Tämä sivu käännettiin automaattisesti, eikä käännösten tarkkuutta voida taata. Katso englanninkielinen versio lähdetekstiä varten.

The Efficacy of an IADL-based Non-immersive Virtual Reality Training Program to Enhance ADL Performance and Cognitive Function for Persons at Risk of Dementia

keskiviikko 4. marraskuuta 2026 päivittänyt: National Taiwan University Hospital

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if a touchscreen-based virtual reality (VR) training program that simulates everyday life tasks works to improve daily living skills and thinking abilities in adults aged 50 and older, including those at risk of dementia (individuals with Subjective Cognitive Decline or Mild Cognitive Impairment). It will also explore what personal factors influence the training results. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the daily life VR training program improve participants' ability to perform complex everyday activities and adapt flexibly to daily life challenges?
  • Does the training improve overall thinking skills (such as memory, attention, and problem-solving), brain activity, and mood (depression and anxiety)? Researchers will compare the daily-life VR training program (IADL-VR) to a non-situational game VR program (Game-VR) and a traditional in-person tabletop cognitive training program (Cog-Entity) to see if realistic daily-life VR simulation works better to enhance everyday functioning and brain health.

Participants will:

  • Be randomly assigned to one of the three training groups (daily-life VR tasks, digital brain-training mini-games, or traditional tabletop board games).
  • Attend a 2-hour group session once a week for 12 weeks, which includes 1 hour of assigned cognitive training and 1 hour of physical fitness exercise.
  • Complete assessments of their daily living skills, thinking abilities, mood, and brain activity (using functional magnetic resonance imaging, or fMRI) within 2 weeks before and after the 12-week program.

Tutkimuksen yleiskatsaus

Opintotyyppi

Interventio

Ilmoittautuminen (Arvioitu)

216

Vaihe

  • Ei sovellettavissa

Yhteystiedot ja paikat

Tässä osiossa on tutkimuksen suorittajien yhteystiedot ja tiedot siitä, missä tämä tutkimus suoritetaan.

Opiskeluyhteys

Opiskelupaikat

      • Taipei, Taiwan
        • Rekrytointi
        • School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University
        • Ottaa yhteyttä:
        • Päätutkija:
          • Hsiao-Wen Chen

Osallistumiskriteerit

Tutkijat etsivät ihmisiä, jotka sopivat tiettyyn kuvaukseen, jota kutsutaan kelpoisuuskriteereiksi. Joitakin esimerkkejä näistä kriteereistä ovat henkilön yleinen terveydentila tai aiemmat hoidot.

Kelpoisuusvaatimukset

Opintokelpoiset iät

50 vuotta ja vanhemmat (Aikuinen, Vanhempi Aikuinen)

Hyväksyy terveitä vapaaehtoisia

Joo

Sukupuolet, jotka voivat opiskella

Kaikki

Kuvaus

Inclusion Criteria:

General Inclusion Criteria (Applicable to All Participants):

  • Aged 50 years or older.
  • Completed at least elementary school education (6 or more years of formal education) and able to read and write in Chinese.

Group-Specific Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Cognitively Healthy Middle-Aged and Older Adults Group:

    • Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score > 26.
    • Does not meet the diagnostic criteria for Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), or dementia.
  2. Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) Group:

    • Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score > 23.
    • Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q) score > 7 (out of a total score of 24).
    • Answers "Yes" to both of the following questions: "Do you feel that you have memory problems compared to your previous normal state?" and "Have your family members or close friends noticed that you have memory problems compared to your previous state?"
    • Normal performance on standardized neuropsychological tests (Color Trails Test and memory-related tests), defined as scoring higher than 1.5 standard deviations below the age- and education-adjusted normative mean.
    • Does not meet the diagnostic criteria for Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) or dementia.
  3. Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) Group:

    • Taiwanese version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) score > 21.
    • Diagnosed with Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) by a neurologist or psychiatrist.
    • Does not meet the diagnostic criteria for dementia.

Exclusion Criteria (Applicable to All Participants):

  • Meets the clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia.
  • Geriatric Depression Scale Short-Form (GDS-S) score >= 8, or cognitive changes caused by other psychiatric disorders, neurological diseases, or substance abuse with unstable medical conditions and interfering symptoms.
  • Severe visual or hearing impairments that prevent the completion of cognitive function assessments.
  • Physical illnesses or conditions that prevent participation in the cognitive and physical training interventions.

Opintosuunnitelma

Tässä osiossa on tietoja tutkimussuunnitelmasta, mukaan lukien kuinka tutkimus on suunniteltu ja mitä tutkimuksella mitataan.

Miten tutkimus on suunniteltu?

Suunnittelun yksityiskohdat

  • Ensisijainen käyttötarkoitus: Ennaltaehkäisy
  • Jako: Satunnaistettu
  • Inventiomalli: Rinnakkaistehtävä
  • Naamiointi: Yksittäinen

Aseet ja interventiot

Osallistujaryhmä / Arm
Interventio / Hoito
Kokeellinen: Daily Life VR Training (IADL-VR)

Participants practice multi-step, realistic daily scenarios on a touchscreen computer, including shopping and cooking for a holiday meal, hospital registration and medication management, and travel planning.

Delivered on a 16-inch touchscreen computer incorporating touch, handwriting recognition, and voice interaction. The software features three core daily living themes with 3 to 4 sequential sub-tasks each, graded across 5 to 8 difficulty levels:

  1. Holiday Reunion Dinner Preparation: Checking home inventory to create a shopping list, supermarket shopping while filtering out audio promotional distractions, price comparison and checkout calculation, and following cooking sequences.
  2. Health Management: Operating a hospital registration kiosk under time and step constraints, remembering physician and pharmacist instructions during a clinic visit, and organizing a medication pillbox.
  3. Travel Planning: Packing luggage spatially, navigating bus and train schedules/platforms, reacting to unexpected events (e.g., retrieving blown-away luggage), and problem-solving during travel emergencies (e.g., lost items or suspended train services).
Active Comparator: Non-Conditional Game VR Training (Game-VR)

Participants play short, decontextualized digital brain-training mini-games targeting attention, memory, math, and language.

Uses commercial digital cognitive games consisting of 22 short mini-games (under 2 minutes each) across five domains: attention, memory, mathematics, general cognition, and language, without real-life situational integration.

Active Comparator: Traditional Cognitive Training (Cog-Entity)

Participants engage in therapist-guided tabletop board games targeting various cognitive skills.

Uses structured commercial board games and tabletop activities facilitated by an occupational therapist, focusing on a specific cognitive domain each week (attention, working memory, visuospatial skills, executive function, cognitive flexibility, and language).

Mitä tutkimuksessa mitataan?

Ensisijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q)
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

Assessed via a semi-structured interview based on the 24 items of the Subjective Cognitive Decline Questionnaire (SCD-Q). Participants identify up to 5 of their most concerning daily life cognitive difficulties and rate each item on two dimensions: (1) Frequency of occurrence, rated from 1 to 10 (where 10 indicates very frequent occurrence), and (2) Perceived distress/bother level, rated from 1 to 10 (where higher scores indicate lower distress, with 10 representing no distress at all).

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
The Brief University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment-Traditional Chinese Version (UPSA-B)
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

An objective, performance-based measure that evaluates instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) in simulated real-world scenarios across two domains: financial skills and communication skills (telephone use). Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better everyday functional performance.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
IADL Context-Based Cognitive Flexibility Assessment (ICFA)
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

A performance-based assessment evaluating cognitive flexibility within daily life contexts across 5 IADL-related scenarios (e.g., public transportation use, financial management, and daily life problem-solving). Each scenario consists of two parts assessing (1) spontaneous cognitive flexibility and (2) reactive cognitive flexibility (including intra-dimensional and extra-dimensional shifting). Higher scores indicate better real-life cognitive flexibility.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

Toissijaiset tulostoimenpiteet

Tulosmittaus
Toimenpiteen kuvaus
Aikaikkuna
the Taiwanese Version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA-T)
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

Assesses global cognitive function across 8 cognitive domains: visuospatial/executive function, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall, and orientation. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating better global cognitive function.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
Color Trails Test (CTT)
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

Evaluates sustained attention, alternating attention, and executive function. Consists of two parts: CTT-1 requires connecting numbered circles from 1 to 25 in sequence as quickly as possible; CTT-2 requires connecting numbered circles from 1 to 25 while alternating between pink and yellow colors. Measured by completion time (in seconds), where shorter completion times indicate better attention and executive functioning.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition (WMS-III) Family Pictures Subtest
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

Evaluates immediate and delayed visual memory. Participants view 4 pictures of family scenes and are asked to recall the characters, their spatial locations, and their activities immediately and after a 25-to-35-minute delay. Scores for both immediate recall and delayed recall range from 0 to 64, with higher scores indicating better visual memory.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
the Wechsler Memory Scale-Third Edition (WMS-III) Spatial Span Subtest
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

Assesses visuospatial working memory. Participants tap blocks on a board in the same order (Spatial Span Forward) or reverse order (Spatial Span Backward) as demonstrated by the examiner. Scores for the forward and backward subscales each range from 0 to 16 (total score range: 0 to 32), with higher scores indicating better visuospatial working memory.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI)
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

Evaluates changes in resting-state functional connectivity using a 3.0-Tesla MRI scanner (Magnetom Prisma, Siemens). Includes T1-weighted structural MRI (MPRAGE sequence) and blood-oxygen-level-dependent (BOLD) resting-state functional EPI sequences to assess neural network changes before and after the cognitive intervention.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
Word Sequence Learning Test
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

Assesses short-term and delayed verbal memory across learning and 10-minute delayed recall phases. Scoring includes position score (range: 0 to 60), accuracy score (range: 0 to 60), total learning score (range: 0 to 20), and 10-minute delayed recall score (range: 0 to 30). Higher scores in each component indicate better verbal learning and memory performance.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
Tower of Hanoi (TOH) Completion Time
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

A performance-based task evaluating executive planning and problem-solving skills. Participants move perforated disks of varying sizes across three pegs from an initial state to a goal state while adhering to specific rules. This outcome assesses task execution efficiency, measured as the total completion time in seconds across all test trials. Shorter completion times indicate better planning and problem-solving ability.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
Tower of Hanoi (TOH) Total Moves
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

A performance-based task evaluating executive planning and problem-solving skills. Participants move perforated disks of varying sizes across three pegs from an initial state to a goal state while adhering to specific rules. This outcome assesses movement efficiency, measured as the total number of moves made to complete the task. Fewer moves indicate more efficient planning and problem-solving ability.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
Tower of Hanoi (TOH) Rule Violations
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

A performance-based task evaluating executive planning and problem-solving skills. Participants move perforated disks of varying sizes across three pegs from an initial state to a goal state while adhering to specific rules (e.g., only one disk may be moved at a time, and a larger disk may never be placed on top of a smaller disk). This outcome assesses rule-following and inhibitory control during problem-solving, measured as the total number of rule violations committed across the test trials. Fewer rule violations indicate better executive control and planning ability.

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
Geriatric Depression Scale Short-Form (GDS-S)
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

A 15-item self-report questionnaire assessing the severity of depressive symptoms in older adults. Total scores range from 0 to 15, with higher scores indicating more severe depressive symptoms (a score of 8 or higher suggests clinically significant depressive symptoms).

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Aikaikkuna: Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

A 21-item self-report inventory measuring the severity of emotional and somatic symptoms of anxiety. Each item is rated from 0 to 3, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 63. Higher scores indicate more severe anxiety (8-15: mild to moderate anxiety; 16-25: moderate to severe anxiety; 26-63: severe anxiety).

Baseline (within 2 weeks prior to intervention) and post-intervention (within 2 weeks after the 12-week intervention)

Yhteistyökumppanit ja tutkijat

Täältä löydät tähän tutkimukseen osallistuvat ihmiset ja organisaatiot.

Opintojen ennätyspäivät

Nämä päivämäärät seuraavat ClinicalTrials.gov-sivustolle lähetettyjen tutkimustietueiden ja yhteenvetojen edistymistä. National Library of Medicine (NLM) tarkistaa tutkimustiedot ja raportoidut tulokset varmistaakseen, että ne täyttävät tietyt laadunvalvontastandardit, ennen kuin ne julkaistaan ​​julkisella verkkosivustolla.

Opi tärkeimmät päivämäärät

Opiskelun aloitus (Todellinen)

Perjantai 6. helmikuuta 2026

Ensisijainen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)

Lauantai 31. heinäkuuta 2027

Opintojen valmistuminen (Arvioitu)

Lauantai 31. heinäkuuta 2027

Opintoihin ilmoittautumispäivät

Ensimmäinen lähetetty

Maanantai 19. lokakuuta 2026

Ensimmäinen toimitettu, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Maanantai 19. lokakuuta 2026

Ensimmäinen Lähetetty (Todellinen)

Maanantai 26. lokakuuta 2026

Tutkimustietojen päivitykset

Viimeisin päivitys julkaistu (Todellinen)

Maanantai 9. marraskuuta 2026

Viimeisin lähetetty päivitys, joka täytti QC-kriteerit

Keskiviikko 4. marraskuuta 2026

Viimeksi vahvistettu

Sunnuntai 1. helmikuuta 2026

Lisää tietoa

Tähän tutkimukseen liittyvät termit

Muut tutkimustunnusnumerot

  • 202401189RINA

Yksittäisten osallistujien tietojen suunnitelma (IPD)

Aiotko jakaa yksittäisten osallistujien tietoja (IPD)?

EI

IPD-suunnitelman kuvaus

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared publicly due to participant privacy protections, ethical restrictions approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), and Taiwanese personal data protection regulations. Aggregate data and statistical results will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.

Lääke- ja laitetiedot, tutkimusasiakirjat

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää lääkevalmistetta

Ei

Tutkii yhdysvaltalaista FDA sääntelemää laitetuotetta

Ei

Nämä tiedot haettiin suoraan verkkosivustolta clinicaltrials.gov ilman muutoksia. Jos sinulla on pyyntöjä muuttaa, poistaa tai päivittää tutkimustietojasi, ota yhteyttä register@clinicaltrials.gov. Heti kun muutos on otettu käyttöön osoitteessa clinicaltrials.gov, se päivitetään automaattisesti myös verkkosivustollemme .

Tilaa