- ICH GCP
- Yhdysvaltain kliinisten tutkimusten rekisteri
- Kliininen tutkimus NCT07732543
Developing and Testing the Effectiveness of Smart Healthcare Assisted Individualized Symptom Management Education and Home-based Exercise on Frailty, Treatment-related Adverse Events and Quality of Life in Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy
The goal of this randomized controlled intervention is to develop and evaluate the effectiveness of the nurse-led with AI chatbot Individualized Symptom Management Education and Home-based Exercise (AI-ISME&HE) based on The Theory of Symptom Self-Management (TSSM) on frailty, self-efficacy in cancer care, trAE, and quality of life in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- Can AI-ISME&HE reduces frailty in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy?
- Can AI-ISME&HE increases quality of life in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy?
- Can AI-ISME&HE increases self-efficacy in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy?
- Can AI-ISME&HE reduces all-caused death in advanced gastric cancer patients receiving immunotherapy within two years? Researchers will compare usual routine care to see if AI-ISME&HE can reduce frailty, all-caused death and increase quality of life and self-efficacy.
Participants will not be blinded, but the outcome evaluator will be blinded. The participants will be asked to complete three tasks for 12 weeks:
- Self-reporting treatment-related adverse events
- Interacting with AI-ISME&HE for seeking information related to self-management educational materials, including symptom management with the most reported trAEs and prevention from frailty
- ViviFrail-based exercise
Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus
Tila
Ehdot
Interventio / Hoito
Opintotyyppi
Ilmoittautuminen (Arvioitu)
Vaihe
- Ei sovellettavissa
Yhteystiedot ja paikat
Opiskeluyhteys
- Nimi: Shiow-Ching Shun, PhD
- Puhelinnumero: +886911268998
- Sähköposti: scshun@nycu.edu.tw
Osallistumiskriteerit
Kelpoisuusvaatimukset
Opintokelpoiset iät
- Aikuinen
- Vanhempi Aikuinen
Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia
Kuvaus
Inclusion Criteria:
- age ≥18 years
- diagnosed as AGC (TNM: T2~T4, N>0, Any M, Stage: III~IV, or unresectable GC)
- scheduled to receive the first cycle of immunotherapy
- willingness to provide written informed consent after receiving a full explanation of the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- a diagnosis of another type of cancer within the past five years
- inability to communicate clearly
- a diagnosis of dementia
- acute pulmonary embolism
- acute myocardial infarction
- extremity bone fracture within the past three months
- bone metastasis
Opintosuunnitelma
Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?
Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat
- Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Muut
- Jako: Satunnaistettu
- Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
- Naamiointi: Yksittäinen
Aseet ja interventiot
Osallistujaryhmä / Arm |
Interventio / Hoito |
|---|---|
|
Kokeellinen: Intervention
AI-ISME&HE intervention group
|
|
|
Ei väliintuloa: Control
Usual routine care
|
Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?
Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Level of Frailty Assessed by The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The SPPB score from 0-12 points, with 10-12 indicating robust, 7-9 indicating prefrail, and 4-6 indicating frail.
It has good reliability (ICC range from 0.82-0.92)
and validity.
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Level of Frailty Assessed by Comprehensive Geriatrics Assessment
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
A total of 8 domains were used to comprehensively assess frailty in cancer patients: Functional status, Comorbidity, Nutrition, Polypharmacy, Social support, Cognition, and Mood. 0 abnormal domains indicate robust, any 1 abnormal indicates pre-frail, and 2 or more abnormality indicate frailty. Each domain can be assessed by different tools. In this study, we chose the tools according as follows:
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Level of Frailty Assessed by Geriatric 8 (G8)
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The G8 score from 0-17 points, with score ≤14 indicating frailty.
It has good sensitivity (86.9%) in cancer patients
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Level of Frailty Assessed by Taiwan Cancer Frailty Tool (TCFT)
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The TCFT score from 0-5 points, with score >0 indicating frailty.
It has good ROC values of 0.857 in cancer patients
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet
Tulosmittaus |
Toimenpiteen kuvaus |
Aikaikkuna |
|---|---|---|
|
Score of Quality of Life Assessed by The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General - 7 Item Version (FACT-G7)
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
It includes 7 items and compromised physical well-being (3 items), emotional well-being (1 items), and functional well-being (3 items).
The score of each item is from 0 (not at all) to 5 (very much), and the total score ranging from 0 to 28, with a higher score indicating better quality of life.
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Level of Self-efficacy Assessed by The Modified Cancer Behavior Inventory (CBI)
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
It is a 0-10 Likert-type scale, where 0 indicates no confidence at all and 10 indicates fully confidence.
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
All Cause Mortality After 2 Year Follow-up
Aikaikkuna: Record patient's survival status at baseline, 1 year after baseline, and 2 year after baseline.
|
The survival status of the patients will be followed by medical record.
|
Record patient's survival status at baseline, 1 year after baseline, and 2 year after baseline.
|
|
Level of Symptom Severity Assessed by The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE®)
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The 14 symptoms include fatigue, headache, shortness of breath, nausea/vomiting, rash, diarrhea, decreased appetite, numbness/tingling, general pain, blurred vision, constipation, abdominal pain, itching, and dizziness.
Symptoms are assessed by using five-point Likert-type scale to rate symptom frequency (never, rarely, occasionally, frequently, almost constantly), severity (none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe), and interference (not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit, very much) in the past 7 days.
It can composite grading based on an algorithm into grade 0 to 3.
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Level of Nutrition Status Assessed by The Mini Nutritional Assessment Short Form (MNA-SF)
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
It includes 6 items relating to food intake in the past three months, weight loss in the past three months, physical activity, stress, dementia or depression, and body mass index (BMI).
The total score ranges from 0-14, with 12-14 representing well, 8-11 representing at risk, and 0-7 representing malnutrition.
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Level of Cognitive Function Assessed by The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
The scale consists of 12 items with a total score ranging from 0 to 30, assessing cognitive function across eight domains, including visuospatial construction, executive function, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation.
A score of 24 below indicates cognitive impairment.
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Level of Depression Assessed by The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
PHQ-9 is a depression muddle from the complete PHQ, including nine DSM-IV criteria for depression, each item scores from 0-3, with a total score range from 0-27.
A higher score indicates higher severity of depression, with a score 0-4 as none, 5-9 as mild, and ≥ 10 as moderate-severe depression.
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Level of Physical Function Assessed by Grip Strength (GS)
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
GS will be assessed by JAMAR hydraulic dynamometer, which show good reliability.
The participants will be asked to sit in the neutral position with their elbows flexed at 90° and resting at their sides.
Next, they need to squeeze the handle of the dynamometer for 3-5 seconds as hard as possible for 3 trials on dominant hand with a rest of 60 seconds.
The average and the maximum of the grip strength (kg) will be recorded.
Female with GS ≤ 16 kg and male ≤ 26.7 kg refer to frailty.
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
|
Changes of Body Composition Assessed by Body Composition Machine
Aikaikkuna: Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Body composition will be examined by ACCUNIQ BC300 which is a lightweight, foldable professional body composition analyzer that utilizes bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) technology.
Through eight electrodes and three different frequencies (5, 50, 250 kHz), it performs full-body and segmented (arms, legs, torso) measurements, quickly providing detailed data such as body fat, muscle mass, and water content with high accuracy within 5 minutes.
|
Changes from baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 24 weeks after baseline.
|
Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat
Yhteistyökumppanit
Tutkijat
- Opintojen puheenjohtaja: I-Wen Chang, PhD, Department of Nursing, Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Opintojen ennätyspäivät
Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät
Opiskelun aloitus (Arvioitu)
Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)
Opintojen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)
Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät
Ensimmäinen lähetetty
Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)
Tutkimustietojen päivitykset
Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)
Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit
Viimeksi vahvistettu
Lisää tietoa
Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit
Muita asiaankuuluvia MeSH-ehtoja
Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot
- 2026-02-009CC
- 115-2314-B-A49 -016 -MY3 (Muu apuraha/rahoitusnumero: National Science and Technology Council)
Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta
Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta
Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .