Reducing Post-Operative Opioid Prescribing in Southeastern North Carolina
Building an Implementation Science Network to Reduce Post-Operative Opioid Prescribing in Southeastern North Carolina
The goal of this stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial is to evaluate whether an opioid stewardship intervention improves post-operative opioid prescribing practices. Participants will include surgeon champions and identified change team members (e.g., pharmacists, hospitalists, nurses, advanced practice providers, anesthesiologists, etc.) and patient representatives at designated hospital sites in North Carolina.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
I. Does the intervention reduce postoperative opioid prescribing behavior at the surgeon and hospital level? II. Is the intervention acceptable, feasible, and effective for implementation among participating hospitals?
Researchers will compare opioid prescribing and implementation outcomes across sites before and after implementation using a stepped-wedge cluster randomized design, in which sites are randomly assigned to different intervention start times.
Participants will attend educational sessions delivered, introduce the Standard Opioid Prescribing (SOPS) Toolkit into their clinical practice, review benchmarked, deidentified opioid prescribing performance reports that use administrative claims data (secondary data source, data not collected or shared between hospitals), and complete surveys assessing intervention acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness. Preliminary effectiveness will be assessed through reduction of opioid prescriptions using administrative claims data.
Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus
Tila
Ehdot
Interventio / Hoito
Yksityiskohtainen kuvaus
A stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial will be conducted across participating hospital sites in Southeastern North Carolina. Sites will transition sequentially from the control condition to the intervention condition based on randomization, until all clusters have completed the opioid stewardship intervention over a 10-week period.
During the control phase, opioid prescribing will continue according to existing practices. During the intervention phase, sites will implement a multi-component site-specific opioid stewardship intervention. The intervention includes dissemination of the Standard Opioid Prescribing (SOPS) Toolkit, quality improvement (QI) educational sessions, and benchmarked opioid prescribing performance reports generated from administrative claims data. These reports provide deidentified surgeon- and site-level prescribing summaries so that sites are able to see their current opioid prescribing levels.
The primary outcomes are the acceptability, feasibility, and effectiveness of the intervention assessed during and after implementation as determined from semi-structured interviews and surveys. Secondary outcomes include additional provider and patient opioid prescribing outcomes related to post-operative opioid fills by patients. This information will be obtained from administrative claims data. No patient information will be collected and no patient will be enrolled int eh study. These measures evaluate whether tailoring the opioid stewardship intervention to each hospital improves routine clinical practice and provider opioid prescribing.
Opintotyyppi
Ilmoittautuminen (Arvioitu)
Vaihe
- Ei sovellettavissa
Yhteystiedot ja paikat
Opiskeluyhteys
- Nimi: Jessica Schumacher, PhD
- Puhelinnumero: (919) 966-4320
- Sähköposti: Jessica_Schumacher@med.unc.edu
Tutki yhteystietojen varmuuskopiointi
- Nimi: Meaghan Hazelet
- Sähköposti: meaghan.hazelet@med.unc.edu
Opiskelupaikat
-
-
North Carolina
-
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, Yhdysvallat, 27514
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
-
Ottaa yhteyttä:
- Jessica Schumacher, PhD
- Puhelinnumero: 919-966-4320
- Sähköposti: Jessica_Schumacher@med.unc.edu
-
Päätutkija:
- Jessica Schumacher, PhD
-
Wilmington, North Carolina, Yhdysvallat, 28401
- Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center
-
Ottaa yhteyttä:
- William Hope, MD
- Sähköposti: william.hope@novanthealth.org
-
-
Osallistumiskriteerit
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Opintokelpoiset iät
- Aikuinen
- Vanhempi Aikuinen
Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia
Kuvaus
Inclusion Criteria:
Surgeon champions and identified change team members must be currently practicing at one of the sites participating in this study.
Patient representatives must be:
Proficient in the English language Prescribed opioids following a qualifying general surgery procedure (inpatient or outpatient laparoscopic appendectomy, inguinal/femoral hernia repair, umbilical hernia, bariatric/weight loss surgery, mastectomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic colectomy, lipoma/soft tissue tumor excision, and anal/rectal procedures).
No patients will be enrolled for this trial. However, claims data will be used to assess the claims based outcome measure (opioid prescribing).
Inclusion criteria for the claims analysis includes:
Patients greater than or equal to 18 at the time of a qualifying general surgery procedure either inpatient or outpatient (laparoscopic appendectomy; umbilical/ventral/inguinal/femoral hernia repair; bariatric/weight loss surgery; mastectomy; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; laparoscopic colectomy; lipoma/soft tissue tumor excision; anal/rectal procedures) based on procedure codes Patients must have continuous insurance coverage (including prescription drug coverage), 6 months before to 60 days post discharge to assess comorbidities and prescription drug fills.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with an opioid fill 6 months before the procedure. Patients who undergo a significant operation during the stay associated with their index procedure that would require additional pain management.
Opintosuunnitelma
Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?
Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat
- Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Terveyspalvelututkimus
- Jako: Satunnaistettu
- Inventiomalli: Crossover-tehtävä
- Naamiointi: Ei mitään (avoin tarra)
Aseet ja interventiot
Osallistujaryhmä / Arm |
Interventio / Hoito |
|---|---|
|
Muut: Usual Care (Control Period)
During the control phase of the stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, participating hospitals continue opioid prescribing according to existing local practices.
Clinicians do not receive any components of the opioid stewardship intervention during this period.
Each hospital contributes data to this arm prior to crossing over to the intervention phase based on randomized timing.
|
Existing opioid prescribing practices and guidelines at each participating hospital site, with no additional educational, benchmarking, or quality improvement activities.
|
|
Kokeellinen: Opioid Stewardship Intervention (Intervention Period)
During the intervention phase, hospitals implement a multi component opioid stewardship intervention after crossing over from the control condition according to randomized start time.
Clinician participants at each site engage in the intervention for approximately 10 weeks.
All hospitals eventually receive the intervention as part of the stepped wedge design.
|
A multi component intervention consisting of dissemination of the Standard Opioid Prescribing (SOPS) Toolkit, quality improvement educational sessions for clinicians, and benchmarked opioid prescribing performance reports generated from administrative claims data.
Reports provide deidentified surgeon and site level summaries of opioid prescribing patterns.
|
Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of the Intervention Assessed by Semi-Structured Interviews (Change Team Members)
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
Acceptability will be assessed qualitatively using themes derived from semi-structured interviews conducted with change team members.
Interviews will explore perceptions of the intervention and its fit within the hospital context.
Themes identified after the 10-week implementation period will be compared with themes identified prior to implementation.
|
From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
|
Proportion of training and learning sessions attended (Feasibility Measure 1)
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
Proportion of training and learning sessions attended by change team members
|
From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
|
percentage of change team member providers that completed pre- and post- assessments (Feasibility Measure 2)
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
percentage of change team member providers that completed pre- and post- assessments
|
From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
|
change team's ability to start the trial as randomized (Feasibility Measure 3)
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
change team's ability to start the trial as randomized (yes/no)
|
From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
|
proportion of intervention components implemented (Feasibility Measure 4)
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
proportion of intervention components implemented using themes gathered from semi-structured interviews (intervention fidelity)
|
From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
|
Change in Organizational Readiness to Change (ORIC) Measure (Effectiveness Measure 1- survey)
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period)
|
Change in ORIC score from pre- to post intervention.
Change team members will complete the survey before the intervention start phase and after intervention completion.
|
From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period)
|
|
Audit and feedback effectiveness as assessed by learning sessions and semi structured interviews (Effectiveness Measure 2)
Aikaikkuna: Intervention Period
|
Audit and feedback effectiveness is defined as the extent change team members feel ownership and agreement, can make sense of the information provided, are motivated by the social influence that reviewing their performance shows (e.g., comparing their performance to other hospitals), and accept accountability for the proposed changes.
|
Intervention Period
|
|
Change in Milligram equivalents (MME) of the first post-operative fill pre- and post-intervention using administrative claims data (Effectiveness Measure 3).
Aikaikkuna: Comparing pre (6 months before enrollment) and 6 month period starting at the end of the 10-week intervention period.
|
Change in Milligram equivalents (MME) of the first opioid prescription filled (outpatient) by patients -3 days before admission for their qualifying procedure through 7 days post-discharge during the pre- and post-intervention time periods.
|
Comparing pre (6 months before enrollment) and 6 month period starting at the end of the 10-week intervention period.
|
Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Second opioid fill within 60-days of discharge (yes/no) using administative claims data
Aikaikkuna: From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
For patients with one or more post-operative opioids filled, the proportion that filled a second prescription within 60 days of discharge from the qualifying procedure
|
From enrollment through 6 months after completion of the 10-week intervention period
|
Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat
Tutkijat
- Päätutkija: Jessica Schumacher, PhD, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Opintojen ennätyspäivät
Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät
Opiskelun aloitus (Arvioitu)
Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)
Opintojen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)
Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)
Tutkimustietojen päivitykset
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Lisää tietoa
Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit
Avainsanat
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
- 25-1636
Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)
Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?
IPD-suunnitelman kuvaus
Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta
Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .