurcation, M1 or proximal M2)
  • Patient or trustworthy person informed about the study and having orally consented to participation in the study. If the patient is unable to receive information and no trustworthy person can be contacted during screening for the study, trial inclusion will be completed as an emergency procedure by the investigator, in compliance with the French laws
  • With or without intravenous thrombolysis

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Absence of large vessel occlusion on non-invasive imaging
  • Known or suspected pre-existing (chronic) large vessel occlusion in the symptomatic territory
  • Suspected pregnancy; if, in a woman is of child-bearing potential, a urine or serum beta HCG test is positive
  • Severe contrast medium allergy or absolute contraindication to use of iodinated products
  • Clinical history, past imaging or clinical judgment suggests that the intracranial occlusion is chronic
  • Patient has severe or fatal comorbidities that will likely prevent improvement or follow-up or that will render the procedure unlikely to benefit the patient
  • Acute ischemic stroke involving posterior circulation (vertebro-basilar occlusion)
  • Angiographic evidence of carotid dissection or tandem cervical occlusion or stenosis requiring treatment
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding women
  • Patient benefiting from a legal protection
  • Non-membership of a national insurance scheme
  • Opposition of the patient or (in case of inclusion as a matter of urgency) of the trustworthy person
  • Patient with modified Rankin score > 3 before qualifying stroke

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Hoito
  • Jako: Satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Yksittäinen

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Kokeellinen: combined EMBOTRAP II or III and Contact Aspiration
refer to title
Active Comparator: Contact Aspiration alone
refer to title

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
The rate of near to complete reperfusion after 3 passes of the device defined by a modified treatment in cerebral infarction (eTICI) score of 2c/3
Aikaikkuna: At Day 0 immediately after 3 passes
Preliminary data suggested in case of SVS+ occlusions a superiority of the first line SR strategy in terms of eTICI2c/3 after 3 passes compared to first line CA alone.The first pass (FPE) is an ambitious technical endpoint defined as a successful reperfusion obtained after the first pass that has been recently associated with an increased probability of favorable clinical outcome, a reduced mortality rate and procedural adverse events.However, this constitutes a "very technical" endpoint and the external validity in daily practice would be reduced compared to the three passes cut-off.Even if a FPE eTICI 2b, 2c or 3 has shown better clinical outcome compared to a final eTICI 2b, 2c or 3,there is no study that has proved the better clinical outcome when compared FPE eTICI 2b,2c or 3 to three passes eTICI 2b,2c or 3.Last, there was no preliminary data that suggests in case of SVS+ occlusions, a superiority of the first pass SR strategy in terms eTICI2c/3 compared to first pass CA alone.
At Day 0 immediately after 3 passes

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Near to complete first-pass effect
Aikaikkuna: Day 0 immediately after first pass
Defined as a eTICI 2c/3 after first pass device
Day 0 immediately after first pass
Complete first-pass effect
Aikaikkuna: Day 0 immediately after first pass
Defined as a eTICI 3 after first pass device
Day 0 immediately after first pass
Complete reperfusion
Aikaikkuna: Day 0 immediately after three passes
Defined as eTICI 3 after three passes
Day 0 immediately after three passes
Final near to complete reperfusion
Aikaikkuna: Day 0 at the end of the intervention
Defined as eTICI 2c/3 final
Day 0 at the end of the intervention
Final complete reperfusion
Aikaikkuna: Day 0 at the end of the intervention
Defined as eTICI 3
Day 0 at the end of the intervention
Time to achieve eTICI 2c or better revascularization
Aikaikkuna: Day 0
Time to achieve eTICI 2c or better revascularization
Day 0
Time between groin puncture to clot contact
Aikaikkuna: Day 0
Time between groin puncture to clot contact
Day 0
Rate of functional independence
Aikaikkuna: At 90days
Defined as a modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-2
At 90days
Rate of excellent functional outcome
Aikaikkuna: At 90days
Defined as a mRS 0-1
At 90days
The distribution of mRs scores
Aikaikkuna: At 90days
Combining scores of 9 and 10
At 90days
Change in NIHSS from baseline to 24 hours
Aikaikkuna: Baseline and 24hours
Change in NIHSS
Baseline and 24hours
Rate of symptomatic and asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage
Aikaikkuna: At 24hrs
Assessment of symptomatic and asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage at MRI or CT scan 24h after thrombectomy
At 24hrs
Rate of parenchymal hematoma type 1 and 2
Aikaikkuna: At 24hrs
Assessment of parenchymal hematoma type 1 and 2
At 24hrs
Rate of all-cause mortality at 90 days
Aikaikkuna: At 90days
Assessment of all-cause mortality at 90 days
At 90days
Rate of periprocedural complications
Aikaikkuna: At 90days
Occurrence of emboli to new territory, vasospasm, dissection, perforation and subarachnoid hemorrhage
At 90days

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Tutkijat

  • Päätutkija: Romain Bourcier, Nantes university hospital

Julkaisuja ja hyödyllisiä linkkejä

Tutkimusta koskevien tietojen syöttämisestä vastaava henkilö toimittaa nämä julkaisut vapaaehtoisesti. Nämä voivat koskea mitä tahansa tutkimukseen liittyvää.

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)

Tiistai 26. marraskuuta 2019

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Maanantai 14. helmikuuta 2022

Opintojen valmistuminen (Todellinen)

Maanantai 3. lokakuuta 2022

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Maanantai 7. lokakuuta 2019

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Keskiviikko 23. lokakuuta 2019

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)

Perjantai 25. lokakuuta 2019

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Maanantai 14. syyskuuta 2026

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Torstai 10. syyskuuta 2026

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Torstai 1. joulukuuta 2022

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta

Ei

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta

Ei

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Tilaa