Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Radiation Therapy and Either Capecitabine or Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin Before Surgery in Treating Patients With Resectable Rectal Cancer

22 mars 2016 mis à jour par: NSABP Foundation Inc

A Clinical Trial Comparing Preoperative Radiation Therapy And Capecitabine With or Without Oxaliplatin With Preoperative Radiation Therapy And Continuous Intravenous Infusion Of 5-Fluorouracil With or Without Oxaliplatin In The Treatment Of Patients With Operable Carcinoma Of The Rectum

RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as capecitabine, fluorouracil, and oxaliplatin work in different ways to stop tumor cells from dividing so they stop growing or die. Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to damage tumor cells.

PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying radiation therapy and either capecitabine or fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin and comparing them to see how well they work when given before surgery in treating patients with resectable rectal cancer. It is not yet known whether radiation therapy and either capecitabine or fluorouracil is more effective with or without oxaliplatin in treating rectal cancer.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

  • Compare the rate of local-regional relapse in patients with resectable rectal cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy comprising radiation therapy and either capecitabine or fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin.

Secondary

  • Compare the rate of clinical complete response in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the rate of pathologic complete response in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Determine the increase in the number of patients who are able to undergo sphincter-saving surgery after treatment with these regimens.
  • Correlate genetic patterns and the presence or absence of specific tissue biomarkers with response and prognosis in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare preoperative quality of life (QOL) of patients treated with oral capecitabine versus continuous infusion with fluorouracil.
  • Determine the impact of oxaliplatin on neurotoxicity in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Compare the toxic effects of these regimens in these patients.
  • Compare the convenience of care in patients treated with these regimens.
  • Determine the impact of the type of surgical management on QOL at 1 and 5 years postoperatively in these patients.
  • Describe the long-term impact of cancer treatment on symptoms (e.g., vitality and neurotoxicity) and QOL at 5 years after randomization (5-year follow-up visit).

OUTLINE: This is a randomized, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center, gender, clinical tumor stage (stage II vs stage III), and surgical intent (sphincter saving vs non-sphincter saving). Patients are randomized to 1 of 4 treatment arms.

  • Arm 1: Patients receive fluorouracil IV continuously and undergo radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks.
  • Arm 2: Patients receive fluorouracil and undergo radiotherapy as in arm 1. Patients also receive oxaliplatin IV over 1 hour once weekly for 5 weeks.
  • Arm 3: Patients receive oral capecitabine twice daily and undergo radiotherapy once daily 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks.
  • Arm 4: Patients receive capecitabine and undergo radiotherapy as in arm 3. Patients also receive oxaliplatin as in arm 2.

Within 6-8 weeks after the completion of chemoradiotherapy, patients with responding or stable disease undergo surgery. Patients with progressive disease are treated at the discretion of the investigator and continue to be followed.

Quality of life is assessed at baseline, at completion of chemoradiotherapy, and at 1 and 5 years after surgery.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 6 months for 5 years.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 1,606 patients will be accrued for this study within 4 years.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

1608

Phase

  • Phase 3

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans et plus (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients must consent to participate in the study and must have signed and dated an IRB-approved consent form conforming to federal and institutional guidelines.
  • Patients must be > 18 years of age.
  • Patients must have a life expectancy of 5 years, excluding their diagnosis of cancer (as determined by the investigator), and must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) (Zubrod) performance status of 0 or 1.
  • Patients must have a diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the rectum obtained by a biopsy technique which leaves the major portion of the tumor intact.
  • The interval between the initial diagnosis of rectal adenocarcinoma and randomization must be no more than 42 days.
  • Prior to randomization, the investigator must specify the intent for sphincter saving or non-sphincter saving surgery.
  • The tumor must be either palpable by digital rectal exam or be accessible via a proctoscope or sigmoidoscope.
  • Distal border of the tumor must be located < 12 cm from the anal verge.
  • The tumor must be considered by the surgeon to be amenable to curative resection. (Note that curative resection can include pelvic exenteration.)
  • The tumor must be clinically Stage II (T3-4 N0 with N0 being defined as all imaged lymph nodes are < 1.0 cm) or Stage III (T1-4 N1-2 with the definition of a clinically positive node being any node > 1.0 cm). Stage of the primary tumor may be determined by ultrasound or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Computed Tomography (CT) scan is acceptable provided there is evidence of T4 and/or N1-2 disease.
  • At the time of randomization, all patients must have had the following within the previous 42 days: history and physical examination; if technically feasible, a complete colonoscopic examination; if not feasible, a proctoscopic or sigmoidoscopic exam; clinical staging of the tumor; CT or MRI of the abdomen and pelvis (combined PET/CT may be substituted), and a chest x-ray (PA and lateral) or CT scan of the chest to exclude patients with metastatic disease.
  • At the time of randomization: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) must be > 1,200/mm3; Platelet count must be > 100,000/mm3; There must be evidence of adequate hepatic function as follows: total bilirubin must be < 1.5 x the upper limit of normal (ULN) for the lab; and alkaline phosphatase must be < 2.5 x Upper Limit of Normal (ULN) for the lab; and the Aspartate Amino Transferase (AST) must be < 2.5 x ULN for the lab; and If AST is > ULN, serologic testing for Hepatitis B and C must be performed and results must be negative; Calculated creatinine clearance must be > 50 mL/min.
  • Patients with prior malignancies, including invasive colon cancer, are eligible if they have been disease-free for > 5 years and are deemed by their physician to be at low risk for recurrence. Patients with squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin, melanoma in situ, carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or carcinoma in situ of the colon or rectum that have been effectively treated are eligible, even if these conditions were diagnosed within 5 years prior to randomization.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Findings of metastatic disease.
  • On imaging, clear indication of involvement of the pelvic side wall(s).
  • Rectal cancers other than adenocarcinoma, i.e., sarcoma, lymphoma, carcinoid, squamous cell carcinoma, cloacogenic carcinoma, etc.
  • History of invasive rectal malignancy, regardless of disease-free interval.
  • Pregnancy or lactation at the time of proposed randomization. Eligible patients of reproductive potential (both sexes) must agree to use adequate contraceptive methods.
  • Any therapy for this cancer prior to randomization.
  • Synchronous colon cancer.
  • History of viral hepatitis or other chronic liver disease.
  • Nonmalignant systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, hepatic, etc.) that would preclude the patient from receiving any chemotherapy treatment option or would prevent required follow-up. Specifically excluded are patients with active ischemic heart disease (class III* or class IV** myocardial disease as described by the New York Heart Association), a recent history (within 6 months) of myocardial infarction, or symptomatic arrhythmia at the time of randomization. *Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Such patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity that causes fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. **Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to perform any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or anginal syndrome may be present even at rest.
  • Patients who, in the opinion of the investigator, have uncontrolled hypertension.
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease (i.e., patients requiring current medical interventions or who are symptomatic).
  • Prior pelvic radiation therapy for any reason.
  • Known hypersensitivity to 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, or oxaliplatin.
  • Clinically significant peripheral neuropathy at the time of randomization (defined in the NCI Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 [CTCAE v3.0] as grade 2 or greater neurosensory or neuromotor toxicity).
  • Existing uncontrolled coagulopathy.
  • Inability to take oral medications.
  • Participation in any investigational drug study within 4 weeks prior to randomization.
  • Psychiatric or addictive disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the patient from meeting the study requirements.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: Arm 1: 5-FU + RT
Patients receive fluorouracil IV continuously and undergo radiation therapy (RT) once daily 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks.
225 mg/m2 IV daily continuous infusion
Autres noms:
  • 5-FU
Given 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks
Autres noms:
  • RT
Expérimental: Arm 2: 5-FU + RT + Oxaliplatin
Patients receive fluorouracil and undergo RT as in arm 1. Patients also receive oxaliplatin IV over 1 hour once weekly for 5 weeks.
225 mg/m2 IV daily continuous infusion
Autres noms:
  • 5-FU
Given 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks
Autres noms:
  • RT
50 mg/m2 IV 5 days a week on days of planned RT
Expérimental: Arm 3: Capecitabine + RT
Patients receive oral capecitabine twice daily and undergo RT once daily 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks.
Given 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks
Autres noms:
  • RT
825 mg/m2 oral daily 5 days a week on days of planned RT
Expérimental: Arm 4: Capecitabine + RT + Oxaliplatin
Patients receive capecitabine and undergo RT as in arm 3. Patients also receive oxaliplatin as in arm 2.
Given 5 days a week for 5-6 weeks
Autres noms:
  • RT
50 mg/m2 IV 5 days a week on days of planned RT
825 mg/m2 oral daily 5 days a week on days of planned RT

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Délai
Loco-regional disease control as assessed by evidence of tumor at 3 years
Délai: Time from randomization to first local recurrence up to 3 years
Time from randomization to first local recurrence up to 3 years

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Délai
Clinical complete response as assessed by digital rectal exam and sigmoidoscopy or proctoscopy at time of definitive analysis
Délai: Prior to surgery approximately 6 weeks
Prior to surgery approximately 6 weeks
Pathologic complete response as assessed by gross and microscopic exam of surgical specimens at time of definitive analysis
Délai: At the time of surgery approximately 6 weeks
At the time of surgery approximately 6 weeks
Sphincter-saving surgery at time of definitive analysis
Délai: At the time of surgery approximately 6 weeks
At the time of surgery approximately 6 weeks
Survival as measured by deaths from any cause at time of definitive analysis
Délai: From time of randomization through 5 years
From time of randomization through 5 years
Disease-free survival as assessed by recurrence, second primary cancer, or death from any cause at time of definitive analysis
Délai: From time of randomization through 5 years
From time of randomization through 5 years
Tissue biomarkers as assessed by analysis of tumor tissue using current biotechnology after definitive analysis
Délai: At the time of surgery approximately 6 weeks
At the time of surgery approximately 6 weeks
Quality of life as assessed by FACT-C trial outcome index and EORTC CR38 after definitive analysis
Délai: Assessed prior to therapy and at approximately 5 weeks, 15 months, 5 years
Assessed prior to therapy and at approximately 5 weeks, 15 months, 5 years
Neurotoxicity as assessed by FACT-NTX scale after definitive analysis
Délai: Assessed prior to therapy and at approximately 5 weeks, 15 months, 5 years
Assessed prior to therapy and at approximately 5 weeks, 15 months, 5 years
Symptoms as assessed by fluoropyrimidine symptom scale adapted from SWOG after definitive analysis
Délai: Assessed prior to therapy and at approximately 5 weeks, 15 months
Assessed prior to therapy and at approximately 5 weeks, 15 months
Vitality as assessed by SF-36 vitality scale after definitive analysis
Délai: Assessed prior to therapy and at approximately 5 weeks, 15 months, 5 years
Assessed prior to therapy and at approximately 5 weeks, 15 months, 5 years
Convenience of care as assessed by NSABP C-06 convenience of care scale adapted from ECOG after definitive analysis
Délai: Assessed prior to therapy and at approximately 5 weeks, 15 months
Assessed prior to therapy and at approximately 5 weeks, 15 months

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Publications générales

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 juillet 2004

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 août 2013

Achèvement de l'étude (Anticipé)

1 mai 2016

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

7 avril 2003

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

8 avril 2003

Première publication (Estimation)

9 avril 2003

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

23 mars 2016

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

22 mars 2016

Dernière vérification

1 mars 2016

Plus d'information

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner